"Save the Internet" News, Censorship and Solutions

Information

"Save the Internet" News, Censorship and Solutions

What you need to know about the FCC's new net neutrality proposal

Dusting off old regulations won't protect free, open Internet

The Internet is and will continue to be an indispensable part of the lives of Floridians and all Americans. As we grow more dependent on it for everyday tasks, ensuring fair and open Internet access will continue to be a priority.

In the early days of the Internet, Congress and regulators intentionally left the Internet free from burdensome regulation. This bipartisan decision to keep government’s hands off the Internet has been responsible for leaps in innovation and investment – making America a global leader in broadband development. Revolutionary ways to connect with other people around the world online; billion dollar smart phone applications; near-instantaneous Internet speeds; the list of truly life-altering innovations goes on and on.

No one disagrees that the Internet should be free and open. The president’s plan just does not accomplish that goal.

We have all benefitted from a system that incentivizes broadband providers to be the fastest and most reliable consumer access to the Internet.

Over the last six years, however, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has tried to assert more control over this valuable American resource. The courts have already overturned two sets of FCC rules, but this so-called “independent agency” is poised to vote this week on its most aggressive rules yet.

At the urging of President Obama, FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler submitted a proposal that included more drastic changes and regulations than ever before. This government takeover of the Internet follows the President’s position that reclassification of broadband services to Title II common carrier status – which were originally designed and implemented to protect against 1930s monopolies– is the only option.

Dusting off regulations from the Roosevelt-era will not protect a free and open Internet. They will not benefit consumers. They will not spur innovation. They will not encourage a young entrepreneur to develop a new innovative app, or a company to develop new “smart” appliances.

Consumers – yes, you, reader – will be most hurt by this proposal. A whole host of new regulations and years of uncertainty will come. Even worse, this plan opens the door to billions of dollars in new fees on your Internet service, while putting nearly $45 Billion of new investments at risk over the next five years.

Do you like streaming live sports or network TV on your computer or mobile device? The agreements that allow you to do that quickly and reliably will now be subject to new, untested regulations. This unknown regulatory landscape is likely to reduce future investments in services that many consumers rely upon.

Small businesses across the country are also put in jeopardy from these rules. http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2015/02/26/net-neutrality-debate-dusting-off-old-regulations-wont-protect-free-open/

Location: 12160mods
Members: 164
Latest Activity: Feb 2, 2019

 

"LEAKED! Here's The White House's Draft Cybersecurity Executive Order"



Earlier this week, we wrote about how the White House was working on an executive order to act as a "stand in" for cybersecurity legislation that has so far failed to pass Congress (CISPA passed in the House, but a different effort, the Cybersecurity Act, failed in the Senate, and it would have been difficult to get the two houses aligned anyway). Last weekend Jason Miller from Federal News Radio wrote about a draft he saw... but failed to share the actual draft. We got our hands on a draft (and confirmed what it was with multiple sources) and wanted to share it, as these kinds of things deserve public scrutiny and discussion. It's embedded below. As expected, it does have elements of the Lieberman/Collins bill (to the extent that the White House actually can do things without legislation). It's also incredibly vague. The specific requirements for government agencies are left wide open to interpretation. For example, the State Dept. should engage other governments about protecting infrastructure. Well, duh. As expected, most stuff focuses on Homeland Security and its responsibilities to investigate a variety of different cybersecurity issues -- but, again, it's left pretty vague.

There is, as expected, plans concerning information sharing -- but again, they're left pretty empty on specifics. It talks about an "information exchange framework." Unfortunately, it does not appear to highlight privacy or civil liberties concerns in discussing the information sharing stuff. That seems like a pretty big problem. Homeland Security is tasked with coming up with a way to share information, pulling on some existing efforts, but nowhere do they call out how to make sure these information exchange programs don't lead to massive privacy violations, despite the President's earlier promises that any cybersecurity efforts would take into account privacy and civil liberties.

Mike Masnick

techdirt.com

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum

GOOGLE Complies With Government Requests for User Data 88% of the Time

Started by Central Scrutinizer. Last reply by Central Scrutinizer Jan 24, 2013. 2 Replies

Google starts watching what you do off the Internet too

Started by Central Scrutinizer. Last reply by DTOM Dec 21, 2012. 1 Reply

AUSTRALIA ABANDONS MANDATORY INTERNET FILTER PLAN

Started by Central Scrutinizer. Last reply by Lawrence Edward Calcutt Nov 9, 2012. 1 Reply

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of "Save the Internet" News, Censorship and Solutions to add comments!

Comment by Central Scrutinizer on March 27, 2018 at 6:30pm
Comment by Central Scrutinizer on May 10, 2017 at 1:15pm

New browser out, designed right this time (personal opinion) called

Lunascape6, luvvin the hell out of this one ;)

http://www.techspot.com/downloads/5925-lunascape.html

Comment by Tara on February 26, 2015 at 10:45am
Comment by Central Scrutinizer on March 24, 2013 at 1:43pm

Wireless Mesh Networks – The Internet Censorship Solution

Fabulous must see video! James Corbett again brilliantly nails the ongoing internet "war of attrition" by our would-be controllers. More than that, he introduces our ultimate solution to their clampdown - a decentralized pirate internet via "mesh networks"!

Get ready, folks, it's about to come to that, same story as in all fascist clampdowns. They can't stamp us out as hard as these bastards try. Listen and learn and start getting hooked up. Keep on!

Comment by Central Scrutinizer on February 2, 2013 at 6:06pm
Comment by Friday Woodlans-Sprite on January 3, 2013 at 6:49pm

anyone who invokes god needs to learn.

