merican citizens using drones are being taken. Source confidentiality guaranteed.
In the first appearance in a long time by Julian Assange on a major American TV channel, the founder of WikiLeaks lashed out at the re-elected President Barack Obama and his administration, which gave the go-ahead to elimination of the American citizens abroad using military Unmanned Automatic Vehicles (UAVs).
An unclassified document from the US Justice Department, revealed by NBC News this week, exposed that US authorities consider the elimination of senior Al-Qaeda members lawful and ethical, even if they are American citizens and plotting no crime. The Obama administration promised to provide American lawmakers with access to classified documents giving the legal basis for such drone strikes.
The first known assassination of Americans by a US UAV occurred in September 2011, when a US drone strike in Yemen killed radical preacher Anwar al-Awlaki and Samir Khan, editor of an Al-Qaeda magazine. Both were US citizens who had never been charged with a crime.
“I cannot see a greater collapse when the [American] executive can kill its own citizens arbitrarily, at will, in secret, without any of the decision-making becoming public,” Assange said during his appearance in the HBO talk show ‘Real Time with Bill Maher’.
“That's why we need organizations like WikiLeaks. I encourage anyone in the White House who has access to those rules and procedures, work them on over to us. We'll keep you secret and reveal [the drone killing rules] to the public,”Assange promised.
REST OF IT
…
ur cultural method of debate tends to divide individual issues into carefully separated spheres of discussion. This hyperfocus on single issues, from gun rights to illegal wars to invasion of privacy, draws us away from looking at the bigger interconnected picture, otherwise known as the “macro.” Each social or political conflict is compartmentalized by the mainstream, the dots are left isolated and the overwhelming overall threat to our foundational principles is marginalized.
The problem with this civic philosophy is that the general public is left without peripheral vision and unequipped to comprehend that there is a process in motion, an overarching plan that is eating away at the edges of our liberty from every angle, one small piece at a time. That is to say, we have been conditioned to obsess over the pieces and ignore the plan.
I want you to imagine the globalist establishment and the useful socialist idiots it employs as a hive of ants lurking in the grass around a bountiful picnic basket you (or your forefathers) worked very hard to procure. Now, one ant snatches a single crumb and races away, and you think to yourself that losing that one crumb is not such a sacrifice. A few more ants pilfer crumbs, and you shrug it off. A dozen more arrive, and you start to worry a little but are still too lazy to pull out the Raid. The rest of the hive sees your apathy and attacks, gobbling everything in a swarm of single-minded destruction. Left with nothing, you sit dumbfounded and hungry, wondering where you went wrong. The truth is, you went wrong with the first ant.
Not only are personal wealth and property ransacked by the collective in this way, but also personal freedom.
Every time a smaller attack on liberty is exposed or openly announced by the cult of statism, elitists invariably respond with a false face of rationality and common sense. They claim that they respect the line. They claim that they will take only the minimum. They claim that they are pursuing only a reasonable compromise. They expound on the “virtues” of their motives. They sing songs of unity, brotherhood and the greater good. They appeal to our diplomatic side; and if that doesn’t work, they try to shame us instead for being “selfish” or “ignorant” of so-called “social progress.” But this never has been and never will be about social progress.
Their goal is not to introduce greater understanding or awareness. It is not about public good or public safety. And at the very core, it is not about truth. If they cared about truth or principle and if their objectives were honorable, they would not feel the need to constantly lie, cheat, steal, manipulate and threaten in an effort to impose their own worldview on the rest of us. If their purpose was as righteous as they pretend, then deceit and subversion should be beneath them. Their philosophy should be able to carry itself, without their convoluted efforts.
The power elites and the people who blindly follow them are not interested in being on the right side. They are interested only in being on the winning side, and the two are certainly not the same. In the end, the result they covet most is not to achieve compromise on Constitutional ideals, but to achieve total and unequivocal destruction of those ideals. They seek to erase our heritage from history, along with those of us who value it. They want to annihilate Constitutional culture.
Through the efforts of the liberty movement, many Americans are now at least loosely aware of such issues as the National Defense Authorization Act, which allows the designation of anyone — including American citizens — as enemy combatants subject to the laws of war, thus destroying the Constitutional right to due process and trial by jury. They have witnessed the vicious trampling of the 4th Amendment and our right to privacy through legislation like the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. They have been confronted with the gross tyranny of Barack Obama’s executive assassination lists and predator drone fetish. They are aware of the existence of Department of Defense efforts to remove all vestiges of Posse Comitatus and allow standing military authority in the United States through the U.S. Northern Command (Northcom).
All of these things are clearly part of a violent war on our Constitutional rights, but what about the more subtle poison being introduced under the surface? The first place to look is always in your child’s school.
In Duvall County, Fla., the father of a 10-year-old boy discovered his son had been asked by a teacher to write and sign this statement as part of a school project:
“I am willing to give up some of my constitutional rights in order to be safer or more secure.”
When questioned on the purpose of directing fourth-graders to sign such a statement, the school district argued that the students participated in the activity of their own free will and that the lesson was designed to “create an awareness of the five rights contained in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution” and help students “determine their opinions on which rights they value most and least.”
First of all, let’s be honest; I went through public schooling, and anyone else who went through it knows as well as I do that almost nothing within the public school system is treated as voluntary. Threats, fearmongering and mob mentality are all used by State teachers all across the country daily to manipulate and terrorize children into submitting to the program. As a nostalgic refresher, re-examine the incident in a North Carolina school in which a teacher screamed down a student who criticized Obama, claiming that people “could be arrested” for speaking ill of the President.
Secondly, if the teacher in Duvall County was looking to encourage students to “think critically” about their Constitutional rights, then perhaps it would have been helpful to educate them on what those rights are. Unfortunately, the children had not been given practical lessons on their rights before being asked to abandon them for “safety.”
This is a perfect example of the indoctrination process in action. While the gun rights issue has brought the politicization of public schools out in the open, with federalized education centers punishing children across the Nation for merely playing with imaginary guns or talking about toy guns, the real target is not the gun issue for the establishment. The real target is all Constitutional thought.
Perhaps this is why the methodology of home-schooling has been so demonized by the mainstream, and why Ron Paul’s latest home-schooling initiative is already being attacked as “Christian fundamentalism.” The real reason the establishment’s panties are in a twist is simple; they do not like the idea of parents being able to compose their child’s own curriculum and, thus, remove anti-Constitutional conditioning from their daily lives.
The erasure of Constitutional culture has spread far beyond schooling, however.
The city of New Rochelle, N.Y., has demanded a local veterans’ post take down its Gadsden flag, a flag in existence since the Revolutionary War, because it has been adopted as a symbol of the Tea Party. The city council, led by Democratic Mayor Noam Bramson, voted to remove the flag after voicing concerns about the flag’s message.
Obama sycophant and hardcore big-government mouthpiece Bill Maher this week stated that the left (neo-liberals) needs to stop being afraid of its true goal in the gun debate — to dissolve the 2nd Amendment — rather than play at compromise.
“I’m so sorry, but this is the problem with the gun debate — it is that it’s a constant center-right debate,” Maher said. “There’s no left in this debate. Everyone on the left is so afraid to say what should be said, which is the Second Amendment is bullshit. Why doesn’t anyone go at the core of it?”
My response would be: “Yes, please do admit your true goals, gun grabbers and opponents of civil liberties. At least be honest about your fascist intentions so that we can stop playing games and have a real eye to eye debate (or fight) on the subject.:
And finally, NASCAR has come under siege by anti-2nd Amendment legislators as well as the media in general for allowing the National Rifle Association to endorse races. Senator Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) called on broadcasters to block transmissions of the NRA 500 because it would bring national attention to gun rights while the Senate is legislating for gun control (which, in his opinion, is bad).
Perhaps this is purely coincidental, but the timing of this stance against NASCAR’s support of gun culture has arisen right as Oath Keepers, a Constitutional organization dedicated to teaching current serving military, veterans and law enforcement about civil liberties and the affirmation of their oath, announced it is working with racecar driver Jeffrey Earnhardt to bring an Oath Keepers-sponsored vehicle to the NASCAR track.
While some people may not care less about NASCAR or even the 2nd Amendment, I would point out that through the gun issue, the establishment is ultimately undermining the holy grail of the 1st Amendment. If gun rights speech and culture can be silenced in the name of “safety” or “compassion,” then why not any other belief?
This problem of selective free-speech has now been exacerbated by the Boston Marathon Bombings. Oath Keepers had planned and already received a permit for a high profile rally at Lexington Green in Massachusetts (a public venue where one should not need a permit to rally anyway), but the bombings opened the door for the Lexington Board (one member had been trying to undermine the rally from it's inception) to revoke the event. The excuse given was, of course, that it was for everyone's "safety", and that not enough police were available to secure it. Though, a secondary event in a nearby town remains approved with little to no trouble. The right to free speech is NOT subject to the intensity of the times, it is sacrosanct. Period. However, many in government today believe that they can rescind our Constitutional liberties whenever the public is distracted enough by disaster.
Incidents like these by themselves do not necessarily seem like an imminent threat to the freedoms of average citizens; but, taken together as a flurry of strategic movements, they represent a full spectrum attack on the very pillars of our founding structure. Throughout history, when conquerors wished to fully dominate a population, they would seek to slowly subsume the people’s mythology and principles. They would attempt to co-opt cultural ideas and values, twisting them into something completely different or wiping them from memory altogether. When the people lose their traditions and heritage, they become easier to mold and rule. This is exactly what is happening in the United States today: an ideological colonization that views Constitutional life as a mortal enemy and hopes to obliterate it from the pages of time.
You can contact Brandon Smith at: brandon@alt-market.com
Alt-Market is an organization designed to help you find like-minded activists and preppers in your local area so that you can network and construct communities for mutual aid and defense. Join Alt-Market.com today and learn what it means to step away from the system and build something better.
To contribute to the growth of the Safe Haven Project, and to help us help others in relocating, or to support the creation of barter networks across the country, visit our donate page here:
http://www.alt-market.com/donate
Silver and Gold are on their way back to historic highs, and now is the time to buy. Let LibertyCPM.com help you decide how to best protect your savings and insulate you from an ever destabilizing dollar.
Do you need long term food storage but want the best quality as well? The good people at Nuvona Premium Foods are offering discounts on their Non-GMO food storage for Alt-Market readers only! Take advantage of this incredible deal while it lasts!
http://www.nuvonapremiumfoods.com/altmarket/
Do you have enough Non-GMO seeds in case of economic collapse? Seeds are the OTHER alternative currency, and if you aren't stocked, then you aren't prepared. To buy top quality non-GMO seeds at a special 10% discount, visit Humble Seed, and use the code Alt10…
Another very controversial article by Gordon Duff follows that has much information to consider regarding the powerful deception by US-coalition and Israeli intelligence partners. The comments at the…
Added by Jonathan Mark at 11:32am on October 26, 2010
in Russia and, in 1933, the Rothschild-financed electoral victory of Mr Hitler – all of these creating all of the preconditions for WW2, which, as planned at Versailles, was set off in Poland, whose 3.5 million Jews (or whatever number was still there after the war) were desperately wanted by the Jew Rothschild banksters on their Palestine project. WW2 – again, fattest war dividends, plus the utter destruction and vicious ritual vilification of Hitler's Germany, the major anti-Judo-communist belligerent, plus the actual Jew conquest of Palestine in 1948, beginning with the back-stabbing Jew terror attacks against the Brits, who fought the war to save their kosher hides, plus the new post-war order – the NWO of today, where asking any questions about the Jew Rothschild banksters is anti-$emitic...
