poses only and should not be construed as offering medical advice. Individuals should seek advice from a qualified health practitioner before pursuing any course of action on their own.)
This post is a compilation of videos and supporting links for alternative cancer therapies as well as various herbs, foods,and substances that have been shown to have immune boosting/cancer fighting properties. It is by no means a complete list as I have only added sections for which videos have been found; however, I will continue to add sections as new video content becomes available. In the meantime, it would be wise to read "Understanding Treating Cancer With Alternative Medicine", ”An Overview of the Best Alternative Cancer Treatments”, as well as the CancerTutor.com Articles section of this post to get an overview of the various alternative therapies and why it is absolutely necessary to have an expert in these therapies guide in the selection of the correct protocol and its adaptation to each individual's unique health condition. The articles also discuss the effectiveness of older treatments versus newer more potent protocols. When viewing testimonials for various treatments, it is important to keep in mind that many of the successes with older treatments occurred before the increased use of chemotherapy and radiation. As a result, they may be too weak or ineffective by themselves for those who have undergone conventional treatments.
Understandably, some readers may have negative attitudes toward alternative medicine. If they watch nothing else on this post, I encourage them to watch The Burzynski Movie and The Beautiful Truth. These two movies have set many on the path of doing their own research and questioning where they get their information from(See article ”How Bogus Scientific Studies Are Created”). Individuals have to take personal responsibility and investigate what they read, even the information presented on this post.
_______________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS - Sections & Main Presenters (Click "Back" button on browser to return to Table)
CancerTutor.com Articles - ***Important reading***
Useful Links - Quicklist of alternative cancer sites and clinics
Alternative cancer therapies
Bill Henderson Protocol - Bill Henderson, Cancer Coach | Beating Cancer Gently
Cellect-Budwig Protocol - Michael Vrentas | Fred Eichhorn
Holistic Cancer Therapy - Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez, MD, PC version of Kelley Therapy
Gerson Therapy - Dr. Max Gerson, MD (originator of the Gerson Therapy)
Intravenous Vitamin C (IVC) - Dr. Thomas Levy, MD | Dr. Ron Hunninghake, MD
Ozone RHP Therapy - RHP (Recirculatory Haemoperfusion)
Laetrile, Vitamin B17, & Apricot Seeds - G. Edward Griffin
Budwig Diet - Dr. Johanna Budwig, Pharmacologist, Biochemist & Physicist
Hallelujah Acres Diet
Hoxsey Therapy - Hoxsey Therapy has helped many people, but I'm unclear how effective it is with various cancers today.
Burzynski's Gene Targeted Cancer Therapy - Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski, MD, PhD
Electromedicine therapies (Typically combined w/ a nutritional protocol)
Beck Protocol - Dr. Robert Beck, D.Sc.
Rife Frequency Therapy - Dr. Royal Raymond Rife, microbiologist
Herbs, foods, substances with immune boosting/cancer fighting properties
Paw Paw - Dr. Jerry McLaughlin, PhD, Emeritus Professor of Pharmacognosy at Purdue University
Graviola
Cansema (Black Salve) - Greg Caton, herbalist
Hemp Oil & THC - Rick Simpson
Essiac Tea - Rene Caisse
Pau D'arco (Taheebo) Tea
Protocel (Cancell, Entelev, Cantron-different company) - Jim Sheridan, biochemist
Prostabel - Dr. Mirko Beljanski, PhD, molecular biologist
Protandim - Dr. Joe McCord, PhD, biochemist | Co-discovered SOD (Superoxide Dismutase) enzyme which opened up the field of free radical biology.
Beta-1, 3d Glucan - A. J. Lanigan (1'st product in Bill Henderson’s Protocol)
Vitamin D
Iodine
Enzymes, Wheatgrass, & Sprouting
Kombucha Tea - Fermented green or black tea beverage
General nutritional support
Dr. Wallach's 90 Essential Nutrients - Dr. Joel Wallach, DVM, ND (Products based on his 'plant derived' Colloidal Minerals)
Sulfur & MSM - MSM (Methylsulfonylmethane)
Detoxification
Toxic Substances that Interfere with Health and Healing
Dental Procedures - Links between root canals, mercury amalgams and disease
Infrared Saunas - Dr. Mercola, Dr. Brian Clement, Dr. George Yu
Chlorella
Other sections
Related videos & documentaries
Related posts
_______________________________________ CancerTutor.com Articles - ***Important reading*** CancerTutor.com
"Understanding Treating Cancer With Alternative Medicine"
”An Overview of the Best Alternative Cancer Treatments”
”Special Situations Cancer Patients Face”
”What Causes Cancer?”
”The Treatment of Stage IV Cancers” - “by R. Webster Kehr ... Read this free eBook at least once a month. Stage IV cancer is where almost all of the research of the Independent Cancer Research Foundation, Inc. is focused and the owner of Cancer Tutor is a member of the Board of Directors of the ICRF. Developments will hit this web page faster than other single page on the Internet.”
"Introduction to Alternative Cancer Treatments" - "By R. Webster Kehr, Independent Cancer Research Foundation, Inc." (ebook)
"The Importance of MSM Protocols"
”How to Prevent Your Cancer From Coming Back”
”For Those Still Using Chemotherapy and/or Radiation”
_______________________________________ Useful Links
CancerTutor.com
Alternative Cancer Treatment Clinics
www.new-cancer-treatments.org - The Independent Cancer Research Foundation. "One of the premiere alternative cancer treatment research organizations," according to CancerTutor.com
www.beating-cancer-gently.com - Bill Henderson
CancerDecisions.com - Dr. Ralph W. Moss, PhD
Dr-Gonzalez.com - Dr. Nicholas J. Gonzalez, MD, PC
www.BurzynskiClinic.com - Dr. Stanislaw R. Burzynski, MD, PhD
Gerson.org - Gerson Institute
www.hacres.com
www.cancure.org- The Cancer Cure Foundation
Directory of Clinics Worldwide
www.cancercontrolsociety.com
Directory of Doctors and Partients
www.OasisofHope.com - Oasis of Hope Hospital
Mercola.com - Dr. Joseph Mercola, MD
_______________________________________ BILL HENDERSON PROTOCOL CancerTutor.com Review - “...the least expensive of the highly potent protocols.” www.beating-cancer-gently.com
”Short Course”- A six article primer to read before reading his book, “Cancer-Free”.
”Specific Cancer Treatment Options” - Article 6
WebTalkRadio.net - Bill Henderson is the host of How To Live Cancer Free on WebTalkRadio.net. Click on “Archived Shows” tab to listen to previous shows.
Cancer-Free: Your Guide to Gentle, Non-toxic Healing (Second Edition) - (234 page book on Scribd)(2007)
Cancer-Free: Your Guide to Gentle, Non-toxic Healing (Fourth Edition) - Amazon.com (2011)
How to Cure Almost any Cancer at Home for $5.15 a Day - Bill Henderson’s Special Report. (47 page pdf)
Alternative Cancer Treatments - Overview of Bill Henderson’s book, "Cancer-Free", which is “based on the work by Nobel scientist, Dr. Otto Warburg, who discovered a cancer cure in 1931. Today, Bill Henderson, the author of "Cancer-Free, Your Guide to Gentle Non-Toxic Healing", is using those same cancer killing therapies.”
Overview of Bill Henderson book, “Cancer Free” - Video scrolls through Bill Henderson’s website and highlights various parts of his book and health program.
Bill Henderson - Short introduction Curing cancer at home naturally - Short introduction
How to Cure Almost any Cancer at Home for $5.15 a Day - (31 min audio)
Beating Cancer Gently - “Our Health Co-op interviews Bill Henderson, author of Cancer Free. Bill has helped over 2,000 cancer patients.” Part 1 - Introduction Part 2 - Cancer causes Part 3 - Anti-Cancer Diet
(Bill Henderson Protocol testimonials on Daily Paul: holbrook)
_______________________________________ CELLECT-BUDWIG PROTOCOL Note: Michael Vrentas uses the same aspect (Flax Oil/Cottage Cheese -- FOOC) part of the Budwig Diet that Bill Henderson does in his protocol. Bill Henderson said he would include the Cellect product in his protocol if it was less expensive. CancerTutor.com Review - "...one of the crown jewels of alternative medicine!" Supported by Michael Vrentas who is a cancer researcher and member of the board of directors for The Independent Cancer Research Foundation. Bill Henderson’s CANCER-FREE Newsletter (March 2, 2006) - Scroll down to -> (“Get To Know Fred Eichhorn -- You'll Be Glad You Did”) where he talks about Fred, his wife, and their work with cancer patients. Bill Henderson’s CANCER-FREE Newsletter (September 26, 2009) - Scroll down to -> (MICHAEL VRENTAS' NEW WEBSITE”) where he talks a bit about Michael’s Cellect-Budwig Protocol. CellectBudwig.com - Michael Vrentas' site
”Introduction to the Cellect-Budwig Protocol” - “This introduction describes the basics of the Cellect-Budwig Protocol which is covered in detail on our CD's or MP3 Downloads.”
”The Budwig Protocol - Science and Research”
www.ncrf.org - National Cancer Research Foundation was founded by Fred Eichhorn who is the creator of the nutritional supplement known as Cellect.
"Introduction and Fred's Background" - (See parts 2 through 12 for more detail.)
”Cancer Summary”
”Action Causes Reaction”
”How It Works” - Helpful visual aids
Cellect.org - Product Source which Michael Vrentas uses in his protocol.
Cellect_Budwig - Michael Vrentas gives an overview of his CDs covering this protocol. Part 1 Part 2
Testimonials - Most of these testimonials are from people who used Fred Eichhorn's nutritional program exclusively without taking conventional treatments. Bill Henderson interviews Wendy and Kim Sonsini -“Both ladies used Fred Eichhorn’s product called Cellect – and no other products – to heal their cancers.“ (Audio) (Interview 1 @ 16:33) (Interview 2 @ 14:30) ”Jen K - Brain Cancer” ”Anthony L. - Lung Cancer” ”Cesar A Sr. - Colon Cancer” ”Cowboy Joe - Pancreatic, Liver, Stomach, Throat and Neck Cancer” ”Joe Y. - Double Lung and Left Hip cancer - Advanced 4th Stage” ”Steve H. - Prostate Cancer and Mercury Poisoning” ”Laura H. - Multiple Sclerosis”
_______________________________________ HOLISTIC CANCER THERAPY Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez adaptation of the Kelley Therapy. Dr-Gonzalez.com CancerTutor.com Review - Review of original Kelly Therapy
One Answer to Cancer: The Original Metabolic Medicine’s Cancer Cure - By Dr. William Donald Kelley, D.D.S., M.S.(Read online)
Dr. Mercola Interviews Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez on Cancer Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 Part 5 Part 6 Part 7
Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez on Steve Jobs - “Natural health physician and Mercola.com founder Dr. Joseph Mercola and Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez discuss about Steve Jobs' health condition on pancreas tumor.”
Advanced Protocols for Cancer “In this interview, Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez, the author of One Man Alone: An Investigation of Nutrition, Cancer, and William Donald Kelley and co-author of The Trophoblast and the Origins of Cancer, discusses Kelley Therapy: a fascinating nutritional paradigm for healing degenerative diseases. From their New York office, Dr. Gonzalez and his partner Dr. Linda Isaacs develop patient-specific nutritional protocols for diet, supplementation, enzyme therapy, and detoxification to address disease conditions and help the body cope with profound environmental toxicity.” Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 Part 5 Part 6 Part 7
_______________________________________ THE GERSON THERAPY Gerson.org
A Cancer Therapy: Results of 50 cases / 6th edition - By Dr. Max Gerson, MD “In 1958, based on thirty years of clinical experimentation, Dr. Max Gerson published this medical monograph. This is the most complete book on the Gerson Therapy. Dr. Gerson (1881-1959), who developed the Gerson Therapy, explains how the treatment reactivates the body's healing mechanisms in chronic degenerative diseases. The book incorporates extensive explanation of the theory with scientific research and the exact practice of the therapy, as well as a presentation of fifty documented case histories. Also included is a modified version of the Gerson Therapy for use with nonmalignant diseases or preventative purposes.”
Gerson Therapy Handbook / Updated Fifth Edition - By Dr. Max Gerson, MD “The Gerson Therapy Handbook provides a detailed discussion of the Gerson Therapy protocol, starting with procedures at the hospital (including notes from lectures by hospital physicians), necessities for doing the Therapy at home, interpretation of lab tests, and more. It includes juicing schedules and enema formulas, information on healing reactions, adjuvant therapies and procedures, pesticides and merits of organic food. It also includes all of the recipes found in the Gerson Therapy Recipe Book.”
Dr. Max Gerson: Healing the Hopeless - Howard Straus “Howard Straus, the grandson of Dr. Max Gerson (originator of the Gerson Therapy), chronicles Dr. Gerson’s life. It discusses the development of his world-famous dietary therapy and the struggles this medical pioneer faced as he challenged orthodox medicine with his nutritional protocol. This inspiring and uplifting biography follows Dr. Gerson through Nazi persecution, then persecution in the United States from the medical establishment, the continuation of his work despite the opposition, his questionable death and finally the present, where daughter Charlotte Gerson and the Gerson Institute work to continue his legacy and vision.”
Censured for Curing Cancer: The American Experience of Dr. Max - By S.J. Haught “S.J. Haught interviewed Dr. Gerson for his story, "The Unveiling of a Quack." Instead he wrote a story that he describes as about "a man who by absolute record had cured people of cancer, including children, and his incredibly courageous and lonely fight against the forces or organized medicine." “
A Time to Heal - By Beata Bishop “Told that her spreading melanoma would take her life by 1981, Beata Bishop traveled from London to Mexico to begin Gerson Therapy treatment. She writes of her experiences at the hospital with humor and introspection. A Time To Heal illustrates her newfound sense of well-being. “
The Beautiful Truth Trailer - “Garrett is a 15-year old boy living in the Alaskan wilderness with a menagerie of orphaned animals. Growing up close with nature has given him a deep understanding of nutritional needs required by diet sensitive animals on the reserve. Unfortunately, the untimely and tragic death of his mother propelled him into a downward spiral and he risked flunking out of school. This led to his fathers decision to home-school Garrett. His first assignment was to study a controversial book written by Dr. Max Gerson.”
