Bill would give president emergency control of Internet
by Declan McCullagh
CNET

Internet companies and civil liberties groups were alarmed this spring when a U.S. Senate bill proposed handing the White House the power to disconnect private-sector computers from the Internet.

They're not much happier about a revised version that aides to Sen. Jay Rockefeller, a West Virginia Democrat, have spent months drafting behind closed doors. CNET News has obtained a copy of the 55-page draft of S.773 (excerpt), which still appears to permit the president to seize temporary control of private-sector networks during a so-called cybersecurity emergency.

The new version would allow the president to "declare a cybersecurity emergency" relating to "non-governmental" computer networks and do what's necessary to respond to the threat. Other sections of the proposal include a federal certification program for "cybersecurity professionals," and a requirement that certain computer systems and networks in the private sector be managed by people who have been awarded that license.

"I think the redraft, while improved, remains troubling due to its vagueness," said Larry Clinton, president of the Internet Security Alliance, which counts representatives of Verizon, Verisign, Nortel, and Carnegie Mellon University on its board. "It is unclear what authority Sen. Rockefeller thinks is necessary over the private sector. Unless this is clarified, we cannot properly analyze, let alone support the bill."

Representatives of other large Internet and telecommunications companies expressed concerns about the bill in a teleconference with Rockefeller's aides this week, but were not immediately available for interviews on Thursday.

A spokesman for Rockefeller also declined to comment on the record Thursday, saying that many people were unavailable because of the summer recess. A Senate source familiar with the bill compared the president's power to take control of portions of the Internet to what President Bush did when grounding all aircraft on Sept. 11, 2001. The source said that one primary concern was the electrical grid, and what would happen if it were attacked from a broadband connection.

When Rockefeller, the chairman of the Senate Commerce committee, and Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) introduced the original bill in April, they claimed it was vital to protect national cybersecurity. "We must protect our critical infrastructure at all costs--from our water to our electricity, to banking, traffic lights and electronic health records," Rockefeller said.

The Rockefeller proposal plays out against a broader concern in Washington, D.C., about the government's role in cybersecurity. In May, President Obama acknowledged that the government is "not as prepared" as it should be to respond to disruptions and announced that a new cybersecurity coordinator position would be created inside the White House staff. Three months later, that post remains empty, one top cybersecurity aide has quit, and some wags have begun to wonder why a government that receives failing marks on cybersecurity should be trusted to instruct the private sector what to do.

Rockefeller's revised legislation seeks to reshuffle the way the federal government addresses the topic. It requires a "cybersecurity workforce plan" from every federal agency, a "dashboard" pilot project, measurements of hiring effectiveness, and the implementation of a "comprehensive national cybersecurity strategy" in six months--even though its mandatory legal review will take a year to complete.

The privacy implications of sweeping changes implemented before the legal review is finished worry Lee Tien, a senior staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation in San Francisco. "As soon as you're saying that the federal government is going to be exercising this kind of power over private networks, it's going to be a really big issue," he says.

Probably the most controversial language begins in Section 201, which permits the president to "direct the national response to the cyber threat" if necessary for "the national defense and security." The White House is supposed to engage in "periodic mapping" of private networks deemed to be critical, and those companies "shall share" requested information with the federal government. ("Cyber" is defined as anything having to do with the Internet, telecommunications, computers, or computer networks.)

"The language has changed but it doesn't contain any real additional limits," EFF's Tien says. "It simply switches the more direct and obvious language they had originally to the more ambiguous (version)...The designation of what is a critical infrastructure system or network as far as I can tell has no specific process. There's no provision for any administrative process or review. That's where the problems seem to start. And then you have the amorphous powers that go along with it."

Translation: If your company is deemed "critical," a new set of regulations kick in involving who you can hire, what information you must disclose, and when the government would exercise control over your computers or network.

The Internet Security Alliance's Clinton adds that his group is "supportive of increased federal involvement to enhance cyber security, but we believe that the wrong approach, as embodied in this bill as introduced, will be counterproductive both from an national economic and national secuity perspective."

