free hit counter

"Save the Internet" News, Censorship and Solutions

What you need to know about the FCC's new net neutrality proposal

Dusting off old regulations won't protect free, open Internet

The Internet is and will continue to be an indispensable part of the lives of Floridians and all Americans. As we grow more dependent on it for everyday tasks, ensuring fair and open Internet access will continue to be a priority.

In the early days of the Internet, Congress and regulators intentionally left the Internet free from burdensome regulation. This bipartisan decision to keep government’s hands off the Internet has been responsible for leaps in innovation and investment – making America a global leader in broadband development. Revolutionary ways to connect with other people around the world online; billion dollar smart phone applications; near-instantaneous Internet speeds; the list of truly life-altering innovations goes on and on.

No one disagrees that the Internet should be free and open. The president’s plan just does not accomplish that goal.

We have all benefitted from a system that incentivizes broadband providers to be the fastest and most reliable consumer access to the Internet.

Over the last six years, however, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has tried to assert more control over this valuable American resource. The courts have already overturned two sets of FCC rules, but this so-called “independent agency” is poised to vote this week on its most aggressive rules yet.

At the urging of President Obama, FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler submitted a proposal that included more drastic changes and regulations than ever before. This government takeover of the Internet follows the President’s position that reclassification of broadband services to Title II common carrier status – which were originally designed and implemented to protect against 1930s monopolies– is the only option.

Dusting off regulations from the Roosevelt-era will not protect a free and open Internet. They will not benefit consumers. They will not spur innovation. They will not encourage a young entrepreneur to develop a new innovative app, or a company to develop new “smart” appliances.

Consumers – yes, you, reader – will be most hurt by this proposal. A whole host of new regulations and years of uncertainty will come. Even worse, this plan opens the door to billions of dollars in new fees on your Internet service, while putting nearly $45 Billion of new investments at risk over the next five years.

Do you like streaming live sports or network TV on your computer or mobile device? The agreements that allow you to do that quickly and reliably will now be subject to new, untested regulations. This unknown regulatory landscape is likely to reduce future investments in services that many consumers rely upon.

Small businesses across the country are also put in jeopardy from these rules. http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2015/02/26/net-neutrality-debate-dusting-off-old-regulations-wont-protect-free-open/

  • truth

  • Suzanne Stapler

    Maybe this is not the time to do a web site for my new business.  I'm a holistic nutritionist and anything that's on the Food Pyramid, I totally disagree with.  That might be enough to shut my site down.  Any suggestions?
  • Michael S. Smith

    What kind of National Emergency are we talking about
  • Suzanne Stapler

    It could be anything that the gov't deems as an emergency like if the stock market begins losing money left and right.  Many financial analysts believe this will happen.  When prices get too high in the supermarkets and/or there is very little food left which is also something people think could happen within a year or so.
  • youhavetoforgiveme

    @ Michael: NObama farted is sufficient-- ANY excuse will do.
  • TheLasersShadow

    You have to make sure to protect the peer to peer file sharers aka pirates, the feds are using copyright issues to take over the internet. Even if you are against them the conduit to destroying the free internet is going to be sold as combating pirates.
  • Tula

    http://www.youtube.com/user/NancyRedStar  Well, They Just Arrested People For Reading The Constitution...We Will Have To Do More Than Comment On The Internet
  • Suzanne Stapler

    The Jewish reps are the worst.  I wish people would get up the nerve to start running for office  themselves.  Even if they don't win at least they'll make noise.
  • noblsht

    Government wants to censor the Internet article>>>http://act.demandprogress.org/act/protectip_docs/?source=fb
  • Robert Carobene

    The Internet should remain free and open like it was intended to do. I think Pc makers and softwares companies and Internet companies would lose alot of money if this was done and people stopped using the Internet!
  • truth

  • Tula

    Copyright issues is the way they are trying to shut down my channel...Is MIRRORING Illegal? Let me know!
  • truth

    sorry dont know Tula, maybe thoraxe knows
  • Tula

    Well, they are shutting Alex 1 Channel but he is going legal with ? 3 warnings...your fried and they shut Truthtube TV
  • Russell S.Wyllie

    Last night at exactly 12:00am GMT (British Time) the internet went dead. I waited half an hour, trying to access the web- the 'Talk-Talk' network came back online at approximately 12:30am

    It felt kinda strange- not the usual router crash or PC lockup.