Full Movie - “Raised on a wildlife reserve in Alaska, 15-year-old Garrett was interested in the dietary habits of the farm animals. After the tragic death of his mother, Garrett's father decided to home-school his son and assigned a book written by Dr. Max Gerson that proposed a direct link between diet and a cure for cancer. Fascinated, Garrett embarks in this documentary on a cross-country road trip to investigate The Gerson Therapy. He meets with scientists, doctors and cancer survivors who reveal how it is in the best interest of the multi-billion dollar medical industry to dismiss the notion of alternative and natural cures.”
The Gerson Miracle “The Gerson Miracle examines many of the elements of the Gerson Therapy, explaining why we are so ill and how we have in our grasp the power to recover our health without expensive, toxic or mutilating treatments, using the restorative forces of our own immune systems. Even the most advanced cases of cancer can be successfully reversed using this method. While the results seem miraculous, the real "miracle" lies within our own body and its healing processes.” Full Movie
YouTube: Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 Part 5 Part 6 Part 7 Part 8 Part 9…
is already deemed as the law of the land. Hitler used “Rule of Law”, and of course, he appointed his judges.
I heard Hillary Clinton state during the debates when running against Trump that the next POTUSA must follow the RULE OF LAW. She must have been referring to what R. E. Sutherland is writing about. Depends on who wrote the Law and who interprets it and who has the power to enforce it.
This issue of CLIMATE CHANGE is another secret implementation that is going to be coming forth more openly and fully in the form of a NATIONAL SUNDAY LAW to go beyond the current NATIONAL DAY OF PRAYER ON SUNDAY.
SUBJECT: The Act of 1871 in the United States
By R.E. Sutherland, M.Ed./sciences
INTRODUCTION: Unfolding before our eyes is a clash of titans who are hidden from us by clever news editors. Hence, until and unless the people are willing to study and search for hidden information, the battle will continue without the light of understanding. Here is some knowledge to guide your understanding.
FIRST: Do our government leaders tell us the truth? QUOTE: We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false. — William Casey, CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)
SECOND: What is our government leadership hiding from us? START HERE to learn when the political deceptions began in the USA. 1775 – Speech by Edmund Burke to Parliament – Urging members to trick American colonists. Let them believe that they are free, and work them like slaves to continue building the British Empire. QUOTE from Edmond Burke in March 22, 1775 with his Speech on Conciliation with America: “. . . Let the colonies always keep the idea of their civil rights associated with your government–they will cling and grapple to you, and no force under heaven will be of power to tear them from their allegiance. But let it be once understood that your government may be one thing and their privileges another that these two things may exist without any mutual relation–the cement is gone, the cohesion is loosened, and everything hastens to decay and dissolution. As long as you have the wisdom to keep the sovereign authority of this country as the sanctuary of liberty, the sacred temple consecrated to our common faith, wherever the chosen race and sons of England worship freedom, they will turn their faces toward you.
The more they multiply, the more friends you will have, the more ardently they love liberty, the more perfect will be their obedience. Slavery they can have; they can have it from Spain; they may have it from Prussia. But until you become lost to all feeling of your true interest and your natural dignity, freedom they can have from none but you. This commodity of price, of which you have the monopoly. This is the true Act of Navigation, which binds to you the commerce of the colonies, and through them secures to you the wealth of the world. Deny them this participation of freedom, and you break that sole bond which originally made, and must still preserve, the unity of the empire. . . Let us get an American revenue as we have got an American empire. English privileges have made it all that it is; English privileges alone will make it all it can be.”
THIRD: What is the difference between the “de jure Congress” (1776 to 1860) and the “sine de Congress” (1865-present)?
Definition of de jure: The government, which is recognized de jure, obtains full legal and diplomatic privileges from the granting state.. Source: dictionary.cambridge.org/…/english/de-jure
Definition of sine die: Adjournment sine die (from the Latin “without day”) means “without assigning a day for a further meeting or hearing”. To adjourn an assembly sine die is to adjourn it for an indefinite period. Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adjournment_sine_die
FOURTH: What happened to the United States when Congress passed The Act of 1871? QUOTE: Two Constitutions in the USA: The 1st was suspended in favor of a Vatican Corporation in 1871
https://worldtruth.tv/two-constitutions-in-the-united-states-1st-was-suspended-in-favor-of-a-vatican-corporation-in-1871/
Tuesday, February 12, 2019
REPORTER NOTES: (rough transcript from the website; go to link for full disclosures)
(QUOTE) Since 1871 the United States president and the United States Congress has been playing politics under a different set of rules and policies. The American people do not know that there are two Constitutions in the United States. The first penned by the leaders of the newly independent states of the United States in 1778. On July 4, 1776, the people claimed their independence from Britain and Democracy was born. And for 95 years the United States people were free and independent. That freedom ended in 1871 when the original “Constitution for the united states for America” was changed to the “THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”.
The Congress realized that the country was in dire financial straits, so they made a financial deal with the devil – international bankers – (in those days, the Rothschilds of London) thereby incurring a DEBT to said bankers. The conniving international bankers were not about to lend the floundering nation any money without some serious stipulations. So, they devised a way of taking back control of the United States and thus, the Act of 1871 was passed. With no constitutional authority to do so, Congress created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia.
With the passage of “the Act of 1871” a city state (a state within a state) called the District of Columbia located on 10 sq miles of land in the heart of Washington was formed with its own flag and its own independent constitution – the United States’ secret second constitution.
The flag of Washington’s District of Columbia has 3 red stars, each symbolizing a city state within the three city empire. The three city empire consists of Washington D.C., London, and Vatican City. London is the corporate center of the three city states and controls the world economically. Washington’s District of Columbia city state is in charge of the military, and the Vatican controls it all under the guise of spiritual guidance.
Although geographically separate, the city states of London, the Vatican and the District of Columbia are one interlocking empire called “Empire of the City”.
The constitution for the District of Columbia operates under tyrannical Vatican law known as “lex Fori” (local law). When congress passed the act of 1871 it created a separate corporation known as THE UNITED STATES and corporate government for the District of Columbia. This treasonous act has unlawfully allowed the District of Columbia to operate as a corporation outside the original constitution of the United States and in total disregard of the best interests of the American citizens.
POTUS is the Chief Executive (president) of the Corporation of the United States operating as any other CEO of the corporation – governs w/a Board of Directors (cabinet officials) and managers (Senators/Congress)
Obama as others before him is POTUS – operating as “vassal king” taking orders once again from “The City of London” through the RIIA (Royal Institute of Intl Affairs). The Illuminati (founded by The Society of Jesus or Jesuits, the largest Roman Catholic Religious Military Order headed by the Black Pope) created the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA) in 1919. The American equivalent to the RIIA is the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR). The RIIA and CFR set up Round Table Groups (based on the King Arthur myths).
What did the Act of 1871 achieve? The ACT of 1871 put the United States back under British rule (which is under Vatican rule). The United States people lost their independence in 1871.
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is the constitution of the incorporated United States of America. It operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it governs the Republic. It does not!
Capitalization is NOT insignificant when one is referring to a legal document. This seemingly “minor” alteration has had a major impact on every subsequent generation of Americans. What Congress did by passing the Act of 1871 was create an entirely new document, a constitution for the government of the District of Columbia, an INCORPORATED government.
Instead of having absolute and unalienable rights guaranteed under the organic Constitution, we the people now have “relative” rights or privileges. One example is the Sovereign’s right to travel, which has now been transformed (under corporate government policy) into a “privilege” that requires citizens to be licensed – driver’s licenses and Passports. By passing the Act of 1871, Congress committed TREASON against the People who were Sovereign under the grants and decrees of the Declaration of Independence and the organic Constitution. The Act of 1871 became the FOUNDATION of all the treason since committed by government officials.
As of 1871 the United States isn’t a Country; It’s a Corporation!
In preparation for stealing America, the puppets of Britain’s banking cabal had already created a second government, a Shadow Government designed to manage what “the people” believed was a democracy, but what really was an incorporated UNITED STATES. Together this chimera, this two-headed monster, disallowed “the people” all rights of sui juris. [you, in your sovereignty]
The U.S. A. is a Crown Colony. The U.S. has always been and remains a British Crown colony. King James I, is not just famous for translating the Bible into “The King James Version”, but for signing the “First Charter of Virginia” in 1606 – which granted America’s British forefathers license to settle and colonize America. The charter guaranteed future Kings/Queens of England would have sovereign authority over all citizens and colonized land in America.
After America declared independence from Great Britain, the Treaty of Paris, signed on September 3, 1783 was signed. That treaty identifies the King of England as prince of U.S. “Prince George the Third, by the grace of God, king of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, defender of the faith, duke of Brunswick and Lunebourg, arch-treasurer and prince elector of the Holy Roman Empire etc., and of the United States of America” – completely contradicting premise that America won the War of Independence.
Article 5 of that treaty gave all British estates, rights and properties back to Britain.
(QUOTE from Article 5) It is agreed that Congress shall earnestly recommend it to the legislatures of the respective states to provide for the restitution of all estates, rights, and properties, which have been confiscated belonging to real British subjects; and also of the estates, rights, and properties of persons resident in districts in the possession on his Majesty’s arms and who have not borne arms against the said United States.
And that persons of any other description shall have free liberty to go to any part or parts of any of the thirteen United States and therein to remain twelve months unmolested in their endeavors to obtain the restitution of such of their estates, rights, and properties as may have been confiscated; and that Congress shall also earnestly recommend to the several states a reconsideration and revision of all acts or laws regarding the premises, so as to render the said laws or acts perfectly consistent not only with justice and equity but with the spirit of conciliation which on the return of the blessings of peace should universally prevail.
And that Congress shall also earnestly recommend to the several states that the estates, rights, and properties, of such last mentioned persons shall be restored to them, they refunding to any persons who may be now in possession the bona fide price (where any has been given) which such persons may have paid on purchasing any of the said lands, rights, or properties since the confiscation.
And it is agreed that all persons who have any interest in confiscated lands, either by debts, marriage settlements, or otherwise, shall meet with no lawful impediment in the prosecution of their just rights. (END Quote from Article 5)
It is becoming increasingly apparent to American citizens that government is no longer being conducted in accordance with the U.S. Constitution, or, within states, according to state constitutions.
While people have recognized for more than 150 years that the rich and powerful often corrupt individual officials, or exert undue influence to get legislation passed that favors their interests, most Americans still cling to the naïve belief that such corruption is exceptional, and that most of the institutions of society, the courts, the press, and law enforcement agencies, still largely comply with the Constitution and the law in important matters. They expect that these corrupting forces are disunited and in competition with one another, so that they tend to balance one another.
Mounting evidence makes it clear that the situation is far worse than most people think, that during the last several decades the U.S. Constitution has been effectively overthrown, and that it is now observed only as a façade to deceive and placate the masses.
What has replaced it is what many call the Shadow Government – created with the illegal passing of the Act of 1871. It still, for the most part, operates in secret, because its control is not secure.
The exposure of this regime and its operations must now become a primary duty of citizens who still believe in the Rule of Law and in the freedoms which this country is supposed to represent. END REPORTER NOTES: rough transcript
FIFTH: What is “Rule of Law”?
Technically it is rule by judges. Under actual “Law”, even the judges must come under the laws, and their role is merely to adjudicate what is already deemed as the law of the land. Hitler used “Rule of Law”, and of course, he appointed his judges.
SIXTH: What happened in 2012 to the sovereign status of the United States?
The U.S. Government Corporation of 1871 seized control over the sovereignty of the United States by using the international law at The Hague. In 2012, a few patriots in the individual states reclaimed sovereignty for themselves via The Hague. The Federal Republic for the United States of America was reinstated as sovereign, and the U.S. Government Corporation lost the protection of the U.S. Military, which was notified of the action. The U.S. Military requested Certified-and-True copies of the documents filed with The Hague. Once delivered, the military came under Command-and-Control of the citizens in those states, and it remains under that control today. Trump was asked to run and become the elected President of the Federal Republic for the United States. He won.
Unfortunately, most Americans are totally ignorant about the Act of 1871, and the ex post facto laws generated by that controlling entity. The state Governors are bribed and blackmailed to cooperate with the USG. There is a power struggle at this time. Russia and China are very aware of who the real sovereign representatives are in the USA, and they are cooperating. Most of the members in Congress have taken bribes or have been blackmailed to cooperate with the U.S.G. Corporation. Money is the carrot; Murder is the stick. They are very frightened by the events of 2012, because they know the penalty for treason.
LINK to information: http://divinecosmos.com/mass_arrests.pdf
[The documents from The Hague have been accessed by this reporter. The evidence proves that the PDF link is reporting TRUTH. Drake Bailey’s information is documented.]
SEVENTH: Since Obama’s presidency, what has changed on the political landscape that is significant? The article called “Two Constitutions in the USA” was posted under Obama’s presidency. Remember, that under the Act of 1871, the President of the USA served the Vatican. As a Muslim, Obama was working with the Vatican to create a Muslim-Catholic alliance, per the Vatican’s orders. That alliance was formerly completed and signed on February 4, 2019. The Vatican always creates a new seat of power for the Holy Roman Empire, when the old seat falls. The Vatican’s movement has been studied for over 2,000 years, and it is not changing its behavior.
Source ONE: Pope Francis signs peace declaration on ‘Human Fraternity’ with Grand Imam, By Mary Rezac https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/pope-francis-signs-peace-declaration-on-human-fraternity-with-grand-imam-98253
Source TWO: Pope Francis and Grand Imam of Al Azhar Sign Historic Abu Dhabi Declaration for World Peace and Living Together https://business.financialpost.com/pmn/press-releases-pmn/business-wire-news-releases-pmn/pope-francis-and-grand-imam-of-al-azhar-sign-historic-abu-dhabi-declaration-for-world-peace-and-living-together ABU DHABI, United Arab Emirates — Pope Francis and His Eminence the Grand Imam of Al Azhar Dr. Ahmed At-Tayyeb have signed the historic Abu Dhabi Declaration – a document on Human Fraternity in the United Arab Emirates.
EIGHTH: What happened in 2019 to the Vatican that is upsetting the “Catholic cart” of power? FACT: The Vatican lost control of the Vatican City and its wealth on January 17, 2019 Source: Italy Arrests Cardinals And Seizes Vatican City
Vatican City is invaded and ceases to exist as an independent country.
www.patheos.com
Confirmation of source: Interview with Drake Bailey on Quantum Shift, January 22, 2019 http://kcorradio.com/KCOR/Podcasts/The-Quantum-Shift/2019/January/january-22-2019.mp3
NINTH: Do we already know the outcome of the clash of the titans in the USA, which is happening under the political table? No, we do not know the final outcome; however, there is plenty of prophecy that tells us where we are headed. Source: The Trump Prophecies, as given to Mark Taylor, retired Firefighter in Orlando in 2011. LINK: www.SORDrescue.com
Source: Kim Clement prophetic information about Trump. LINK: Man Who Prophesied Trump’s Election In 2007 Reveals 3 More Chilling Predictions, Tuesday, February 5, 2019 https://beforeitsnews.com/v3/prophecy/2019/2503023.html
Daniel 9:27 And he will make a firm covenant with the many for one week, but in the middle of the week he will put a stop to sacrifice and grain offering; and on the wing of abominations will come one who makes desolate, even until a complete destruction, one that is decreed, is poured out on the one who makes desolate.”
Jeremiah 6:14 14 “They have healed the brokenness of My people superficially, Saying, ‘Peace, peace,’ But there is no peace.
Revelation 11:15-19 15 Then the seventh angel sounded; and there were loud voices in heaven, saying, “The kingdom of the world has become the kingdom of our Lord and of His Christ; and He will reign forever and ever.” 16 And the twenty-four elders, who sit on their thrones before God, fell on their faces and worshiped God, 17 saying,
“We give You thanks, O Lord God, the Almighty, who are and who were, because You have taken Your great power and have begun to reign. 18 And the nations were enraged, and Your wrath came, and the time came for the dead to be judged, and the time to reward Your bond-servants the prophets and the saints and those who fear Your name, the small and the great, and to destroy those who destroy the earth.”
19 And the temple of God which is in heaven was opened; and the ark of His covenant appeared in His temple, and there were flashes of lightning and sounds and peals of thunder and an earthquake and a great hailstorm.
TENTH: What is the opinion of the globalist Elites concerning President Trump?
The Elites are On the Record stating: “God has intervened.” They are not able to move forward with their destructive Plan of world domination, until God pulls back his hand of protection from the United States and President Donald J. Trump. That is what they tell us. Even Satan knows not to “mess with the Almighty”. This reprieve by the Almighty is a chance for Man to rise, expose evil, and get rid of Roe vs Wade…which is the sacrificing of babies to Baal via abortion… and also by infanticide, a criminal act. Source: The Elites Are Panicking! 2019 Predictions – Lindsey Williams Thursday, February 7, 2019 16:42 https://beforeitsnews.com/v3/alternative/2019/3661411.html
CONCLUSION: The Congress that has violated God’s Law, as written in the Torah, was established in 1871. Using its crafty political power to legislate, it created “federal areas” to extend its grip beyond the boundaries of Washington, D.C. Trump’s administration along with the White Hats in the military and federal agencies are working to end that power grab.
END…
he chairmanship of H.R.H. The Prince of the Netherlands.It will be recalled that previous conferences of the same kind were held at Bilderberg in Holland in May, 1954, and at Barbizon in France in March, 1955. The purpose of this series of conferences is to reach the highest possible denominator of mutual understanding between the countries of Western Europe and North America and so to work for the removal of causes of friction,to study those fields where action may be necessary to prevent friction from arising in the future and to examine the general areas in which agreement may be sought. To this end it was thought desirable to bring together a group of men of ex-perience, outstanding qualities and influence from different countries of the Western world in an atmosphere of mutual confidence and personal friendship which would admit of free and frank discussion. It is not the purpose of the Bilderberg series of conferences toconstruct policy. Participants include statesmen and diplomatists; trades unionists, intellectuals, business and professional men.
They speak as individuals and not as representatives of their respective countries or the political parties, associations, or organizations to which they may belong. All, however, share a high purpose and a clear recognition of the urgency of the situation.It was a conclusion of the first Bilderberg Conference that for historical reasons, together with many factors which were the ingredients of the present political, economic, and social situation, there would always be differences of opinion between the countries of Western Europe and those of North America, and in fact between any two countries in the world. Divergencies of view are not in themselves deplorable, and indeed, they are the quintessence of democratic life. Nevertheless, it is a matter of the utmost urgency that the will and the means should exist for finding a common basis on which to build our future.At the second conference, held in Barbizon this year, subjects were chosen for the agenda which were bound to be controversial to a certain extent, but the discussion of which could clarify the situation, and in some cases could be followed up in the future.The problem of the uncommitted peoples was discussed and the general question of communist infiltration and propaganda, together with the approach of the Western European and North American countries to this question. It was felt that there must grow up not only a better understanding between the countries of the Western alliance but a closer contact and better understanding with the Asian and African countries, to many of which belong the so-called uncommitted peoples of the world.
There was a strong current of opinion also that there might be great value in arranging a subsequent meeting between leaders of the mind and spirit of the East and West in an atmosphere similar to that of the Bilderberg series of conferences.It was also generally agreed that too little was being done to counteract the unceasing and insidious encroachment of communist propaganda. The participants agreed that whenever they had the opportunity they would try to further those ideas and suggestions which had found general agreement at the two previous meetings, by making whatever use might be possible of the press and other contacts with public opinion. It is believed also that in the wide and important field presented by the European-American Associations much could be done towards creating the friendly atmosphere needed for the growth of the highest degree of co-operation. It will be seen from the list of participants that the Garmisch Conference was attended by men from thirteen different countries. The subjects discussed were:I. Review of events since the Barbizon Conference.
II. Article 2 of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
III. The political and strategic aspects of atomic energy.
IV. The reunification of Germany.
V. European unity.
VI. The industrial aspects of atomic energy. VII. Economic problems:
(a) East-West trade(b) The political aspects of convertibility(c) Expansion of international trade.In order to allow participants to speak with perfect frankness and in the knowledge that their words would not be read outsidethe conference circle, the Chairman asked for the utmost discretion. The press, as at the previous conferences, was not admitted,and this document should be treated as strictly confidential and for the personal use of the recipient only.A press statement, released at Garmisch-Partenkirchen on 26 September, 1955, is reproduced in the Appendix to this report.SUMMARY OF CONSENSUS OF OPINION AT THE CONFERENCEA. The changes in internal characteristics and external behaviour of the Soviet regime.The group noted that during the last year or two there have been significant changes both in the internal characteristics and theexternal behaviour of the Soviet regime. These changes are such as to deserve the considered attention of the Western peoples, and give some grounds for hope that the problem of Soviet Russian power and ideology will not be necessarily over the long term what we have known it to be in the past. Nevertheless, they have not yet led to any alterations in the Soviet position on majorissues that could warrant in the slightest degree any modifications in the military posture of the Western countries as embodied in the policies and arrangements of NATO, or in their efforts to strengthen the free world politically and economically. Nor can therebe any relaxation of vigilance in the face of other devices directed against the unity and the inner strength of the free world.On the contrary, it is obvious that if the Western powers should permit themselves to be led into a premature relaxation of their defence effort, or into a slackened pursuit of their political and economic goals, this might very well give rise to renewed falsehopes and miscalculations on the Soviet side which could undo even those slender elements of hope and encouragement implicit in the present situation.On the other hand, there is also the opposite danger of needlessly rebuffing Soviet moves which may offer an opportunity for the establishment of a better atmosphere in internal relations and of inflicting on the peoples of the free world a discouragementgreater than circumstances would warrant. It must be made clear to the Russians that every positive move on their part towards an improvement of relations with the' free world will meet with an appropriate response.In the coming period, Western policy will have to bear in mind constantly these two preoccupations. An undue emphasis on either of them can be distinctly dangerous. A carefully selected blend of unshakeable firmness and willingness to put forward andseriously to examine suggestions affords prospects that warrant reasonable optimism as to the possibility of preserving peace without jeopardy to the security of the free nations.
B. The North Atlantic Treaty OrganizationDuring a broad discussion, the different aspects of the role of NATO were examined:
1 The need for maintaining and even increasing the effectiveness of the Atlantic Pact on all levels was recognized, for onthe vigour of the Atlantic Pact depend largely the chances of negotiation and peace.2 The military effort must be continued and maintained to the point necessary to prevent all temptation to resort toviolence.3 Emphasis was laid upon the importance of the Atlantic Community strengthening itself by making use of all facilities,including those offered by the Pact, for economic, social, and psychological co-operation.C. The Political and Strategic Aspects of Atomic Energy The group discussed the impact of atomic energy on the political anddefence • f the free countries of the West. No agreement was reached as to any method by which atomic warfare could be limitedwithout surrendering the freedom of action of the Western countries to defend themselves but it was generally felt that theirdefensive arrangements are already based on the use of the minimum atomic or nuclear force necessary.If the devastating effect of nuclear war acted as a deterrent to aggressive action and made war less likely it followed that thestruggle on the ideological front would become more intense. The West must prepare itself for this development by increasing in every way the vitality of its society.D The Reunification of Germany There was general agreement within the group as to the urgency of this problem as expressed by many speakers. There could be no real security in Europe until the reunification of Germany had been achieved on a basis of real freedom.In discussing the Soviet's interest in German reunification there was a general feeling that the Soviet was not so much interested in the reunification of Germany as in the terms which she could get for it. It appeared that her object was still to use reunificationas a central device to detach Western Germany from the Western security organization and eventually to absorb her into the Soviet satellite system. Some participants expressed the view that the Soviet had a fear of what she called capitalist encirclement and eventual attack by the Western powers. Whether this fear was real or false, the West should not abandon the hope of a possible successful approach by means of a security arrangement which would not endanger NATO or impair German freedom.There was a general consensus of opinion that in these circumstances great caution and great patience were needed in any approach to the solution of this important problem.
E. European UnityThe discussion on this subject revealed general support for the idea of European integration and unification among the participants from the six countries of the European Coal and Steel Community, and a recognition of the urgency of the problem.While members of the group held different views as to the method by which a common market could be set up, there was a general recognition of the dangers inherent in the present divided markets of Europe and the pressing need to bring the German people, together with the other peoples of Europe, into a common market. That the six countries of the Coal and Steel Communityhad definitely decided to establish a common market and that experts were now working this out was felt to be a most encouraging step forward and it was hoped that other countries would subsequently join it. The need was generally accepted to press forward with functional integration in the economic domain particularly with regard to the industrial utilization of atomic energy. It was generally recognized that it is our common responsibility to arrive in the shortest possible timeat the highest degree of integration, beginning with a common European market. It was also generallyagreed that the tariff walls surrounding this common market should certainly not be higher and shouldpossibly be lower than the average of the existing tariffs now applied by the individual countriesconcerned.
F. The Industrial Aspects of Atomic Energy During this discussion a consensus of opinion manifested itself in certain points.1 The future of the human race is bound up with the development of nuclear energy.2 The cost of research, development, installation, and the training of large numbers of specialists is very high. Thus thedevelopmental expense which must be put into what might be called the first and second generations of reactors meant thateconomic justification would come after this. Nevertheless in the next few years this problem can be expected to be solved.3 As a result of the high cost it is of vital importance that Europe should combine her resources, since the cost per capitain any single country would be far greater than that in the United States with its larger population and resources.4 The opportunity to initiate joint action in Europe should be seized before atomic development has been crystallizedalong national lines and at a time when vested interests have not yet established the obstacles which may make co-operative actionmore difficult, if not impossible, in a few years' time.5 The opportunity to develop this new source of energy is an opportunity to increase productive output and is directlyconnected with the establishment of a common European market. Around it can be built, if the opportunity is not lost, a newaspect and a new hope for the unification of Europe.6 The quickest possible steps should be taken towards the integration of Europe in respect to the industrial use of atomicenergy, and joint planning, training and research should be started as soon as possible. The possibility of extending this particularform of integration to other than European countries was also emphasized.