THE FIRST WORLD WAR | Wide Awake Gentile "Russia and Germany were ruled by second cousins Kaiser Wilhelm and Tsar Nicholas, who spoke and wrote to each other in English, and called each other Willy and Nicky. They and many of their ministers did not want war. In June to August of 1914, they tried to avoid war by corresponding with each other." The Willy-Nicky Correspondence WW1 wouldn't have been allowed to happen, had the German Chancellor in 1914 been someone like Bismarck – or had the Russian Prime Minister Stolypin not been murdered earlier on by a Jew terrorist – or had the Russian Tsar been someone like any Tsar other than the poor old Nicholas. And, of course, the poor old Wilhelm – Kaiser Bill – was just as helpless. Both were easy prey for the Jew Rothschild banksters. And perhaps it wasn't entirely coincidental that the German Chancellor in 1914 was one Theobald von Bethmann-Hollweg of the prominent Bethmann banking family of Frankfurt – not at all unknown for its close association with the Jew Rothschild banksters. The Jew Rothschild banksters, the Foreign Office and the MI6 played the poor old Kaiser, as well as the even more naive and defenceless Nicholas – just like they played Mr Hitler and the rulers of Poland some two decades later. As we all know by now, neither the Kaiser nor the Tsar had anything to gain from that war – and everything to lose. And the Jew Rothschild banksters knew it well before they threw their Jew-loaded dice. ‘Loaded dice’ in the shape of millions of British Tommies and their colonial cousins – subhuman goyim – over a million of whom were murdered in that war for the greater profits of the Jew Rothschild banksters – in addition to hundred thousand-odd Yanks, who wouldn't have been in that war at all, had they not been betrayed to the Jew Rothschild banksters by President Wilson – another big pawn in the big Jew war swindle – to be used as a human (subhuman) means of exchange with which to pay off the British government for the Balfour Declaration. The assassination of Stolypin, the man who could have saved Russia Had Stolypin lived, Russia would have stayed out of WW1, and the 1917 Judo-communist coup would have never happened. To the Jew Rothschild banksters, his assassination was an absolute necessity: clever and incorruptible goyim in power must be killed first – or else, the Jew banksters' global blood-game cannot be nearly as profitable. Note the way the Jew assassin bought into the job – a clear indication of having been offered a ‘most lucrative contract’ – or so he thought.
"I fear that Jewish banks with their craftiness and tortuous tricks will entirely control the exuberant riches of America… The Jews will not hesitate to plunge the whole of Christendom into wars and chaos, in order that the earth should become the inheritance of Israel." – Otto von Bismarck
"This crafty race has one great principle: as long as order prevails, there is nothing to be gained." – Goethe
Full text of "By Way of Deception" - by Victor Ostrovsky, ex-Mossad 200 Years Together - by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn https://www.docdroid.net/OdYUy5a/200-years-together.pdf Initially lots of minutiae with lots of typos, then some ancient history... What seems to have gotten very little notice, however, was detailed descriptions in the book of the numerous aspects of the all-powerful Jewish government that was alive and kicking and viciously grasping – in complete absence of any state structure. The Hidden History of the Balfour Declaration - WRMEA Detailed research
Johann Philipp Bethmann (1715-1793) One of the ancestors of Bethmann-Hollweg Fake shower heads … One more reason why the real gas chambers had to have real shower heads Like all strong poisons, hydrocyanic acid (HCN) is very good at being water-soluble – and could have been most effectively dispensed dissolved in boiling water – or, better still, superheated steam – run through the real shower heads. Moreover, while a whole can of Zyklon B was required to kill all insects in a relatively small fumigation chamber, hardly more than one scoop of the Zyklon B pellets should have been needed to dispatch any number of humans in a shower room of any size. Besides, only the lethal agent HCN was required, Zyklon B as such was unnecessary. This more costly compound was specifically developed for use in fumigation chambers, where, not unlike any other dry cleaning process, the fumigated clothes had to be given back dry to the inmates coming out of the shower rooms – as the properly run camp routine demanded. What's more, HCN itself – highly flammable and potentially explosive – was superfluous to the task, as, in an enclosed space, any volatile noxious substance – such as cheap as rubbish ammonia, for example – is just as deadly, but reasonably safe to handle. As the Jews themselves very well know, they murdered numerous Palestinians just by firing ‘harmless’ tear gas into their houses. The more one reads the Holohoax literature and the closer one looks at those putative ‘gas chambers’ – the less sense they make. And the kosher Holo-mongers themselves are keenly aware of this. And hence, those once-obligatory Jewish ‘holes in the