by David DeGraw

Building on my Af-Pak War Racket report, a few recent news items help expose the true
drivers of current wars around the world.

#1) Wherever there is a war, look for CIA/IMF/private military war profiteers covertly funding and supporting BOTH sides in
order to keep the wars raging and the profits rolling in. As former CIA
Station Chief John Stockwell explained: “Enemies are necessary for the
wheels of the US military machine to turn.”

Here’s an important glimpse of truth to seep through last week in the NY Times, via Raw Story:

US-backed ‘bribes’ in Afghanistan may be funding Taliban

On June 7, the day Afghanistan became America’s longest-ever war, the New York Times reported on an ongoing
investigation poised to prove that private security companies “are using
American money to bribe the Taliban” to fuel combat and thus enhance
demand for their services. The news follows a “series of events last
month that suggested all-out collusion with the insurgents,” the Times
said.

“The American people are paying to prop up a corrupt government that may be using our money to pay private companies to drum
up business by paying the insurgents to attack our troops,” [Kucinich]
said…. The Times interviewed a NATO official in Kabul who “believed
millions of dollars were making their way to the Taliban.” [read more]

#2) On top of that report, Sunday’s headlines read, “Pakistani spy agency supports Taliban:”

Pakistan’s main spy agency continues to arm and train the Taliban and is even represented on the group’s leadership council
despite U.S. pressure to sever ties and billions in aid to combat the
militants, said a research report released Sunday.

The findings could heighten tension between the two countries and raise further questions about U.S. success in Afghanistan
since Pakistani cooperation is seen as key to defeating the Taliban,
which seized power in Kabul in the 1990s with Islamabad’s support.

U.S. officials have suggested in the past that current or former members of Pakistan’s powerful Inter-Services
Intelligence agency, or ISI, have maintained links to the Taliban
despite the government’s decision to denounce the group in 2001 under
U.S. pressure. [read more]

First off, these two reports are really not news at all. Reports of American tax dollars ending up in the hands of the
Taliban have been coming out since the start of the war and the ISI, as
the CIA has been well aware of for years now, has been playing both
sides of this war and is pivotal in keeping the war going. Secondly, I
have long wondered when the CIA / US military would start exposing all
of this in the mainstream propaganda press as a pretext to further
expand the war into Pakistan.

#3) As a result of all this, and not surprising at all to people who were paying close
attention to Obama’s surge strategy, costs and death counts are
quickly rising. Jim Lobe reports from Afghanistan that the “News is
Bad.”

While U.S. officials insist they are making progress in reversing the momentum built up by the Taliban insurgency over the
last several years, the latest news from Afghanistan suggests the
opposite may be closer to the truth.

Even senior military officials are conceding privately that their much-touted new counterinsurgency strategy of
“clear, hold and build” in contested areas of the Pashtun southern and
eastern parts of the country are not working out as planned despite the
“surge” of some 20,000 additional U.S. troops over the past six months.

Casualties among the nearly 130,000 U.S. and other NATO troops now deployed in Afghanistan are also mounting quickly. [read
more]

#4) In a propaganda effort to spin away from all the latest bad news, the desperate US military has pulled this dusty old
news report out of their back-pocket and launched a psychological
operation in the NY Times to give a positive spin in hopes of further
manipulating US public opinion:

U.S. Identifies Vast Riches of Minerals in Afghanistan

The United States has discovered nearly $1 trillion in untapped mineral deposits in Afghanistan, far beyond any previously
known reserves…. The previously unknown deposits — including huge veins
of iron, copper, cobalt, gold and critical industrial metals like
lithium — are so big and include so many minerals that are essential to
modern industry that Afghanistan could eventually be transformed into
one of the most important mining centers in the world, the United States
officials believe.

An internal Pentagon memo, for example, states that Afghanistan could become the “Saudi Arabia of lithium,” a key raw
material in the manufacture of batteries for laptops and BlackBerrys. [read more]

In the process of this latest propaganda campaign, the Pentagon has unwittingly exposed two things that I will now jump on.
A) The real reason why we are in this war to begin with: it’s all about
natural resources. And B) All the BS statements about these “previously
unknown deposits” clearly prove, yet again, that the NY Times is not a
“news” outlet, but a straight up propaganda paper. For those of us
paying attention, we’ve been reading reports about these minerals for
the past decade! Roland Sheppard just sent this along:

“The New York Times, when it was beating the drums of war in 2002, failed to mention that the USGS published a report, at
that time, Mines and Mineral Occurrences of Afghanistan Compiled by G.J.
Orris and J.D. Bliss. Open-File Report 02-110. On page 16, they list as
‘Significant Minerals or Materials’ magnetite, hematite, chalcopyrite,
covellite, chalcocite, cuprite, malachite, azurite, molybdenite, and
native gold – lithium is mentioned on page 10 under ‘References.’”

