Speaking of "9-11 TRUTH", Mr. Anthony Lawson sent me his latest video on the subject this morning.
I have posted it here twice. Not only has it not made it to the WRH front page, but it keeps disappearing from the "Member Submitted News" section as well.
"if it is a no planner point of view, it will get deleted here,... for it is the owners right to moderate to his own liking."
I think there may have been a misunderstanding by the moderator on Mr. Anthony Lawson's latest 9-11 video.
I think "1newsjunkie" is correct in his observation that this may have hit the "no plane at the Pentagon" zero-tolerance switch by the moderator.
In my work with Mr. Anthony Lawson over the years, I have never seen him as a "no plane at the Pentagon" person in the least.
I guess the working hypothesis many of us in the 9-11 TRUTH Community are currently pursuing is more of a "Planes=Yes, but most likely NOT the planes we were told were used on 9-11."
For me, this is based largely on the research by Mr. Christopher Bollyn in identifying the Israeli controlled Airline "Chop Shop" operations such as "ATASCO USA", "Israeli Aircraft Industries" (IAI), "Bedek Aviation Company", "Commodore Aviation", etc. . .
. . . as well as the research by "Pilots for 9-11 Truth" who have basically provided the same "That is physically impossible" arguments in the vein of the research done by "Architects and Engineers for 9-11 TRUTH" on WTC-7 when it comes to the aerodynamics and physics (especially VMO, wingspan, and engine placement and trajectories, etc) of the known flight paths and structural limitations of the aircraft in question.
Over the many years here I have suggested a member only area, where some basic rules are outlined.
It does suck to have your post deleted, especially when no reason given. But it is what it is. One could surmise it simply isn't a priority for our host, and leave it at that. We are here voluntarily, and the door remains open. I (tried to) quit this place a few times, with the last being a 7 month stretch away. Did anyone miss me? ha!
As far as the planes issue, I could give two fucks, there is so much evidence abound to prove the official story a lie with out the controversial aspects added IMO.
Think we can take a half a step back here? The impacted plug over this issue near absurd.
First off, I will never agree supporting this release akin to being one of them, a zio trash agent as our host emotionally implied a month back. It reminds me of our host reaction to Alex Jones words about those who fight the Jewish cancer in our lives. It doesn't feel to good to have your opinion outed as an enemy agent or hateful ignorance .
Consider this, the congress critters may be implicating the Saudis, where as we truth seekers want more pieces of the puzzle. Further truths wont harm the critical thinker.
I suggest, the Saudi Intelligence involvement was at the hand of the mossad/cia and their role passive, acting as out right as double agents and / or other compartmentalized dupes.
— That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government..
I was at one of those "Used DVD" stores last week. They had a special of "Buy 2 Get 2 Free". I picked up a copy of Director Michael Moore's 9/11 "misdirection" as one of my "freebies" . . .
. . . I thought it would make an interesting study. I hadn't watched it since it first came out in 2004 (Right after I had gotten "blacklisted" for trying to blow the whistle on the entire NSA/Telco/ISP/Manufacturer illegal electronic surveillance and data mining/profiling programs. . . but I still had my house & farm & marriage).
When I watched it last week, I definitely saw a VERY different film with "these eyes" than the one I saw in 2004.
Given the "kosher" nature of the 9-11 "False Flag" attacks, I wonder if the Zio-Plan from day 1 was to have "Osama bin Laden with al Qaeda" as the "Patsy of First Choice" . . .
. . . but keep the "Bush Family, Halliburton & The Saudis" as the "Back Up Patsies" in case the "Public Relations" Marketing campaign on the primary patsies didn't fly?
This 2004 Michael Moore hit-piece does more than enough to "seed" this "The Saudis Did 9-11" meme in the minds of the so-called "Liberal Progressive Left" . . .
. .. all those clever "Zealots for Tolerance" that will destroy you if you dare "question" either the official story of 9-11 . . . or "THE Holocaust(TM)" . . . or dare point out what is going on in Gaza right now.
Yet another "Palestinian Massacre" by the same Tribe that gave us those "Dancing Israelis" on 9-11.
Anyone ever get Misdirector Michael Moore to address the fact of the "Dancing Israelis" arrested on 9-11?. . . ;-)
Kingsley L. Dennis discussing subjects from his new book - 'The Inversion: How We Have Been Tricked into Perceiving a False Reality' (published September 26,...
You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!
Join 12160 Social Network