roof’ or the later ‘holes in the wall’ – through which the Zyklon B was supposedly chucked in – are hardly ever heard of anymore. The Jewish Holohoax is getting assimilated. It's no longer as Jewish and hysterical as it used to be in the 1970s-80s, in the wake of the October (Yom Kippur) War (1973-4), when little I$rael is said to have experienced some ‘existential angst’ (enter Madison Avenue). In their latter-day rendition, the physical details of this ever-apocryphal Zio narrative get to be more and more like the Holy Ghost – positively invisible – and never again rendered in graven images. And the ‘venerable’ Anne Frank gets to be more and more like the Holy Virgin... (In fact, with HCN boiling point at 25.6 °C, Zyklon B couldn't have been used at room temperature in fumigation chambers, either – not without the special pulverizer/blower – never ever mentioned in the whole of the Holohoax literature in relation to the putative gas chambers.) Mainstream Holocaust Narrative "Substantially, if not Entirely, False" – Jew Ron Unz, founder and editor of The Unz Review My Holo cup runneth over … In Holland and Belgium, Growing Resistance to Holocaust Memorials "The phenomenon is becoming particularly common in the Netherlands. In Amsterdam, dozens of artists this month signed a petition opposing the erection of a national monument in the capital city's former Jewish quarter. Many current residents object to the memorial's prominent footprint. And in May, an Amsterdam bookshop owner said that a police officer asked him to remove a sign commemorating Holocaust victims, citing Israel's actions [Jew war crimes]." – The Jew Lipshiz, JTA The Kingdom of Shylock - Hesperian Press - by Frank Anstey, MP "First published in 1917, when it was repressed. This is a reprint of the second edition. Frank Anstey (1865-1940) was a leader of the Labor Party... a supporter of public finance... and viewed WWI as "a war of rival capitalists"... In this age of the globalization, of organized criminality, we need more like him who will stick to their guns against cannibalistic corporate capitalism... [Frank Anstey was a Freemason, but obviously not a crook. The book is mainly about the matters of economics.]" Frank Anstey - Wikipedia US rejects I$raeli demand that convicted spy Jonathan Pollard be allowed to move to I$rael While employed by the US Navy as an analyst, the Mossad Jew Pollard stole close to a million of 'SCI' classified documents. The Jew Pollard's treason led to the deaths of as many as 1,000 of pro-American intelligence operatives. How so?… Because any information stolen or otherwise collected by the Jews is necessarily traded by their I$rael to whosoever happens to be on the market for it. For example, it's not out of the goodness of Putin's heart that the Jews were allowed to carry out hundreds of terrorist acts in Syria in recent years. Every time Netanyahu flies in to Moscow – or Peking – he brings with him a hard drive with tons of classified American information on it – and not only American, of course – and not only classified information, either. So if your business or your vices are known to the Jews, they are also known to the Jew Mossad – and thus even to the enemies you didn't know you had. (The Jewpsy Google gangsters kept spiking this email every time it was addressed to more than one or two recipients – hardly a coincidence. In fact, they've got Jews on watch who observe and ‘manage’ my mailbox round the clock. A few years ago, they made it quite a chore for me just to log in. And on at least one occasion which I distinctly recall, instead of the usually senseless combination of letters, one such ‘code’ clearly read "arger" – anger – not the handiwork of an algorithm.) The Jew mass murderers who exterminated hundreds of millions of goyim now control the exercise of your freedom of speech. Jew Newsweek: I$rael Flagged as Top Spy Threat to U.S. in New Snowden/NSA Document The headline says it all How did this Satanic Jew shit get splashed onto the pages of the Christian Bible? The Council of Nicaea 325 AD, the Church fathers are hanging on to the ‘Holy Writ’…
''Secular democratic I$rael''… ''The only democracy in the Middle East''… Happy Hannukah, goyim! Have you paid your Jews?… Izrael is protecting you all from the horrors of Islam! Who do you think sent you millions of Muslim refugees?… "Jews should rejoice at the fact that Christian Europe is losing its identity as a punishment for what it did to us for the hundreds of years we were in exile there... And now Europe is losing its identity in favor of another people and another religion..." – Rabbi Baruch Efrati Here is a Jew worthy of Der Stürmer – ignore the rest of the shit Jew entertainer Bill Maher tells Goyim how stupid it is that we consume Jew entertainment - Daily Stormer Strong Brown Communist Girl REFUSES to Bend the Knee to Kikes -- and Take AIPAC Trip to I$rael - Daily Stormer …
myth. I won’t go into detail in this particular post, but you can watch the videos on the last page for a good overall explanation as to why our world is not falling to the ‘human plague’. I suggest you do your own research, it doesn’t take much to see the man behind the curtain.
The following are 46 population control quotes that show just how badly the global elite want to wipe us all out…
1. Charles Darwin (his thinking is at the foundation of so many of our scientific theories today): “At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace throughout the world the savage races. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked, will no doubt be exterminated. The break will then be rendered wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state as we may hope, than the Caucasian and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as at present between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.”
2. Bill Gates: “The problem is that the population is growing the fastest where people are less able to deal with it. So it’s in the very poorest places that you’re going to have a tripling in population by 2050. (…) And we’ve got to make sure that we help out with the tools now so that they don’t have an impossible situation later.”
3. UK Television Presenter Sir David Attenborough: “We are a plague on the Earth. It’s coming home to roost over the next 50 years or so. It’s not just climate change; it’s sheer space, places to grow food for this enormous horde. Either we limit our population growth or the natural world will do it for us, and the natural world is doing it for us right now”
4. UN Under-Secretary-General Baroness Valerie Amos: “Population growth puts increased pressure on everything else…Girls and women must be educated. Even a few years’ basic education leads to smaller families.”
5. Paul Ehrlich, a former science adviser to president George W. Bush and the author of “The Population Bomb”: “Solving the population problem is not going to solve the problems of racism… of sexism… of religious intolerance… of war… of gross economic inequality. But if you don’t solve the population problem, you’re not going to solve any of those problems. Whatever problem you’re interested in, you’re not going to solve it unless you also solve the population problem.”
6. Dave Foreman, the co-founder of Earth First: “We humans have become a disease, the Humanpox.”
7. CNN Founder Ted Turner: “A total world population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”
8. Japan’s Deputy Prime Minister Taro Aso about medical patients with serious illnesses: “You cannot sleep well when you think it’s all paid by the government. This won’t be solved unless you let them hurry up and die.”
9. David Rockefeller: “The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident.”
10. Richard Branson: “The truth is this: the Earth cannot provide enough food and fresh water for 10 billion people, never mind homes, never mind roads, hospitals and schools.”
11. Environmental activist Roger Martin: “On a finite planet, the optimum population providing the best quality of life for all, is clearly much smaller than the maximum, permitting bare survival. The more we are, the less for each; fewer people mean better lives.”
12. HBO personality Bill Maher: “I’m pro-choice, I’m for assisted suicide, I’m for regular suicide, I’m for whatever gets the freeway moving – that’s what I’m for. It’s too crowded, the planet is too crowded and we need to promote death.”
13. Al Gore: “One of the things we could do about it is to change the technologies, to put out less of this pollution, to stabilize the population, and one of the principal ways of doing that is to empower and educate girls and women. You have to have ubiquitous availability of fertility management so women can choose how many children to have, the spacing of the children… You have to educate girls and empower women. And that’s the most powerful leveraging factor, and when that happens, then the population begins to stabilize and societies begin to make better choices and more balanced choices.”
14. MIT professor Penny Chisholm: “The real trick is, in terms of trying to level off at someplace lower than that 9 billion, is to get the birthrates in the developing countries to drop as fast as we can. And that will determine the level at which humans will level off on earth.”