So, from the very beginning, as I went into further detail in the past, the war in Afghanistan is all about resources. I’ll
get back to the “Saudi Arabia of lithium” in a minute, here’s a brief
excerpt from my prior report on another key resource in the region:

ORIGINS OF THE AFGHANISTAN OCCUPATION: “STRATEGY OF THE SILK ROUTE”

Up until 9/11, oil companies, with the help of the Bush administration, were desperately trying to work out a deal with the
Taliban to build an oil pipeline through Afghanistan. One of the
world’s richest oil fields is on the eastern shore of the Caspian sea
just north of Afghanistan. The Caspian oil reserves are of top strategic
importance in the quest to control the earth’s remaining oil supply.
The US government developed a policy called “The Strategy of the Silk
Route.”

The policy was designed to lock out Russia, China and Iran from the oil in this region. This called for U.S. corporations to
construct an oil pipeline running through Afghanistan. Since the mid
1990s, a consortium of U.S. companies led by Unocal have been pursing
this goal. A feasibility study of the Central Asian pipeline project was
performed by Enron. Their study concluded that as long as the country
was split among fighting warlords the pipeline could not be built.
Stability was necessary for the $4.5 billion project and the U.S.
believed that the Taliban would impose the necessary order. The U.S.
State Department and Pakistan’s ISI, impressed by the Taliban movement
to cut a pipeline deal, agreed to funnel arms and funding to the Taliban
in their war for control of Afghanistan. [read
more]

Then of course we have the war in Iraq, again from my previous report:

ORIGINS OF THE IRAQ OCCUPATION: CHENEY ENERGY TASK FORCE

As an AlterNet report put it: “In January 2000, 10 days into President George W. Bush’s first term, representatives of the
largest oil and energy companies joined the new administration to form
the Cheney Energy Task Force.”

Secret Task Force documents that were dated March 2001, which were obtained by Judical Watch in 2003 after a Freedom of
Information Act lawsuit, contained “a map of Iraqi oilfields, pipelines, refineries and
terminals, as well as two charts detailing Iraqi oil and gas projects…”
They also had: “… a series of lists titled ‘Foreign Suitors for Iraqi Oilfield Contracts‘ naming
more than 60 companies from some 30 countries with contracts in various
stages of negotiation.

None of contracts were with American nor major British companies, and none could take effect while the U.N. Security
Council sanctions against Iraq remained in place. Three countries held
the largest contracts: China, Russia and France — all members of the
Security Council and all in a position to advocate for the end of
sanctions.

Were Saddam to remain in power and the sanctions to be removed, these contracts would take effect, and the U.S. and its
closest ally would be shut out of Iraq’s great oil bonanza.”

Project Censored highlighted a Judicial Watch report that stated: “Documented plans of occupation and exploitation predating
September 11 confirm heightened suspicion that U.S. policy is driven by
the dictates of the energy industry. According to Judicial Watch
President, Tom Fitton, ‘These documents show the importance of the
Energy Task Force and why its operations should be open to the public.’”

So that’s the oil angle of this resource war, now back to the lithium angle. This longest war in US history is very
similar to the even longer wars raging in Northern Africa, another
resource rich paradise of death and destruction. In the late 1990s,
CIA-connected corporations like Bechtel worked with NASA to conduct
infrared satellite studies to discover mineral rich regions throughout
the world. Other than the discoveries in South-Central Asia (Af-Pak
region), Northern Africa (Democratic Republic of Congo region), emerged
as a key source for future resources. In particular, the mineral coltan,
which like lithium, is vital to powering most computer technology.
Since Bechtel and NASA made these discoveries, a report from The
International Rescue Committee revealed that an astonishing 5.4
MILLION Africans have been killed in the region. For some
background, here’s an excellent report from July 2001, in Dollars and
Sense magazine:

The Business of War in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Dena Montague and Frida Berrigan

“This is all money,” says a Western mining executive, his hand sweeping over a geological map toward the eastern Democratic
Republic of Congo (DRC). He is explaining why, in 1997, he and
planeloads of other businessmen were flocking to the impoverished
country and vying for the attention of then-rebel leader Laurent Kabila.
The executive could just as accurately have said, ‘This is all war.’

The interplay among a seemingly endless supply of mineral resources, the greed of multinational corporations desperate to
cash in on that wealth, and the provision of arms and military training
to political tyrants has helped to produce the spiral of conflicts that
have engulfed the continent – what many regard as “Africa’s First World
War.” These minerals are vital to maintaining U.S. military dominance…” [read more]

For further detail, here’s Project Censored’s 2003 report:

American Companies Exploit the Congo:

The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) has been labeled “the richest patch of earth on the planet.” The valuable
abundance of minerals and resources in the DRC has made it the target of
attacks from U.S.-supported neighboring African countries Uganda and
Rwanda.