Comment by truth on December 6, 2012 at 11:46am

U.N. Report Reveals International Protocol for Tracking People Online

The document outlines the stages law enforcement agencies should go through when conducting electronic surveillance of suspects: first, by obtaining data and “cookies” stored by websites like Facebook, Google, eBay and Paypal; second, by obtaining location data from servers used by VoIP Internet phone services (like Skype); then, by conducting a “smart analysis” of these data before moving on to the most serious and controversial step: intercepting communications, exploiting security vulnerabilities in communications technologies for “intelligence-gathering purposes,” and even infecting a target computer with Trojan-horse spyware to mine data.

Comment by Tula on December 1, 2012 at 11:47am

Alex Jones Connected To Stratfor/Israel CIA Front

Comment by Nathan on November 27, 2012 at 3:41pm

Orin Kerr was on the Kojo Nnamdi show (on DC’s NPR station, 88.5 WAMU) this morning ... with Julian Sanchez and Julia Angwin. It’s a one-hour program that was inspired by the Petraeus investigation but turned to many of the broader issues of online investigations and privacy.

You can listen here:

http://thekojonnamdishow.org/audio-player?nid=22494

Comment by Nathan on November 21, 2012 at 8:21am

Last week, we posted a list of open questions about how voters’ personal information was used in the 2012 presidential election (and how it’ll be used now that the election’s over). We posted the questions on our blog and on the social news site Reddit, and lo and behold, someone from the Obama campaign’s data mining team answered!

Although he wasn’t in charge of the data mining operations, his answers still give some insight into how personal information drove the campaign. We found it especially unsettling to see how much detailed Facebook data is up for sale for marketing, regardless of whether you’ve set your Facebook account to be more private (see his answer to question 4).

We’re posting our questions and his answers below (note that we haven’t edited his answers at all, except to format their numbering):

1. Abine: How detailed did the profiles that the campaign built up about people get? Like, was it “category of single guys in OH who like microbrews,” or “John Smith in OH who hasn’t had a girlfriend in 3 years and always drinks Dogfishhead?” Bonus: can we see a (redacted) real profile?

Campaign Employee: “I wasn’t high enough to get end results, but I saw some of the print outs upstairs… They know everything Google and FB know about you, pretty much. They know what music you like, which Harry Potter book is your favorite, your voting habits, etc. It’s all in databases, you’re just a number in a DB with a name attached.” 

2. Abine: It sounds like databases have become a valuable asset in a growing number of campaigns. Is there anything stopping, say, the losing party who’s in campaign debt and has to answer to creditors from selling the data to marketers and other third parties to help fulfill that debt?

Campaign Employee:Again, I’m not the person to talk to about that, didn’t even think to ask that. I AM in advertising with a focus on DB marketing though and it depends on the conditions on which they got your data and what they agreed to in the process.”

3. Abine: Let’s talk about online tracking. Advertisers always argue that the data they collect doesn’t pose any privacy problems because it’s aggregated and “de-personalized,” while researchers say there’s no such thing as truly anonymous tracking. Given your experience, who’s closer to the truth?

Campaign Employee: “I’ve worked on advertising campaigns before. I can tell you that as long as the databases aren’t leaked, you’re fairly safe. They will have your name, CCN, SSN etc. but most of that is only used to match personally identifiable information to you (matching your Amazon spending habits to your FB “likes” for example). In other words, the latter, but it’s happened since the first targeted print ads. Magazines and newspapers have collected similar data without you knowing for decades.”

https://www.abine.com/blog/2012/update-answers-from-an-obama-campai...

 
 
 

"Destroying the New World Order"

TOP CONTENT THIS WEEK

THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!

mobile page

12160.info/m

12160 Administrators

 

Latest Activity

Doc Vega posted blog posts
Wednesday
rlionhearted_3 posted a photo
Wednesday
Doc Vega posted photos
Tuesday
Snakedaddy favorited Doc Vega's photo
Monday
Snakedaddy favorited Doc Vega's photo
Monday
Sandy posted a video

'The White Van' ABC News 20/20 Preview on Urban Moving Systems and 9/11 Hi-Fivers (Dancing Israelis)

ABC 20/20 'The White Van: Were Israelis Detained on Sept. 11 Spies?' June 21, 2002, Dancing Israelis:https://youtu.be/8TdH1VsvTvMhttps://www.patreon.com/post...
Sunday
cheeki kea commented on Doc Vega's photo
Sunday
Sandy posted a video

Larry Silverstein no response to lies

http://wearechange.org/donate Please consider donating to help us continue to make videos like this. We Are Change would not exist without YOU! http://wearec...
Jul 11
rlionhearted_3 posted photos
Jul 11
Snakedaddy favorited Doc Vega's photo
Jul 9
Snakedaddy favorited Doc Vega's photo
Jul 9
Doc Vega posted a blog post

The Economic, Official, and Industrial Refusal to Acknowledge Bigfoot-Why?

 Little do you realize that throughout the US Park and Recreation territory of America that all…See More
Jul 9
Doc Vega posted a blog post

What is the Most Likely Reason Humanity Could Turn to Socialism?

 Decades ago, there were fears that automation would destroy US jobs, and it was true that whole…See More
Jul 8
Doc Vega posted photos
Jul 7
Doc Vega posted blog posts
Jul 7
Doc Vega posted blog posts
Jul 6
tjdavis posted a blog post
Jul 3
Snakedaddy favorited tjdavis's video
Jul 2
Less Prone posted a photo

When the power of love beats the love of power the world knows peace.

Love at new heights: Pair climbs 1,454-foot Empire State Building for sky-high proposal…
Jul 2
Less Prone posted a video

How Pornhub Became The Internet’s Biggest Crime Scene - Laila Mickelwait

Laila Mickelwait is an anti-sex-trafficking activist, founder, and an author.One of the most visited websites on the planet is more than just a site; it’s a ...
Jul 2

© 2026   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2019 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted