The late Dr. Michael Crichton in a speech at the California Institute of Technology made the following observation:

“I want to …talk about … the rise of what has been called consensus science. I regard consensus science as an extremely pernicious development that ought to be stopped cold in its tracks. Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. …

“Let’s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results … .

“There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it’s science, it isn’t consensus. … .”  … Consensus is invoked only in situations where the science is not solid enough. Nobody says the consensus of scientists agrees that E = mc². Nobody says the consensus is that the sun is 93 million miles away. It would never occur to anyone to speak that way.”

 In recent decades, the term consensus science has come to be associated with climate change/global warming.  The appeal to a consensus has been used to avoid honest and open debate about the extent of human influence on the climate system.  Climate change has become the poster child for the widely documented corruption in many fields of science resulting from competition for funding, tying funding to specific policy outcomes, and the increasing pressure to publish or perish.

Norman Rogers in the May 14 issue of the American Thinker began his article citing President Eisenhower’s farewell address warning that a “scientific-technological elite” dependent on government money would exert undue influence on government policy”. Scientific advice to policy makers has become heavily influenced by political agendas and rewards to organizations and scientists that provide the necessary scientific support for political objectives.  In the case of climate change, the influence can be traced back to the White House and Al Gore.

More Here: http://fuelfix.com/blog/2014/10/05/the-corruption-of-science/

Views: 601

Replies to This Discussion

He's absolutely right, "consensus science" is not science at all but a process where scientists are bought to express the predetermined results and conclusions, much like in corrupt politics. "Consensus science" is corrupt.

RE: “Let’s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics..."

And politics it is.

In Canada, that's all that it boils down to.

Case in point was the "wrongful dismissal' of Dr. Shiv Chopra, a scientist with the Federal Government of Canada (Health Canada) who spoke out regarding Monsanto's Bovine Growth Hormone drug which was to be approved by him, and to which he refused to sign off on, for more obvious reasons known to us now.

Dr. Chopra wrote a book about this life changing event:

Corrupt to the Core: Memoirs of a Health Canada Whistleblower

Here is a recent example; a perfect example of how "Consensus is the business of politics...POLICY"

Un-muzzle the scientists? Not so fast - Those with the lab coats do...

Un-muzzle the scientists?: Critics say “Yes, please” - Government s...

Shiv Chopra - Issues about Health and Food Safety

http://shivchopra.com/category/corrupt-to-the-core/

RSS

Latest Activity

Chris of the family Masters posted videos
8 minutes ago
Doc Vega posted a blog post

2000 Radioactive Wild Boars Threaten Fukushima

 In the wake of the reactor disaster at Fukushima due the tsunami, that wreaked havoc upon the Japanese coast and into the…See More
27 minutes ago
Boris favorited James T. Kirk's video
31 minutes ago
Boris favorited Chris of the family Masters's video
32 minutes ago
Diana's photo was featured
33 minutes ago
Randy commented on Boris's page “Rapper” Cash Bentley uses racial slurs and threatens violence against two teenage students minding their own business for wearing MAGA hats
"Why isn't the black African American SOB going after Kane West for his red hat? Stupid is as stupid does , Trump did more for the boy in 2 years Than his fellator hero Obama did his whole term. "
41 minutes ago
Diana replied to truth's discussion The Dark Side of "I Have a Dream": The FBI's War on Martin Luther King
"It might have been statements like these that made people think he was a threat.  1.“I am now convinced that the simplest approach will prove to be the most effective – the solution to poverty is to abolish it directly by a now…"
41 minutes ago
Profile Icon via Twitter
RT @SteveDietrich: Checking out "What is a man? A response to Gillette" on 12160 Social Network: https://t.co/ooogVr4hbE
Twitter44 minutes ago · Reply · Retweet
Profile Icon via Twitter
RT @badluck_jones: This GUY !! - Womens March - Video - #WomensMarch2019 - Salmon Andy @lifesmavrek - 12160 Social Network https://t.co/jw
Twitter44 minutes ago · Reply · Retweet
Profile Icon via Twitter
RT @Aaron_777543: Southern Poverty Law Center Slapped with Racketeering Suit Over ‘False Hate Group Designation !!!!***** SPLC is a farce !…
Twitter44 minutes ago · Reply · Retweet
Profile Icon via Twitter
RT @Aaron_777543: Twitter finally admits it. They coordinate with other Big tech companies on how to conduct their Censorship. - 12160 Soci…
Twitter44 minutes ago · Reply · Retweet
Profile Icon via Twitter
RT @Aaron_777543: ‘They Are Starving Us to Death’: Cubans Protest Food Shortages – 12160 Social Network ⚠️👀🙏🏾 https://t.co/aqv58M26aH
Twitter44 minutes ago · Reply · Retweet
Profile Icon via Twitter
RT @12160mhz: The Dark Side of "I Have a Dream": The FBI's War on Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. https://t.co/pYe7vrFuDP
Twitter45 minutes ago · Reply · Retweet
Boris commented on Boris's page BREAKING: Covington Catholic High School ‘may sue’ mainstream media outlets for spreading ‘fake news’
"Lawyer: #CovingtonBoys were victims of criminal assault"
53 minutes ago
Nazda Pokmov commented on Boris's page HUGE ! 5th Circuit rules Project Veritas’ undercover Planned Parenthood videos are “authentic” and “undoctored”.
"Good....enough of the profiting on dead babies.  They should receive a decent BURIAL instead of being chopped up and used as "flavor enhancers" in human and dog food.  PP is nothing but a huge industry catering to the soft drink…"
1 hour ago
Diana left a comment for Mark Janik
1 hour ago

Please remember this website is supported by your donations...

© 2019   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2015 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted