Why would the senate need to meet outside the District of Columbia? Hmmm what about that?
111th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. CON. RES. 1
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
January 6, 2009
Received and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Regarding consent to assemble outside the seat of government.
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That pursuant to clause 4, section 5, article I of the Constitution, during the One Hundred Eleventh Congress the Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the Senate or their respective designees, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate,
may notify the Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to assemble at a place outside the District of Columbia if, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
Passed the House of Representatives January 6, 2009.
Attest:
LORRAINE C. MILLER,
Clerk.
1st Session
H. CON. RES. 1
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
January 6, 2009
Received and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Regarding consent to assemble outside the seat of government.
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That pursuant to clause 4, section 5, article I of the Constitution, during the One Hundred Eleventh Congress the Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the Senate or their respective designees, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate,
may notify the Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to assemble at a place outside the District of Columbia if, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
Passed the House of Representatives January 6, 2009.
Attest:
LORRAINE C. MILLER,
Clerk.
Comment
-
Comment by Daniel F Swain on June 1, 2009 at 5:34pm
-
It sounds like it, maybe. They would instill a full millatary state of martial law at this point on the people if this is the case. But I agree with your comment.
"Destroying the New World Order"
THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!
Latest Activity
- Top News
- Everything
What Will happen When Robot Brides Replace Human Marriage?
With the rapidly approaching prospect of singularity and artificial intelligence dominance taking…See More
TRUMP ADVOCATING FOR PEACE, CABINET PICKS ADVOCATE WAR
The Trends Journal is a weekly magazine analyzing global current events forming future trends. To access our premium content, subscribe to the Trends Journal...
When Will the True Reparations Be Awarded?
Americans have weathered the worst storm perhaps in American history from an intentionally…See More
Veteran’s Day a Time That Should Be Honored
At a time in our confusing and idiotic history when a Democrat can’t define a woman when being…See More
"Thumbs up to this awesome school. Isn't it amazing that some of the greatest teachers are to…"
"Oh wow he is not wasting any time. May the power of the words he just spoke resonate across America…"
"A creative way to get hands on participation with students and the community."
The Perfect Lies
The Perfect Lies Time is like an ocean with its secrets running deepLike all the lovers you’ve…See More
© 2024 Created by truth.
Powered by
You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!
Join 12160 Social Network