I. REVIEW OF EVENTSSINCE THE BARBIZON CONFERENCEA European rapporteur surveyed the international events of the past six months. There had been a political evolution which might be called sensational; the conclusion of the Austrian Treaty, the visit of Bulganin and Khrushchev to Yugoslavia, the Summit Conference in Geneva, and lastly, the Atomic Conference in Geneva. The question was whether this was illusion or reality.There seemed to be no serious reason to believe that the communist leaders had become less communist and therefore the changes in Soviet foreign policy were only tactical changes. Perhaps we were entering into a new "Litvinov" period. There seemed to be a parallel in the situation today according to what the Soviet leaders had themselves told us. Their statementsindicated that there was a serious crisis in Soviet agriculture and in the productivity of Soviet industry, and there was an undoubted political crisis as a result of the adjustments made after Stalin's death. There was a tendency in the West to say "In spite of threats and Soviet actions we have set up the Western European Union and this has brought the Russians to the negotiatingtable." Was this really true? Or was it that Russia, having been unable to prevent the ratification of the Western European Union, was trying to prevent its implementation and aiming at neutralizing NATO? Russia could be likened to malaria. It was wrong tobelieve oneself dead when the fever was high and even more wrong to believe oneself cured when the attack was over. It was necessary to use the period when the fever subsided to take a cure and build up resistance against the next attack and this should indicate the action which we should take to meet the new turn in Soviet policy.The cold war, as we had known it, had been a trench war, whereas the new conflict, called co-existence, was a war of movement. The change over from a trench war to a war of movement had often resulted in serious military disasters and we should be very careful lest this transition also caused disasters in the political field. There were serious dangers in the new diplomacy by television rather than by negotiation and it was of great importance that we should not lower our guard. While we all sincerely hoped that the Russians really wanted peace, we must never forget that they may only wish to disrupt the military andpolitical organization of the Western world and that they will try to exploit all the difficulties which may arise between Europe and America.It was significant that Khruschev himself, speaking recently in Moscow, had said that the Russians always spoke the truth to their friends as well as to their adversaries. They were in favour of the relaxation of tension but if anyone thought that, to achieveit, they were going to forget about Marx, Lenin and Engels, he would be wrong. This was as likely to happen as it was for Easterto fall on a Tuesday. They were for co-existence because both capitalism and socialism exist in the world, but they would alwaysstand for the construction of socialism. They did not believe that war was necessary for that, since peaceful emulation wouldsuffice.An American participant next described the current trend of United States affairs and policies affecting Europe. Since Barbizonthe United States had gone through a period of relative tranquillity in its public opinion which had been remarkably quiet onforeign policy matters and a mood of moderation prevailed. The Austrian settlement and the Geneva talks on atomic energy hadbeen well received and the misgivings with which the Summit Conference had first been viewed had given way in the end tosatisfaction that some good might have been achieved. The speaker agreed, however, that great caution was necessary. The UnitedStates was also entering its quadrennial fever of presidential elections, a fact which could not but complicate to some extentUnited States foreign policy arrangements. With regard to diplomacy by television which had been mentioned by the first speaker,he felt that we should note that United States foreign policy would continue to be subject to a vigorous and interested publicdiscussion, since a government in his country could not expect to follow an important policy over a considerable period of timewithout full discussion, full understanding and support by a large proportion of the population.The speaker mentioned two long-range issues of great importance. The first was the meaning of the new Soviet diplomacy and itseffect upon the solidarity of the free world. Radically different assumptions about Soviet policy might lead us into dangerouslydivergent paths. We must seek the proper balance between vigilance and strength on the one hand, and willingness to negotiateand settle specific issues as steps towards reducing tension on the other. Would our essential Western unity melt under the newSoviet sun and our inevitable differences loom larger? What would our attitude now be towards the fate of our friends in theSoviet satellites ? Would we be wise and sophisticated in the more difficult competition in non-military fields and determined insustaining the economic and other burdens of this competition? We need a common view, common strategy and commondetermination since communism would become more seductive if it were to modify its two most repelling aspects of ruthlesstotalitarianism and armed aggression, and would present us with an even more serious problem than in the past.The second issue, or set of issues, which might divide and weaken us arose in the Pacific. The United States was orientatedtowards two oceans and concerned about Pacific security only slightly less than Atlantic security. This was why Americans wereexercised about the problem of Japan earning a living in the world in which she finds herself and were disappointed at thereservations which accompanied the admission of Japan to the GATT agreements. And then there was the problem of China. Herewe were confronted by a problem which was far more than a technical question of credentials and recognition, and the Chinaquestion could seriously affect our total relationship unless we could find a basis of agreement among ourselves.A Canadian speaker could not find very much in Canadian opinion which differed from that described by his American colleague.Technically and diplomatically the United States and Canada were in the same position but opinion in the latter country had beenincreasingly worried about the realism and wisdom of non-recognition of China and that was an anxiety shared by all politicalparties. Another United States speaker felt that it was important to recognize that the major differences that had existed betweenRussia and the Western countries since the recent war did not arise basically from the ideological disparity between the twosystems, although that was important, or even from the personality and methods of Stalin himself, but rather from the fact that thedestruction temporarily of the power of Germany and Japan left great political and military voids in the world and there was noagreement in 1945 between the major powers on the Western side, on the one hand, and Russia on the other, as to how these voidsshould be filled. Internal conditions in Russia could change. There could be a strong subjective reaction, as the speaker thoughtthere had been, among Soviet officialdom against the many manifestations of Stalinism, and there could be a changed outwarddirection of approach to the Western world. All this did not alter the nature of Soviet political interests vis-a-vis Europe as theyhad emerged from World War II. There were more encouraging long-term factors. A parallel had been drawn between the presentperiod and the Litvinov period of the late 'twenties and early 'thirties and in many respects it had been well drawn. But there wassomething that was significantly different. Firstly in the late 'twenties and early 'thirties Russia was only entering upon the periodof extreme nightmarish terrorism that endured for twenty years, from 1933 to 1953. Today she is emerging from that period, andfrom the speaker's own observations there had been a feeling of acute horror and revulsion in almost all ranks of the Soviet systemof officialdom right up to the very top. Even the Soviet Olympus today seemed to be united primarily by the slogan "No return tothe extremities and horrors of Stalinism". This, of course, implies a transition to something else and what that something else iswe do not yet know. Perhaps the Russians themselves do not know and for that reason they might be facing something in thenature of a new constitutional crisis.Secondly, there was the state of mind of what might be called the Soviet cultural and scientific elements, a body of people farmore numerous and important today than they were in the late 'twenties. At that time there was a great stir of real ideologicalenthusiasm among these people while today their minds were dominated by something which might be described as politicalapathy and a burning desire for world contacts, appreciation, and the opening of a window to the Western world. These forceswere the more powerful for the reason that they began to grow up under Stalin but were repressed under him and had now comeout with redoubled force. That might affect both the internal nature of the Soviet system and the entire tenor of its relations withthe outside world. It might be said that nothing had changed but the manners of Soviet diplomacy but we should not underrate theimportance of manners on the final results achieved in life.they might be faced in the near future. NATO had imposed upon itself the rule that it would not use forces greater than werenecessary to accomplish its tasks.A European participant commented on the fact that the Western world had largely been occupied during the last few years withdefensive measures. While this might be true as far as military questions were concerned, it was not true that the initiative had been surrendered, since NATO itself and the development of its institutional strength amounted to seizing the initiative. But now the Russians, by launching their campaign of charm, had again seized the initiative. They had been forced to launch their newcampaign as a result of NATO and of Western co-operation and we were moving from the cold war to the hot peace.
Article 2might provide a method by which we could regain the initiative, and this was a matter which might well be discussed here.There was a body of opinion which held that NATO could not undertake the kind of development on the spiritual side that wasrequired in Europe, and that the member countries themselves must do this. NATO had in any case a most inadequate budget forthis purpose. One of the functions of the Bilderberg Group, therefore, might be to help to create a realization, through members intheir own countries, that NATO has a mission which is a mission of peace as well as of defence. Much good had been done in thisdirection by the references to NATO by Queen Juliana of the Netherlands when she opened her Parliament recently. It had to beremembered that the Russians were spending a billion dollars at least on propaganda, and in fact spent more money in jammingour propaganda programmes than the free world spends on its own propaganda. It was felt that most effective propaganda couldbe developed from the human experience of NATO which could be used to familiarize people with the kind of co-operation thatNATO represented. There was, for instance, a monthly magazine published by NATO, but more than this was required.A British participant felt that the recent NATO meeting of parliamentarians of its member countries had not been as strikinglysuccessful as it should have been and that NATO had not identified itself sufficiently with the conference. He felt that more thanthis was required. Possibly some parliamentary group might be conceived in connection with the NATO organization which couldmeet each year and serve as a means of education and propaganda for the NATO effort.Another speaker felt that the question was not so much one of propaganda but one of what NATO itself could do to inspirepeople and prepare them psychologically for the use of nuclear weapons should this become necessary for their defence. Whilethe United States had done so much to pool its military resources through the NATO mechanism little had been done to pool itspolitical and economic resources in the same manner and the question was asked how far would the United States be willing to goin this direction. The more that atomic weapons were developed the more it might be possible that they would not be used and thisgave even greater emphasis to the importance of conventional weapons and of the spirit of the Western people. It would be ofgreat use if NATO officials could bring pressure on their governments to prepare young people in their respective countries forthe task which they would have to face as members of the armed forces of NATO.Other participants were more concerned with the hard core of military reality, which was the real responsibility of NATO, thanwith the economic and political aspects provided by Article 2. Some nations were displaying tendencies to reduce the militaryresources which they were making available through NATO, and it was essential that these tendencies should be checked. It mightbe regarded as a military duty for the free nations to engage in mutual discussions before taking unilateral action.It was also pointed out, as an objection to the further implementation of Article 2, that there was not an identity of membershipbetween NATO and other European organizations in the economic field. It was further contended that for NATO to attempt toconsider controversial economic matters might endanger that complete agreement among its members which existed in themilitary field.III. THE POLITICAL AND STRATEGIC ASPECTS OF ATOMIC ENERGYThe Conference discussed the issues which arose from papers on this subject prepared by United States and Europeanparticipants.The trends in recent years towards the increase in the power of atomic weapons, their speed and range of delivery, wereemphasized by most speakers, together with the fact that the West had now lost its atomic monopoly. Doubts were expressed,however, as to whether there could be such a thing as an atomic stalemate since, as both sides developed the means of deliveringan atomic attack, the emphasis shifted to geographical considerations of target location and dispersal, base location and dispersal,and factors such as the maintenance and turn-round of aircraft and other weapons. Moreover, if the countries of the Westmaintained their unity of alliance they had a definite advantage over the communist world and might be able to look forward to along-term maintenance of superiority in the atomic field. It should be possible, therefore, to build up a defensive system givingsome degree of protection against the possibilities of a decisive surprise attack, and making atomic aggression extremelyexpensive to the aggressor. In any case, it would be necessary to build up such a defence and to preserve it.Another speaker recalled the previous discussion in which it had been pointed out that we were now entering into a period ofhot peace and that as the fronts were moving closer the ideological war would become more tense in all non-military, andparticularly in the social and economic, fields. He feared that we were not sufficiently prepared for this new trend of events. It wasequally dangerous to replace the argument of military strength by the argument that communism, as shown by recent changes inSoviet policy, would change. The important point would now be to get vitality into our society. A strong argument was putforward by a British participant in favour of a policy of graduated deterrence, by which the West would make a declaration that inthe event of its being attacked, it would not use the hydrogen bomb at all unless it were first used by the enemy, nor would itattack centres of civilian population outside a specific battle area unless, again, the enemy did so first. It was claimed that such apolicy would make a total thermo-nuclear war very much less likely, since it was in the interests of both sides to avoid thedestruction of their cities; this would become particularly relevant as the Soviet became able to strike the cities of the UnitedStates. Massive retaliation therefore had become far too drastic to be justified, and was in fact no longer necessary. On the otherhand, the clear warning that atomic weapons would be used to repel any aggression would decrease the possibilities of warbreaking out, and enhance the security of the "grey" areas in which the Soviet might think that the United States or her allieswould not be prepared to commit themselves, at the same time providing the necessary counter-balance to communist superiorityin manpower. Since the West would be dependent on the use of its large ports in the case of Soviet aggression....
IF you've actually read this much of this, & this far, then you deserve to download the PDF's for yourself to read the whole 9 yards of it See below…
America Must Reject Netanyahu’s War Cry on Iran
Written by Sheldon Richman
Wednesday March 4, 2015
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu came to Washington this week to prepare the Ameri
ox News reporter James Rosen. But it turns out that it was Holder’s own signature on the search warrant.
Even the liberal Huffington Post said that Holder should be fired over this.
Holder could get five years in prison.
So, did President Obama fire Holder?
Of course not!
Instead, Obama asked that Holder be investigated – not by an independent investigating committee – but by Holder himself!
I can see it now…
Obama: “Did you lie?”
Holder: “No.”
Obama: “OK. That’s good enough for me. You’re cleared of any wrongdoing.”
180) Used Obamacare to illegally give the IRS additional powers without approval from Congress
In May 2013 the Washington Post wrote:
The law allows the Department of Health and Human Services to set up federal health exchanges in the holdout states. But the statute makes no mention of the IRS providing credits and subsidies through federal exchanges.
The IRS resolved this conundrum by denying its existence. In a May 2012 regulatory ruling, it asserted its own right to provide credits outside the state exchanges as the reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous law. But the language of the law is not ambiguous. And health scholars Jonathan Adler and Michael Cannon, in an exhaustive recent analysis, find no justification for the IRS’s ruling in the legislative history of Obamacare. “The statute,” they argue, “and the lack of any support for the IRS rule in the legislative record put defenders of the IRS rule in the awkward position of arguing that it was so obviously Congress’ intent to offer tax credits in federal exchanges that despite a year of debate over the PPACA, it never occurred to anyone to express that intent out loud. A better explanation is that the PPACA’s authors miscalculated when they assumed states would establish exchanges.”
So: The IRS seized the authority to spend about $800 billion over 10 years on benefits that were not authorized by Congress. And the current IRS scandal puts this decision in a new light. What was the role of politics in shaping this regulatory decision? What pressure was applied?
181) Used environmental regulations to shut down an ambulance while it was taking a patient to the hospital
In May 2013 the Washington Post reported:
A Wednesday shootout on the streets of Washington Highlands left a cop injured and a carjacking suspect dead. But before the suspect expired, he went on an unusual ambulance ride that involved moving him from one vehicle to another on the shoulder of Interstate 295. While this might appear to be another story of Fire and Emergency Medical Services dysfunction, the story is rather more complicated. As WUSA-TV explains, newer-model diesel engines are required by federal regulations to have emission-control features that, in some circumstances, require the motor to shut down for “regeneration” — a process in which the exhaust system burns off trapped soot. The need for regeneration can be unpredictable. The transfer to a second ambulance delayed 34-year-old Nathaniel McRae’s arrival at a hospital by seven minutes. FEMS insists the wait did not play a role in his death.
182) Had “a serious management problem” with his refusal to fire bad workers
A 2011 USA Today article on federal employees states:
“The federal government fired 0.55% of its workers in the budget year that ended Sept. 30 — 11,668 employees in its 2.1 million workforce.”
