Supreme Court declines to clarify gun rights question

The US Supreme Court declined on Monday to take up a potentially important gun rights case, which could have established guideposts for future gun regulations at the local, state, and national levels.

By Warren Richey, Staff writer / November 28, 2011

The US Supreme Court declined Monday to take up a potentially important gun rights case examining whether a federal regulation banning loaded firearms from vehicles in a government park violated the constitutional right to keep and bear arms.

Lawyers for a Virginia man had asked the justices to examine a question left largely unresolved in the high court’s two prior landmark rulings identifying the scope and substance of Second Amendment protections. The question is: Does the Second Amendment guarantee a right to bear arms in public for personal protection?

The court dismissed the case in a one-line order without comment. The action leaves lower court rulings intact and postpones the prospect of high court clarification on a key gun rights issue.

In 2008, the Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment establishes a fundamental right of law-abiding individuals to keep a handgun in their home for self-protection. In 2010, the high court extended that ruling to apply Second Amendment guarantees beyond federal enclaves like Washington, D.C., to all state and local jurisdictions.

The dismissed appeal, Masciandaro v. US (10-11212), had asked the court to examine whether Americans have a right to carry loaded weapons in public places for self defense. 

How the justices answered that question would have established guideposts for future gun regulations at the local, state, and national levels of government.

In the 2008 decision, District of Columbia v. Heller, the court said that gun rights are not unlimited. The court said there is no right to “carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.”

Gun rights advocates say that statement confirms a right to carry at least some weapons, in some manner, for some purpose.

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2011/1128/Supreme-Court-declin...

featured members
http://12160.info/profiles/friend/listFeatured

featured videos
http://12160.info/video/video/listFeatured

featured blogs
http://12160.info/profiles/blog/list?promoted=1

MORE

Supreme Court declines to clarify gun rights question : ning.it/sNFENi

Barney Frank Will Retire From Congress ning.it/vJlwch

 Man-made super-flu could kill half humanity ning.it/vf2hy8

 Survival Shop Reports Jump In Sales To People Preparing For “Possible Collapse” ow.ly/1fQ5Zh

Merck Scientist Admits Cancer & AIDS Came From Vaccines ning.it/uhMy2D

 
 
 The Untold Story of Psychotropic Drugging (Documentary) : ning.it/vMusfu

  A collection of ridiculous, over the top fear-mongering articles on global warming 12160.info/profiles/blogs...

10 Things They Have In Mind For Our Future ning.it/uPn6pO

Seymour Hersh -- Pre-War Propaganda Mounting on Iran ning.it/rx7PJl

Work Until You Die : ning.it/umys83

new video : 9/11 Truth Versus The BBC ning.it/ujOZgW  

Debt Super Committee Needs a Hero? I'll be your Huckleberry ning.it/uZWtjw

 Paul Craig Roberts - Loss of the middle class, dictatorial executive branch and loss of law ning.it/t5uDCB

 How To Take Our Country Back I - Strategy - The Federal Reserve System is designed to create, increase, and perpetu... ow.ly/1fSAME