Greetings Governor Brown (your gov name),

I am writing for the purpose of asking for public statements from the Governor, County Commissioners, all California Mayors, all California Sheriffs and Police Chief’s regarding the issue of your (and their) stand on the US Constitution and California Constitution, and the peoples rights as guaranteed under the uninfringeable (uninfringeable: unbreakable, sacrosanct, firm, unchallengeable, inviolate) Bill of Rights, versus the current federal government’s intention of disarming the American people, which is clearly in violation of the Supreme Law of the land.

The Preamble to the Bill of Rights shows that the sole purpose of the proposed amendments was to prevent the federal government from “misconstruing or abusing its powers.” To accomplish this, “further declaratory and restrictive clauses” were being proposed, voted upon, and then accepted. The amendments, which were adopted, placed additional restraints or limitations on the powers of the federal government to prevent that government from usurping its constitutional powers. Every clause of the Bill of Rights, without exception, is either a declaratory statement or a restrictive provision:

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

RESOLVED by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, two thirds of both Houses concurring, that the following Articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as amendments to the Constitution of the United States, all, or any of which Articles, when ratified by three fourths of the said Legislatures, to be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of the said Constitution; viz.

ARTICLES in addition to, and Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the Legislatures of the several States, pursuant to the fifth Article of the original Constitution.

“We the People” of the state of California ask that all the officials I have referenced above make a clear and convincing public statement by April 19th, 2013 regarding their stand in this matter.  Are you / they going to uphold the lawfully required and legally binding Oath of Office, or commit treason and betray their oath, their country, and their state?

The ability to recognize and defend oneself against a threat to life and freedom is most decidedly a sign of sanity, while the willingness to disarm a population so that only criminals have the guns is the same concept used in Hitler’s Germany, Stalinist Russian, China, and many other tyrant and nations demoncidic governments (Democide: The murder of any person or people by a government, including genocide, politicide, and mass murder). When the government is on the side of the traitors, domestic enemies, and criminals; it is time to take a hard look at whom those in office serve and what the lawfully required and legally binding Oath of Office means.

The Oath of Office directs everyone who takes it to support and defend the US Constitution against ALL enemies, domestic and foreign. The Constitution says that our right to bear arms and defend ourselves SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED (Infringe: actively break the terms of a law, agreement, etc). 

This “gun grab” is not about “gun control”, this is about “people control” with gun control being the excuse used to disarm and then enslave the American people.

“We the People” feel that the federal government has overplayed its hand to such an extent that the States and every County within them must stand up immediately and respond to this imminent threat as is required of them or be removed from office or the position they are currently occupying as 'no longer meeting the lawful requirements' of said office or position.

There are many unlawful laws, bills, oath breakers, acts of treason, etc that you as Governor (fill in name of the position beng sent to) of California have not stopped as per the assigned and sworn duty assigned to that position. Below is the Oath of office, a list of these duties, and the applicable laws that you and state Attorney General should have been enforcing, banning, or nullifying. Why haven't you?

Ca Constitution Art 20 Misc Subjects, Sec 3:

 "I, ______, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I WILL SUPPORT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AGAINST ALL ENEMIES, foreign and DOMESTIC; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties upon which I am about to enter.

 "And I DO FURTHER SWEAR (or affirm) THAT I DO NOT ADVOCATE, NOR AM I A MEMBER OF ANY PARTY OR ORGANIZATION, POLITICAL OR OTHER-WISE, THAT NOW ADVOCATES THE OVERTHROW OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OR OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA BY force or violence OR OTHER UNLAWFUL MEANS; THAT WITHIN THE FIVE YEARS IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING THE TAKING OF THIS OATH (or affirmation) I HAVE NOT BEEN A MEMBER OF ANY PARTY OR ORGANIZATION, POLITICAL OR OTHER-WISE, THAT ADVOCATED THE OVERTHROW OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OR OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA BY force or violence OR OTHER UNLAWFUL MEANS EXCEPT AS FOLLOWS:

     ________________________________________________________________

(If no affiliations, write in the words "No Exceptions") and that during such time as I hold the office of ______________________________________________ I WILL NOT ADVOCATE NOT BECOME (name of office) A MEMBER OF ANY PARTY OR ORGANIZATION, political or otherwise, THAT ADVOCATES THE OVERTHROW OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OR OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA BY force or violence or OTHER UNLAWFUL MEANS."

