We Are Having an Effect!

http://www.resistnet.com/forum/topics/smackdown-of-barack-obama-by?...

According to sources who watch the inner workings of the federal government, a
smackdown of Barack Obama by the U.S. Supreme Court may be inevitable...

Ever since Obama assumed the office of President, critics have hammered him
on a number of Constitutional issues.  Critics have complained that much
if not all of Obama's major initiatives run headlong into
Constitutional roadblocks on the power of the federal government.

Obama certainly did not help himself in the eyes of the Court when he used
the venue of the State of the Union address early in the year to
publicly flog the Court over its ruling that the First Amendment grants
the right to various organizations to run political ads during the time
of an election.

The tongue-lashing clearly did not sit well with the Court, as demonstrated by Justice Sam Alito, who publicly shook his
head and stated under his breath, 'That's no... when Obama told a
flat-out lie concerning the Court's ruling.  

As it has turned out, this was a watershed moment in the relationship between the
executive and the judicial branches of the federal government.  Obama
publicly declared war on the court, even as he blatantly continued to
propose legislation that flies in the face of every known Constitutional
principle upon which this nation has stood for over 200 years.

Obama has even identified Chief Justice John Roberts as his number one enemy,
that is, apart from Fox News and Rush Limbaugh.  And it is no accident
that the one swing-vote on the court, Justice Anthony Kennedy, stated
recently that he has no intention of retiring until 'Obama is gone.'

Apparently, the Court has had enough.

The Roberts Court has signaled, in a very subtle manner, of course, that it intends to address the issues
about which Obama critics have been screaming to high heaven.  A ruling
against Obama on any one of these important issues could potentially
cripple the Administration.

Such a thing would be long overdue.

First, there is ObamaCare, which violates the Constitutional principle barring
the federal government from forcing citizens to purchase something.
 And no, this is not the same thing as states requiring drivers to
purchase car insurance, as some of the intellectually-impaired claim.
 The Constitution limits FEDERAL government, not state governments, from
such things, and further, not everyone has to drive, and thus, a
citizen could opt not to purchase car insurance by simply deciding not
to drive a vehicle.

In the ObamaCare world, however, no citizen can 'opt out.'

Second,  sources state that the Roberts court has quietly accepted information concerning discrepancies in Obama's history
that raise serious questions about his eligibility for the office of
President.  The charge goes far beyond the birth certificate issue.
 This information involves possible fraudulent use of a Social Security
number in Connecticut, while Obama was a high school student in Hawaii.
 And that is only the tip of the iceberg.

Third, several cases involving possible criminal activity, conflicts of interest, and
pay-for-play cronyism could potentially land many Administration
officials, if not the President himself, in hot water with the Court.
 Frankly, in the years this writer has observed politics, nothing comes
close to comparing with the rampant corruption of this Administration,
not even during the Nixon years.  Nixon and the Watergate conspirators
look like choirboys compared to the jokers that populate this
Administration.

In addition, the Court will eventually be forced to rule on the dreadful decision of the Obama DOJ to sue the state of
Arizona.  That, too, could send the Obama doctrine of open borders to an
early grave, given that the Administration refuses to enforce federal
law on illegal aliens.

And finally, the biggie that could potentially send the entire house of cards tumbling in a free-fall is
the latest revelation concerning the Obama-Holder Department of Justice
and its refusal to pursue the New Black Panther Party.  The group is
caught on tape committing felonies by attempting to intimidate Caucasian
voters into staying away from the....

A whistle-blower who resigned from the DOJ is now charging Holder with the deliberate refusal
to pursue cases against Blacks, particularly those who are involved in
radical hate-groups, such as the New Black Panthers, who have been
caught on tape calling for the murder of white people and their babies.

This one is a biggie that could send the entire Administration
crumbling--that is, if the Justices have the guts to draw a line in the
sand at the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
There may be Hope and Change yet!!