Pilot Gives Sworn Testimony That No Planes Hit The Twin Towers

Ex-CIA Pilot Gives Sworn Testimony That No Planes Hit The Twin Towers

US Will Have To Rebut Or Accept Statement As Truth

By: Ron Baitley-Simens

on 5th March 2014 @ 7.15pm

Share on facebook Share on tumblr Share on email More Sharing Services 452

http://neonnettle.com/news/211-ex-cia-pilot-gives-sworn-testimony-t...

A former CIA and civilian pilot has sworn an affidavit, stating that no planes flew into the Twin Towers as it would have been physically impossible.

John Lear, the son of Learjet inventor, Bill Lear, has given his expert evidence that it would have been physically impossible for Boeing 767s, like Flights AA11 and UA175 to have hit the Twin Towers on 9/11, particularly when flown by inexperienced pilots:

‘No Boeing 767 airliners hit the Twin Towers as fraudulently alleged by the government, media, NIST and its contractors’, he stated in the affidavit.

‘Such crashes did not occur because they are physically impossible as depicted, for the following reasons: in the case of UAL 175 going into the south tower, a real Boeing 767 would have begun 'telescoping' when the nose hit the 14 inch steel columns which are 39 inches on center.

‘The vertical and horizontal tail would have instantaneously separated from the aircraft, hit the steel box columns and fallen to the ground.

‘The engines when impacting the steel columns would havemaintained their general shape and either fallen to the ground or been recovered in the debris of the collapsed building.

‘No Boeing 767 could attain a speed of 540 mph at 1000 feet above sea level ‘parasite drag doubles with velocity’ and ‘parasite power’ cubes with velocity.

The fan portion of the engine is not designed to accept the volume of dense air at that altitude and speed.
The piece of alleged external fuselage containing 3 or 4 window cutouts is inconsistent with an airplane that hit 14 inch steel box columns, placed at over 500 mph. It would have crumpled.
No significant part of the Boeing 767 or engine could have penetrated the 14 inch steel columns and 37 feet beyond the massive core of the tower without part of it falling to the ground.

‘The debris of the collapse should have contained massive sections of the Boeing 767, including 3 engine cores weighing approximately 9000 pounds apiece which could not have been hidden. Yet there is no evidence of any of these massive structural components from either 767 at the WTC. Such complete disappearance of 767s is impossible.

The affidavit, dated 28^th January 2014 is part of a law suit being pursued by Morgan Reynolds in the United States District Court, Southern District, New York.

In March 2007, Reynolds, a former chief economist under the George W Bush administration filed a Request For Correction with the US National Institute of Science and Technology citing his belief that real commercial jets (Boeings) did not hit the WTC towers.

Although the 9/11 Truth movement initially rejected the ‘no-planes’ theory as too outlandish, after scientific and rational analysis, it has become a widely accepted explanation of the evidence collected.

Unlike any other form of statement, an affidavit becomes truth in law, if it is not rebutted. It will now be up to critics of the theory to present their evidence and analysis to rebut the statement point by point. If they do not – or cannot – then the US government will be obliged to admit that the account given by the 9/11 Commission is wrong.

The 65 year old retired airline captain and former CIA pilot – who has over 19,000 hours of flight time -- also drew attention to the inexperience of the pilots who allegedly flew the planes:

‘The alleged 'controlled' descent into New York on a relatively straight course by a novice pilot in unlikely in the extreme because of the difficulty of controlling heading, descent rate and descent speed within the parameters of 'controlled' flight.

‘It takes a highly skilled pilot to interpret the "EFIS" (Electronic Flight Instrument Display) display, with which none of the hijacker pilots would have been familiar or received training on, and use his controls, including the ailerons, rudder, elevators, spoilers and throttles to effect, control and maintain a descent.

http://neonnettle.com/news/211-ex-cia-pilot-gives-sworn-testimony-t...

Favorite

6 members favorited this

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

Comment by Garry Best on March 14, 2014 at 1:48am

Here's something for all. Humour!

----- Original Message -----

From: Doug St Just

To: Allan Beardsley ; Barry Meynell ; Blair St Just ; Cherie's st just ; Dave Glentworh ; John Jamieson ; John Hancock ; john.d.esch@clear.net.nz ; Ken St Just ; Lynlee Pegg ; Marilyn St Just ; Paul Holmes ; Steve Lister ; Tablet

Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 12:02 PM

Subject: Fw: STUDENT WHO OBTAINED 0% ON AN EXAM

Subject: FW: STUDENT WHO OBTAINED 0% ON AN EXAM

STUDENT WHO OBTAINED 0% ON AN EXAM
I would have given him 100% for his wit!!!

Q1. In which battle did Napoleon die? * his last battle

Q2. Where was the Declaration of Independence signed? * at the bottom of the page

Q3. River Ravi flows in which state? * liquid

Q4. What is the main reason for divorce? * marriage

Q5. What is the main reason for failure? * exams

Q6. What can you never eat for breakfast? * Lunch & dinner

Q7. What looks like half an apple? * The other half

Q8. If you throw a red stone into the blue sea what it will become? * It will simply become wet

Q9. How can a man go eight days without sleeping ? * No problem, he sleeps at night.

Q10. How can you lift an elephant with one hand? * You will never find an elephant that has only one hand..

Q11. If you had three apples and four oranges in one hand and four apples and three oranges in other hand, what would you have ? * Very large hands

Q12. If it took eight men ten hours to build a wall, how long would it take four men to build it? * No time at all, the wall is already built.

Q13. How can u drop a raw egg onto a concrete floor without cracking it? *Any way you want, concrete floors are very hard to crack.

Comment by Garry Best on March 14, 2014 at 1:17am: NWO. Throw an egg against a wall. Egg smashes.

Throw a wall at an egg. Egg smashes.

Throw it slow (same)

Throw it fast ( same)

400 ton of plane cannot compete with 200,000 ton of static building. That's not my idea. That's physics.

Comment by Garry Best on March 14, 2014 at 1:03am: Glad to see you agree with what i have TRIED to say. Cheers Honest

Comment by Garry Best on March 14, 2014 at 12:39am: Can you explain hoe a plane can disapear into a building.

Comment by Garry Best on March 14, 2014 at 12:32am: Where was picture taken. Not 911. And yes.

Comment by Garry Best on March 14, 2014 at 12:27am: NWO? Oh shit. New World Order. Yes, I do have eyes.

You ask a lot of questions and don't really have any idea on the physics of this.

Comment by Garry Best on March 14, 2014 at 12:20am: Did it go right through the concrete. We can see a chair.

Comment by Garry Best on March 14, 2014 at 12:16am: Your on to it Spyda. This building came down with WTC7. For the same reason. From the bottom. Not the top.

All is revealed in Dimitri's book and video. Controlled demo with nuclear bombs.

Now that may have put the cat with the pigeons.

Comment by Spydaman13 on March 13, 2014 at 11:34pm: some good pics of WTC 6 here...he also mentions the space shuttle Columbia and how they recovered 80,000 parts from it and compares it to the lack there of with Flight 93 in Pennsylvania. To date, no serial number matching part has been recovered from any of the supposed planes. Cheer Gary!

Comment by Garry Best on March 13, 2014 at 10:28pm: Multiple networks covered the whole thing, with a 17 second delay. Most, supposedly live footage was doctored. Suppossedly helicopter pictures that are impossible. Oh shit the whole thing was orchastrated. BBC reported WTC 7 coming down 20 minutes before it happened. What a fuck up. And we all know it was a controlled demo job. BUT here's another question I'd like to ask. Why was WTC 6 gutted? No so called plane hit that building. Please look at photos of WTC 6. Then tell me why, what, whenever.