“We the People” believe in the US Constitution as the Supreme law of this nation, and that all laws, bills, amendments, etc that are in “pursuance thereof” to be supreme if from an assigned duty of the federal government; otherwise the supremacy of States and the People stand firm (which created the federal Government to have limited power, and can certainly stand together against lawless behavior by the feds). We believe that the current abuses at every level by the federal gov requires a prompt and clear response which clarifies that no president, no congress or senate, no supreme justice, nor any who work within the three branches, no federal bureaucracy can take away the right of the people to bear arms and to defend themselves, or any of the other (not all listed as made clear in the 9th Amendment) natural, God given Rights.

Moreover, the power of the States to nullify the overbearing federal government is clear, and the necessity for the states to begin to utilize that power right now is overwhelming. Will we wait until the government uses extreme military force against us? Will we stand idly by as they come for our guns and then our food? More importantly, will you participate in this gun grab? Even those in the belly of the beast in New York are already standing up against this. Where do you stand? Are you Molon Labe Officers of the County? (Molon Labe means “Come And Take It!” Or are you “Bend Over and take It” as said in New York? “We the People” want to know where you stand on our legitimate government and against the gun grab which is really all about controlling the populace who YOU were elected or put into position to represent and defend.

As said in a letter by Professional Soldiers

http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=40772

Protecting the Second Amendment – Why all Americans Should Be Concerned

“We are current or former Army Reserve, National Guard, and active duty US Army Special Forces soldiers (Green Berets). We have all taken an oath to “...support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same.…” The Constitution of the United States is without a doubt the single greatest document in the history of mankind, codifying the fundamental principle of governmental power and authority being derived from and granted through the consent of the governed. Our Constitution established a system of governance that preserves, protects, and holds sacrosanct the individual rights and primacy of the governed as well as providing for the explicit protection of the governed from governmental tyranny and/or oppression. We have witnessed the insidious and iniquitous effects of tyranny and oppression on people all over the world. We and our forebears have embodied and personified our organizational motto, De Oppresso Liber [To Free the Oppressed], for more than a half century as we have fought, shed blood, and died in the pursuit of freedom for the oppressed.

First, we need to set the record straight on a few things. The current debate is over so-called “assault weapons” and high capacity magazines. The terms "assault weapon" and "assault rifle" are often confused. According to Bruce H. Kobayashi and Joseph E. Olson, writing in the Stanford Law and Policy Review, “Prior to 1989, the term ‘assault weapon’ did not exist in the lexicon of firearms. It is a political term [underline added for emphasis], developed by anti-gun publicists to expand the category of assault rifles.” …

Are there unintended consequences to stricter gun control laws and the politically expedient path that we have started down?

In a recent op-ed piece in the San Francisco Chronicle, Brett Joshpe stated that “Gun advocates will be hard-pressed to explain why the average American citizen needs an assault weapon with a high-capacity magazine other than for recreational purposes.” We agree with Kevin D. Williamson (National Review Online, December 28, 2012): “The problem with this argument is that there is no legitimate exception to the Second Amendment right that excludes military-style weapons, because military-style weapons are precisely what the Second Amendment guarantees our right to keep and bear.”

“The purpose of the Second Amendment is to secure our ability to oppose enemies foreign and domestic, a guarantee against disorder and tyranny. Consider the words of Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story”: ‘The importance of this article will scarcely be doubted by any persons, who have duly reflected upon the subject. The militia is the natural defense of a free country against sudden foreign invasions, domestic insurrections, and domestic usurpations of power by rulers. It is against sound policy for a free people to keep up large military establishments and standing armies in time of peace, both from the enormous expenses, with which they are attended, and the facile means, which they afford to ambitious and unprincipled rulers, to subvert the government, or trample upon the rights of the people. The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them.’

