Should Faking a Name on Facebook Be a Felony?
Should Faking a Name on Facebook Be a Felony?
Imagine that President Obama could order the arrest of anyone who broke a promise on the Internet. So you could be jailed for lying about your age or weight on an Internet dating site. Or you could be sent to federal prison if your boss told you to work but you used the company's computer to check sports scores online. Imagine that Eric Holder's Justice Department urged Congress to raise penalties for violations, making them felonies allowing three years in jail for each broken promise. Fanciful, right?
Think again. Congress is now poised to grant the Obama administration's wishes in the name of "cybersecurity."
The little-known law at issue is called the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. It was enacted in 1986 to punish computer hacking. But Congress has broadened the law every few years, and today it extends far beyond hacking. The law now criminalizes computer use that "exceeds authorized access" to any computer. Today that violation is a misdemeanor, but the Senate Judiciary Committee is set to meet this morning to vote on making it a felony.
The problem is that a lot of routine computer use can exceed "authorized access." Courts are still struggling to interpret this language. But the Justice Department believes that it applies incredibly broadly to include "terms of use" violations and breaches of workplace computer-use policies.
Breaching an agreement or ignoring your boss might be bad. But should it be a federal crime just because it involves a computer? If interpreted this way, the law gives computer owners the power to criminalize any computer use they don't like. Imagine the Democratic Party setting up a public website and announcing that no Republicans can visit. Every Republican who checked out the site could be a criminal for exceeding authorized access.
If that sounds far-fetched, consider a few recent cases. In 2009, the Justice Department prosecuted a woman for violating the "terms of service" of the social networking site MySpace.com. The woman had been part of a group that set up a MySpace profile using a fake picture. The feds charged her with conspiracy to violate the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Prosecutors say the woman exceeded authorized access because MySpace required all profile information to be truthful. But people routinely misstate the truth in online profiles, about everything from their age to their name. What happens when each instance is a felony?
Getty Images
In 2010, the Justice Department charged a defendant with unauthorized access for using a computer to buy tickets from Ticketmaster. Ticketmaster's website lets anyone visit. But its "terms of use" only permitted non-automated purchases, and the defendant used a computer script to make the purchases.
Continues
http://online.wsj.com/art...
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by truth on
-
Logging onto Facebook could become a felony
Published: 16 September, 2011, 21:55
Logging onto Facebook could become a felony
TAGS: Crime, Scandal, SciTech, Politics, Law, Internet, Information Technology, USA, Culture, Social networks
Reading this article could land you in prison.
The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act has been on the books since the 1980s to allow the feds to go after the culprits of malicious hacks and cybercrimes. An addendum to the act that Congress is expected to take a look at today, however, can cause almost any misuse of a computer to be interpreted as a felony.
The Senate Judiciary Committee will vote on an updated version of the act on Friday that will make it a felony crime to use a computer in a way that “exceeds authorized access.” But what exactly constitutes authorized access?
Exactly.
The wording of the addition creates a slippery slope that could cause nearly anyone to be punished for violating the rules of, well, anyone. "The problem” with the proposed legislation, says Orin Kerr of The Wall Street Journal, “is that a lot of routine computer use can exceed 'authorized access.'"
Violating those mundane Terms of Use agreements on websites could be interpreted as a violation of the law, as could going against a workplace Internet protocol policy. That means that fibbing on your Facebook profile, logging on to check sports scores at work or even browsing RT.com when you’re on the clock could, depending on who says what’s cool and what’s not, land you in prison.
-
-
Permalink Reply by WTRH-AM-AE on
-
I am about to abort Facebook cause everything on there is getting out of control. I tried to play the sweepstakes and lost 117 times so far, never won anything. I feel that these sweepstakes are nothing but catches, scams, and obligations to make you buy something. No I don't think it should be a felony cause what if you lost your password and your user name you should have every right to create another account as much as you need to. I wish that people would not hack our Facebook accounts and compromise them. Also the spyware and adware NEED's to go! There is plenty of it on each app, page, and other parts of Facebook.
-
- ‹ Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next ›
"Destroying the New World Order"
THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!
Latest Activity
- Top News
- Everything
Another incredibly Stupid!! What, no mirrors?
"Personally , I go for the more classic forms of cosmetic surgery! "
Another incredibly Stupid!! What, no mirrors?
"When the problem is inside, it causes transformations like this. I like the original better. Maybe…"
YouTube Downloader Tools You Never Knew Existed
A YouTube downloader is an online tool or software that helps convert YouTube videos into…See More
Experimenter - Official Trailer
Like on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/experimenterfilmYale University, 1961. Stanley Milgram (Peter Sarsgaard) designs a psychology experiment that stil...
How Did the Soviets First Discover the SR-71 Blackbird?
Although President Lydon Johnson announced the development of the Lockheed SR-71 in 1964 which…See More
"Personally, I don't consider Don Lemon or people like him to be journalists at all. They are…"
The Farmer vs the Billionaire — Jeremy Clarkson Says NO to Bill Gates’ £100 Million Deal | UK News
OFFICIAL NOTICE: This channel is NOT Jeremy Clarkson, is not affiliated with him, and does not represent his official views or Diddly Squat Farm. This is an ...
The Forbidden Canyon and It’s Residents
Chapter OneSituated 10 miles from Mount Jefferson in the Oregon wilderness a forest researcher…See More
G_LrzqtXMAAhT7w
"He would never do that. Mosques and Synagogues are out of the question, only Christianity is free…"
Disgraced Former CNN Anchor Don Lemon Arrested
No longer an employed journalist, Don Lemon had been seen with far left agitator, Nekima Levy…See More
The Illusion of Fuck You Money
The United States use to have this idea that once you make enough money, you.can do as you want.…See More
© 2026 Created by truth.
Powered by
