"Save the Internet" News, Censorship and Solutions
Information
What you need to know about the FCC's new net neutrality proposal
Dusting off old regulations won't protect free, open Internet
The Internet is and will continue to be an indispensable part of the lives of Floridians and all Americans. As we grow more dependent on it for everyday tasks, ensuring fair and open Internet access will continue to be a priority.
In the early days of the Internet, Congress and regulators intentionally left the Internet free from burdensome regulation. This bipartisan decision to keep government’s hands off the Internet has been responsible for leaps in innovation and investment – making America a global leader in broadband development. Revolutionary ways to connect with other people around the world online; billion dollar smart phone applications; near-instantaneous Internet speeds; the list of truly life-altering innovations goes on and on.
No one disagrees that the Internet should be free and open. The president’s plan just does not accomplish that goal.
We have all benefitted from a system that incentivizes broadband providers to be the fastest and most reliable consumer access to the Internet.
Over the last six years, however, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has tried to assert more control over this valuable American resource. The courts have already overturned two sets of FCC rules, but this so-called “independent agency” is poised to vote this week on its most aggressive rules yet.
At the urging of President Obama, FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler submitted a proposal that included more drastic changes and regulations than ever before. This government takeover of the Internet follows the President’s position that reclassification of broadband services to Title II common carrier status – which were originally designed and implemented to protect against 1930s monopolies– is the only option.
Dusting off regulations from the Roosevelt-era will not protect a free and open Internet. They will not benefit consumers. They will not spur innovation. They will not encourage a young entrepreneur to develop a new innovative app, or a company to develop new “smart” appliances.
Consumers – yes, you, reader – will be most hurt by this proposal. A whole host of new regulations and years of uncertainty will come. Even worse, this plan opens the door to billions of dollars in new fees on your Internet service, while putting nearly $45 Billion of new investments at risk over the next five years.
Do you like streaming live sports or network TV on your computer or mobile device? The agreements that allow you to do that quickly and reliably will now be subject to new, untested regulations. This unknown regulatory landscape is likely to reduce future investments in services that many consumers rely upon.
Small businesses across the country are also put in jeopardy from these rules. http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2015/02/26/net-neutrality-debate-dusting-off-old-regulations-wont-protect-free-open/
Location: 12160mods
Members: 164
Latest Activity: Feb 2, 2019
"LEAKED! Here's The White House's Draft Cybersecurity Executive Order"
Earlier this week, we wrote about how the White House was working on an executive order to act as a "stand in" for cybersecurity legislation that has so far failed to pass Congress (CISPA passed in the House, but a different effort, the Cybersecurity Act, failed in the Senate, and it would have been difficult to get the two houses aligned anyway). Last weekend Jason Miller from Federal News Radio wrote about a draft he saw... but failed to share the actual draft. We got our hands on a draft (and confirmed what it was with multiple sources) and wanted to share it, as these kinds of things deserve public scrutiny and discussion. It's embedded below. As expected, it does have elements of the Lieberman/Collins bill (to the extent that the White House actually can do things without legislation). It's also incredibly vague. The specific requirements for government agencies are left wide open to interpretation. For example, the State Dept. should engage other governments about protecting infrastructure. Well, duh. As expected, most stuff focuses on Homeland Security and its responsibilities to investigate a variety of different cybersecurity issues -- but, again, it's left pretty vague.
There is, as expected, plans concerning information sharing -- but again, they're left pretty empty on specifics. It talks about an "information exchange framework." Unfortunately, it does not appear to highlight privacy or civil liberties concerns in discussing the information sharing stuff. That seems like a pretty big problem. Homeland Security is tasked with coming up with a way to share information, pulling on some existing efforts, but nowhere do they call out how to make sure these information exchange programs don't lead to massive privacy violations, despite the President's earlier promises that any cybersecurity efforts would take into account privacy and civil liberties.
Mike Masnick
Discussion Forum
HOW TO KEEP YOUR CHATS TRULY PRIVATE WITH SIGNAL
Started by Central Scrutinizer May 2, 2017. 0 Replies 2 Favorites
LEAKED NSA MALWARE THREATENS WINDOWS USERS AROUND THE WORLD
Started by Central Scrutinizer Apr 14, 2017. 0 Replies 1 Favorite
ICANN is now planning to take over domain privacy providers, a plan driven by the people who brought you SOPA
Started by Central Scrutinizer Jun 28, 2015. 0 Replies 0 Favorites
Internet access “not a necessity or human right,” says FCC Republican
Started by Central Scrutinizer Jun 28, 2015. 0 Replies 0 Favorites
Do you have an iPhone, iPad or an Android phone? Help RBN win $20,000! No money Involved!
