The FAA's two-year program called the "UAS Integration Pilot Program" claims to be nothing more than a line of sight package delivery program that will benefit commerce and emergency management.

So what are the FAA's integration plans?

The FAA's plan is spelled out in their first sentence. "The Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Integration Pilot Program is an opportunity for state, local, and tribal governments to partner with private sector entities, such as UAS operators or manufacturers, to accelerate safe UAS integration."

Their integration plan, encourages law enforcement to partner with drone manufacturers to accelerate their usage.

A closer look at the FAA's "Programs, Partnerships and Opportunities" section revealed that San Diego's pilot drone program is ideally suited for police surveillance.

"The proposal focuses on border protection and package delivery of food, with a secondary focus on international commerce, Smart City/autonomous vehicle interoperability and surveillance."

And the Kansas Department of Transportation plans to use GeoFencing drones to spy on the public.

"Operations will use a range of technologies, such as detect and avoid, ADS-B, satellite communications and geo-fencing."

Another hint that this is really a national police drone surveillance program can be found by looking at Reno, Nevada's partnership.

The city of Reno claims they are testing a "nationwide scalable model for medical delivery operations." Last year, I warned everyone that DOT's like first responders claimed drones would only be used to respond to emergencies and that proved to be a lie.

The FAA's, UAS Integration Pilot Program has been carefully worded so as not to cause public outcry. They appear to be following the script laid out in Bloomberg's role-playing drone workshops that act as though police drones will only be used for emergency response and not surveillance.

The old adage if it looks like a duck (police drone), flies like a duck (drone) then it must be national police surveillance drone program,  certainly appears to be the case here.