Site Complaints

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by truth on September 21, 2010 at 12:48am

(DixieMiller) decided to leave 12160. included this message:
"The name calling and insinuations I find personally negative and don't want to be any part of it

Permalink Reply by truth on September 21, 2010 at 1:59pm

A suspended member has sent you a message - Machinegunmomma writes:

You have made a grave mistake in blaming me for this stuff I was only helping robert out after kim scolded him abotu his post- I can speak my mind an I'm called rude for what that idiot from last night Hilary?
I want evrything I have ever posted here to be deleted. I'm sorry it came to this but obviously someone said something to you. I want to add, I had nohting to do with Keisha leaving, nothing to do with Winston leaving either.

You have made a grave mistake in blaming me for this stuff I was only helping robert out after kim scolded him about his post-

--I only asked if you were involved. Same goes about winston, I made no assumptions than nor do I now.

I can speak my mind an I'm called rude for what that idiot from last night Hilary?

--Hilary will be warned as you have been in the past.
You repeatedly made personal attacks, we can disagree if thats what you did. It is in the end my call. Frankly this is an exact repeat of the last time you were here. I been walking on egg shells with you ever since. When I gave you the warning today you said you were going to leave rather than deal with my responsibility here as an admin. I dont accept threats even if you were one of the best people we have here.

I want evrything I have ever posted here to be deleted.

---Um, thought you realized this work we do is above our own egos and emotions? You once told me a few months ago when we had an issue that you would leave if asked and keep your work here. So I assumed you understood this.
Read the ning terms of service, we will not be deleting the work.

I'm sorry it came to this but obviously someone said something to you. I want to add, I had nohting to do with Keisha leaving, nothing to do with Winston leaving either.

----I made this decision based on what I have seen on the site and in the chat rooms. You lack the social skills to debate people with out making it personal. I am sorry for this, sorry for you and for this site.

Keisha was most likely upset by the comments you made in this (complaints/help) group about tweek. She generally had a thicker skin but I suspect she couldn't be here on the site with you anymore. But I dont know for sure.

Had you declared even a hint of responsibility and / or looked at my point of view with an open mind we may be in a different place today. But you didnt.

Permalink Reply by truth on September 21, 2010 at 2:03pm

Conservative Kitty decided to leave 12160. Conservative Kitty included this message:

"reading the end times in Revelation and accepting Satan will be coming, The Lord will win in the end"

Permalink Reply by docsavage96 on February 16, 2011 at 5:03am

poor choice of words in teh rules of 12160, imo--

http://www.google.com/search?q=define+dissent

peace...

doc

Permalink Reply by Tara on February 16, 2011 at 9:51am

Hey Doc, so it's just the No Dissent part that you're having trouble with or the rules in general? If you have any suggestions on what may need to be changed, please throw it our way. Thanks:)

Permalink Reply by Proud Jew on March 6, 2011 at 1:58pm

As a former organizer myself, I know how hard it is to get things going and how hard it is to get participation. So, when something like a complaint comes up, there is a tendency to be defensive because the person getting the complaint knows how hard he or she has worked at trying to do things right. None of us are perfect, and knowing our shortcomings only helps us do a better job.

Nevertheless, some constructive criticism is sometimes mistaken for a "complaint". So, I have a complaint and a constructive criticism bunched into one. I have been to the roundtable discussions about four times now since I've joined, and most of the discussions that I attended were spent mostly getting mic checks, changing rooms, and volume discussions. I know this chat program, "Tiny Chat" is not the best and its probably free, and it has its flaws. Yet, once the chat room is populated to the tune of 15 or 20 people, its time to have those mic checks and volume checks done with, and if the audio doesn't work for some, use texting.

This is my observation, as I see it now, the chat room is in somewhat of a disarray. People who talk talk over each other, texting goes on at the same time, and there seems to not be any semblance of order. I also noticed one evening, that there was no agenda for discussion. Chat preparations by the chatters should be done 20 minutes in advance, and hosts should be armed with their agenda. Once the chat hour starts, it should be moving along without anymore mic checks. You either can speak or you dont, and then you resort to texting. Also, texting could be slowed down some because I've seen people posting multiple posts without anyone talking to them. How can anyone keep track of whats going on with all thats happening in chat?

For those of you who I've seen organizing chat, Jen and Docsavage and others, you work hard at what you do, and we appreciate it. Please know that what I've just posted is not criticism of you, but constructive suggestions to improve an otherwise not too organized chat event.

Permalink Reply by truth on March 7, 2011 at 5:51am

Thanks Freeman177 we need the feedback from you all if we are to try and improve.

I will bring this up with the admins and rt host, and reply here once that's done.

Permalink Reply by Tara on March 7, 2011 at 10:26am

Constructive suggestions are welcome and we appreciate your feedback. There's always going to be room for improvement, no matter what the task at hand is. Thank you Freeman1776!

Permalink Reply by Glenn Gordon on March 12, 2011 at 10:38am

Whatever happened to the proposed name change idea?
The name 12160.org really does make things difficult. Few of us remember numbers, and I for one am sick of having to search through previous emails to try to reach the site, and you can hardly do a Google search for it. Can we PLEASE get something done about this, and let logic prevail???
I mean how on earth can we refer anyone to a site with such a ridiculous name?
If we are to wage a practical war on the NWO, we need to do it with common sense. Alternative names have been suggested, and it was ignored. So, can we please get the ball rolling on this again, marked as urgent?

Permalink Reply by Glenn Gordon on March 12, 2011 at 3:59pm

Yes, but Jen, but as I've already said, you seem to be missing the point. How many people are going to remember numbers, or be attracted to the site by a meaningless name? It's a matter of what is practical. If we have a sensible name, it'll jump out in search engines and attract more people to our war against the NWO.

Permalink Reply by truth on March 12, 2011 at 11:27am

First,I share your frustration. But I believe all you need to do is search for 12160, on most if not all search engines. 12160.tk will get you straight here now.

The idea of a name change is as of now not going to happen. Basically it was a 50/50 tie about changing or keeping it.

Permalink Reply by Glenn Gordon on March 12, 2011 at 3:54pm

Yes, but James, you're missing the point. how many people are going to remember numbers, or be attracted to the site by a meaningless name? It's a matter of practicality.