PEOPLE ARE GOING TO CALL YOU IGNORANT AND A CONSPIRATOR FOR REFUSING A VACCINE SOME SIMPLE FACTS, STATS THAT'LL ILLUMINATE HOW INSANE AN MRNA VACCINE BROUGHT 2 MARKET IN 6 MONTHS REALLY IS

SOURCE: REDDIT

FRIENDS, FAMILY AND COWORKERS ARE GOING TO CALL YOU CRAZY, IGNORANT AND A CONSPIRACIST FOR REFUSING A VACCINE. HERE ARE SOME VERY SIMPLE FACTS AND STATS THAT WILL ILLUMINATE JUST HOW INSANE AN MRNA VACCINE BROUGHT TO MARKET IN SIX MONTHS REALLY IS...

SS: I wanted to keep this brief and digestible, as speaking of eugenics in Africa, the possibility of reproductive augmentation, the Gates agenda and so on is simply going to make normal individuals run for the hills. Here are some quick bullet points direct from government scientist that show how asinine this push is:

The average time for a vaccine to go from inception and funding to market is 10.7 years. The Covid vaccine has achieved this in 7 months.

The average rate of a vaccine ever successfully reaching market is 7%.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3603987/

The flu vaccine - one of the most studied and well funded in the history of science has an effective protection rate of 40-60% annually. The Covid vaccines are claiming over 95% effective. This stretches the bounds of credulity.

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/vaccines-work/vaccineeffect.htm

The previous record for a vaccine being developed was 4 years for the mumps vaccine. Mumps was a well studied and understood medical condition long before vaccine research began. It was not a new, novel virus with unknown origins.

I could go on, but these are facts I have used to have these discussions that are succinct and well supported. Additionally, I believe they do a good job of providing a groundwork to make anyone with a bit of critical thinking capability to question the information we are being given.

The time will come for all of us to draw a line in the sand and say, no, this is where my consent ends. The question may well become, what are you willing to sacrifice to not fall in line and go along to get along.

Maybe this will prove helpful for someone.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE...

Favorite

3 members favorited this

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

Comment by Chris of the family Masters on December 11, 2020 at 2:10am: Any communication with vaccinators should have a heading"Nuremberg Protocols" on top.

Comment by Parrhesia on December 9, 2020 at 3:21pm: They claim the vaccine is 95% effective (The measure of success for these studies is if they reduce symptoms in symptomatic people by at least 30%.) when the CDC shows a 95-99+% of survival without a vaccine. How does it make sense to take a vax? In addition:

"None of the trials currently under way are designed to detect a reduction in any serious outcome such as hospital admissions, use of intensive care, or deaths. Nor are the vaccines being studied to determine whether they can interrupt transmission of the virus.

Severe illness requiring hospital admission, which happens in only a small fraction of symptomatic covid-19 cases. Data published by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in late April reported a symptomatic case hospitalisation ratio of 3.4% overall, varying from 1.7% in 0-49 year olds and 4.5% in 50-64 year olds to 7.4% in those 65 and over. Because most people with symptomatic covid-19 experience only mild symptoms. Hospital admissions and deaths from covid-19 are simply too uncommon in the population being studied for an effective vaccine to demonstrate statistically significant differences in a trial of 30 000 people. The same is true of its ability to save lives or prevent transmission: the trials are not designed to find out." https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4037

It does not keep you from getting COVID, it doesn't stop transmission, it offers no better survival rate. In fact here's the FDA's adverse event list.

FDA Safety Surveillance of COVID-19 Vaccines : DRAFT Working list of possible adverse event outcomes ***Subject to change***

 Guillain-Barré syndrome

 Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis

 Transverse myelitis

 Encephalitis/myelitis/encephalomyelitis/ meningoencephalitis/meningitis/ encepholapathy

 Convulsions/seizures

 Stroke

 Narcolepsy and cataplexy

 Anaphylaxis

 Acute myocardial infarction

 Myocarditis/pericarditis

 Autoimmune disease

 Deaths

 Pregnancy and birth outcomes

 Other acute demyelinating diseases

 Non-anaphylactic allergic reactions

 Thrombocytopenia

 Disseminated intravascular coagulation

 Venous thromboembolism

 Arthritis and arthralgia/joint pain

 Kawasaki disease

 Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children

 Vaccine enhanced disease

https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download

Plus Big Pharma has absolutely no liability for the consequences, so what incentive do they have to make sure it's safe? The goodness of their hearts? One is ignorant if they believe that's true.