If your too busy I do appreciate that and I’ll not want to keep you from anything important.



All I want to discuss is an idea on how to protect our children and If I tend to prattle on or state the obvious to you I do apologize in advance but people need to see a fundamental flaw in our communities. Let us make one thing crystal clear; I am not against interference in a social environment by lawful and legal instruments if it is proven that a need is being fulfilled, my argument is that there must be clear accountability and transparency in all parts of the process. I am not alone in stating this is not in evidence in our child protection services, I will state that many good people will be in that system. For them however to be party to, even by association, to any form of abuse of power is unacceptable.


Our foundation is Common Law, we CAN lawfully refute being governed by the establishment’s statutory rules of the Law Society, of which we are not members. Nor the legislation based on the rules of their society, utilized by their revenue collectors as we are not required consent to it and we are after all governed by consent.

However it is our government and Legal professions that require that we do so or in fact they have no authority over us


A little information on how this is accomplished:

In our two-tier legal system when a parent(s) fills out that form to register their child’s birth they are actually doing a lot more. It’s all in the wording you SUBMIT an APPLICATION to REGISTER the BIRTH.

Break that down, (from Black’s law dictionary).

• SUBMITION – to surrender, be deferential to,
• APPLICATION – to plead, petition, beg,
• REGISTRATION – to sign over for safe keep, to abandon,
• BIRTH – as in creation (not our idea of), or BERTH.



These are the twisted interpretation of English in Legalese (language of the law society), in effect we consent to begging the state’s permission to take our offspring into their care as wards of the state. What is created is the legal fiction, the PERSON, the titled capitalized version of your name you see on official documents. The BIRTH or BERTH is in fact creating a legal fiction functioning as a ship under maritime law and operating in commerce under regulation/legislation. The child now becomes the 3rd party agent of the legal fiction as stated on the birth certificate as the NAME and DOB which is necessary for the human being to be put under contract/joinder/power of the state’s statute based and legislative regulation, because a HUMAN BEING is actionable only be common law under witnesses affidavit of truth. The maxim in law, we are all equal before the law is thus circumvented as we are OPERATING in commerce under the FORCE of law.

There is of course much more to this i.e. a lot of money in it for the government if it remains as is. This is commercial law, only applicable by the consent of us and by mutual contract with the legal PERSON. A contract must be reciprocal and have full disclosure to both parties, were any parents told they were giving their offspring into perpetual economic slavery? I think not. The creation of the National Insurance number becomes both our employee number for the state and the reference of our security (bond) held in trust by the chancellor in the name of the human being or share owner of the corporation known as the United Kingdom Ltd.

What now has happened is that this legal person is unclaimed, a parent with full knowledge can claim (as trustee), the security of the child at registration (even though they make it exceptionally difficult). Problem is, they are not informed, and that is fraud on a grand scale. The greatest fraud the modern world has ever seen. If the “child” does not affirm its status as a living human being before age 8, the legal fictional PERSON is legally classified as “dead”. As such can be classified as property and can now be subject to maritime salvage laws, used by the state to claim said property.

Very few people can even comprehend this, let alone know they UNDERSTAND or STAND UNDER it by default (see the play on words). Most will reject it simply because they don’t want to believe it and will refuse to research it for themselves. I certainly never read my PERSON’s obituary, did you?

This is where your fathers in particular lose out, as the children are made wards of the state the state becomes the perennial father, followed by mother and lastly father. We are now and always will be considered children in this limited liability system, constant submission and application (asking permission) to do almost anything keeps us there. This is the child snatchers greatest tool, peoples’ ignorance of their inalienable rights.

I have been researching this for a while now, I’ve come across people who are unwilling or afraid to discuss it. I have heard of people who have done a process similar and it has not worked and they were sucked into the secret courts and gagged. One need's to know all the information and comprehend it with due diligence if you are do this and cut the state out of any claim to our children and thus even the field.


Our reading/intuition suggested the following:

• A trust is set up in the name of the child
• An annuity is issued and placed with the bank of England to cover the expenses of the child through its life in the bankruptcy
• The grantor is the informant, i.e. YOU
• The trustee is the government, most likely the Chancellor
• The entitled beneficiary is the child which is lost on the sea of commerce
• After 8 years (8th birthday) the child is declared dead, & beneficiary is declared to be the national debt fund via the comptroller and auditor general
• And we then go through life not knowing about it so they reap the benefits.

So here is how we see the remedy:

• As grantor you can nominate yourself as trustee, thereby reclaiming legal title by expressing the trust
• You can nominate your child as the one with beneficial entitlement
• You declare your child alive and reclaim the beneficial entitlement to the annuity for them


Further investigation is still needed, potentially a family trust is the beginning of our remedy. It’s the legality of the annuity that has us quibbling, the point of the bond or security is supposedly for the good of the Society as a whole (even if our governments don’t practice what they preach). This is where we need to be careful, the security is for services and quality/standard of living, it must not be for personal profit or investment. This is why we can lawfully access the security when we accept a bill of exchange for value against the security held for us in trust. This is a very strong and wealthy country, the people as well as its resources make it valuable and we are all, every one of us, share OWNERS and all I’m proposing is returning us to the status of share HOLDERS. A right we have incrementally lost over the years.


I see this as the ultimate protection for our children, lifetime security, defended against those disguised as child protection workers and government officials who would use them for profit and power. Imagine every living breathing human being as a shareholder, ultimate government accountability, government as the servants to the people and not rulers of the people as it always should have been.

And of course this is applicable under ANY common law jurisdiction i.e. the commonwealth (it’s even in the name for all to see).


* Now to an additional point. Has anyone ever considered the legalities involved in forced adoption?


Those facts are that forced adoption has become big business, reports are fabricated/made, impartial "expert" testimony, investigative expenses, administration, warehousing the children to suitably mess them up, costs on virtually everything and let’s not forget those targeted bonuses. Targets for forced adoption which debatably were "officially" removed after an outcry from the public. This must be incredibly wasteful of resources and manpower, so how can it possibly be productive enough that it has grown to such a degree when crime rates have not risen in proportion? The fact of the matter is that official figures put the number of abuse accusations from social workers about abuse at over 53% of the total. The majority of these being potential "emotional" abuse which at present has no clear legal definition but have increased by over 125%. How about unofficially? Paid informants perhaps, all informants identities are of course kept private.

Also telling is that legislation is being put in place now to make this legal, in the guise of course that they must protect the whistleblowers and the children.


Check out some of the statistics for yourself, it's not pleasant reading.


MP John Hemming : http://john.hemming.name/national/familylaw/2007adoptionfigures.html

England : http://www.baaf.org.uk/info/stats/england.shtml

Scotland : http://www.baaf.org.uk/info/financial/scotland.shtml


Finally, another individual of similar intent put forward a theory (thanks Hope), just a theory, but in its simplicity it fits the current facts.

To remove the child the SS, (I refuse to call then child protection), MUST create joinder/contract with the legal guardian(s). Again this is usually done through bullying, intimidation, coercion, misdirection, outright deceit etc, but no matter what there must be consent, even by a seemingly tacit agreement to a "fact" presented. Now as I mentioned earlier, the birth certificate is a physical instrument of the security floated in the child's PERSON, the two are linked, stated on that document is the legal guardian(s).

So after an adoption, how is it illegal to EVER be able to reverse this decision? Or until the child reaches their majority and decides to find the parents themselves.

The theory we have is that the PERSON has already been declared legally dead anyway, they remove the PERSON from the human being and create a new one. This new PERSON must have a security floated in the limited liability system. So what could have happened to the original security? The ultimate cash cow people, slave trading's new face, big business after all and if we are right the only loss is to a growing national debt. These funds would be funnelled away into other markets to purchase real physical assets.

Now we come to the real big one, ever heard of the PRISONER BOND? (thanks to Musashi) These have a separate securities domain in which they are bought and sold.

This is significantly more valuable than your own bond/security, why else would huge companies like Serco want to take on private prisons, they are extremely profitable. Is it really such a stretch to see these forced adoptions as a form of imprisonment?

Musashi suggested I look into CUSIP Global Services to start, so I did and guess what I found. CGS is the U.S. National Numbering Agency and has agents in countries such as Canada, Bermuda, The Cayman Islands and Jamaica.

One of their uses is safekeeping of corporate assets...
"to accurately identify and track financial instruments that are being held on behalf of institutions and investors."


In this I admit to being out of my depth, today. Tomorrow...


"The truth will out."

William Shakespeare