Illinois: Where Recording On-Duty Cops Is Treated Like Sexual Assault

Last week, an Illinois judge rejected Chicago artist Christopher Drew's motion to dismiss the Class I felony charge against him. Drew is charged with violating the state's eavesdropping statute when he recorded his encounter with a police officer last December on the streets of Chicago. A Class I felony in Illinois is punishable by 4 to 15 years in prison. It's in the same class of crimes as sexual assault. Drew will be back in court in June to request a jury trial.

I'm currently working on a feature for Reason about man in a more rural part of the state charged with six violations of the same statute, all of them for making audio recordings of on-duty public officials. For several of the counts in that case, the police were actually on the man's property. He started recording his conversations with police because he felt he was being unjustly harassed for violating a town ordinance he thought was unconstitutional.

I'm of the opinion that it should always be legal to record on-duty police officers, both as a matter of policy and under the free speech, free press, and right to petition the government provisions in the First Amendment. We saw the power and potential of audio and video recording technology to expose government abuse in the Iranian protests last summer. But we also see it here in the U.S. with the thousands of  police misconduct videos uploaded to YouTube in recent years.

Typically, police who want to arrest someone for recording them while on duty use a strained interpretation of state wiretapping laws or whatever state or local law addresses obstructing or  interfering with law enforcement. These incidents are troubling enough, and I think state legislatures should consider passing laws explicitly making it legal to record on-duty law enforcement officials. Those laws should include remedies for people wrongly arrested, or who have had their cameras or cell phones illegally confiscated, damaged, or destroyed.

But in Illinois the situation is quite a bit worse. In Illinois it actually is illegal to make audio recordings of on-duty cops--or any other public official. Illinois is one of a handful of states that require all parties to consent before someone can record a conversation. But the other all-party-consent states also include a provision in their statutes stating that for there to be a violation of the law the nonconsenting party must have a reasonable expectation of privacy. On-duty police officers in public spaces have no such expectation.

Here's where it gets even worse: Originally, the Illinois eavesdropping law did also include a similar expectation of privacy provision. But the legislature stripped that provision out in 1994, and they did so in response to an incident in which a citizen recorded his interaction with two on-duty police officers. In other words, the Illinois legislature specifically intended to make it a Class I felony, punishable by up to 15 years in prison, to make an audio recording of an on-duty police officer without his permission.

Given the spate of recent stories about cops in Chicago caught on video misbehaving (some of whom were subsequently held accountable only because of the video), the legislature's already-awful-when-it-passed 1994 amendment hasn't aged well.

I suspect most state officials know this law is unconstitutional. While several people have been charged under the statute for recording public officials, I've so far been unable to find anyone who was actually convicted, much less had a conviction upheld. (If you know of someone who has, please email me!) Prosecutors tend to either drop the charges or offer a plea bargain before the case gets to trial. It isn't difficult to see why someone would take a misdemeanor plea and a clean record instead of challenging a bad law and risking up to 15 years in prison and a felony record if they lose.

Before Drew the closest anyone came to challenging the law came in 2004, when documentary filmmaker Patrick Thompson was arrested for recording police interactions with patrons outside of bars and restaurants in Champaign-Urbana. He was looking to document allegations that police were treating white patrons differently than black patrons. (See the ACLU's brief on Thompson's behalf here). But Thompson took a plea bargain before his case went to trial.

So the law remains on the books. Which Illinois police officers remain authorized by state law to detain, arrest, and jail people who record them while on-duty, and they can continue to confiscate the recordings.

(Cross-posted at Instapundit.)

UPDATE/CORRECTION: Eugene Volokh emails to say that Massachusetts also doesn't appear to recognize an expectation of privacy exception to its all-party-consent law, and has upheld a conviction for recording on-duty police officers.

 

http://reason.com/blog/2010/05/20/illinois-where-videotaping-on

Views: 114

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

i agree. the police are totally out of hand. im honestly nursing a broken rib now because of st louis police. i just asked why i was pulled over n was attacked, drug out n kicked. i didn't smart off, i never resisted. it ended up i had a traffic warrant for not showing an insurance card from 1992!!! honestly. im a white guy, short hair, driving a truck thats only a couple years old. my history as far as the police has no crimes except traffic. cant imagine if i woulda pulled out a camera. prolly woulda shot me. we deserve the right to protect ourselves, n if they have nothing to hide they shouldn't be worried. on the contrary, they should revel in the chance at more evedence. just my 2 cents.

RSS

"Destroying the New World Order"

TOP CONTENT THIS WEEK

THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!

mobile page

12160.info/m

12160 Administrators

 

Latest Activity

Doc Vega posted blog posts
5 hours ago
Doc Vega posted a photo
yesterday
Doc Vega posted blog posts
yesterday
Burbia posted a blog post
yesterday
cheeki kea posted a photo
yesterday
cheeki kea commented on cheeki kea's blog post Vaccines Cause Autism: The Burden of Proof has been met.
yesterday
cheeki kea posted a blog post
yesterday
tjdavis posted a video
yesterday
cheeki kea commented on Burbia's video
Thumbnail

Soros Will Never Recover..Elon AIR The whole Thing

"Good find Burbia. It can only get worse. Is Soros too big to fail for he has his thumb in every pie…"
Monday
Doc Vega posted blog posts
Monday
Doc Vega commented on Doc Vega's blog post What's Meant to Be?
"tjdavis Thanks for your support Dude! "
Monday
tjdavis posted photos
Monday
tjdavis favorited Doc Vega's blog post What's Meant to Be?
Monday
tjdavis posted a video

PORCUPINE TREE - BUYING NEW SOUL (HD)

Filmed at the Park West, Chicago, USA, 11-12 Oktober 2005
Monday
Burbia commented on Burbia's video
Thumbnail

Meet GibberLink, Conversational AI's secret language

"One agent's audio range has a lower frequency than the other. Another example of different…"
Sunday
Burbia posted a video

Meet GibberLink, Conversational AI's secret language

Join Boris Starkov and Anton Pidkuiko, the developers behind GibberLink, for a fireside chat with Luke Harries from ElevenLabs.On February 24, Georgi Gergano...
Sunday
Doc Vega posted blog posts
Saturday
Doc Vega posted a blog post

Interpersonal Insanity

Interpersonal Insanity How do you expect me to read your mind?All those hidden things that I might…See More
Apr 18
cheeki kea replied to cheeki kea's discussion Tartaria
"Look at what we have to put up with. Leftist journalism in full swing. Everyone knows who created…"
Apr 18
Doc Vega posted a blog post

Why Did We Americans Become so Cynical? At Least Those Who Think

 Cynicism is a form of counter intelligence. It materializes when the general public has been…See More
Apr 16

© 2025   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2019 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted