Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Aka Anonymous on March 20, 2016 at 11:58pm

Humanity Party Exposed by Anonymous

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Amaterasu Solar on March 21, 2016 at 6:16pm

I was with it up to the point where is said,"TO protect each person’s right to vote for those who enact the laws that govern them..."  I consent to an Ethical anarchy in a solutocracy which supports the principle of freedom FAR better than Any being given power to decide for Others what They may and may not do outside the three Laws of Ethics.  It is clear this is a reverse psychology title...  I, as one anonymous Individual, cannot consent to what is given, as it still affords psychopaths a path to power.

Anonymous (the Human-hearted faction) MUST have access to data on things like electrogravitics, which offer free energy.  I might expect, at any rate.  Why go for giving Individual power over to Others?  Why not free Humanity?  Why not release the data so We can stop accounting for Human energy?  Only slaves have to account for Their energy.

Why not work to build servers that mirror with a site We can solve problems Ethically, by Ethical consensus, rather than throwing power to a few to mandate what punishments will accrue for doing something and then thwart Ethics when circumstances suggest no problem?

I really wish I could say I'm on board, but I'm not.  We can create SOOOO much better here.  And leaving both towers to psychopaths in power in place, I think is a poor choice to make at this juncture, given what We CAN create:  eliminating poverty, oppression, wage/debt slavery, intrusion, and profiteering (war profiteering, prison profiteering, pharma profiteering, medical profiteering, chemical profiteering, food, water, air profiteering).

Seriously.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Aka Anonymous on May 22, 2016 at 3:27pm

Agreed,

 There was a time the the British Empire was bring into effect a Constitution, but of course, the Queen opt it out, and she determines how each person is protected according to class.

• ▶ Reply