    I had a sense that something was going on other than 'maintenance'...

    I wonder what my network provider has become part of...and what they're planning next. 

  • truth

    Google Skynet takes on Facebook social networking http://12160.info/profiles/blogs/google-skynet-takes-on
  • truth

    The Copyright Lobby Absolutely Loves Child Pornography http://torrentfreak.com/the-copyright-lobby-absolutely-loves-child-...
  • truth

  • guest_blog

    How to Prevent People from Tracking You on the Internet

    Image
    Misti
    The internet was built for convenience; not for security. If you surf the internet as much as an average person capable of accessing it, chances are you have many people tracking your browsing habits in the form of spyware, scripts, and maybe even through a camera! With this kind of information, a person from anywhere on the planet can figure out who you are, where you live and much more personal information.

    http://www.wikihow.com/Prevent-People-from-Tracking-You-on-the-Inte...

    http://imperialtwilight.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/internet-survei...
  • truth

  • Maria De Wind

    URGENT - HUGE STEALTH TAKEOVER

    They actually did it. Last week, the FCC published its net neutrality order in the Federal Register, stating that effective November 20 the federal government will begin regulating the Internet.

    Americans didn't want this. Congress rejected it decisively -- it only had 27 sponsors last year. The courts rejected it-- they said the FCC did not have the power to do this. And voters rejected it, defeating all 95 of the candidates who campaigned on the issue. That's right a perfect zero for 95.
    But unless the Senate votes to overturn this order before it takes effect November 20, we will start down the path to a government regulated and government controlled Internet.

    Demand your Senators kill this new STEALTH THEFT OF YOUR RIGHTS **

    "A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves."
  • truth

  • truth

    Israel Denies Anonymous Cyber-Attack to Blame for Websites Failure

    Matthew Kalman in Jerusalem
    In a YouTube video posted last Friday, Anonymous threatened to "strike back" at Israel if it continued to block vessels attempting to reach Gaza by sea. The video was released shortly after Israeli naval commandos boarded a Canadian and Irish vessel sailing to Gaza and arrested the passengers and crew.

  • calgarycmmc.com

    I use this for an anonymous search...and I give away the code for free...use it or not...although it defaults to my topic of choice...you can click on the All web button for security search

    Anonymous Search

     

    webmasters can copy and paste this code below...hope it helps

     

    <center><FORM METHOD=POST ACTION="http://www.scroogle.org/cgi-bin/nbbw.cgi">
    <INPUT type=text name="Gw" SIZE="10" MAXLENGTH="225">
    <INPUT type="submit" value="Anonymous Search">
    <BR><font size=1><INPUT type=hidden name="n" value="2">
    <INPUT type=radio name="d" value="www.calgarycmmc.com" CHECKED>Cannabis Research A-Z
    &nbsp;<INPUT type=radio name="d" value="*">All Web
    &nbsp; &nbsp;
    <BR></font></FORM></center>

     

     

  • Nana Silvergrim

    @calgarycmmc.com TYVM!

    I am using it here: http://folly-roger.blogspot.com/

  • Anonymiss Express

    I thank you too: http://anonymiss-express.blogspot.com/
  • truth

    Twitter Ordered to Disclose Data in WikiLeaks Investigation

    News Link  •  Police State

    Twitter Ordered to Disclose Data in WikiLeaks Investigation


    11-11-2011  •  slatest.slate.com 

    114986305Twitter stores information, including IP addresses, on individual accounts. A federal judge ruled Thursday that the company can be forced to turn over that information to the government.

    Photo by Oli Scarff/Getty Images.

    Twitter will have to disclose information, including location-revealing IP addresses, on three account holders currently under investigation for their possible involvement with WikiLeaks, a federal judge ruled this week.

    The New York Times reports that the Justice Department requested the information earlier this year, but did so without a warrant, a decision that helped turn the case into "a flash point for online privacy and speech." Twitter contacted the three account holders earlier this year to inform them of the demand for their information. None have been charged with a crime.

    Read Full Story

  • truth

    Handy anonimity tools

    You might as well start by looking in the data of your machine. Did you fill in your real name and address anywhere? Remove it. And don’t keep any of your passwords on your machine. A piece of paper will do.

    KeePassX is very useful if you make more identities, keeping the database on a USB stick that you take out of your machine when you walk away from it, and keep that stick in a location only known to you.

  • Anonymiss Express

    U.S. could claim millions of Canadian domain names in piracy battle

    By Michael Geist Internet Law Columnist

    The U.S. Congress is currently embroiled in a heated debated over the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA), proposed legislation that supporters argue is needed to combat online infringement, but critics fear would create the “great firewall of the United States.”

    SOPA’s potential impact on the Internet and development of online services is enormous as it cuts across the lifeblood of the Internet and e-commerce in the effort to target websites that are characterized as being “dedicated to the theft of U.S. property.” This represents a new standard that many experts believe could capture hundreds of legitimate websites and services.

    For those caught by the definition, the law envisions requiring Internet providers to block access to the sites, search engines to remove links from search results, payment intermediaries such as credit-card companies and PayPal to cut off financial support, and Internet advertising companies to cease placing advertisements.

    While these measures have unsurprisingly raised concern among Internet companies and civil society groups, the jurisdictional implications demand far more attention. The U.S. approach is breathtakingly broad, effectively treating millions of websites and IP addresses as “domestic” for U.S. law purposes.

    http://www.thestar.com/article/1085837--geist-u-s-could-claim-milli...

  • Anonymiss Express

  • truth

    DOJ: Make It a Federal Crime to “Lie” on the Internet

    •   The Alex Jones Channel Alex Jones Show podcast Prison Planet TV Infowars.com Twitter Alex Jones' Facebook Infowars store

    Kurt Nimmo
    Infowars.com
    November 16, 2011

    Obama’s Department of Justice will tell Congress today it should have the ability to prosecute people who lie on the internet. It wants to do this by making it illegal to breach the terms of service of websites.

    The DOJ’s deputy computer crime chief, Richard Downing, will argue that the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) — an amendment to the Counterfeit Access Device and Abuse Act generally used to prosecute hacking and other serious cyber-crime — must give prosecutors the ability to charge people “based upon a violation of terms of service or similar contractual agreement with an employer or provider,” according to Andrew Couts, writing for Digital Trends.

    Downing said law enforcement needs the revision in order to prosecute individuals for identity theft, privacy invasion or the misuse of government databases, and other violations of the law.

    Orin S. Kerr, professor of George Washington University Law School, told Digital Trends that if implemented the law would criminalize people under the age of 18 who use the Google Search engine. Under its terms of service, minors are not allowed to use Google or its services.

    “The same goes for someone who uses a fake name in their Facebook profile, or sheds a few pounds in their Match.com description — both of which are forbidden by those sites’ terms of service,” Couts notes.

    If implemented, the government will not use the law to prosecute people who use fake names on Facebook, although it may use it selectively to prosecute “cyber-criminals.”

  • Anonymiss Express

  • Anonymiss Express

    American Censorship: Round 2

    http://fc04.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2011/087/6/4/epic_fail_by_shitsujinoterepoto-d3cphbp.jpg

    Congress is trying to use the jobs crisis as an excuse to censor the internet. Tell them NO WAY, sign up now for the massive call-in day next week.

  • noblsht

    I signed in on that, I am good to go thanks for your efforts, we all need to band together on this

     

  • Tula

    Me tooo

  • guest_blog

    Phone 'Rootkit' Maker Carrier IQ May Have Violated Wiretap Law In M...

    A piece of keystroke-sniffing software called Carrier IQ has been embedded so deeply in millions of HTC and Samsung-built Android devices that it’s tough to spot and nearly impossible to remove, as 25-year old Connecticut systems administrator Trevor Eckhart revealed in a video Tuesday.

    That’s not just creepy, says Paul Ohm, a former Justice Department prosecutor and law professor at the University of Colorado Law School. He thinks it’s also likely grounds for a class action lawsuit based on a federal wiretapping law.