Update at 3:14 p.m. PDT: I just talked to Jena Longo, deputy communications director for the Senate Commerce committee, on the phone. She sent me e-mail with this statement:

The president of the United States has always had the constitutional authority, and duty, to protect the American people and direct the national response to any emergency that threatens the security and safety of the United States. The Rockefeller-Snowe Cybersecurity bill makes it clear that the president's authority includes securing our national cyber infrastructure from attack. The section of the bill that addresses this issue, applies specifically to the national response to a severe attack or natural disaster. This particular legislative language is based on longstanding statutory authorities for wartime use of communications networks. To be very clear, the Rockefeller-Snowe bill will not empower a "government shutdown or takeover of the Internet" and any suggestion otherwise is misleading and false. The purpose of this language is to clarify how the president directs the public-private response to a crisis, secure our economy and safeguard our financial networks, protect the American people, their privacy and civil liberties, and coordinate the government's response.


Jay Rockefeller "Internet should have never been invented"

Jay Rockefeller Confronted by WeAreChange NYC & LA

Views: 47

Reply to This

"Destroying the New World Order"

TOP CONTENT THIS WEEK

THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!

mobile page

12160.info/m

12160 Administrators

Doc Vega, Chris of the family Masters, cheeki kea and 3 more were featured

 

Latest Activity

Parrhesia posted discussions
2 minutes ago
Less Prone commented on KLC's group MUSICWARS
"Robbie Williams - Party Like a Russian"
38 minutes ago
Parrhesia replied to Parrhesia's discussion Law Enforcement Buying "Anti-Scale" Fencing For Police Stations
"Years ago, when I went to Belfast, the fencing around the police station really made an impression…"
49 minutes ago
Less Prone replied to Parrhesia's discussion Law Enforcement Buying "Anti-Scale" Fencing For Police Stations
"The people and the government are becoming two sides of a war."
58 minutes ago
Less Prone posted a discussion

Brazilian Military Stands with Bolsonaro – Is Prepared to Invoke Article 142 to Save the Nation (VIDEO)

Matthew "Tyrmand has been reporting on the massive democracy protests against the Socialist party…See More
59 minutes ago
Less Prone commented on Parrhesia's photo
Thumbnail

TransTrans

"I wonder when they get to transtranstrans and beuoynd. Is she joking or..., really?"
1 hour ago
Less Prone favorited Parrhesia's photo
1 hour ago
MAC posted a video

Demining Donbass | Sappers risk their lives clearing Donbass from Ukrainian mines

Despite being banned under the UN Ottawa Treaty since 1997, thousands of anti-personnel mines litter the parks, streets, schools and homes in Donbass. Reside...
12 hours ago
Parrhesia commented on Parrhesia's photo
17 hours ago
Parrhesia posted photos
17 hours ago
ralfy commented on Less Prone's blog post They Want a War - And a Big One
"The U.S. was targeting China because it did not anticipate the point that the poked bear would lash…"
17 hours ago
Doc Vega commented on cheeki kea's blog post right wing Meds for a left wing world.
"I wish soma was the method they were going to use instead of mass depopulations, destruction of our…"
18 hours ago
Doc Vega commented on youhavetoforgiveme's blog post I'm preaching to the choir for the regulars here at 12160.info but.....
"Great commentary Cheeki! I wrote about this back in 2012. The big question why were there also well…"
18 hours ago
Doc Vega commented on tjdavis's blog post Vanished In America
"One might recall the Pentagon Papers. I read that book when it came out. the CIA advised against…"
19 hours ago
Doc Vega posted blog posts
19 hours ago
Parrhesia posted a blog post

Netanyahu hands control of police ministry to supremacist Ben Gvir

The anti-Arab Religious Zionist party will also be in charge of the expansion of illegal…See More
21 hours ago
Parrhesia commented on tjdavis's blog post Vanished In America
"The CIA has started wars; overthrown governments; assassinated foreign leaders (and, no doubt at…"
yesterday
cheeki kea commented on Parrhesia's photo
yesterday
Parrhesia replied to Less Prone's discussion Hungary: Soros NGO Spent $4 Million to Oust Orbán with Opposition Including Neo-Nazis
"Find someone who looks at you like Zelensky looks at Trudeau - true lust!  lol"
yesterday
Parrhesia favorited Less Prone's discussion Hungary: Soros NGO Spent $4 Million to Oust Orbán with Opposition Including Neo-Nazis
yesterday

© 2022   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2019 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted