Since logic is no longer taught as a required subject in schools, the door is open to all sorts of bizarre reactions to the presence of information.

Here are three favorites:

One: grab the headline or the title of an article, make up your mind about how you "feel," and ignore everything else.

Two: Actually read the article until you find a piece of information that appeals to you for any reason; latch on to it, and run with it in any direction.  In all cases, the direction will have nothing to do with the intent of the article.  

Three: From the moment you begin to read the headline of the article, be in a state of "free association."  Take any word or sentence and connect it to an arbitrary thought or feeling, associate that thought with yet another arbitrary thought...and keep going until you become tired or bored.

You might be surprised at how many people use these three "methods of analysis."

The very idea that the author of the article is making a central point doesn't really register.  And certainly, the notion that the author is providing evidence for the central point and reasoning his way from A to B to C is alien.  

A college liberal education?  These days it could be imparted in a matter of weeks, simply by hammering a small set of values into students' skulls---along with requisite guilt and fear at the prospect of wandering off the reservation.

Logic as a subject is viewed with grave suspicion, as if it might involuntarily take a person down the wrong track and dump him in a politically incorrect ditch---a fate to be avoided at all costs.  

Therefore, the practice of rational debate is on the way out.  Too risky.  Besides, the preferred method of dealing with opponents is screaming at them, shoving them off stage, and whining about "being triggered."

If you think obtaining what's called a liberal college education is vastly overrated (and absurdly expensive), you're right.  Learning logic, instead, would be a good start down a different road.

And an analysis of the principle of "greatest good for the greatest number" would be very, very useful---since it underpins so much of values-centered education these days.

What does greatest good mean, specifically?  How would it be achieved?  Who would implement it?  How would the implementation affect individual freedom?  

Wrestling with these questions would open up whole new territories of insight.

As I've mentioned in past articles, when I taught a few basics of logic to middle-school students, the clutter in their minds receded.  They found the ability to follow a line of thought---for the first time, they recognized there was such a thing as a connected flow of reasoning from A to B to C to D.  The lights went on.

The world may be sinking into deeper levels of know-nothing non-rationality, but that's not a good excuse for trailing along down into the swamp.  It should be a wake-up call to go the other way.

No matter what anyone says, it's not a crime to be smarter than other people.
Use this link to order Jon's Matrix Collections.
Jon Rappoport

Views: 92

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

Comment by cheeki kea on December 15, 2019 at 7:47am

True and knowing all this on the bright side can be an advantage, particularly upon mild debate in Formal situations. Even acknowledging tiny inconsistency of their "facts" or how they ~"feel"~about it, can cause them to become unhinged and erupt into emotional outburst. ( always to their determent, and in front of others ) That's when a debate is won or meeting closed with successful conclusion.  

Comment by Parrhesia on December 14, 2019 at 11:24am

People don't seem to care about truth anymore, that's why they are able to "identify" as whatever they want and it's okay because "feelings".  

"Destroying the New World Order"

TOP CONTENT THIS WEEK

THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!

mobile page

12160.info/m

12160 Administrators

 

Latest Activity

harrisseo is now a member of 12160 Social Network
19 hours ago
Doc Vega's 4 blog posts were featured
19 hours ago
tjdavis posted a blog post
yesterday
tjdavis posted videos
yesterday
cheeki kea left a comment for Gordon Freeman
"Greetings and welcome to you Gordon it's great to have you join us all here."
Friday
cheeki kea commented on cheeki kea's photo
Friday
cheeki kea posted a photo
Friday
cheeki kea commented on Doc Vega's blog post How Many Clues Did You Need To Figure out the Covid scare was Bogus? Revisiting Stupidity
"For those trapped in mass formation the ugly truth and all the clues will not be realised until the…"
Friday
cheeki kea favorited Doc Vega's blog post How Many Clues Did You Need To Figure out the Covid scare was Bogus? Revisiting Stupidity
Friday
tjdavis posted a video

Dare to Dream/Dare to Build

As we enter the month of Av we intensify our traditional mourning for the Holy Temple, but are we really in touch with what we are mourning for? Are we ready...
Thursday
Gordon Freeman is now a member of 12160 Social Network
Tuesday
Burbia posted a photo
Tuesday
Doc Vega commented on Doc Vega's blog post How Many Clues Did You Need To Figure out the Covid scare was Bogus? Revisiting Stupidity
"The Chinese sent more than 100 thousand visitors to the US after the failure of the Wuhan lab to…"
Mar 30
Sandy posted photos
Mar 30
Doc Vega commented on Doc Vega's blog post This is What Pisses Me Off-How About You?
"Burbia! Thank you for the video, yes Texas aint puttin up with this shit! "
Mar 29
Burbia commented on Doc Vega's blog post This is What Pisses Me Off-How About You?
"This is encouraging."
Mar 28
Burbia commented on Doc Vega's blog post How Many Clues Did You Need To Figure out the Covid scare was Bogus? Revisiting Stupidity
"There was no trail of death from the first case in the US landing in Seattle and brought north of…"
Mar 28
Doc Vega posted blog posts
Mar 28
Sandy posted photos
Mar 28
Sandy posted videos
Mar 27

© 2026   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2019 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted