Why would the senate need to meet outside the District of Columbia? Hmmm what about that?
111th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. CON. RES. 1
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
January 6, 2009
Received and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Regarding consent to assemble outside the seat of government.
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That pursuant to clause 4, section 5, article I of the Constitution, during the One Hundred Eleventh Congress the Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the Senate or their respective designees, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate,
may notify the Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to assemble at a place outside the District of Columbia if, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
Passed the House of Representatives January 6, 2009.
Attest:
LORRAINE C. MILLER,
Clerk.
1st Session
H. CON. RES. 1
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
January 6, 2009
Received and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Regarding consent to assemble outside the seat of government.
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That pursuant to clause 4, section 5, article I of the Constitution, during the One Hundred Eleventh Congress the Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the Senate or their respective designees, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate,
may notify the Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to assemble at a place outside the District of Columbia if, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
Passed the House of Representatives January 6, 2009.
Attest:
LORRAINE C. MILLER,
Clerk.
Comment
-
Comment by Daniel F Swain on June 1, 2009 at 5:34pm
-
It sounds like it, maybe. They would instill a full millatary state of martial law at this point on the people if this is the case. But I agree with your comment.
"Destroying the New World Order"
THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!
Latest Activity
- Top News
- Everything
In the Political Realm They've Gone One Step Too Far!
I'm Your Host here on a completely new program. We call it One Step Too Far! Join us now for some…See More
All In The Family | Mike Meets Archie For The First Time | The Norman Lear Effect
"Wow almost as brainless as entitled as the college dolts who argued with Charlie Kirk before his…"
America Copied Germany’s Jerry Can — But Missed The One Genius Detail that Made All the Difference
America Copied Germany’s WWII Jerry Can — But Missed The One Genuis Detail that Made All the DifferenceIn World War II, Allied armies were losing up to half ...
What was the Significance of the F-94 C and What role in History?
It’s July 19, 1952 over White House forbidden airspace and Captain William Patterson observes…See More
FLUORIDEGATE: An American Tragedy. a film by Dr. David Kennedy
FLUORIDEGATE: An American Tragedy, is a feature documentary that reveals the tragedy of how government, industry and trade associations protect and promote a...
Rendezvous With The Unknown
Rendezvous With the Unknown Chapter I It was about 9:00 am when I received a text on my phone from…See More
© 2025 Created by truth.
Powered by
You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!
Join 12160 Social Network