Comment

Comment by DTOM on June 20, 2016 at 5:18am

DS - but you will always have that moment when he realized what you did - that my friend lives for ever.

Comment by DTOM on June 19, 2016 at 8:26am

I've been staring at the pic of Hannah Davis for 15 minutes and forgot why I am here...

DS wins the interwebs for his prices comment + the childhood story, which I am tempted to steal and write into a book or script one day ;)

(DS you need to write that into one of your routines...)

Girls with ink do nothing for me...most of them look like they fell asleep in a waiting room, and several unattended under-5s got out the magic markers and whispered 'let's draw on the lady'.

Comment by Central Scrutinizer on August 28, 2015 at 10:11pm

Comment by Maas on August 28, 2015 at 9:05pm

You're funny man. I lolled @ "Wow. The prices have gone up quite a bit."

Comment by Maas on August 28, 2015 at 8:20pm

Yep, that looks like the genuine article alright. It's interesting where the priorities of modern science and technology are. It's like I always say, scientists can't cure male pattern baldness, but they can turn a physically healthy young boy into a convincing, practically fully functioning woman.

Comment by suzie on August 27, 2015 at 5:01pm

I was a little girl in 1962 ~ there are no little girls in 2015

Comment by Maas on August 27, 2015 at 8:20am

So may this wasn't the most accurate comparison considering that the cover girl from 1962 was an actual swimmer in a swim suit while the cover girl from 2015 is a model in a swim suit.

This 2015 content may have been acceptable in the magazine back in the 90's early 2000', but definitely not on the cover. It just goes to show how over the top these media and advertising companies have gone, especially since the late 90's. I wonder if in the next five years or so, Sports Illustrated will have its first transgender swimsuit model on their cover.