The DRC is mineral rich with millions of tons of diamonds, copper, cobalt, zinc, manganese, uranium, niobium, and
tantalum also known as coltan. Coltan has become an increasingly
valuable resource to American corporations. Coltan is used to make
mobile phones, night vision goggles, fiber optics, and capacitators used
to maintain the electrical charge in computer chips….

The DRC holds 80% of the world’s coltan reserves, more than 60% of the world’s cobalt and is the world’s largest supplier
of high-grade copper. With these minerals playing a major part in
maintaining US military dominance and economic growth, minerals in the
Congo are deemed vital US interests.

Historically, the U.S. government identified sources of materials in Third World countries, and then encouraged U.S.
corporations to invest in and facilitate their production. Dating back
to the mid-1960s, the U.S. government literally installed the
dictatorship of Mobutu Sese Seko, which gave U.S. corporations access to
the Congo’s minerals for more than 30 years. However, over the years
Mobutu began to limit access by Western corporations, and to control the
distribution of resources. In 1998, U.S. military-trained leaders of
Rwanda and Uganda invaded the mineral-rich areas of the Congo. The
invaders installed illegal colonial-style governments which continue to
receive millions of dollars in arms and military training from the
United States. Our government and a $5 million Citibank loan maintains
the rebel presence in the Congo. Their control of mineral rich areas
allows western corporations, such as American Mineral Fields, to
illegally mine. Rwandan and Ugandan control over this area is beneficial
for both governments and for the corporations that continue to exploit
the Congo’s natural wealth….

San Francisco based engineering firm Bechtel Inc. established strong ties in the rebel zones as well. Bechtel drew up an
inventory of the Congo’s mineral resources free of charge, and also paid
for NASA satellite studies of the country for infared maps of its
minerals. Bechtel estimates that the DRC’s mineral ores alone are worth
$157 billion dollars. Through coltan production, the Rwandans and their
allies are bringing in $20 million revenue a month. Rwanda’s diamond
exports went from 166 carats in 1998 to 30,500 in 2000. Uganda’s diamond
exports jumped from approximately 1,500 carats to about 11,300. The
final destination for many of these minerals is the U.S.” [read more]

And to close this out, let me return to “The Business of War” report by Dena Montague and Frida Berrigan. As you will see, you always have to follow the money,
the bankers and our friends at the IMF are always at the root of global
death and destruction, and are the true Masters
of War:

“Today, the United States claims that it has no interest in the DRC other than a peaceful resolution to the current war.
Yet U.S. businessmen and politicians are still going to extreme lengths
to gain and preserve sole access to the DRC’s mineral resources. And to
protect these economic interests, the U.S. government continues to
provide millions of dollars in arms and military training to known
human-rights abusers and undemocratic regimes. Thus, the DRC’s mineral
wealth is both an impetus for war and an impediment to stopping it….

During his historic visit to Africa in 1998, President Clinton praised Presidents Kagame and Musevini as leaders of
the ‘African Renaissance,’ just a few months before they launched their
deadly invasion of the DRC with U.S. weapons and training….

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank have knowingly contributed to the war effort. The international lending
institutions praised both Rwanda and Uganda for increasing their gross
domestic product (GDP), which resulted from the illegal mining of DRC
resources. Although the IMF and World Bank were aware that the rise in
GDP coincided with the DRC war, and that it was derived from exports of
natural resources that neither country normally produced, they
nonetheless touted both nations as economic success stories….

In January 2000, Chevron – the corporation that named an oil tanker after National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice –
announced a three-year, $75 million spending program in the DRC, thus
challenging the notion that war discourages foreign investment…. As one
investor put it, “It is a good moment to come: it is in difficult times
that you can get the most advantage.”….

In April 2001, a scathing UN report argued that Presidents Kagame and Museveni are “on the verge of becoming the
godfathers of the illegal exploitation of natural resources and the
continuation of the conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo.” The
two leaders, the report alleged, have turned their armies into armies
for business….

According to East African media reports, U.S. diplomats continue to view Rwanda and Uganda as “strategic allies in the
Great Lakes region” and “would not want to upset relations with them at
this time.” …. The IMF and World Bank have also indicated that their
policies toward Rwanda and Uganda will remain unchanged….”

Famed two-time Congressional Medal of Honor recipient US Brigadier General Smedley D. Butler accurately summed up the
situation when he said: “I spent 33 years in the Marines, most of my
time being a high-class muscle man for big business, for Wall Street and
the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer for Capitalism…. The general
public shoulders the bill. This bill renders a horrible accounting.
Newly placed gravestones, Mangled bodies. Shattered minds. Broken hearts
and homes. Economic instability. Back-breaking taxation for generations
and generations.”

“Come you masters of war…
You that hide behind desks
I just want you to know,
I can see through your mask…”
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=19837