The End of Entropy: A Look at Our Entropic World and the Evidence Supporting How We Could Change This

The End of Entropy:

A Look at Our Entropic World and the Evidence Supporting How We Could Change This

by Amaterasu Solar

Entropy… That measure of disorder that increases as energy is dissipated into unusable forms effects many aspects of our present human condition. It is easy to grasp the principle as it pertains directly to heat. We see the energy of a fire heat our food, but we also can see a great deal of heat going out unused and unusable. This extra heat can be seen as increasing the disorder, as the molecules affected move more rapidly and more disorderedly. A more difficult aspect to see is the entropy inherent in our social structure.

In Jeremy Rifkin’s seminal work Entropy, published in 1980, he does an excellent job of demonstrating that, because energy is at the base of life, itself, entropy can ripple through society, creating disorder even as we try to clamp down and control the order of things. In fact, he paints a very grim picture of what we can expect as we consume more and more energy, explaining that fascist tendencies are most likely to crop up in the efforts to overcome entropy in our society. Today we see more and more signs of encroaching fascism.

The reason why energy and its entropy are tied in to our social structures is made clear by Rifkin in his work (p. 89):

… Every time we add our labor to a product or perform a service we expend energy and increase the overall entropy of the environment. Every time we exchange money for a product or a service, the legal tender we use represents payment for previous energy that we expend. Money, after all, is nothing more than stored energy credits.

If money is merely the accounting of the available energy, it becomes clear that should an energy source come along that has the properties of being effectively infinite, available from anywhere, and negentropic (from “negative entropy”), the need for money dissipates. “Infinite money” has no social application.

In fact, because of our limited available energy and the money system developed to account for it, it is clear why we have a “power” elite, as well as poverty and exploitation. Rifkin explains (p. 57):

Energy is the basis of human culture, just as it is the basis of life. Therefore, power in every society ultimately belongs to whoever controls the exosomatic [external] instruments that are used to transform, exchange, and discard energy. Class divisions, exploitations, privilege, and poverty are all determined by how a society’s energy flow line is set up. Those who control the exosomatic instruments control the energy flow line. They determine how the work in society will be divided up and how the economic rewards will be allocated among various groups and constituencies.

Given this, it becomes clear that if such an infinite, available, negentropic source of energy were to be introduced, power over others would give way to individual autonomous power over self but no others. This can be seen as a major shift in Consciousness on this planet.

This all sounds hypothetical, a waste of time to contemplate even, to the average individual who has been told that we are stuck with the many entropic sources of energy we presently use (which also are sources we have to pay for). “Where is this miracle source?” they might ask.

And here is where I bring up the “Dark” Energy that is now heralded all over science shows about physics and cosmology. This energy, which has been called “radiant energy” and “cosmic rays” (Tesla), “orgone” (Wilhelm Reich), “Zero Point Energy,” and many others, is pervading space. It is within you and within me, around all of us, and is present anywhere we go. Interestingly, though we are told of this energy (usually as “Dark” Energy), no mainstream media (MSM) outlet has asked the most logical question: Can we extract this energy in usable form?

In fact, back in the 1950’s, the science of electrogravitics was being discussed openly in the aerospace literature, an industry that was studying electrogravitics at all the major players: Martin, Convair, Lear, Raytheon, Sperry, and many others. The discussion vanished in the latter part of that decade; it just wasn’t discussed anymore, despite the fact that so many companies had been drawn into the electrogravitics arena. Reports were that, “They want it secret for now.” Electrogravitics could draw on this energy and create overunity – free energy, in other words. So why was this a threat?

The reasons for these occurrences – that the media never ask if we can draw on the Dark Energy, that electrogravitics became highly classified – become clear when we look at the fact that those presently in power would have to give up their power over others (having already power over themselves). From the perspective of those few, they would “lose.”

Such an energy source would represent, at least, a virtually infinite source that is available to all. Any attribution of a negentropic aspect comes from reports from a number of sources suggesting that cold, not heat, is the defining characteristic of drawing on this source. These reports and the surrounding research and data have surely been suppressed – at least to the extent of not reporting on it and never, ever asking whether we can get something usable from “Dark” Energy. It would be a naïve position at best to expect the present power elite to ignore and NOT suppress and disparage any efforts to develop this source in usable form.

And so, it would appear that we have had methods of extracting usable forms of energy from the “Dark” Energy pool, called the plenum (opposite of “vacuum,” from a root which means “empty” – “plenum” means “full”) for at least 100 years (Tesla seems to have developed such methods). And we might conclude that the power elite wish to remain in their place of power over others, else they would have released the means to extract usable energy to the public. (There is strong evidence of suppression of many “free” energy devices, from hydrogen-from-water devices through magnetic devices, as well as the Plenum Energy methods.)

The question now becomes, what would happen if we had this energy available to all of us? The answer depends on how we, as a planetary society, approach the matter.

Since we’re examining society, it helps to understand that it moves and emerges in fractal expressions from a relatively small seed set of parameters. Up until now, the fractal seeds of all societies in history have included scarcity of energy (which is reflected in the scarcity of goods and money), and thus we see emerging greed, conspiracy, poverty, power elite, wage slavery and many other ills. If we look for a seed that gives an overarching structure for a society’s development in the advent of having such a source of energy available, and take advantage of what media we can to raise awareness to the tipping point of the goals and precepts we define, the society that fractalizes out of that seed will be strong, healthy, and unrestrictive – provided the seed is geared to that end.

The key things that must be addressed are:

A code of conduct
Our approach to the Earth and how we bring forth the abundance she has to give
How open we will be on code and programs for our machines
How necessary work gets done
How we communicate and identify the primary issues
What focus in life should be stressed

If we seed our society with a code of conduct, calling to the fore the three Laws – which are:

Do not willfully harm or kill another Being
Do not willfully take or damage another Being’s property
Do not willfully defraud another Being

this sets one parameter of the seed to ethics.

If we insist that all farming be organic – in its true sense, and not some trumped up legal definition – our food will grow ever better. If we insist that mining is done with a conscious awareness for retaining beauty and structure, our impact will be small and repairable. If we insist that manufacturing be done such that it is free of pollutants, our planet will remain healthy and abundant. If we are using the Plenum Energy, the energy we use will be clean (and fracture drilling, oil pumping, coal mining, rain forest clearing and other nasty behaviors and consequences associated with petrofuels will be eliminated). If we set this parameter of the seed with the drive to be thoughtful of our planet, our planet will thrive.

If we demand open-source in all technology, we remove fears of machines “taking over.” Code can be looked at, published on the web – and better code will be worked out by those whose bliss it is to program things. A distrust of proprietary code (or any other hidden thing) should be promoted. Such a setting in this parameter of the seed will bring forth the best we can create.

By creating robots to do all the necessary work no one (or not enough people) wants to, we release ourselves to do what we enjoy – we are released from slavery, having cast it off onto our machines. This seed parameter is one only now available to humanity. Never before in our history have we had the option to create mechanical slaves for every “dirty job.” Therefore, it, along with the addition of a negentropic energy source, will provide a frame for unique emergence, a new societal framework, a new consciousness.

With a central website, in forum style, to address major issues – divided into local sections, regional sections and global sections, with “votes” at a certain level elevating the problems and solutions to the next level to be voted on by a greater number – we can collectively coordinate to solve the issues of this planet. Social responsibility will be seen as spending 15 minutes a day (or more) reviewing the issues on this site. This seed parameter will see an emergence of human unity as a race and as a planet.

Setting a focus of fulfilling one’s own bliss, exchanging the “work ethic” for a Betterment Ethic, will see very much happier people, and far better results of efforts made – a job is done far better by someone who loves to do it than by one who feels compelled against their main desire. No job will be required to live well, but any job one wants to do is open to be done. I quote again from Rifkin’s Entropy (p. 210) to illustrate the differences between the scarcity paradigm and the new abundance paradigm, as it relates to work:

… [T]he authoritarian structure of the workplace robs the individual worker of a chance to join in a community with his fellows to make decisions and develop his talents. Unable to join with others to explore his potential and creativity, the individual is forced to retreat into a shell in which he has neither meaningful rights nor responsibilities at his work. All he is left with is a job, a place to make money, and a degrading environment to which he must submit, eight hours of every day.