15. Julia Whitty, a columnist for Mother Jones: “The only known solution to ecological overshoot is to decelerate our population growth faster than it’s decelerating now and eventually reverse it—at the same time we slow and eventually reverse the rate at which we consume the planet’s resources. Success in these twin endeavors will crack our most pressing global issues: climate change, food scarcity, water supplies, immigration, health care, biodiversity loss, even war. On one front, we’ve already made unprecedented strides, reducing global fertility from an average 4.92 children per woman in 1950 to 2.56 today—an accomplishment of trial and sometimes brutally coercive error, but also a result of one woman at a time making her individual choices. The speed of this childbearing revolution, swimming hard against biological programming, rates as perhaps our greatest collective feat to date.”
Depopulation as a conspiracy theory sure seems to move out of the realm of ‘theory’ when you look at the vast number of world leaders calling for it.
16. Colorado State University Professor Philip Cafaro in a paper entitled “Climate Ethics and Population Policy”: “Ending human population growth is almost certainly a necessary (but not sufficient) condition for preventing catastrophic global climate change. Indeed, significantly reducing current human numbers may be necessary in order to do so.“
17. Professor of Biology at the University of Texas at Austin Eric R. Pianka: “I do not bear any ill will toward people. However, I am convinced that the world, including all humanity, WOULD clearly be much better off without so many of us.”
18. Kofi Annan, UN Secretary-General from 1997-2006: “The idea that population growth guarantees a better life — financially or otherwise — is a myth that only those who sell nappies, prams and the like have any right to believe.”
19. Thoraya Ahmed Obaid, UN Under-Secretary-General from 2000-2010: “We cannot confront the massive challenges of poverty, hunger, disease and environmental destruction unless we address issues of population and reproductive health.”
20. Detroit News Columnist Nolan Finley: “Since the national attention is on birth control, here’s my idea: If we want to fight poverty, reduce violent crime and bring down our embarrassing drop-out rate, we should swap contraceptives for fluoride in Michigan’s drinking water.
We’ve got a baby problem in Michigan. Too many babies are born to immature parents who don’t have the skills to raise them, too many are delivered by poor women who can’t afford them, and too many are fathered by sorry layabouts who spread their seed like dandelions and then wander away from the consequences.”
21. John Guillebaud, professor of family planning at University College London: “The effect on the planet of having one child less is an order of magnitude greater than all these other things we might do, such as switching off lights. An extra child is the equivalent of a lot of flights across the planet.”
22. Pope Francis: “Some people think that — excuse my expression here — that in order to be good Catholics we have to be like rabbits. No. Parenthood is about being responsible. This is clear.”
23. Tenzin Gyatso, 14th Dalai Lama 1950-present: “The growth in population is very much bound up with poverty, and in turn poverty plunders the Earth. When human groups are dying of hunger, they eat everything: grass, insects, everything. They cut down the trees, they leave the land dry and bare. All other concerns vanish. That’s why in the next 30 years the problems we call ‘environmental’ will be the hardest that humanity has to face.”
24. Democrat strategist Steven Rattner: “WE need death panels. Well, maybe not death panels, exactly, but unless we start allocating health care resources more prudently — rationing, by its proper name — the exploding cost of Medicare will swamp the federal budget.”
25. Matthew Yglesias, a business and economics correspondent for Slate, in an article entitled “The Case for Death Panels, in One Chart”: “But not only is this health care spending on the elderly the key issue in the federal budget, our disproportionate allocation of health care dollars to old people surely accounts for the remarkable lack of apparent cost effectiveness of the American health care system. When the patient is already over 80, the simple fact of the matter is that no amount of treatment is going to work miracles in terms of life expectancy or quality of life.”
26. Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger: “All of our problems are the result of overbreeding among the working class”
27. Gloria Steinem: “Everybody with a womb doesn’t have to have a child any more than everybody with vocal chords has to be an opera singer.”
28. Jane Goodall: “It’s our population growth that underlies just about every single one of the problems that we’ve inflicted on the planet. If there were just a few of us, then the nasty things we do wouldn’t really matter and Mother Nature would take care of it — but there are so many of us.”
