Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), formerly the ranking member on the Intelligence Committee, voted against the measure.

After the vote, she tweeted: "I voted no on #CISPA-it didn't strike the right balance & #GOP didn't allow amendments to strengthen privacy protections."

The House adopted several amendments to the bill before passing it, including one by Rep. Mick Mulvaney (R-S.C.) that added a five-year sunset to the bill.

But lawmakers voted to reject a motion to recommit by Rep. Ed Perlmuttter, who sought to add language specifying that nothing in the bill could be construed to allow employers and the government to mandate that employees and job applicants disclose confidential passwords without a court order. The defeated motion also would have added language saying that nothing in the bill could allow the government to block access to the Web through “the creation of a national Internet firewall similar to the ‘Great Internet Firewall of China.'”

Privacy hawks were disappointed with the outcome of the passage vote.

"Americans should be concerned at the extent to which their privacy will be compromised because of the passage of this bill in the House of Representatives," said Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.). "They should be very afraid."

Markey had wanted to offer a floor amendment, with Rep. Joe Barton (R-Texas), to address  privacy concerns, but Republicans did not allow a vote on it.

"I'd just encourage those that voted for [CISPA] to read the 4th Amendment," Barton said.

The tech sector immediately applauded the House action on Thursday.

“We strongly urge the Senate to swiftly take up this issue because the United States cannot afford to wait to improve our nation’s cybersecurity posture,” TechAmerica CEO Shawn Osborne said in a statement. “Standing pat will only further risk our national security.”

But civil libertarians were unhappy with the outcome.

“Cybersecurity does not have to mean abdication of Americans’ online privacy. As we’ve seen repeatedly, once the government gets expansive national security authorities, there’s no going back,” ACLU legislative counsel Michelle Richardson said. “We encourage the Senate to let this horrible bill fade into obscurity.”

The Senate is expected to turn to the issue next month.

"Sen. Reid has said as explicitly as he can that we're going to take this up in May,” Lieberman said earlier on Thursday. “I'm glad the House is taking it up now because it's a kind of preface and encouragement for the Senate to act.”

Jonathan Allen contributed to this report.

This article first appeared on POLITICO Pro at 7:13 p.m. on April 26, 2012.