Three substitutes for logic
| Since logic is no longer taught as a required subject in schools, the door is open to all sorts of bizarre reactions to the presence of information. Here are three favorites: One: grab the headline or the title of an article, make up your mind about how you "feel," and ignore everything else. Two: Actually read the article until you find a piece of information that appeals to you for any reason; latch on to it, and run with it in any direction. In all cases, the direction will have nothing to do with the intent of the article. Three: From the moment you begin to read the headline of the article, be in a state of "free association." Take any word or sentence and connect it to an arbitrary thought or feeling, associate that thought with yet another arbitrary thought...and keep going until you become tired or bored. You might be surprised at how many people use these three "methods of analysis." The very idea that the author of the article is making a central point doesn't really register. And certainly, the notion that the author is providing evidence for the central point and reasoning his way from A to B to C is alien. A college liberal education? These days it could be imparted in a matter of weeks, simply by hammering a small set of values into students' skulls---along with requisite guilt and fear at the prospect of wandering off the reservation. Logic as a subject is viewed with grave suspicion, as if it might involuntarily take a person down the wrong track and dump him in a politically incorrect ditch---a fate to be avoided at all costs. Therefore, the practice of rational debate is on the way out. Too risky. Besides, the preferred method of dealing with opponents is screaming at them, shoving them off stage, and whining about "being triggered." If you think obtaining what's called a liberal college education is vastly overrated (and absurdly expensive), you're right. Learning logic, instead, would be a good start down a different road. And an analysis of the principle of "greatest good for the greatest number" would be very, very useful---since it underpins so much of values-centered education these days. What does greatest good mean, specifically? How would it be achieved? Who would implement it? How would the implementation affect individual freedom? Wrestling with these questions would open up whole new territories of insight. As I've mentioned in past articles, when I taught a few basics of logic to middle-school students, the clutter in their minds receded. They found the ability to follow a line of thought---for the first time, they recognized there was such a thing as a connected flow of reasoning from A to B to C to D. The lights went on. The world may be sinking into deeper levels of know-nothing non-rationality, but that's not a good excuse for trailing along down into the swamp. It should be a wake-up call to go the other way. No matter what anyone says, it's not a crime to be smarter than other people. |
 |
|
Use this link to order Jon's Matrix Collections.
|
|
Jon Rappoport
|
Comment
-
Comment by cheeki kea on December 15, 2019 at 7:47am
-
True and knowing all this on the bright side can be an advantage, particularly upon mild debate in Formal situations. Even acknowledging tiny inconsistency of their "facts" or how they ~"feel"~about it, can cause them to become unhinged and erupt into emotional outburst. ( always to their determent, and in front of others ) That's when a debate is won or meeting closed with successful conclusion.
-
Comment by Parrhesia on December 14, 2019 at 11:24am
-
People don't seem to care about truth anymore, that's why they are able to "identify" as whatever they want and it's okay because "feelings".
"Destroying the New World Order"
THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!
Latest Activity
- Top News
- Everything
YouTube Downloader Tools You Never Knew Existed
A YouTube downloader is an online tool or software that helps convert YouTube videos into…See More
Experimenter - Official Trailer
Like on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/experimenterfilmYale University, 1961. Stanley Milgram (Peter Sarsgaard) designs a psychology experiment that stil...
How Did the Soviets First Discover the SR-71 Blackbird?
Although President Lydon Johnson announced the development of the Lockheed SR-71 in 1964 which…See More
"Personally, I don't consider Don Lemon or people like him to be journalists at all. They are…"
The Farmer vs the Billionaire — Jeremy Clarkson Says NO to Bill Gates’ £100 Million Deal | UK News
OFFICIAL NOTICE: This channel is NOT Jeremy Clarkson, is not affiliated with him, and does not represent his official views or Diddly Squat Farm. This is an ...
The Forbidden Canyon and It’s Residents
Chapter OneSituated 10 miles from Mount Jefferson in the Oregon wilderness a forest researcher…See More
G_LrzqtXMAAhT7w
"He would never do that. Mosques and Synagogues are out of the question, only Christianity is free…"
Disgraced Former CNN Anchor Don Lemon Arrested
No longer an employed journalist, Don Lemon had been seen with far left agitator, Nekima Levy…See More
The Illusion of Fuck You Money
The United States use to have this idea that once you make enough money, you.can do as you want.…See More
The Human Antenna - OFFICIAL FILM
THE HUMAN ANTENNA - Can We Reverse The Trans Humanist Agenda?MORE INFORMATION: → www.humanantennafilm.com ← MASTERPEACE: https://mphcs.com/PrimeEarthHuman En...
"PS Not sure this video will last much longer."
" Deflection ~ Away from Themselves ! example. -->…"
© 2026 Created by truth.
Powered by
You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!
Join 12160 Social Network