“White-collar federal workers have almost total job security after a few years on the job. Last year, the government fired none of its 3,000 meteorologists, 2,500 health insurance administrators, 1,000 optometrists, 800 historians or 500 industrial property managers.”
Wow! Those must be excellent workers, right?
Actually, no. The article also says:
“San Francisco State University management professor John Sullivan, an expert on employee turnover, says the low departure rates show a failure to release poor performers and those with obsolete skills. ‘Rather than indicating something positive, rates below 1% in the firing and layoff components would indicate a serious management problem,’ he says.”
A serious management problem?
So who exactly is the highest ranking manager of the federal government?
It’s President Obama.
183) Illegally solicited donations from health insurers
In May 2013, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius solicited donations from health insurers to help pay for Obamacare. Such soliciting is illegal.
184) Chose an economic advisor who wanted roads and bridges to be built by unqualified workers
Obama chose to have Robert Reich be his economic advisor. Regarding Obama’s stimulus, Reich said:
“I am concerned, as I’m sure many of you are, that these jobs not simply go to high skilled people… And therefore, in my remarks I have suggested to you, and I’m certainly happy to talk about it more, ways in which the money can be — criteria can be set so that they money does go to others… people who are not necessarily construction workers or high-skilled professionals.”
185) Pressured unions to reduce the amount of health insurance coverage for their employees
In May 2013, the New York Times reported:
Say goodbye to that $500 deductible insurance plan and the $20 co-payment for a doctor’s office visit. They are likely to become luxuries of the past.
Expect to have your blood pressure checked or a prescription filled at a clinic at your office, rather than by your private doctor.
Then blame the so-called Cadillac tax, which penalizes companies that offer high-end health care plans to their employees.
Although the tax does not start until 2018, employers say they have to start now to meet the deadline and they are doing whatever they can to bring down the cost of their plans. Under the law, an employer or health insurer offering a plan that costs more than $10,200 for an individual and $27,500 for a family would typically pay a 40 percent excise tax on the amount exceeding the threshold.
Tom Leibfried, a legislative director for the A.F.L.-C.I.O., one of the unions whose plans are vulnerable to the tax, says the demands that workers pay more for their care is a perennial aspect of labor negotiations. “We’re very concerned about the hollowing out of benefits in general,” he said. “What the excise tax will do is just fuel that.”
186) Falsely said “We believe in the free market”
In June 2013, Obama said,
We don’t think that top-down solutions are the right way to go. We believe in the free market. We believe in a light touch when it comes to regulations. – See more at: http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/obama-we-dont-want-tax-all-businesses-out-business#sthash.NDb17lc6.dpufWe believe in the free market. We believe in a light touch when it comes to regulations.
“We believe in the free market.”
Obama was lying. The free market means that in the business world, it is the customers, not the government, who pick winners and losers. But this list contains a huge number of instances where Obama tried to use the government to pick winners and losers in the business world.
187) Falsely said “We believe in a light touch when it comes to regulations”
In June 2013, Obama said, “We believe in a light touch when it comes to regulations.”
He lied. For example, after Obamacare was passed, Obama added 20,000 extra pages of regulations to to it.
188) Said Catholic schools are “divisive” but did not say the same thing about other religious schools
In June 2013, Obama said:
“If towns remain divided – if Catholics have their schools and buildings and Protestants have theirs, if we can’t see ourselves in one another and fear or resentment are allowed to harden – that too encourages division and discourages cooperation.”
I can understand why a person might criticize religious schools in general – although I myself happen to think that religious schools are a superior alternative to public schools. But for Obama to single out one religion in particular as being divisive, while not saying the same thing about all religious schools in general, is a double standard.
189) Favored a new tax on Christmas trees so the money could be used to subsidize Christmas trees
In November 2011, Obama proposed a new tax on Christmas trees, so that the money could be used to subsidize Christmas trees. If this had been a Rube Goldberg cartoon it would have been funny. But to suggest it as an actual government policy is absurd.
190) Betrayed the people of the city that helped him launch his political career
As part of his effort to get Obamacare passed, Obama repeatedly promised that people could keep their current health insurance if they liked it.
More than any other city, the people of Chicago helped to get Obamacare passed. Chicago is where Obama chose to live when he first got into politics. The people there launched his political career and voted him into office.
And this is how Obama repays them. In May 2013, the Chicago Tribune reported:
Mayor Rahm Emanuel plans to start reducing health insurance coverage next year for more than 30,000 retired city workers and begin shifting them to President Barack Obama’s new federal system.
The move is aimed at saving the city money
Once the phaseout is complete, those retired workers would have to pay for their own health insurance or get subsidies under the Affordable Care Act. The city-subsidized coverage is particularly important to retired workers who aren’t yet eligible for Medicare
Henry Bayer, executive director of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Council 31, said the uncertainties of the Affordable Care Act and the state insurance exchanges they would create make the city’s plan hard to assess.
“This uncertainty will cause anxiety and fear for tens of thousands of seniors who gave their working lives to public service — men and women whose retirement savings are already under attack in the name of ‘pension reform.’” Bayer said.
191) Proposed military interventionism in Syria
In June 2013, Obama proposed that the U.S. get involved in Syria’s military conflicts.
192) Planned to use military snipers to shoot innocent lions and cheetahs in the wild
In June 2013, Obama was planning to use military snipers to shoot innocent lions and cheetahs in the wild.
However, after the media reported on his plans, Obama got embarrassed, and cancelled his plans.
193) Refused to fire or prosecute more than 1,000 IRS employees who illegally used their IRS credit cards for their own personal use
During Obama’s first term, more than 1,000 IRS employees illegally used their IRS credit cards for personal purchases, but Obama refused to fire or prosecute them.
194) Defended intelligence chief who lied under oath
In March 2013, James Clapper, the director of national intelligence, falsely stated under oath that the NSA was not gathering data on millions of U.S. citizens. In June 2013, after it was reported that Clapper had lied under oath, Obama defended him, instead of firing him.
195) Had the Secret Service visit a law abiding citizen who had criticized his policies on Twitter
In April 2013, Obama sent the Secret Service to visit the home of Tom Francois, a law abiding citizen who had criticized Obama’s policies on Twitter.
The Secret Service admitted that Francois had not made any threats against Obama.
196) Had the IRS grant special, illegal favors for his brother’s so-called “charity”
In May 2013, the Dailer Caller reported that the IRS had taken the “unprecedented” step of approving a non-profit application within just one month. In this particular case, the application was from the Barack H. Obama Foundation, a so-called “charity” which was headed by Malik Obama, Barack Obama’s brother.
In addition, the IRS illegally gave retroactive approval for the organization’s tax exempt status. Prior to getting this approval, the organization had illegally solicited tax deductible donations even though it did not have legal approval to do so.
197) Raised the interest rate on student loans to pay for Obamacare
Obamacare raised the interest rate on students loans from 5.3% to 6.8%. The money is used to fund Obamacare.
198) Refused to fire or prosecute 15 IRS agents who illegally seized the medical records of 10 million people
In March 2011, 15 IRS agents illegally seized the medical records of 10 million people without a warrant. Obama refused to fire or prosecute them.
199) Hired 16,500 new IRS agents to run Obamacare
In June 2013, it was reported that Obama had hired 16,500 new IRS agents to run Obamacare.
200) Tried to reward wasteful IRS spending with an increase in funding
In June 2013, Danny Werfel, Obama’s new nominee to head the IRS, asked Congress for an increase in funding. At the same time, NPR reported on this waste of taxpayer money at an IRS conference:
Some of the 2,600 attendees received benefits, including baseball tickets and stays in presidential suites that normally cost $1,500 to $3,500 per night. In addition, 15 outside speakers were paid a total of $135,000 in fees, with one paid $17,000 to talk about “leadership through art,” the committee said.
Considering how the IRS wasted all that money on luxury hotel rooms and worthless speeches, Werfel really had some nerve asking Congress for more money. By proposing to reward wasteful spending with a budget increase, Werfel proved that he is incompetent to head the IRS. The fact that Obama nominated such an incompetent person does not surprise me one bit.
201) Illegally bypassed Congress to delay Obamacare’s employer mandate
As the Obamacare law was written, the employer mandate was to begin in January 2014. This is what the law said when it was passed by the House and Senate, and signed by President Obama.
However, in July 2013, Obama delayed the employer mandate part of Obamacare until January 2015. Obama did this without approval from Congress.
For Obama to change a law that was passed by Congress, without first getting approval from Congress, is a violation of the Presidential oath that Obama took to uphold and defend the Constitution.
What Obama did here is an action of a dictator, not an action of a President whose power is limited by a written constitution.
If Obama can get away with this, then it sets a horribly dangerous precedent, and means that the President can arbitrarily make any change to any law that has been passed by Congress, without first getting approval from Congress.
202) Made it too hard for some doctors to continue their practices
In July 2013, ABC News reported that some doctors were shutting down their practices in response to Obamacare.
Dr. Robert WcWilliams, an obstetrician/gynecologist with more than 5,000 patients, said:
“It’s going to be run by bureaucrats – and it’s going to be run by politicians – who have no idea what is in your best interests, then I’m getting out.”
203) Falsely told Africans that contaminated water is a smaller problem than global warming
In July 2013, while speaking in Johannesburg, South Africa, President Obama said that global warming was “the biggest challenge we have environmentally” and that it was worse than “dirty water, dirty air.”
However, according to the World Health Organization, while global warming kills 140,000 people each year, air pollution kills 3 million people per year.
According to UNESCO, each year, contaminated water causes 4 billion cases of diarrhea, 120,000 cases of cholera, 300 million cases of malaria, 12 million cases of typhoid, 6 million cases of trachoma, 200 million cases of schistosomiesis, and more than 1 billion incidents of intestinal parasites.
You know what’s worse than global warming? How about living your entire life without ever having access to a toilet?
The World Health Organization says that dirty water is “the leading cause of disease and death around the world.”
That Obama would downplay these problems shows how scientifically illiterate he is.
That he would do so while giving a speech in Africa, which has the highest rate of water borne illness of any continent, shows how thoughtless and insensitive he is.
204) Spent $630,000 to get more Facebook “likes”
In July 2013, it was reported that Obama had spent $630,000 of taxpayers’ money in order to get more Facebook “likes.”
205) Declared that hacking was an act of war, then hacked the EU
In 2011, the Obama administration issued a statement which said that when one country hacked another country’s computers, the hacking constituted an “act of war.”
In July 2013, it was reported that the Obama administration had hacked computers which were owned by the European Union.
206) Said “If I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon”
In Florida, after a school security camera showed Trayvon Martin marking graffiti, a search of his backpack showed that it contained 12 pieces of women’s jewelry, including silver wedding rings, and earrings with diamonds. The backpack also had a screwdriver, which is often used as a tool by burglars. Martin said that the jewelry belonged to a friend, but refused to say who that friend was.
Why would a teenage boy bring a backpack full of silver wedding rings and diamond earrings to school? Do Martin’s millions of defenders really think that he was not a burglar?
The fact that Martin was in possession of stolen jewelry at school is perfectly in line with George Zimmerman’s claim on the 911 call that Martin was acting suspiciously. And there had been quite a few burglaries in the area recently.
Also on the 911 call, Zimmerman had said that Martin was acting as if he was on drugs. Martin’s autopsy showed that there was THC in his system. And while other parts of marijuana can stay in the system for weeks after it’s smoked, the THC only stays in the person’s system for a few hours. Therefore, Martin was indeed high when Zimmerman saw him.
So Trayvon Martin was a burglar, used illegal drugs, broke Zimmerman’s nose, and smashed Zimmerman’s head against the concrete.
And how does Obama respond to all of this?
Obama said:
“If I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon.”
207) Falsely said that Secretary of State John Kerry had not been on his yacht during the regime change in Egypt
In July 2013, the Obama administration falsely said that Secretary of State John Kerry had not been on his yacht during the regime change in Egypt.
Evan after CBS news presented the Obama administration with photographic evidence that Kerry had been on his yacht during that time, the Obama administration still continued to falsely claim that Kerry had not been on his yacht.
CBS News reported:
On Thursday night, CBS News obtained a photo of Kerry on his boat and sent it to the State Department, asking whether they still stand by their denial that Kerry was on a boat.
The response: “Yes.”
208) Said “the planet will boil over” if African citizens adopt a first world standard of living
In July 2013, Obama said “the planet will boil over” if African citizens adopt a first world standard of living.
“the planet will boil over
209) “Among those who Strongly Approve of the president, more fear the Tea Party than radical Muslims.”
In June 2013, Rasmussen conducted a poll to find out what people considered to be the “nation’s top terror threat.”
Reporting on the results of the poll, Rasmussen wrote:
“Among those who Strongly Approve of the president, more fear the Tea Party than radical Muslims.”
210) Illegally forced 2,200 privately owned auto dealerships to close, which destroyed 120,000 jobs
In 2009, Obama illegally forced 2,200 privately owned auto dealerships to close. These dealerships had employed 120,000 people.
211) Subsidized the production of alcoholic beverages
In June 2013, Breitbart reported:
The USDA Rural Development agency also touted a program to subsidize the Wine Barn LLC in “marketing and increasing production of its Kansas produced wine.” That cost $25,000. The USDA Rural Development also said it would hand $300,000 to the Mackinaw Trail Winery in Michigan, $100,000 for the Appleton Creek Winery in New York, $162,500 for the Old Westminster Winery in Maryland, and tens of thousands of dollars to wineries in Nebraska and Iowa.
Liquor is the name of the game for the USDA, apparently – they’re also subsidizing the production of vodka in North Carolina, Bloody Mary mix in West Virginia, and hard cider in Virginia.
212) Gave 23,994 tax refunds worth a total of $46,378,040 to illegal aliens who all used the same address
In 2011, the IRS gave 23,994 tax refunds worth a total of $46,378,040 to illegal aliens who all used the same address in Atlanta, Ga.
