"was accused (by the FBI) of sanctioning a $100,000 wire payment to Mohammed Atta, one of the 9/11 hijackers, immediately before the attacks."
"Following 9/11, a number of the foreign operatives were taken in for questioning by the FBI..." 2. The senior State Department official received a call from a foreign agent asking for help to "get them out of the U.S. because we can’t afford for them to spill the beans."
"You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. "The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people… to turn to the State to ask for greater security."
"In 1997, NATO asked Hosni Mubarak to release from prison Islamist militants affiliated to Ayman al-Zawahiri. They were flown under U.S. orders to Turkey for (training and use in) operations by the Pentagon."
In 1998, NATO got Al Zawahiri's brother, Muhammed, to lead an elite unit of the Kosovo Liberation Army which has been involved in the drugs trade.
"I know for a fact that NATO planes routinely shipped heroin to Belgium, where they then made their way into Europe and to the UK. "They also shipped heroin to distribution centres in Chicago and New Jersey.
"FBI counterintelligence and DEA (Drug Enforcement Agency) operations had acquired evidence of this drug trafficking in its surveillance of a wide range of targets, including senior officials in the Pentagon, CIA and State Department..."
According to a Sunday Times journalist:
"We'd spoken to several current and active Pentagon officials confirming the existence of U.S. operations sponsoring mujahideen networks in Central Asia from the 1990s to 2001. "Those mujahideen networks were intertwined with a whole range of criminal enterprises, including drugs and guns.
"The Pentagon officials corroborated Edmonds' allegations against specific U.S. officials, and I’d also interviewed an MI6 officer who confirmed that the U.S. was running these operations sponsoring mujahideen in that period."
Continued here: The Sunday Times report on the US government's ties to the boss of al-Qaeda was spiked on the orders of the US government ~~~ AL QAEDA ARE MERCENARIES, LINKED TO DRUGS THE CIA's 'GLADIO B'
Thank you for posting this one. I have a lot of respect for Sibel Edmonds. Brave women. :)
I think I know Sibel Edmonds by now, and I am deeply confused.
"She mentioned his “acceptance of large sums of bribery in forms of cash or laundered cash” coupled with the ability “to do certain favors…make certain things happen for… [the] Turkish government’s interest.”"
She is "Turkish", she is working against Turkey. There are not many with that attitude. But I am worried about what that may imply (why would FBI hire any free thinker from Turkey in the first place?). And the same about her friend James Corbett. Who they are I don't know any more.
I think, no matter who it is, each revelation must be taken and believed only after considerable whetting and cross checking and if it leaves no unanswered questions. We know that, in the times that prevail, it is not possible to give a clean chit to any individual based on their last revelation and all that they may have helped bring to light. Revealing something critical in the past or present should not absolve any individual of their susceptibility to fall into traps created by those that wish to sabotage them as well as their possible conscious decision of siding with the devil (whether due to ulterior motives or for the lure of unfair gains). First and foremost, regardless of all evidence, the fact is there Is always more to every story than what meets the eye. So, personally, I chose to take things with a pinch of salt. Revealing something in absolute truth does not mean the one revealing it is absolutely truthful as a person.
I'm convinced she's the real deal. Just as Edward Snowden exposed the NSA. Just as Daniel Ellsberg exposed the Pentagon Papers., etc... If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it must be a duck.
"if it leaves no unanswered questions" Right
Andrew Gavin Marshall is a regular podcaster on Sibel's BoilingFrogPost (BFP)
"He is Project Manager of The People’s Book Project, head of the Geopolitics Division of the Hampton Institute, "
"We are interested in manuscripts that are compatible with progressive, working-class and radical politics. Intellectual content consisting of theoretical analysis, specifically regarding Marxist, Syndicalist, Anarchist or Left Libertarian theory, is also desirable. "
Obviously Andrew Gavin promotes the left-right paradigma and is not my type. I have no problem with that in itself, but why promote him on BFP? I could not understand that.
Does Sibel believe CIA is a bureaucracy that behaves like any bureaucracy .. doing everything it can to expand it own power? That is what James Corbett/Sibel promote. Sibel is very good at exposing CIA fraud, but she will not tell us who CIA is working for, except by references to "the military-industrial complex" and "for money". I became increasingly frustrated by her analyses, but explained that away as naivity. BFP promotes people that are left liberals. We can (for now) agree upon Sibel being a "left liberal" I hope
I reread Sibel's "Boiling Frogs Post: An Independent Site … Not a Duck Nest"
I write on the Israel lobby contributions to candidates, and others come after me with Anti-Israel & Anti-Semite tags.
"Israel lobby" is the mainstream term
I write on the Turkish lobby and it’s octopus like tentacles in purchasing politicians, and I become Anti-Turkey & Anti-Turkish to some.
I criticize certain Neocon policies, and I am an Unrealistic Liberal Fantasist to certain people who consider themselves realists.
I go after our out-of-control federal government police practices, and I am called Libertarian Anarchist by a few.
I stand by my rights and do my share by handing out information on TSA-DHS airport abuses, and many stop to call me Terrorist Sympathizer.
My whistleblower organization members happen to be mainly men, and I’m accused of being Sexist.
Sibel's and James Corbett's anti-zionism is at nil level (while most of her topics involve zionism, like 911 and Snowden). Why is that so? (in the above quotes, she critisize Israel lobby, Turkey, Neocon, TSA .. but there is no connection of dots)
From top post
"She knows that the US government supports al Qaeda and supports organised crime. Her allegations have been confirmed by journalists at The Sunday Times, a Rupert Murdoch newspaper."
The underlying message of "CIA Runs Al-Qaeda" is to blame Americans? Al Qaeda is also linked to Mossad and MI5, and even more to Prince Bandar. Al Qaeda is not an American enterprice - it is a Zionist enterprice.