29. U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg: “Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”
30. Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger: “The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”
Of course, when it comes to depopulation, the people calling for it don’t include themselves! Why not lead by example? The rest of the world would like to see you set an example…
31. Salon columnist Mary Elizabeth Williams in an article entitled “So What If Abortion Ends Life?”: “All life is not equal. That’s a difficult thing for liberals like me to talk about, lest we wind up looking like death-panel-loving, kill-your-grandma-and-your-precious-baby storm troopers. Yet a fetus can be a human life without having the same rights as the woman in whose body it resides.”
32. Paul Ehrlich: “Basically, then, there are only two kinds of solutions to the population problem. One is a ‘birth rate solution,’ in which we find ways to lower the birth rate. The other is a ‘death rate solution,’ in which ways to raise the death rate — war, famine, pestilence — find us.”
33. Alberto Giubilini of Monash University in Melbourne, Australia and Francesca Minerva of the University of Melbourne in a paper published in the Journal of Medical Ethics: “[W]hen circumstances occur after birth such that they would have justified abortion, what we call after-birth abortion should be permissible. … [W]e propose to call this practice ‘after-birth abortion’, rather than ‘infanticide,’ to emphasize that the moral status of the individual killed is comparable with that of a fetus … rather than to that of a child. Therefore, we claim that killing a newborn could be ethically permissible in all the circumstances where abortion would be. Such circumstances include cases where the newborn has the potential to have an (at least) acceptable life, but the well-being of the family is at risk.”
34. Nina Fedoroff, a key adviser to Hillary Clinton: “We need to continue to decrease the growth rate of the global population; the planet can’t support many more people.”
35. Barack Obama’s primary science adviser, John P. Holdren: “A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.
The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.”
36. David Brower, the first Executive Director of the Sierra Club: “Childbearing [should be] a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license … All potential parents [should be] required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.”
37. Maurice Strong: “Either we reduce the world’s population voluntarily or nature will do this for us, but brutally.”
38. Thomas Ferguson, former official in the U.S. State Department Office of Population Affairs: “There is a single theme behind all our work–we must reduce population levels. Either governments do it our way, through nice clean methods, or they will get the kinds of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control, it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it…”
39. Mikhail Gorbachev: “We must speak more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about values that control population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there aren’t enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage.”
40. Jacques Costeau: “In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it is just as bad not to say it.”
41. Television personality Kate Humble: “There are far too many people in the world…I think one of the most environmentally friendly things you can do is not to have children.”
42. Finnish environmentalist Pentti Linkola: “If there were a button I could press, I would sacrifice myself without hesitating if it meant millions of people would die”
43. Author Dan Brown: “Overpopulation is an issue so profound that all of us need to ask what should be done.”
44. Prince Phillip, husband of Queen Elizabeth II and co-founder of the World Wildlife Fund: “In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation.”
45. Ashley Judd: “It’s unconscionable to breed, with the number of children who are starving to death in impoverished countries.”
46. Charles Darwin: “With savages, the weak in body or mind are soon eliminated; and those that survive commonly exhibit a vigorous state of health. We civilised men, on the other hand, do our utmost to check the process of elimination; we build asylums for the imbecile, the maimed, and the sick; we institute poor-laws; and our medical men exert their utmost skill to save the life of every one to the last moment. There is reason to believe that vaccination has preserved thousands, who from a weak constitution would formerly have succumbed to small-pox. Thus the weak members of civilised societies propagate their kind. No one who has attended to the breeding of domestic animals will doubt that this must be highly injurious to the race of man. It is surprising how soon a want of care, or care wrongly directed, leads to the degeneration of a domestic race; but excepting in the case of man himself, hardly any one is so ignorant as to allow his worst animals to breed.”
http://www.truthandaction.org/46-quotes-population-control-world-leaders-will-chill-bone/
…
China’s Demand For Physical Quadruples Gold Premium
2 June 2013, by Tyler Durden (zerohedge)
The premium that gold buyers in China pay to take immediate delivery of bullion has jumped four-fold in th
The Untold Stories Of Your Favorite Musicians | Hired Gun | Full Music DocumentaryThey are the “First Call, A-list” musicians, just 20 feet from stardom, yet...