The Second Amendment has been ruled to specifically extend to firearms “in common use” by the military by the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in U.S. v Miller (1939). In Printz v U.S. (1997) Justice Thomas wrote: “In Miller we determined that the Second Amendment did not guarantee a citizen’s right to possess a sawed-off shot gun because that weapon had not been shown to be “ordinary military equipment” that could “could contribute to the common defense”.

A citizen’s right to keep and bear arms for personal defense unconnected with service in a militia has been reaffirmed in the U.S. Supreme Court decision (District of Columbia, et al. v Heller, 2008). The Court Justice Scalia wrote in the majority opinion: “The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.” Justice Scalia went on to define a militia as “… comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense ….”

“The Anti-Federalists feared that the Federal Government would disarm the people in order to disable this citizens’ militia, enabling a politicized standing army or a select militia to rule. The response was to deny Congress power to abridge the ancient right of individuals to keep and bear arms, so that the ideal of a citizens’ militia would be preserved.,” he explained.

On September 13, 1994, the Federal Assault Weapons Ban went into effect. A Washington Post editorial published two days later was candid about the ban's real purpose: “No one should have any illusions about what was accomplished [by the ban]. Assault weapons play a part in only a small percentage of crime. The provision is mainly symbolic; its virtue will be if it turns out to be, as hoped, a stepping stone to broader gun control.”

In a challenge to the authority of the Federal government to require State and Local Law Enforcement to enforce Federal Law (Printz v United States) the U.S. Supreme Court rendered a decision in 1997. For the majority opinion Justice Scalia wrote: "…. this Court never has sanctioned explicitly a federal command to the States to promulgate and enforce laws and regulations When we were at last confronted squarely with a federal statute that unambiguously required the States to enact or administer a federal regulatory program, our decision should have come as no surprise….. It is an essential attribute of the States' retained sovereignty that they remain independent and autonomous within their proper sphere of authority.”…

Throughout history, disarming the populace has always preceded tyrants’ accession of power. Hitler, Stalin, and Mao all disarmed their citizens prior to installing their murderous regimes. At the beginning of our own nation’s revolution, one of the first moves made by the British government was an attempt to disarm our citizens. When our Founding Fathers ensured that the 2nd Amendment was made a part of our Constitution, they were not just wasting ink. They were acting to ensure our present security was never forcibly endangered by tyrants, foreign or domestic…

This is our country, these are our rights. We believe that it is time that we take personal responsibility for our choices and actions rather than abdicate that responsibility to someone else under the illusion that we have done something that will make us all safer. We have a responsibility to stand by our principles and act in accordance with them. Our children are watching and they will follow the example we set.

The undersigned Quiet Professionals hereby humbly stand ever present, ever ready, and ever vigilant.

1100 Green Berets Signed this Letter

We have a list of all their names and unlike any MSM outlets we can confirm that over 1100 Green Berets did sign. The list includes Special Forces Major Generals & Special Forces Command Sergeants Major down to the lowest ranking "Green Beret".

The letter stands for itself.

Read it and send it everywhere.

Team Sergeant’

End Of Letter.

From the Veterans of Foreign Wars:

“Whereas it has been proposed that the United States of America become a part of a world federal government;

And ... this program...would entail the surrender of our national sovereignty and... bring into being a form of government whose authority would supercede that of the Constitution of The United States Government;

And ... institute a system of laws where-by American citizens could be tried by aliens in controversion of the provisions of the Constitution of the United States;

And ... the Veterans of Foreign Wars is composed solely of men who have worn the uniform of the United States on foreign shores and in hostile waters in time of war and from their personal experiences are familiar with the traditions and operations of other countries;

And ... many of our comrades rest forever in foreign soil and their sacrifices were made to retain the dignity and sovereignty of the United States of America:

Now therefore, be it Resolved by the Fiftieth Annual Convention of the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States, That we hereby declare that we are unalterably opposed to any program which would entail the surrender of any part of the sovereignty of the United States of America in favor of a world government...”

Veterans of Foreign Wars

END.

Multiple Sheriffs in the state of California and throughout the USA have also said that they will NOT enforce this unlawful action, that they will defend the people as they were elected and took a lawfully required and legally binding oath to do so.

Nationwide the American people have been quietly gearing up for an attack on them by treasonous representatives, foreign entities, foreign military, and some US military who have ‘passed’ the litmus test required by Obama of “Will they fire on US citizens”. We have spoken out many times against these unlawful and traitorous actions by ‘our’ representatives.

“We the People” have also noticed that we currently have foreign military “training” on US soil, mercenary soldiers here in the US Military even though they cost more then US soldiers and our country is broke. That China, and other foreign nations, has been brought into the US to “repair” our bridges (currently the Golden Gate Bridge), dams and roads  - over the last four plus years under the outright lie that there is NO American citizens available who can do those jobs (and do them better). That there have been foreign submarines outside San Francisco Bay, and up and own the US coastline, etc.

We have been highly aware of the implementation of UN’s Agenda 21 here in the USA and specifically being widely implemented within the state of California. That is treason committed by those who allowed it to go on, who supported the agencies, by those who have been implementing this at all levels: federal, private, and state; that have been slowly implementing this takeover of our legitimate government. 

Plus “We the people” of the state of California, and many others in other states, have noticed that you (as per your lawfully required and legally binding oath and the requirements of the US Constitution and California Constitution) have not moved to nullify and/or ban these unconstitutional and unlawful acts / bills / executive orders / etc against all US citizens, and against the citizens of the state of California:

• Patriot Act,
• NDAA,
• UN’s Agenda 21,
• All gun control laws & bills, etc.
• Plus BAN Warrant-less spying/tracking/searches/etc,
• TSA in airports/bus stations/train stations /on our roads/at stadiums/etc,
• Nor Obamacare (Health Care Bill) – which requires the microchipping of all US citizens, plus a create and support a private army paid for by any citizens who are forced to use Obamacare (I suspect, like most, you have not read it)
• ETC

All of which are against the US Constitution/Bill of Rights limitations put on those serving in the federal government; and are against the US Constitution plus California’s State Constitution, which the state's executive branch sworn duties are to defend, support and enforce.

US Constitution, Article IV, Section 2, 14th Amendment: "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States"

Bill of Rights:

Amendment IX: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Amendment X: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Madison: “The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government, are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former (fed gov) will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected. The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State.”

“We the People” of the state of California, and of the USA are telling you to take a public and very visible stand. Once you take this stand - if it is to support the US Constitution and the Constitution of the USA –  to keep your oath of office; there will be an ocean of people standing with you, with many talents and the dedication to follow through.

If you are going to break the LAWFULLY required and LEGALLY binding Oath of Office we will remove you from office as you will no longer meet the requirements of the position or office you are occupying and replace you and any who stand with you with those who WILL keep the lawfully required and legally binding Oath of office.

It is my sincere hope that you will each stand publicly and reaffirm your oath to the Constitution of the united States of America, and to the state of California; that you will state clearly that California is a Molon Labe State, County - including all the California Sheriffs, law enforcement agencies, etc - before April 19th, 2013. That is the date that Americans everywhere have set for those who will not commit. They will be replaced as willing to commit treason, and / or break their legally binding Oath.

California State Constitution

Art 1 Dec Of Rights, Sec 1: All people are by nature free and independent and have inalienable rights. Among these are enjoying and DEFENDING LIFE AND LIBERTY, acquiring, POSSESSING, and PROTECTING PROPERTY, and PURSUING AND OBTAINING SAFETY, happiness, and PRIVACY.

Art 1 Dec Of Rights, Sec 13: The RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO BE SECURE IN THEIR PERSONS, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable seizures and searches may not be violated; and a warrant may not issue except on probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons and things to be seized.

Art 1 Dec Of Rights, Sec 18: Treason against the State consists only in levying war against it, ADHERING TO ITS ENEMIES, or giving them aid and comfort. A person may not be convicted of treason except on the evidence of two witnesses to the same overt act or by confession in open court.

Art 1 Dec Of Rights, Sec 26: The provisions of this Constitution are mandatory and prohibitory, unless by express words they are declared to be otherwise.

Art 3 State Of California, Sec 1: The State of California is an inseparable part of the United States of America, and the UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION IS THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND.

Art 5 Exec, Sec 1: The supreme executive power of this State is vested in the Governor. THE GOVERNOR SHALL SEE THAT THE LAW IS FAITHFULLY EXECUTED.

Art 5 Exec, Sec 7: The Governor is COMMANDER IN CHIEF OF A MILITIA THAT SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR BY STATUTE. The Governor may call it forth to execute the law. (Why is there not a training schedule posted for all able-bodied citizens to train for the militia?)

Art 5 Exec Sec 13: Subject to the powers and duties of the Governor, the Attorney General shall be the chief law officer of the State. IT SHALL BE THE DUTY OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL TO SEE THAT THE LAWS OF THE STATE ARE UNIFORMLY AND ADEQUATELY ENFORCED…

Art 7 Public Officers And Employees: SEC. 9. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Constitution, NO PERSON OR ORGANIZATION WHICH ADVOCATES THE OVERTHROW OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OR THE STATE BY force or violence or OTHER UNLAWFUL MEANS or WHO ADVOCATES THE SUPPORT OF A FOREIGN GOVERNMENT AGAINST THE UNITED STATES in the event of hostilities shall:

(a) HOLD ANY OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT UNDER THIS STATE, including but not limited to the University of California, or with any county, city or county, city, district, political subdivision, authority, board, bureau, commission or other public agency of this State; or

(b) Receive any exemption from any tax imposed by this State or any county, city or county, city, district, political subdivision, authority, board, bureau, commission or other public agency of this State.

Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654

Breaks the militia down in three groups.

· The organized militia, henceforth known as the National Guard of the State, Territory and District of Columbia,

· The unorganized militia and

· The regular army.

It further states: The militia encompasses every able-bodied male between the ages of 18 and 45. All members of the unorganized militia have the absolute personal right and 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms of any type, and as many as they can afford to buy. (Anyone who can be in the military can be in the Militia, so women are not excluded)

The Bill of Rights says that the people are required to be a militia, and that the state militia is for the protection of the people in every state and county by the people residing therein. The US Constitution forbids a standing army. In fact, the Bill of Rights says that the Militia is supposed to provide for the common defense, and prevent the kind of overweening and tyrannical government behavior we have been seeing for all too long. We are meant to be self-governing, and you are our representatives, our public servants. You have taken an Oath. Will you stand up with us as Oath Keepers?

Please let us know by your public declaration before, or on April 19th whether or not California representatives will declare that California is a Molon Labe State, so we know where our representatives stand. Molon Labe means “Come and Take it”, and it is a statement that means we will fight for ALL of our Constitutional Rights, and will not stand for gun control as the excuse to control the people and to destroy our legitimate government. Will you assist in unlawfully disarming the citizens? Will you enlist the aid of those who are trained, and train those who are willing for California's Militia? Will you protect our County? Are you a Patriot, or a Redcoat - that is basically the question you are being asked? Let us know soon.

Thank You.

Sincerely

Your Name, A Very Concerned Citizen

Please be aware that this is being sent to every congressperson, senator, California Sheriff's, and to other state's sheriff's, to the Governors of the other states, every media that I can get to post it, and various other groups and agencies that are supporting and defending our nation remaining under its legitimate government. I am also letting other people use this a form as ‘template’ that they can insert their own state constitution and required oath, plus Governors name into.