Thus we can see how a seed parameter of encouraging one to follow one’s bliss – since in this new paradigm one can – uplifts each one of us and increases the value of consciousness in society.

Having described the seed, how might it be expected to manifest? One of the first products that is likely to be seen are “power boxes,” which will be sold, initially. These would be units that had a mechanism to draw on the Plenum Energy and outlets to plug in our air conditioners, stoves, heaters, refrigerators, freezers, and so forth. This would allow us to move anywhere and bring our comfort items with us. We could “go camping” and still have our amenities, and many will. Eventually these items will each have their own units within.

As the cost of energy is removed from the production line at every stage, things will become less and less expensive, and at some point, will be given freely.

Other observables will include:

Money falling into disuse
Motivation from the heart as opposed to profit
“Greed” becomes meaningless
Peace
Abundance for everyone
Elimination of corruption
Power over others supplanted by power over self
Elimination of GMO’s
Great reduction in violence
Creative pursuits increased greatly
A healed planet
Reduced or eliminated hoarding
Value placed on human-created art, textiles and products
Focus on cures, not patentable chemicals that sicken for profit motive
Human interaction with only those whose company is enjoyable (reduced social friction)
Robotic stewardship of the planet
Increased love and compassion
Greatly reduced stress
Wondrous works
“Live and let live” behavior
Most “laws” become unnecessary
Corporate power eliminated
Products made to last – no “planned obsolescence”
Waste reduced to virtually nil
Food nutrition increased for all
One’s reputation becomes the “coin” one uses
Personal responsibility for one’s own behavior
Spiritual growth
Slavery (outright or wage-slavery) abolished
Human dignity encouraged
Increase in charitable behavior
Self autonomy
Things are done because someone cares – from raising children to caring for others

From this list, it is clear that many issues we now face will be solved. Wealth will be measured in richness of character, rather than in deposits to a bank account. And we will spend our time doing what we like to do, being with the people we like and share interests with. Inventions, rather than being suppressed, will burgeon, and the “Star Trek universe” may be within our grasp, with things like transporters and replicators emerging.

And spiritual growth and communication will be encouraged as we find a greater amount of our time available to pursue the exploration of our inner dimension.

And though this is not a solution to every issue arising from human interaction – we will always have our personal disagreements – the overall health of society will skyrocket. Yes, we may still argue with others over the smaller issues in our lives, and some may choose to behave violently, but the numbers of occurrences will drop to a level we would consider statistically insignificant. Definitely a vast improvement over what we see today.

When you consider what I present here, ask yourself these questions:

Does this threaten a pet vision – passing laws, say, to solve a problem you see, or a view of striking it rich – that you have of your future? Does this scare you? Do you look for reasons that it won’t work? (All you envision as barrier issues – are scarcity paradigm views…)

Then ask yourself why working towards what I present here won’t solve the issue you want to solve, why you wouldn’t be rich in what I show to you, why it wouldn’t fulfill your idea of heaven, why you are afraid, and/or why you look for reasons it won’t work – rather than apply the proactive will to make this happen.

If we each choose to create this, since we have all it would take, consciously co-creating towards this goal, what I present would happen. It would take enough of us reaching a tipping point before it would all be downhill, and you may choose your future behavior. Speak for abundance, or reduce the chances that this will ever happen by keeping silent.

In closing, I recommend any who work for someone else and also are privy to information (such as methods of extracting usable energy from the plenum) give strong consideration to coming forth with what is known. In the end, you and all of us will be better off – and even today’s power elite will retain their life style, if not their power over us.

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

Comment by Amaterasu Solar on September 27, 2012 at 12:48pm: Thank You all so very much. My goal is to spread this - widely! All help is immensely appreciated!

Comment by Paul Jones on September 27, 2012 at 10:32am: I MEANT TO SAY: GRRRREAT WORK :)

Comment by Paul Jones on September 27, 2012 at 10:30am: HOW C O O L IS THAT !!! GREAT WORK - VERY VERY IMPRESSIVE :))) HAPPYHAPPYJOYJOY

Comment by Amaterasu Solar on July 17, 2012 at 2:05pm: Bless everyOne of You! All the more if You share this frequently in every way. Hotel Califacebook it. Tweet it. Email it. The first step in getting it to work is to reach the tipping point of awareness. And I surely cannot do it alone. [smile] (Special hugs to You, suzie - You know why. [smile])

Comment by suzie on July 17, 2012 at 1:28pm: hiya Amaterasu.. your so smart and loving ;)

Comment by honeygirl on July 17, 2012 at 1:21pm: Excellent Thank you and bless you Amaterasu Solar !

Comment by Amaterasu Solar on July 3, 2012 at 12:37am: The Strad: The Person to whom it belongs could keep it, give it to You, or You might have something S/He wants and do a trade. Nothing to stop a trade - just that exchange will not be REQUIRED to eat healthy and organic food, have appropriate and well-made clothing to wear, have a roof over Your head that suits Your tastes, and transportation.

Turns out We can create what materials We need. Back in the 1970's They transmuted lead to gold - a small amount, because the cost of the energy to create an ounce would have made that ounce cost a million (1970's) dollars. We will not be limited in scarce materials.

And though You may think "hardship" makes Us thrive, I can tell You that is not true. If it was, We would welcome being unemployed, homeless and penniless. What We THRIVE on is bliss - through doing what We LOVE to do, spending quality time with the Ones We love, and making contributions to the betterment of society.

And yes, Human creativity does not thrive with no incentive - but bliss is one HELL of a motivator. Do You know anyOne who slogs to a job They hate - or at least doesn't like much - who comes home to build models? Volunteer? Paint? Spend quality time with family? Tinker with something? It is not a wage/debt slave job that inspires Them - They only do THAT because otherwise They would have...hardship. It is the chance to do what They love to do. And We could spend ALL Our time following Our blisses, whatever they might be at any given moment.

As for Our music, coming out of a controlled, evil industry that TELLS Us what is "popular" - what can I say. The good stuff is NOT promoted. Once there is no money motive, music will spring fresh and new from the hearts of Those whose bliss it is to create music.

The robots will handle the mining and manufacturing. Those who LOVE to program and tinker with robots will "supervise" - because "supervision" will only be ensuring the robots know what to do. And those who love to be of service, earning social currency in the form of gratitude, thanks, lauds, name recognition, and Self satisfaction will handle and major issues, stigmergicly. When a problem affects People, Their bliss of the moment will tend to be finding a solution.

Autonomous AI... That is why all public works will be programmed open-source, and We can see what the process is doing. We really don't need to go AI for most drudgery. Just clever programs. And what We might need an AI for, there may be Humans whose bliss is to do whatever it is... If not, the problem will be solved stigmergicly and the BEST way - not the cheapest or most profitable.

No... No "handing over" to an AI...unless We see that as the BEST solution - and We will have good reason to if that's what We see.

I covered the "political model." A website, much like a forum, except there will be a page of new additions, and they will go on into an order based on "votes" or "stars" or "thumbs up" given by the readers. The more "votes" the higher on the list an issue gets.

There will be local, regional, continental perhaps, and global levels. Here's how it will work:

I have a problem I need solved. I go to the website, to My local section, and post the problem. Since (as I mentioned in the essay) social duty is to spend 15 minutes a day (at least) looking over what is posted, My community members will see it. They may show that They think it's a problem too by voting it up, show apathy for what I see as a problem by not voting, or vote it down, showing that They don't think it's a problem.

They may also post a solution suggestion. Any may "cheer" or "boo" the suggestion, or not do anything if They're apathetic.

Should a good solution be brought up, those who care will implement it, with leaders of the moment emerging and earning social currency as described above. Should not enough care, then it really isn't a problem. Should no suggestions come forth but it IS a problem, the problem will get enough votes to bump it up to the next level, allowing more minds to come up with solutions. More votes will push it higher still, if it is truly a problem and no solution has come forth, until the whole globe is working on the problem.

If it is truly a problem and the whole globe cannot find a solution... I guess Humanity is SOL. Somehow, I doubt We will encounter such a case. In fact... Rarely will problems reach the global level.

Now One is not limited to looking only at One's own area. One can look, vote and make suggestions in any location, allowing ideas to run smoothly through the whole.

I hope I addressed Your issues.

Comment by DTOM on July 2, 2012 at 8:54pm: You could have an automated infrastructure maching, milling, casting, forging, lasercutting, 3d-printing etc all manner of consumables, but there will always be material items where value is relative.

I could laserscan a Stradevarius violin in detail, and from that CAD/CAM a perfect replica, which could then be replicated in the utmost detail by present and coming advanced manfacturing techniques.

But what if I wanted an original, made by Anton Stradevarius' own hands?

There will always be items or raw materials, that due to their uniqueness or scarcity will intrinsically be seen to be of more value than mass produced and freely available items, and these will require a representive commodity exchange means.

Also, humans thrive on challenge and hardships, whether we like to admit it or not.

Human creativity does not thrive, when people have no incentive to do anything...that's pretty evident in the current world.

We only have to look at current society and the popular music that is derivative and totally unoriginal that is celebrated, and the now established trend for remakes and the apathetic acceptance of this by a public who now have access to all manner of information and knowledge, but actively choose to embrace unmitigated shit.

I would love a house in the middle of nowhere, running on free energy, with a workshop with all manner of machine tools, CNC, laser cutter, 3d printers etc

But who is going to supervise the mining and processing of raw materials?

I'm also distrustful of autonomous AI.

Say we hand over control of everything to some 'beneficial' AI, at some point it may start to come to some interesting descisions regarding its duties, position and how it conducts itself.

Equally, if this is not the case and humans are going to decide their own destiny, what political model do you percieve accompanying this vision of the future? Who makes the important decisions?

There is always going to be some creep/s who will do their best to engineer events that will permit them to act as overlords.

Comment by Amaterasu Solar on July 2, 2012 at 5:20pm: DTOM, that is because You're looking at it from a scarcity paradigm. If free energy runs robots to feed Us, clothe Us, house Us, who would We give money to? Meanwhile every One of Us can follow Our bliss: it may be solving problems (finding solutions), it may be curing Others, it may be writing music, it may be studying something, it may be teaching, it may be throwing parties, it may be climbing mountains, it may be blogging, it may be cooking for Others, it may be painting pictures, it may be writing novels, it may be traveling the planet(s), it may be caring for children, it may be researching, it may be gardening, it may be fishing, it may be designing buildings, it may be programming robots, it may be skiing, it may be archaeology, it may be directing plays, it may be acting, it may be singing, and so on and so on.

The reason any given couch potato is a couch potato is because that Person CANNOT AFFORD what They REALLY want to do. There may be a rare exception and someOne's bliss is being a couch potato, but They will be difficult to find.

Meanwhile, We are no longer debt slaves, and FAR happier than We are now. Any who break the three Laws will be dealt with pretty much as We deal with Them now...but there will be FAR fewer such crimes. Like maybe 1% of the willful hurting, killing, taking or damaging of Others' property, and defrauding as We see today. ANY crime will truly be sensational.

Thor, thank You so much. [smile]

Comment by thorfourwinds on July 2, 2012 at 1:03pm: Greetings:

A most amazing post!

Thank you for the eye-opener...

Peace Love Light

tfw

Liberty & Equality or Revolution

Twitter: EARTH AID CONCERT

Twitter: thorfourwinds

RSS

Welcome to
12160 Social Network

Sign Up
or Sign In

Or sign in with:

"Destroying the New World Order"

Latest Activity

Top News
·
Everything

Doc Vega posted a blog post

A Prelude to WW III ? It Seems There We Are Trailblazing Idiocy into More Blood and Destruction!

They're rolling out the 25th Amendment trying to stop Joe Biden from insanely thrusting the US in a…See More

4 hours ago

0 Comments 0 Favorites

Less Prone posted a video

Chris Langan - The Interview THEY Didn't Want You To See - CTMU [Full Version; Timestamps]

DW Description: Chris Langan is known to have the highest IQ in the world, somewhere between 195 and 210. To give you an idea of what this means, the average...

23 hours ago

0 Comments 0 Favorites

Doc Vega posted a blog post