Judge Napolitano’s Column: Where’s the Outrage About the Use of Drones in America?

By Judge Andrew Napolitano


For the past few weeks, I have been writing in this column about the government’s use of drones and challenging their constitutionality on Fox News Channel where I work. I once asked on air what Thomas Jefferson would have done if – had drones existed at the time – King George III had sent drones to peer inside the bedroom windows of Monticello. I suspect that Jefferson and his household would have trained their muskets on the drones and taken them down. I offer this historical anachronism as a hypothetical only, not as one who is urging the use of violence against the government.


Nevertheless, what Jeffersonians are among us today? When drones take pictures of us on our private property and in our homes, and the government uses the photos as it wishes, what will we do about it? Jefferson understood that when the government assaults our privacy and dignity, it is the moral equivalent of violence against us. The folks who hear about this, who either laugh or groan, cannot find it humorous or boring that their every move will be monitored and photographed by the government.

Don’t believe me that this is coming? The photos that the drones will take may be retained and used or even distributed to others in the government so long as the “recipient is reasonably perceived to have a specific, lawful governmental function” in requiring them. And for the first time since the Civil War, the federal government will deploy military personnel inside the United States and publicly acknowledge that it is deploying them “to collect information about US persons.”

It gets worse. If the military personnel see something of interest from a drone, they may apply to a military judge or “military commander” for permission to conduct a physical search of the private property that intrigues them. And, any “incidentally acquired information” can be retained or turned over to local law enforcement. What’s next? Prosecutions before military tribunals in the US?

The quoted phrases above are extracted from a now-public 30-page memorandum issued by President Obama’s secretary of the Air Force on April 23, 2012. The purpose of the memorandum is stated as “balancing … obtaining intelligence information … and protecting individual rights guaranteed by the US Constitution. …” Note the primacy of intelligence gathering over freedom protection, and note the peculiar use of the word “balancing.”

When liberty and safety clash, do we really expect the government to balance those values? Of course not. The government cannot be trusted to restrain itself in the face of individual choices to pursue happiness. That’s why we have a Constitution and a life-tenured judiciary: to protect the minority from the liberty-stealing impulses of the majority. And that’s why the Air Force memo has its priorities reversed – intelligence gathering first, protecting freedom second – and the mechanism of reconciling the two – balancing them – constitutionally incorrect.

More here:   http://foxnewsinsider.com/2012/06/07/judge-napolitanos-column-where...

Views: 71

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

"Destroying the New World Order"

TOP CONTENT THIS WEEK

THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!

mobile page

12160.info/m

12160 Administrators

 

Latest Activity

tjdavis posted a blog post
1 hour ago
Doc Vega posted blog posts
12 hours ago
rlionhearted_3 posted a photo
13 hours ago
Doc Vega commented on Doc Vega's blog post And on November 5th The People Spoke!
"cheeki kea Ha! Good one!"
19 hours ago
Doc Vega commented on tjdavis's video
19 hours ago
Doc Vega favorited tjdavis's video
19 hours ago
cheeki kea commented on Doc Vega's blog post And on November 5th The People Spoke!
"Congrats to Trump club and let the memes begin.... first ones off the block emerge as follows.."
20 hours ago
Doc Vega posted blog posts
yesterday
Doc Vega posted a blog post

The State of Being

The State of Being Who really cares?Are you really there?When life’s too much to bareWith all the…See More
Tuesday
Doc Vega posted blog posts
Sunday
cheeki kea commented on cheeki kea's video
Sunday
cheeki kea posted a video

Ivermectin and Cancers

Ivermectin, a potential anticancer drug derived from an antiparasitic drug https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7505114/Mechanisms of actionIVM induc...
Sunday
cheeki kea commented on tjdavis's blog post Call For Israel To Join Five Eyes
Sunday
tjdavis posted a video

David Gilmour with Romany Gilmour - Between Two Points (Later... with Jools Holland)

David Gilmour with Romany Gilmour perform Between Two Points on Later... with Jools Holland. Watch more Later... with Jools Holland on BBC iPlayer: bbc.co.uk...
Sunday
Sandy posted a video
Sunday
tjdavis commented on tjdavis's blog post Call For Israel To Join Five Eyes
Sunday
tjdavis posted a blog post
Sunday
Doc Vega posted a blog post
Nov 1
Less Prone commented on Less Prone's photo
Thumbnail

NATO KB FINLAND

"Finland is being pushed into a totally unnecessary war. Russia hasn't been a thread to us for…"
Nov 1
tjdavis favorited Doc Vega's blog post A Parallel Society May be the only Plausible Solution to the Division in the US
Oct 31

© 2024   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2019 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted