This is part 2 of a 3 part series involving recent government actions which appear to represent a move by our government towards more transparency and accountability of our government. In part one we discussed the intent of our Founders that government be transparent and accountable in anticipation of the nature of mankind. In part 1 we also discussed the decision by Minneapolis Police Chief Janeé Harteau to outsource major internal investigations to the Minnesota BCA in an attempt to restore public trust in the MPD. You can read part 1 by clicking here http://t.co/eM1OyheqVF.
In Part 2 this writer will share his thoughts on:

ANALYSIS: JUDGE RICHARD LEON FINDS NSA PHONE SNOOPING LIKELY UNCONSTITUTIONAL

For your convenience, here again is a link to the Major Media's version of what transpired:

Judge: NSA phone snooping likely unconstitutional http://cnet.co/1heJfJd

In this writer's opinion, the Major Media just regurgitated a partial
summary of the facts that make up this story. In a lame and uninspired
manner, Major Media would have you believe that this is a simple story
of a single Federal Judge (Richard Leon) ruling that certain activities
of the NSA are unconstitutional. But, in so doing, they have left out so
many relevant facts and hopelessly understated the significance of
Judge Richard Leon's ruling, that to this writer's way of thinking, they
have been duplicitous.

This writer will lay out his unique and more in depth perspective in 2 parts; 1) What should be, and; 2) What is.

But before this writer can do that, this writer will have bring most
of you up to speed on significant facts and history that your government
has purposely had your public schools ignore and/or gloss over.
In summary of previous articles by this writer, our American
Revolution was in reality a revolt against the Governance Doctrine of
the Divine Right of Kings. Pursuant to the Divine Right of Kings, the
King is a God or an emissary of God here on earth. Therefore, no
earthly being can question the decisions of the King. Under the Divine
Right of Kings, there were no rights; there were only permissions and
privileges that could be revoked by the King or his representatives at
any time for any reason.

During the Enlightenment (circa 1650AD-1800AD) their was a
scientific, intellectual and culture revolution of thought. Average
persons came to question the authority of the King and the Church. Using
their own observations and reasoning, individuals began determining
truth for themselves. During this time, Men of Letters such as John
Locke, developed a body of thought that came to be known as Natural Law.
Amongst other things, Natural Law prescribed that all men had certain
unalienable Natural Law Rights. (In fact, Natural Law was so well known
and understood at the time that the Founder's debated whether the Bill
of Rights was even necessary) Locke continued this line of reasoning and
developed the Governance Doctrine known as Consent of the Governed. In
essence, government could only rule with the consent of the governed.
And, in fact, that exact phrase appears in the American Declaration of
Independence. [ If you want a little more detail you can read Natural
Law: How WE THE PEOPLE got to the 4th of July,1776 2/2 http://goo.gl/If3Pxk and Proof that our country is founded on Natural Law http://t.co/rZswNupbeO]
Another important concept developed and/or reestablished at this point
in time was the Rule of Law. In brief, the Rule of Law provides that all
men, regardless of wealth, position or social status, should be judged
in the same manner pursuant to the same code of laws. With that
extremely brief background, it is now possible to continue laying out
the background which reveals the true magnitude of Judge Richard Leon's
ruling.
Upon having secured victory in our revolution, the Founder's set about creating Foundational Documents. Their first attempt....

To continue reading for free, please click here http://t.co/faELvykmrK


Those were my thoughts.

In Closing:

Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking your valuable time to read and reflect upon what is written here.

If what is written here rings true to you, perhaps you should contact
your local elected officials and let them know. If you are afraid of
repercussions, snail mail it anonymously and ask them to respond in the
local paper or their own monthly/quarterly internet newsletter. Even if
this article refers to something outside you geographic area, it still
likely applies to your location. Remember all those taxpayer training
junkets we taxpayers send the bureaucrats on? They all learn the same
“livestock management” techniques to use on WE THE PEOPLE.

And that leaves WE THE PEOPLE with this conundrum: While our
#Government works full time with compensation and funded with our money
for the cause of #Tyranny; WE THE PEOPLE are forced to work part time
without compensation for the cause of #liberty with what is left over of
our time, money and energy.

Finally, this article is written with the same intentions as Thomas Paine http://ushistory.org/paine. I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense” http://amzn.to/kbRuar

Keep Fighting the Good Fight!

In Liberty,

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
http://twitter.com/dmashak
http://Facebook/Don.Mashak
Don Mashak Google Plus http://goo.gl/1AUrE

WE THE PEOPLE TAR #WETHEPEOPLETAR
http://WETHEPEOPLETAR.blogspot.com
http://facebook.com/WETHEPEOPLETAR
http://twitter.com/WETHEPEOPLETAR

End the Fed(eral Reserve Bank System) #ETF
National http://bit.ly/ta3Rju Minneapolis http://bit.ly/tjZJKF

Bring Home the Politicians #BHTP
http://BringHomethePoliticians.com

Lawless America #LawlessAmerica
http://LawlessAmerica.com

Term Limits #TermLimit
http://TermLimits.org

Justice in Minnesota #JIM
http://JusticeinMN.com

Critical Thinking Notice - This author advises you as no politician would dare. Exercise Critical Thinking (http://bit.ly/ubI6ve)
in determining the truthfulness of anything you read or hear. Do not
passively accept nor believe anything anyone tells you, including this
author... unless and until you verify it yourself with sources you trust
and could actively defend your perspective to anyone who might debate
you to the contrary of your perspective.