Feds grant eminent domain as collateral to China for US debts.

FLASHBACK - Feds grant eminent domain as collateral to China for US debts.

Tags: CLICK THENM LINK ABOVE FOR THE WHOLE STORY.

Sources at the United States Embassy in Beijing China have just CONFIRMED to me that the United States of America has tendered to China a written agreement which grants to the People's Republic of China, an option to exercise Eminent Domain within the USA, as collateral for China's continued purchase of US Treasury Notes and existing US Currency reserves!
The written agreement was brought to Beijing by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and was formalized and agreed-to during her recent trip to China.

Webmaster's Commentary:

See Chinese Free Trade Zones in the United States?????? WTF?????

"CASEY ANTHONY! CASEY ANTHONY! CASEY ANTHONY!" -- ABCNNBBCBS

Favorite

0 members favorited this

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

Comment by Lisa K on July 15, 2011 at 12:51am: http://www.rense.com/general77/dbch.htm

Comment by CHUCK W. on July 14, 2011 at 4:08am: bEEN A BUSY WEEK SORRY I DID NOT RESPOND SOONER.

fIRST AS OF APRIL THE DEBT CHINA WAS HOLDING WAS 1.153 TRILLION DOLLARS.

Second, 50 sq mniles of idaho now belong to china, and they are carving out more land

across the country.

and last, why is it people are so fast to kill the messenger, and rule his message to be false?

Comment by Burbia on July 11, 2011 at 3:17am: lol @ maria. and the head up you ass picture is not enjoyable either. i heard 700 billion is the debt to china. is america for sale for 700 billion?

Comment by SHTFgirl on July 10, 2011 at 10:42pm: Please join my newly formed group called FIRE CONGRESS in 2012 CAMPAIGN

The buck stops here!

Thank you.

Comment by Maria De Wind on July 10, 2011 at 10:25pm: why then does this keeps being featured like that ugly fish that is greeting us now?

Comment by ArchAngel on July 10, 2011 at 8:56pm: Why would they sell out to China? China has sold nearly all their US government securities.

Sure, the government lies. Does that mean the person[s] that Hal and Bob got their info from are right by default?

I don't agree with much in the NAU treaty. But that was public. You can read the agreement. How about the one that Bob and Hal are saying is there?

How can they promise anything using imminent domain when the government would have to compensate the people at least market value for the properties? Saying that Imminent Domain creates value or provides surety is silly.

Maybe they promised to back the debt with US parkland or other government owned land.

Comment by ArchAngel on July 10, 2011 at 8:15pm: And you believe Bob Chapman?

http://www.rgm.com/articles/sec7.html

Comment by ArchAngel on July 10, 2011 at 7:57pm: There is disinfo everywhere out there. Check the sources for the extraordinary. David Booth, Sorcha Faal, Nancy Leider, Hal Turner, Christopher Story, Benjamin Fulford, etc... are all known disinfo sources. And there are plenty more. These things are put out there to distract researchers from the real uncomfortable truths and to make "Conspiracy Theorists" look like fools when they repeat what these disinfo agents produce.

Google "Hal Turner FBI" and "Hal Turner Disinfo".

Comment by ArchAngel on July 10, 2011 at 7:08pm: The original source for the story is Hal Turner. Hal is a known hoaxer and propagandist.

Bovine Droppings are good for fertilizer and not much else.

Are we to believe that this secret deal happened because Hal says that someone told him so?

Did you even look at the article from Snopes? When the government takes property under eminent domain they must compensate the owners. This system is not a source of value for backing loans. They can't just take your property and give it to China. They must give fair compensation for anything taken, and it must be for public use.