The thing about Israel is:
It has, from its creation, acted criminally and with impunity because the world fears being accused of antisemitism. That Jews are so very different from the rest of humans that they must have their own country- that the rest of humanity has always been and will always be so innately evil that they cannot be trusted to interact with Jews justly and rightly- should be offensive to all as it is the most racist contention that could be asserted. And we fell for it.
So we go from today. The fact remains there are more Jews living outside of Israels borders than within. This without their torture and murder for what they are- but the same cannot be said for non-Jews in Israel. Many find this abhorrent and unacceptable, but it remains to be said: The victim has become the victimizer. And what about that? Imagine the most violent, torturous rape a woman could endure and still live to tell her story. If she were to commit violent crimes against, not her rapist, but others, because she was resolved that she would never suffer it again. Never again. Surely the authorities would make clear to her that although what happened to her was wrong, victimizing others did nothing to heal her, harmed others and otherwise played no role in a functioning society. She would be jailed if she didn't stop. Would that be anti-woman?
There is no exact comparison to be made, but I personally can think of no other genetically distinct group historically that has been more victimized than women. You can agree or not. The important point is that no individual or group can be made whole by allowing them to commit the wrongs that they have endured. And EVEN if we entertained such a notion, wouldn't we be smacked back to reality that the harm done to the 2nd victim is no less than what was endured by the first? And that based on the universal premise that all humans are of equal value?
What if it wasn't only the woman who was raped, but her daughter and grandaughter, who did not suffer the crime first-hand, but have been told they too will suffer that fate should they not see themselves as perpetual and inherent victims? That they can only trust other women, and only "real" women? We could say that is not a workable response even though we accept that there will still be crimes committed against women. We can agree there is a problem and strive to change things, but reject outright such a sick and ultimately ineffective way of dealing with it.
And surely, over time, being left unchecked, the victim-become-victimizer would act, not from the emotional damage of the crimes committed against them, but impunity that their acts would only be criticized by those who advocate their suffering.
Whatever motivates individuals to remain silent can surely be overcome by being forced to endure an absolute and shear pain. The strongest constitution can be broke with the simplest torture techniques. What goes on inside Israels borders lead to the cries and pleas we hear, from- not weak people, not insane people, but from people who can do nothing buy cry out. Their cries are no less pained and begging, angry or wanting than any other cries that have pierced the ether. Those in the position to stop the suffering either hear the cries of a lesser being, or believe it serves even a higher purpose than that of humanity. I reject them both.
An impertinent message will one day, hopefully soon, be heard in Israel and throughout the world. It will relay to those who promoted, protected and benefited the "Jewish State" that what what has been placed upon their plate is not because they are Jewish, but because they are wrong. Perhaps then, if we are fortunate, there will be healing- a oneness among humanity.
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Frances Farmer on
-
Thank you Tara!! It is my original, daily, droning rant. Not too well received at school board meetings, fruit stands or the bar at 2 am in rural Indiana, but, you know, we just have to keep on. :))
-
Permalink Reply by scotty michele brown on
-
Good writing! Thank you for posting.
-
-
Thank you for your kind words. Typos notwithstanding, it is from my heart.
-
Permalink Reply by Nobody Will Observe on
-
Don't be antisemtic;)!
-
-
Right?! And as much indignation as we muster up against our own, ie. welfare queens, etc., it has stunned those same minds when it comes to Israel. That is how paralyzing the fear of being called anti-Semitic is for us as every-day citizens. Zionist Christians are the funding source of US fleecing. There a few idiots running around with no real knowledge of anything other than "God loves him some damned Israel, so ...." For those in power, though, it is a 'wink-wink' game of a home base in the ME and a perpetual, obnoxious little brother we must protect. We are all losers in this- even Jews. "Israel" has been the equivalent of pouring Drano on a moderate case of athletes foot. The cure is worse than the disease. At a certain point the only thing left to do is cut it off. Their screwed in the long term- some very pissed off brown people are going to deal with it, no doubt. And hats off to them when they do... and hence>>>
By the time enough Americans get angry enough to call bullshit, though, the US will be fully engulfed in a near global war. It is my opinion that by that time it will probably be too late to take our country back. Forces from other countries will be offering up the arms we will desperately need to act, but the cost will ultimately be more than we should bare, save from a few South American countries who have a sincere interest in a stable US. We must remain sovereign or die trying. *My opinion*
-
-
I have no trouble believing any of this. I've heard there are more Israelis (born or expatriates) leaving Israel than there are Zionists and Jews moving there. Focusing on corruption might be helpful to a country that wishes to function without it, but Israel as it was conceived and functions today must not give way to the will of the people, to a free market, to accepted social norms, peaceful regional interactions, international law, or any other facet of a sovereign country. It is a "Jewish State." Such aspirations to become any (fill-in-the-blank) only State can only grow and function if corrupt. They would have to abandon that aspiration before a study of corruption is anything more than a diversion.
There are many Israeli's, Jewish and not, and even more Non- Israeli Jews that propose just that. Vested in the outcome in a principled sense, they are humans first. So by definition are enemy's of their State. Just as many of us may be of ours. And if we do identify ourselves or feel we have been identified as such, we would lay that at the feet of the corrupt, of what should not be or must be changed, if we wish to survive as a country. Kinda makes me wonder what all the other people are really shooting for. NWO much?
-
Permalink Reply by Douglas on
-
The isreal of today is definitely not the isreal spoken of in the bible, even if there were no such thing as nuclear weapons. Also, the united states is not the country is was even 100 years ago. If I were the elected leader of a country, again I say if, I would tell the un to go straight to hell with all of it's treaties, even if the county I was leading was a good constitutional country like the US is supposed to be. Nukes are one of those things that really aren't need, except for the total destruction of the human race.
-
Permalink Reply by suzie on
-
I enjoyed reading plain honest talk .. So well stated-
once you "see" the thing about Israel becomes very clear
I don't know how many people must die for Israel before mothers say No more!!
Why the connection is not seen by joe blow.. How all the wars are related to usury and the monetary system is astounding!!
JESUS only got angry once .. Took cord and formed a whip and beat the money changers with it and said
" they turned the house of God into a den of thieves" he was not arrested at that time but later crucified brutally by the roman soldiers who obeyed orders ..
At the urgent request of the Jewish leaders who cried out " crucify him " when given the chance to let
One man go which was the custom of the time, the choice was Barabas a thief and a murderer .. Or JESUS who healed the sick on the sabbath ..and preached peace, Again they cried out " crucify him meaning JESUS and let Brabas go! .. Nothing has changed yet
-
-
Mentioning what happened to Jesus at the hands of the JEWS does not inject religion, it states historical fact, there was a man named JESUS crucified by e JEWS, you missed my point completely about a man of peace who only got angry once as recorded and it was about THE MONEY CHANGERS .. For crying out loud can a person even mention Budda or Mohammad or JESUS without being " accused " of bringing religion into it ? You yourself called them the synagogue of Satan.. Religion has a lot to do with everything as Carl Marx there is no such thing as a secular world and never will be .. There has never be an instance in all of history that it hasn't been either about religion or money I would propose to you it has always been about both! Freedom means allowing people to think and believe as they see fit as long as it doesn't hurt others .. Both these instruments have been used to crush and hurt humanity. Mentioning JESUS is not a religion it is an allegory if you prefer. True religion takes care of the poor and widows and loving your neighbour as you love yourself, I don't see a lot of that lately ..
-
-
That's kinda funny ..
And
(My bad) it wasn't you who used the term synagogue of satan .. Sorry
-
Permalink Reply by Cryptocurrency on
-
Hey Frances, good stuff right here. Where'd you come from? You mean to say we've got one that can think AND write!!? Holy crap.
"Destroying the New World Order"
THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!
Latest Activity
- Top News
- Everything
The Federal Government Shell Game
We Americans have the biggest opportunity in, perhaps the last 100 years, to crack the code on the…See More
First World Order
"Ah ha Truth hidden in plane sight. Notice the map depicted on this 'world order' book…"
Iyah May Karmageddon Lyric Music Video
While ‘Karmageddon’ has sparked significantconversation and controversy, Iyah has stood her ground. She refused to compromise her vision when asked to change...
Steven Wilson - PERSONAL SHOPPER (Official Video)
"The song PERSONAL SHOPPER sits somewhere between being a love-letter to shopping (which I love to do!) and the uneasiness I feel about the more insidious si...
propaganda: DIVIDE & CONQUER (1942) - Warner Bros. vs Hitler
Not to be confused with the much drier Frank Capra film from 1943.A "Broadway Brevity", released August 1, 1942. Vitaphone #1022-1023A.Transferred from 16mm.
Thumbs down - ship gone.
" So this sort of stupidity has occurred before. Norway or NZ - Who did it better? Cast your…"
© 2024 Created by truth.
Powered by