Started by Central Scrutinizer Jan 6, 2014. 0 Replies 2 Favorites
SOPA rides again: USA’s secret TPP treaty outlaws phone jailbreaks and unlocking, introduces crazy copyright law
Started by truth. Last reply by Misteri Nov 19, 2013. 1 Reply 0 Favorites
NSA pays tech companies millions to engineer backdoors into encryption protocols
Started by guest_blog Sep 13, 2013. 0 Replies 0 Favorites
MPAA Gets Its Wish: Court Basically Says It Can File Bogus DMCA Takedowns Without Concern For Fair Use
Started by truth Sep 12, 2013. 0 Replies 0 Favorites
Verizon's diabolical plan to turn the Web into pay-per-view
Started by truth. Last reply by Misteri Sep 12, 2013. 1 Reply 0 Favorites
NSA leaks hint Microsoft may have lied about Skype security
Started by truth. Last reply by truth Jun 13, 2013. 1 Reply 0 Favorites
What Is TPP? It’s the Biggest Global Threat to the Internet Since ACTA
Started by Central Scrutinizer Apr 30, 2013. 0 Replies 0 Favorites
GOOGLE Complies With Government Requests for User Data 88% of the Time
Started by Central Scrutinizer. Last reply by Central Scrutinizer Jan 24, 2013. 2 Replies 1 Favorite
Copyright Bill Could Let Publishers Charge for Excerpts in Germany
Started by truth Jan 14, 2013. 0 Replies 0 Favorites
Google starts watching what you do off the Internet too
Started by Central Scrutinizer. Last reply by DTOM Dec 21, 2012. 1 Reply 0 Favorites
AUSTRALIA ABANDONS MANDATORY INTERNET FILTER PLAN
Started by Central Scrutinizer. Last reply by Lawrence Edward Calcutt Nov 9, 2012. 1 Reply 0 Favorites
Comment Wall
Comment
-
Comment by truth on February 3, 2012 at 4:20pm
-
FBI & Scotland Yard phone call hacked: Hacker group "Anonymous" has claimed responsibility for posting a 16-minu... bit.ly/yr8MvZ
-
Comment by TommyD on February 2, 2012 at 4:41pm
-
"Hacker group Teamp0isoN hacked the United Nations and released usernames and passwords of more than 1,000 email accounts"
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
on second thought
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
-
Comment by noblsht on February 2, 2012 at 4:31pm
-
Hacker group Teamp0isoN hacked the United Nations and released usernames and passwords of more than 1,000 email accounts.http://techzwn.com/2011/11/teamp0ison-hacks-un-releases-1000-emails/
-
-
Do You Like Online Privacy? You May Be a Terrorist
A flyer designed by the FBI and the Department of Justice to promote suspicious activity reporting in internet cafes lists basic tools used for online privacy as potential signs of terrorist activity. The document, part of a program called “Communities Against Terrorism”, lists the use of “anonymizers, portals, or other means to shield IP address” as a sign that a person could be engaged in or supporting terrorist activity. The use of encryption is also listed as a suspicious activity along with steganography, the practice of using “software to hide encrypted data in digital photos” or other media. In fact, the flyer recommends that anyone “overly concerned about privacy” or attempting to “shield the screen from view of others” should be considered suspicious and potentially engaged in terrorist activities.
-
Comment by Misteri on January 29, 2012 at 5:53pm
-
-
-
woo hoo.lets go Dutch
-
Comment by guest_blog on January 29, 2012 at 4:45pm
-
-
?? Twitter users are being tricked into joining Anonymous cyber attacks on U.S. government - and could be jailed 1newsjunkie.blogspot.com
-
-
Senator Rand Paul on NDAA, SOPA, Indefinite Detention of American Citizens
"Destroying the New World Order"
THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!
Latest Activity
- Top News
- Everything
What was the Significance of the F-94 C and What role in History?
It’s July 19, 1952 over White House forbidden airspace and Captain William Patterson observes…See More
FLUORIDEGATE: An American Tragedy. a film by Dr. David Kennedy
FLUORIDEGATE: An American Tragedy, is a feature documentary that reveals the tragedy of how government, industry and trade associations protect and promote a...
Rendezvous With The Unknown
Rendezvous With the Unknown Chapter I It was about 9:00 am when I received a text on my phone from…See More
"ah ha - a Tartarian cuisine component lurks inside good old Tartar Sauce. Who would have thought.…"
Shadows in the Wind
If you think that life is but a game you can winYou’re just a shadow in the windConveniently…See More
© 2025 Created by truth.
Powered by
You need to be a member of "Save the Internet" News, Censorship and Solutions to add comments!