213) Sued private businesses for using “racist” criminal background checks to screen employees
In June 2013, the Obama administration filed lawsuits against Dollar General and BMW for using criminal background checks to screen employees. The Obama administration claimed that such background checks were “racist.”
214) Used tax money to pay federal employees to organize protests against George Zimmerman
In March and April of 2012, Obama used tax money to pay federal employees to organize protests against George Zimmerman.
215) Illegally continued giving foreign aid to Egypt after it had a coup
Federal law requires that U.S. foreign aid to Egypt be ended if and when Egypt has a coup. However, after Egypt had a coup in July 2013, the Obama administration said that it would continue giving foreign aid to Egypt.
216) Broke promise to end Bush’s surveillance of U.S. citizens who were not suspected of committing a crime
In August 2007, Obama promised that he would end Bush’s surveillance of U.S. citizens who were not suspected of committing a crime. However, in June 2013, such surveillance was still being conducted.
217) Spent $3 million to study the health risks of dating Mexican prostitutes
In July 2013, it was reported that the Obama administration had spent $3 million to study the health risks of dating Mexican prostitutes.
218) Lied about the cost of IRS conferences
In June 2013 it was reported that the Obama administration had lied about the cost of IRS conferences. While the actual cost was $50 million, the Obama administration had claimed that the cost was only 1% of that mount.
219) Spent $890,000 per year on service fees for bank accounts that had no money
In April 2013, it was reported that the Obama administration was spending $890,000 each year on service fees for bank accounts that did not have any money in them. At the time, the government had 13,712 empty accounts which it was supposed to have closed, but which it had kept open anyway.
220) Spent $34 million to construct a new military headquarters in Afghanistan after U.S. military commanders said they did not want it
After U.S. military commanders said in 2010 that they did not want a new headquarters in Afghanistan, the Obama administration spent $34 million to build it anyway.
221) Falsely said that his scandals were “phony”
In July 2013, Obama said
“With an endless parade of distractions, political posturing and phony scandals, Washington has taken its eye off the ball.”
These scandals are not “phony.” I have cited a huge number of sources in this list to show that these scandals are real.
222) Falsely guaranteed that people could keep their doctor
Before Obamacare was passed, Obama said:
“Here is a guarantee that I’ve made… If you’ve got a doctor that you like, you will be able to keep your doctor.”
However, in July 2013, the Obama administration said that people “may” be able to keep their doctor.
223) Falsely said the auto bailouts prevented Detroit from going bankrupt
Obama falsely stated that the auto bailouts prevented Detroit from going bankrupt.
224) Illegally seized a privately owned gun from a law abiding citizen
After a jury found George Zimmerman not guilty, the Obama administration announced that it would seize his gun. This violated the double jeopardy clause of the U.S. Constitution, as well as the takings clause of the fifth amendment.
225) Broke his promise to have real time verifiability of Obamacare subsidies
In July 2013, Investor’s Business Daily wrote:
Meanwhile, the administration tacitly admitted last week that its promise of real-time verification of a consumer’s eligibility to buy subsidized coverage at an ObamaCare exchange wasn’t exactly panning out.
Under ObamaCare, only those who don’t have access to “affordable” insurance at work can buy coverage in an exchange, and only those below certain income levels are eligible for tax subsidies.
Rather than a high-tech instant check, the administration told states they could simply take the applicants’ word for it when it comes to their employer-provided coverage, as well as their “projected annual household income,” without the need for “further verification.”
226) Signed health care reform whose rules contradicted each other
Obamacare allows insurance companies to charge higher premiums for smokers. At the same time, it prohibits insurance companies from charging more than three times as much for older people as it does for younger people. In June 2013, Obama’s computer programmers said that they had been unable to write a computer program that simultaneously agreed with both of these rules.
227) Signed a health care reform plan that is so horrible that even the IRS agents who run it don’t want to participate in it
Obama hired 16,500 new IRS agents to run Obamacare.
But Obamacare is so awful that even the IRS agents who run it don’t want to participate in it.
In July 2013, the National Treasury Employees Union, which represents the IRS employees who will be running Obamacare, provided a form letter to its members to send to their Congressmen. The letter stated:
“I am very concerned about legislation that has been introduced by Congressman Dave Camp to push federal employees out of the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program and into the insurance exchanges established under the Affordable Care Act.”
When asked about this, IRS chief Daniel Werfel responded by saying:
“I don’t want to speak for the NTEU, but I’ll offer a perspective as a federal employee myself and a federal employee at the IRS. And that is, we have right now as employees of the government, of the IRS, affordable health care coverage. I think the ACA was designed to provide an option or an alternative for individuals that do not. And all else being equal, I think if you’re an individual who is satisfied with your health care coverage, you’re probably in a better position to stick with that coverage than go through the change of moving into a different environment and going through that process. So I think for a federal employee, I think more likely, and I would — can speak for myself, I would prefer to stay with the current policy that I’m pleased with rather than go through a change if I don’t need to go through that change.”
228) Tried to tax small businesses at a higher rate than corporations
Obama raised the top tax rate on small businesses to 39.6%, and tried to lower the top tax rate on corporations to 28%.
229) Illegally prevented individual employees of small businesses from choosing their own plan during the first year of Obamacare
Obamacare requires that individual employees of small businesses be allowed to choose their own insurance plan during the first year of Obamacare. However, in March 2013, the Obama administration announced that it would not be allowing them to make this choice during the first year.
230) Falsely said that Obamacare had not hurt jobs
In July 2013, the Obama administration said that Obamacare had not hurt jobs.
However, in the real world, in response to the medical device tax that is part of Obamacare, some medical device manufacturers have announced plans to layoff employees, including Welch Allyn (275 planned layoffs), Stryker (1,170 planned layoffs), and Medtronic (1,000 planned layoffs). In December 2012, Al Franken, Elizabeth Warren, John Kerry, and 15 other Democrats who supported the passage of Obamacare wrote a letter to Harry Reid, asking him to delay the tax on medical devices, claiming that the tax would hurt job creation in their districts. The New York Times reported that Obamacare “sharply penalizes full-time employment in favor of part-time employment.” In response to the employer mandate of Obamacare, some restaurants have announced plans to switch some of their employees from full time to part time, including some franchises of Olive Garden, Red Lobster, Wendy’s, Taco Bell, White Castle, and Fatburger. Community College of Allegheny County switched 200 professors and 200 other employees from full time to part time in response to Obamacare. Clint Benjamin, an English professor at Community College of Allegheny County, said that this would reduce his own monthly pay by $600. Also in response to the employer mandate of Obamacare, other colleges have announced plans to switch some of their employees from full time to part time, including Florida’s Palm Beach State College, Ohio’s Youngstown State University, and New Jersey’s Kean University. In Virginia, thousands of government employees had their hours reduced because of Obamacare. The Carnegie Museum of Pittsburgh reduced the hours of 48 of its employees in response to Obamacare. Regal Entertainment Group, the largest chain of movie theaters in the country, announced that it would be switching thousands of its employees from full time to part time in response to the Obamacare mandate. Utah’s Granite School District reduced the hours of 1,200 of its employees in response to Obamacare. In response to Obamacare, many Wal-Mart stores have stopped hiring full time workers. In July 2013, leaders of the Teamsters, UFCW, and UNITE-HERE sent a letter to Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi which said that Obamacare will “destroy the foundation of the 40 hour work week that is the backbone of the American middle class… the law creates an incentive for employers to keep employees’ work hours below 30 hours a week. Numerous employers have begun to cut workers’ hours to avoid this obligation.”
231) Falsely said that health insurance premiums would be reduced by $2,500 per family by the end of his first term
In February 2008, Obama said:
“We are going to work with you to lower your premiums by $2,500. We will not wait 20 years from now to do it, or 10 years from now to do it. We will do it by the end of my first term as president.”
However, by the time his first term was over, family premiums had gotten bigger, not smaller. The increase was $3,065 per family.
232) Illegally gave Obamacare waiver to Massachusetts
In August 2013, Obama gave an Obamacare waiver to Massachusetts.
This waiver was illegal for two reasons. First, the waiver was not approved by the U.S. Congress. Second, the U.S. Constitution requires that the federal government treat all states the same.
233) Betrayed the unions that helped him to get elected
In January 2013, the Wall Street Journal reported:
Some Unions Grow Wary of Health Law They Backed
Labor unions enthusiastically backed the Obama administration’s health-care overhaul when it was up for debate. Now that the law is rolling out, some are turning sour.
Union leaders say many of the law’s requirements will drive up the costs for their health-care plans and make unionized workers less competitive. Among other things, the law eliminates the caps on medical benefits and prescription drugs used as cost-containment measures in many health-care plans. It also allows children to stay on their parents’ plans until they turn 26.
Some 20 million Americans are covered by the health-care plans at issue
Top officers at the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, the AFL-CIO and other large labor groups plan to keep pressing the Obama administration to expand the federal subsidies to these jointly run plans, warning that unionized employers may otherwise drop coverage. A handful of unions say they already have examined whether it makes sense to shift workers off their current plans
“We are going back to the administration to say that this is not acceptable,” said Ken Hall, general secretary-treasurer for the Teamsters, which has 1.6 million members and dependents in health-care plans. Other unions involved in the push include the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union and Unite Here
Sheet Metal Workers Local 85 in Atlanta, which has about 1,900 members. Next year it must lift the $250,000 annual cap on the amount it will pay for medical claims. The law’s requirements will add between 50 cents to $1 an hour to the cost of members’ compensation package
234) Illegally changed Obamacare to benefit members of Congress and their staff
Obamacare was passed by the House and Senate, and signed by President Obama.
Three years later, members of Congress and their staff complained that Obamacare was going to cost them a lot of money, and said that this would likely cause a brain drain among their staff. In response to this, Obama made changes to Obamacare so that these things would not happen. However, Obama’s actions were illegal, because he made these changes without Congress voting on them first.
235) Told General Mills to stop making true claims about Cheerios
For quite some time, advertisements for the breakfast cereal Cheerios made the true and accurate claim that eating Cheerios lowers a person’s cholesterol.
However, even though this claim is true and accurate, in May 2009, the Obama administration ordered General Mills, the maker of Cheerios, to stop making this claim in its commercials.
236) Illegally avoided enforcing the required income verification of people who receive subsidies for Obamacare exchanges
Even though Obamacare requires the government to verify the income of people who receive subsidies for Obamacare exchanges, in August 2013 it was reported that Obama would not be verifying their incomes.
237) Placed a 40% tax on so-called “Cadillac” insurance plans
Obamacare includes a 40% tax on so-called “Cadillac” insurance plans. In August 2013, unions that supported the passage of Obamacare complained about this tax.
238) Made medical care for special needs children more expensive
In August 2013, it was reported that Obamacare would make it more expensive for the parents of special needs children to pay for their children’s medical equipment and specialized private schools that cater to their medical needs.
239) Responded to the Benghazi attack by going back to bed, and then later got up and headed off to Las Vegas for a fundraiser
In September 2012, after Obama found out that U.S. citizens were being killed in Benghazi, Libya, he went back to bed. After he got up in the morning, he went off to Las Vegas for a fundraiser.
240) Illegally delayed the caps on out of pocket health care payments without Congressional approval
As it was passed by the House and Senate and signed by Obama, Obamacare sets caps on the out of pocket payments that people pay for health care, and these caps were legally required to take effect in January 2014.
However, in August 2013, Obama delayed these caps until January 2015.
Because Obama imposed this delay without it first being approved by Congress, Obama’s action was illegal. The President does not have the legal authority to change an Act that was passed by Congress, without that change first being approved by Congress. What Obama did here is not the act of a President whose power is limited by a written constitution, but is, instead, the action of a dictator.
241) Holds a double standard when it comes to supporting “gun free” zones
In December 2012, a petition at whitehouse.gov stated:
“Eliminate armed guards for the President, Vice-President, and their families, and establish Gun Free Zones around them”
“Gun Free Zones are supposed to protect our children, and some politicians wish to strip us of our right to keep and bear arms. Those same politicians and their families are currently under the protection of armed Secret Service agents. If Gun Free Zones are sufficient protection for our children, then Gun Free Zones should be good enough for politicians.”
The Obama administration rejected the proposal.
242) Outlawed the low-premium, high-deductible health insurance that some people prefer
In August 2013, it was reported that Obamacare would bring an end to the low-premium, high-deductible health insurance that some people prefer.
243) Lied about how many people he had helped to protect from mortgage fraud
In August 2013, it was reported that less than one month before the 2012 election, the Obama administration had lied about the number of people that it had helped to protect from mortgage fraud, as well as the total amount of money involved. In August 2013, when the truth was revealed, Newsbusters reported:
“Thus, the number of defendants fell by 80% from what DOJ claimed less than a month before the presidential election. The number of victims fell by 76%. The amount of losses involved dropped by over 90%.”
244) Falsely said the NSA review was being conducted by an “independent” body
In August 2013, Obama said that he would establish an “independent” investigation of NSA surveillance.
However, three days later, it was reported that this so-called “independent” investigation would be run by James Clapper, who had falsely testified to Congress that the NSA was not collecting information on U.S. citizens.
245) Used tax money to pay for a separate flight just for his dog
In August 2013, Obama forced taxpayers to pay for a separate airplane flight just for his dog Bo.
246) Closed off public roads so he could buy books
In August 2013, Obama had public roads closed to the public so he could go to a bookstore. Why didn’t he just order the books online?
247) Gave illegal EPA exemption to one oil refinery, and would not say which refinery it was
The EPA has a very expensive ethanol mandate that applies to all oil refineries. However, in August 2013, it was reported that Obama had given one oil refinery an exemption from this mandate.
This exemption is illegal for two reasons. First, the exemption was not approved by Congress. And secondly, the Constitution requires that federal laws apply equally to everyone.
In addition, Obama refused to say which refinery it was that received this exemption, which is completely contrary to his repeated promises of “transparency.”
248) Created new fines for charitable hospitals that give treatment to uninsured people
In August 2013, it was reported that Obamacare creates new fines for charitable hospitals that give treatment to uninsured people.
249) Blamed poverty on zip codes instead of on behavior
In July 2013, HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan said:
“Unfortunately, in too many of our hardest-hit communities, no matter how hard a child or her parents work, the life chances of that child, even her lifespan, is determined by the ZIP Code she grows up in. This is simply wrong.”
However, let’s consider two groups of people in the U.S. The first group has a poverty rate of 2%. The second group has a poverty rate of 76%.
The first group consists of people who followed all three of these steps:
1) Finish high school.
2) Get a full-time job.
3) Wait until age 21 and get married before having children.
The second group consists of people who followed zero of those three steps.
Among people who follow all three of these steps, the poverty rate is 2%.
Among people who follow zero of these steps, the poverty rate is 76%.
(My source for that information is this article, which refers to this PDF, and the relevant data is on page 15 of the PDF. The study uses data from the U.S. Census Bureau.)
250) Nominated a telecommunications lobbyist and Obama fundraiser to head the FCC
In May 2013, Obama nominated Tom Wheeler to head the FCC. Wheeler had previously been the head of the National Cable and Telecommunications Association, which is a lobbying organization for the cable TV industry. He had also been the head of CTIA, a lobbying organization for cellphone carriers. In addition, he had also been a fundraiser for Obama.
251) Tried to violate defendants’ right to a fair trial
In August 2013, Reuters reported:
A secretive U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration unit is funneling information from intelligence intercepts, wiretaps, informants and a massive database of telephone records to authorities across the nation to help them launch criminal investigations of Americans.
Although these cases rarely involve national security issues, documents reviewed by Reuters show that law enforcement agents have been directed to conceal how such investigations truly begin – not only from defense lawyers but also sometimes from prosecutors and judges.
The undated documents show that federal agents are trained to “recreate” the investigative trail to effectively cover up where the information originated, a practice that some experts say violates a defendant’s Constitutional right to a fair trial. If defendants don’t know how an investigation began, they cannot know to ask to review potential sources of exculpatory evidence – information that could reveal entrapment, mistakes or biased witnesses.
“I have never heard of anything like this at all,” said Nancy Gertner, a Harvard Law School professor who served as a federal judge from 1994 to 2011. Gertner and other legal experts said the program sounds more troubling than recent disclosures that the National Security Agency has been collecting domestic phone records. The NSA effort is geared toward stopping terrorists; the DEA program targets common criminals, primarily drug dealers.
“It is one thing to create special rules for national security,” Gertner said. “Ordinary crime is entirely different. It sounds like they are phonying up investigations.”
252) Threatened internet service providers with contempt of court if they did not install surveillance software
In August 2013, it was reported that the Obama administration had pressured internet service providers to install surveillance software, so that it could monitor internet traffic without a warrant. Internet service providers who did not cave in to this pressure were threatened by the Obama administration with contempt of court. This violated the Constitution’s ban on warrantless searches. In addition, the executive branch does not have the legal authority to declare contempt of court, as this power is reserved exclusively for the judicial branch.
http://danfromsquirrelhill.wordpress.com/2013/08/15/obama-252/…
1)
‘The Corona panic is a play. It’s a scam. A swindle. It’s high time we understood that we’re in the midst of a global crime.’
This large group of medical experts publishes a medical newspaper on 500,000 copies every week, to inform the public about the massive misinformation in the mainstream media.
They also organize mass protests in Europe, like the one on August 29, 2020 where 12 million people signed up and several millions actually showed up.
Why do these 500+ medical doctors say the pandemic is a global crime? What do they know, that we don’t?
One of the many protests against the “plandemic” that you will not see in the mainstream media
2. Hundreds Of Spanish Medical Doctors Say The Pandemic Is Planned
In Spain a group of 600 medical doctors called ‘Doctors for Truth’, made a similar statement during a press conference.
Doctors for Truth, Spain
‘Covid-19 is a false pandemic created for political purposes. This is a world dictatorship with a sanitary excuse. We urge doctors, the media and political authorities to stop this criminal operation, by spreading the truth.’ (2)
Germany and Spain are just two examples. Similar large groups of hundreds of medical experts exist in countries across the world.
In the USA a documentary called PLANDEMIC, which exposes COVID-19 as a criminal operation, is supported by over 27,000 medical doctors!
Why are these thousands of medical professionals worldwide saying the pandemic is a crime? What information do they have access to, that we are not getting from the mainstream media?
I invite you to look at the following facts with an open mind and then come to your own conclusions…
3. In 2015 A Testing Method Was Patented For… COVID-19
In 2015 a ‘System and Method for Testing for COVID-19’ was patented by Richard Rothschild, with a Dutch government organisation.
Did you catch that? In 2015 – four years before the disease even existed – a testing method for COVID-19 was developed. (2B)
Take a deep breath and let that sink in for a while…
4. Millions Of COVID-19 Test Kits Sold In 2017 And 2018
As we know the new COVID-19 disease appeared in China towards the end of 2019. Therefore it was named COVID-19 which is an acronym for Corona Virus Disease 2019.
Data from the World Integrated Trade Solution, however, shows something astonishing:
“in 2017 and 2018 – two years before COVID-19 – hundreds of millions of test kits for COVID-19 were distributed worldwide.”
‘Quick! Hide It!!’
This baffling data was discovered by someone on September 5, 2020, who posted it on social media. The next day it went viral all over the world.
On September 6 the WITS suddenly changed the original designation ‘COVID-19’ into the vague ‘Medical Test Kits’.
This is not allowed in trade, because you always have to be specific. There are many types of test kits for different diseases.
The fact that they removed the specification ‘COVID-19’, after this data became known worldwide, proves that they don’t want anyone to know about it.
They however forgot to delete one detail: the product code for these ‘Medical Test Kits’ is 300215 which means: ‘COVID-19 Test Kits’.
Their cover up came too late: this critical information was uncovered and is being revealed by millions worldwide. You can download a PDF that shows the original data of this website.
Two years before the outbreak of COVID-19 the USA, the EU, China and nations around the world started exporting millions of diagnostic test instruments for… COVID-19, a disease that supposedly didn’t even exist back then.
6. The COVID-19 ‘Project’ Is Planned Until 2025
The World Bank shows that COVID-19 is a project that is planned to continue until… end of March 2025! So the intention is to continue it for another FIVE YEARS. (2C)
7. Anthony Fauci Guaranteed A Pandemic Within The Next Two Years
In 2017 Anthony Fauci made a very strange prediction, with an even stranger certainty.
With complete confidence Fauci announced that during the first term of President Trump a surprise outbreak of an infectious disease would surely happen.
Here’s what he said: (3)
“There is NO QUESTION there is going to be a challenge for the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases.
“There will be a SURPRISE OUTBREAK. There’s NO DOUBT in anyones mind about this.”
How could Fauci guarantee a surprise outbreak to happen during the first term of the Trump administration? What did he know, that we don’t?
8. Bill And Melinda Gates Guaranteed An Imminent Global Pandemic
In 2018 Bill Gates publicly announced that a global pandemic was on it’s way that could wipe out 30 million people. He said this would probably happen during the next decade. (4)
Melinda Gates added that an engineered virus is humanities greatest threat and also assured this would hit humanity in the coming years. (5)
‘A global pandemic is ON IT’S WAY. An ENGINEERED VIRUS is humanities greatest threat. This will happen in the NEXT DECADE.’ – BILL GATES, in 2018
Let their choice of words resound into your mind for a moment…
They claim that the dense population of the world guarantees this imminent global pandemic.
But let’s be honest: most of the earth is uninhabited. Just fly over America in an airplane and look out the window. You see empty space most of the time, with a few cities here and there. Most of the United States is still wide open and empty.
The same goes for the rest of the world.
Australia, Russia, India, China, America, Africa… it’s wilderness for the most part. Our planet isn’t nearly as populated as Bill Gates wants us to believe. This world map shows it clearly…
Most of the earth is totally void of any human presence. So the idea that the world is vastly overpopulated and is therefor bound to give rise to an imminent global pandemic is a lie.
[The powers that shouldn’t be also use this excuse to justify a reduction in the world’s population – i.e. depopulation.]
The Gates also claimed that air travel was sure to create a global pandemic. But countless people have been traveling in airplanes the past century.
Did that give rise to constant outbreaks of global pandemics? Of course not!
Their arguments why they guaranteed a global pandemic in the next few years are lies. So what is their real basis to make such guaranteed predictions?
9. Practicing For A Pandemic
A few months before the outbreak, Bill Gates – the world’s nr 1 vaccine dealer – organized an event in New York City. Guess what the event was all about? It was a ‘coronavirus pandemic exercise’.
Yes, you read that right:
Bill Gates organized a coronavirus pandemic exercise, right before it happened!
On the large display in the auditorium, you see the text printed: ‘We need to prepare for the event that becomes a pandemic.’ This pandemic exercise was called Event201 and took place in October 2019, literally right before the outbreak.
Their conclusion was that all of humanity must be vaccinated…
10. Excitement About Selling Vaccines In The Next Year
Shortly after this ‘exercise for a coronavirus pandemic’ Bill Gates tweeted:
“I’m particularly excited about what the next year could mean for one of the best buys in global health: vaccines.” – Bill Gates, Dec. 19, 2019
Think about this: the world’s nr 1 vaccine dealer guarantees a global pandemic to occur in the next few years, and his wife said we should all fear an engineered virus that is ‘on its way’. Then they organize an exercise for an imminent global pandemic and say vaccines will be the only solution. Next Bill Gates tweets how excited he is about selling vaccines in the next year. Immediately after that, the announced pandemic breaks out.
Indeed, right away Bill Gates proclaims that the only solution for humanity is to buy his vaccines…
11. 2020 Coronavirus Pandemic Predicted In 2013
Back in 2013 a musician wrote a song called PANDEMIC. In his lyrics he described a global pandemic that kills millions, shuts down economies and gives rise to riots.
His song literally described in great detail what we are seeing in our world today, seven years later.
He even mentioned the exact year of the pandemic: 2020, and the specific type of virus: a coronavirus. (6)
This is a line in his lyrics from 2013:
‘2020 combined with CoronaVirus, bodies stacking.’
This song also predicted the riots that are now raging throughout America:
‘The State is rioting, using the street outside. It’s coming to your windows.’
How could this musician have known in 2013 that a coronavirus pandemic would break out in 2020, and that during this pandemic riots would erupt? He explains:
‘I did research back in 2012, and read the so called “conspiracy theories”. You know, those investigations the media doesn’t want us to look into. According to those theories pandemics were bound to happen in the decade of 2020 – 2030. So I wrote the song Pandemic about it.’
12. Global Preparedness Monitoring Board In Sept. 2019: ‘Get Ready For A Global Coronavirus Pandemic’
In September 2019 – also right before the outbreak – the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board released a report titled ‘A World At Risk’.
It stressed the need to be prepared for… a coronavirus outbreak!
On the cover of the report is the picture of a coronavirus and people wearing face masks.
In the report we read the following interesting paragraph:
‘The United Nations (including WHO) conducts at least two system-wide training and simulation exercises, including one for covering the deliberate release of a lethal respiratory pathogen.’
Did you catch that?
They have been practicing for a deliberate release of a lethal respiratory pathogen.
13. Outbreak From China Announced
In 2018 The Institute for Disease Modeling made a video in which they show a flu virus originating in China, from the area of Wuhan, and spreading all over the world, killing millions. They called it ‘A Simulation For A Global Flu Pandemic.’ That is exactly what happened, two years later.
Why did they say it would come from China? Why not Africa, where far more diseases are present? Or why not South America? Or India? How could they know there would be a flu virus coming from China and even show Wuhan as the originating area, that would infect the whole world?
Was This Coronavirus Engineered?
Where did the virus come from? One of the world’s leading experts in bioweapons is Dr. Francis Boyle. He is convinced it originated from a bioweapon lab in Wuhan, the Bio Safety Lab Level 4.
This facility is specialized in the development of… coronaviruses!
They take existing viruses and ‘weaponize’ them, meaning they make them far more dangerous, to be used as a biological weapon.
In the following two minute video clip you see a spokesperson for the Trump administration, bioweapon expert Dr. Francis Boyle and president Trump talk about how this virus came from the lab in Wuhan.
Dr. Li-Meng Yan, a Chinese virologist (MD, PhD) fled the country, left her job at a prestigious Hong Kong university and became a whistleblower. She appeared on British television where she claimed SARS-CoV-2, the virus which causes COVID-19, was created by Chinese scientists in a lab – and she offered evidence to support her claims. You can read more on the subject HERE.
Now comes the most interesting part:
14. In 2015 Anthony Fauci Gave This Very Lab 3,7 Million Dollars.
Figure this: the same man who guaranteed a surprise outbreak of a virus in the next two years, gave almost 4 million dollars to a lab that develops coronaviruses.
In the short clip below you can see a journalist ask president Trump about this grant given by Fauci to the Wuhan lab.
There are however more options in Wuhan where this virus could have originated from. Some believe it came from the Wuhan Virology Institute, where they also work on weaponizing coronaviruses.
15. Chinese Biological Experiments To Infect Humans With Coronavirus Exposed In 2015 By Italian State Media
Five years ago, Italian state owned media Company, RAI – Radiotelevisione Italiana, – exposed dark efforts by China on viruses.
The video, which was broadcast in November, 2015, showed how Chinese scientists were doing biological experiments on a SARS connected virus believed to be Coronavirus, derived from bats and mice, asking whether it was worth the risk in order to be able to modify the virus for compatibility with human organisms.
Below is a transcription of the Italian broadcast translated in English:
Chinese Biological Experiments
Chinese scientists have created a pulmonary supervirus from bats and mice only for study reasons but there are many questionable aspects to this. Is it worth the risk? It’s an experiment, of course, but it is worrisome.
It worries many scientists: It is a group of Chinese researchers attaching a protein taken from bats to the SARS virus, Acute Pneumonia, derived from mice.
The output is a super coronavirus that could affect humans. – (Source here, were you can read more)
16. Movies Predicted The Coronavirus Pandemic
Predictive programming is the process of informing the population about events that are soon to occur.
The past years several movies and television series were produced, about… a global coronavirus pandemic!
The film ‘Dead Plague’ depicts a global pandemic with a coronavirus and even mentions hydroxychloroquine as the cure.
Another film called ’Contagion’ shows how a coronavirus spreads globally with social distancing, face masks, lock-downs, washing of hands etc. as a result.
Literally everything we see now, is predicted in detail in these movies.
17. Pandemic Depicted During Olympics Summergames In 2012
Talking about predictive programming: during the opening show of the Summer Olympics in 2012, a coronavirus pandemic was played out for the eyes of the whole world.
Dozens of hospital beds, large numbers of nurses becoming puppets of a controlling system, death lurking about, a demonic giant rising up over the world, and the whole theatre was lit up in such a way that seen from the sky it looked like a coronavirus.
Why did the Olympic Games show a coronavirus pandemic, in their opening show?
18. Worldwide Lockdown Predicted In 2008
The author and investigator Robin de Ruiter predicted in 2008 that there would come a global lockdown.
He said the purpose of this would be to create a new world of authoritarian control.
Because much of what he wrote back in 2008 is now happening right in front of our eyes, this book has been republished.
19. Journalists Predicted Planned Pandemic
In 2014 the investigative journalist Harry Vox predicted a planned global pandemic and said why the ‘ruling class’ would do such thing:
‘They will stop at nothing to complete their toolkit of control. One of the things that had been missing from their toolkit is quarantines and curfews. The plan is to get hundreds of thousands of people infected with it and create the next phase of control.’ (7)
20. ‘Scenario For The Future’
This renown researcher refers to a famous document by the Rockefeller Foundation in which everything we see happening now is literally predicted in great detail: the global pandemic, the lock-downs, the collapse of the economy and the imposing of authoritarian control.
It’s all described with terrifying accuracy… ten years before it happened!
The document is titled ‘Scenario for the Future of Technology and International Development’. (9)
That says it all: a scenario for the future. It has a chapter called ‘LockStep’ in which a global pandemic is reported as if it happened in the past, but which is clearly intended as a rehearsal for the future.
Rockefeller Foundation’s Operation Lockstep: ‘Under The Guise Of A Pandemic, We Will Create A Prison State’
The ‘Scenario for the Future’ continues with comparing two different responses to their predicted pandemic: the USA only ‘strongly discouraged’ people from flying, while China enforced mandatory quarantine for all citizens.
The first response is accused of spreading the virus even more, while the imposing of a suffocating lock-down is praised. Then it goes on to describe the implementation of totalitarian control:
“During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets.”
Clearly the flexing of authority is the desired response. But it gets worse, according to this ‘Scenario of the Future’:
‘Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified.’
‘In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests.’
Handbook For Global Control
Now that the announced pandemic is indeed here, the same Rockefeller Foundation came forward with step two: a handbook on how to implement new control systems during this pandemic. Only when all the required control networks are in place, can the world open up again.
When you combine the two Rockefeller documents, you see the plan:
1) First they announce a global pandemic with a coronavirus and say what it should lead to: a whole new level of authoritarian control. 2) Secondly they give practical steps on how to apply this control system.
These are illustrations and quotes from their guide:
‘Digital apps and privacy-protected tracking software should be widely used to enable more complete contact tracking.’
‘In order to fully control the Covid-19 epidemic, we need to test the majority of the population on a weekly basis.’
According to their ‘Scenario of the future’ the entire world population should get a digital ID that indicates who has received all the vaccines. Without sufficient vaccinations, access to schools, concerts, churches, public transport etc. will be denied.
Now in 2020 that is exactly what Bill Gates and many governments are calling for.
21. Bill Gates Negotiated $100 Billion Contact Tracing Deal With Democratic Congressman Sponsor Of Bill Six Months BEFORE Coronavirus Pandemic
The shocking revelations were unveiled on the Thomas Paine Podcast and the Moore Paine Show on Patreon by the two investigators.
nine months after the meetings with the Gates Foundation in Rwanda — Bobby L. Rush, a Democrat from Illinois, introduced the $100 BILLION H.R. 6666, the COVID-19 Testing, Reaching and Contacting Everyone (TRACE) Act.
Everyone’s Contacts Must Be Checked
In a leaked government video (10) we see a conversation between former American president Bill Clinton and Andrew Cuomo, the governor of the state of New York.
They discuss how to set up a large control system to test the entire population and check all their contacts. They discuss how to build an army to carry out this control system.
A Whole New Level Of Global Control
Bill Gates also made it clear that only people who have been vaccinated against Covid-19 should be allowed to travel, go to school, attend meetings and work. (11)
Digital vaccine ID’s are already being developed (12) and Gates has a patent on the technology that makes it possible to trace an individual’s body anywhere. This technology is called WO2020-060606 (13).
Also very interesting to note: An Enzyme Called LUCIFERASE Is What Makes Bill Gates Implantable Vaccine Work
In addition, Gates wants to set up a global monitoring network, which will track everyone who came into contact with Covid-19 (14).
The Plan: Inject Mankind With DNA Altering Vaccine
The famous investigative journalist Anthony Patch did years of research concerning the plans to control the world, by means of created pandemics and mandatory vaccines. During an interview in 2014 this researcher predicted the following:
‘They will release a man-made coronavirus. As a result the people will demand a vaccine to protect them. This vaccine will add a third strain of DNA to a persons body, essentially making them a hybrid.
‘Once a person is injected, almost immediately their DNA undergoes a transformation. This genetic change will cause people to loose the ability to think for themselves, without them even being aware this happened. Thus they can be controlled easier, to become slaves for the elite.’
Of course that sounds insane and it is insane indeed. Yet we have to be aware that this professional investigator is no fool. He has done years of research and this is what he discovered over the years.
We must be careful not to reject sound knowledge, based on years of research, simply because of our own lack of insight in these topics.
20 Years Of Research Say: The Vaccine Will Change Our DNA
Doctor Carrie Madej directed two large clinics in Georgia, before she went to the Dominican Republic to do humanitarian work. She studied DNA and vaccines for the past twenty years and made an urgent video in which she warns that there is a plan to inject humanity with very dangerous vaccines for Covid-19.
The purpose of these new vaccines will be twofold:
1) reprogram our DNA and make us hybrids that are easier to control.
2) connect us to artificial intelligence through a digital vaccine ID, which will also open a whole new realm of control.
This medical expert says she has observed multiple times how diseases were spread over populations by air craft. Because of satefy reasons she is not able to share more details about this in public.
Depopulate The Earth By Means Of Organized Epidemics
Dr. John Coleman is a famous Intelligence Officer from the CIA who wrote a book titled ‘The Committee of 300‘.
In it he explains how secret societies manipulate governments, health care, food industries, the media and so on. This book can be found on the website of the CIA. (15)
One of the primary goals of the many secret societies, that control governments and the media, is to depopulate the earth.
You can find a list of 32 ‘elites’ who support and promote (according to their own claims) depopulation HERE.
Dr. Coleman says the following about their strategy:
‘At least 4 billion useless eaters shall be eliminated by the year 2050 by means of limited wars and organized epidemics of fatal rapid acting diseases…’ – DR. JOHN COLEMAN, CIA INTELLIGENCE OFFICER
Maintain Humanity Under 500,000,000
In 1980 a granite monument was erected in Georgia, called the Guidestones. A set of 10 guidelines is inscribed on the structure in eight modern languages and a shorter message is inscribed at the top of the structure in four ancient language scripts.
The first guideline goes as follows:
1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
The CIA officer Dr. Coleman revealed that one of their methods to ‘maintain humanity’ is to cause ‘organized epidemics of fatal rapid acting diseases’.
Using Vaccines To Reduce Humanity
During a TED talk Bill Gates echoed this goal, when he literally said that new vaccines can be used to reduce the world’s population with 10 – 15%! (16)
‘There are now 6.7 billion people on earth and soon there will be 9 billion. However, we can reduce that number by ten to fifteen percent if we do a good job with new vaccines, health care and birth control’. – BILL GATES, VACCINE DEALER
Covid19 Vaccine For Population Control?
Mike Adams is a published food scientist, author of the popular science book Food Forensics and founder of ISO-accredited CWC Labs.
Years ago he said the following:
“An engineered bioweapon will be released in population centers. There will be calls for massive government funding for the vaccine industry to come up with a vaccine. Miraculously, they will have a vaccine developed in record time. Everyone will be required to line up and take this vaccine shot.”
There is indeed a release of an engineered bioweapon, followed by a vaccine mandate, massive government funding for the vaccine industry and a vaccine that is being developed in record time.
The rest of his message is that this vaccine will slowly begin to kill millions – if not billions – of people over the course of a few years. It will be a kill-switch vaccine, designed to reduce the world’s population.
SUMMARY: WAS THE PANDEMIC PLANNED?
Thousands of medical doctors call the pandemic a global crime, and a world dictatorship with a sanitary excuse.
Two years before Covid-19 came to the global scene, the European Union, the USA, China and other nations suddenly started exporting tens of millions of test kits for Covid-19.
In 2013 a musician predicts a global pandemic with a coronavirus and says this will happen in 2020. He knew this because of personal investigation of so called ‘conspiracy theories’.
In 2017 Anthony Fauci guaranteed a surprise outbreak of an infectious disease during the first term of the Trump administration.
Right before the outbreak of a coronavirus pandemic, Bill Gates organized a global coronavirus pandemic exercise: Event201.
Right before the outbreak the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board told the world to be ready for a coronavirus pandemic.
In 2018 the Institute for Disease Modeling announced a global pandemic with a flu virus, originating in China in the area of Wuhan.
In 2018 Bill and Melinda Gates announced that in the coming years there would be a global pandemic of an engineered virus.
The coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 was created in the Bio Safety Lab Level 4 in Wuhan, which received millions of dollars from Anthony Fauci.
Several movies depicted the coronavirus pandemic with great detail, and even mention hydroxychloroquine as the cure.
The Summer Olympics in 2012 played a pandemic of a coronavirus during their opening show.
The investigative journalist Harry Vox predicted in 2014 that a global pandemic would be caused, so the ‘ruling class’ could implement a higher level of authoritarian control.
The investigative journalist Anthony Patch predicted a global pandemic with a man made virus, that would be used to force a DNA altering vaccine on humanity.
Dr. Carrie Madej studied DNA and vaccines for decades and says the plan is to use the Covid-19 vaccine to start the process of transhumanism: reprogramming the human DNA.
The CIA officer Dr. John Coleman studied secret societies and says their goal is to depopulate the earth by means of organized pandemics of fatal rapid acting diseases.
In the state of Georgia a huge monument was erected in 1980 with ten guidelines for humanity, in eight languages. The first of these ‘Ten Commandments’ is that humanity needs to be reduced to half a billion people.
Bill Gates said during a TED talk that new vaccines can be used to reduce the world’s population with 10-15%.
The ‘health ranger’ Mike Adams predicted years ago what we see happening now: the release of an engineered bioweapon, followed by a vaccine mandate, massive government funding for the vaccine industry and a vaccine that is being developed in record time. He also predicted that this vaccine will kill innumerable people over the course of a couple of years.
In 2010 the Rockefeller Foundation published the ‘Scenario for the future…’ in which they describe a coming global pandemic, that should result in the implementation of authoritarian control over the people, which will then intensify after the pandemic.
In 2020 they publish a handbook on how to create this world of control, with a step by step guide. They say life cannot return back to normal, until the world has become ‘Locked Down’ with this top down control from authoritarian governments.
We indeed see that Bill Gates and many others worldwide are right away seizing control in unprecedented ways, with enforcing vaccine ID’s, microchips that will be implanted into people, mandating the wearing of face masks, social distancing, forced lock-downs, extreme contact tracing, and so on.
Part of this top down control is extreme censoring of every single voice from doctors, scientists or other experts that criticize what is going on.
All Predictions Were Done Shortly Before It Happened
Note that every single prediction of this pandemic was announced a few years or even months before it happened. That is significant.
Gates and Fauci lie to their audience when they say ‘history tells us this will happen’, but there is no historic basis for guaranteeing a global coronavirus pandemic to occur within a few months or years.
Never in history did anything like this occur, on such a global scale.
The fact that such a historically unique event was predicted in great detail – by movies, shows, investigators, medical doctors, those who finance labs that develop these viruses, those who earn billions from these pandemics, those who want to create a whole new level of control in our world, etc. – shows it was planned.
Are There Signs That The Pandemic Is Being Manipulated?
So far we have looked at indications that the pandemic was planned beforehand. If it is indeed orchestrated, then that should also be obvious during the pandemic. A planned pandemic is also a controlled pandemic.
The Plan To Control The World
You may have heard the word ‘globalists’ before, but for those who aren’t familiar with it: these are people around the world who plan to create one global government, so they can have total global control over health, religion, finances – everything.
Main players in this are the United Nations, the World Economic Forum, the World Health Organization, the European Union, the International Monetary Fund, and many others.
They recently came together in an event called DAVOS, where they expressed how the pandemic will be used to deploy their plans.
Here are some of the statements they made: (18)
‘Now is the historic moment in time, not only to fight the virus, but TO SHAPE THE SYSTEM. The pandemic represents a window of opportunity to RESET OUR WORLD.
The world must act jointly and swiftly to REVAMP ALL ASPECTS of our societies and economies, from educational to social contacts and working conditions.
EVERY COUNTRY, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be TRANSFORMED.’ – Klaus Schwab, Funder of the World Economic Forum
A major leader of gobalism, is the World Economic Forum, founded by Klaus Schwab. He created a ‘spinning wheel’ with all their objectives. On it we can see the following three ‘projects’: Covid19 followed by Global Governance, and Internet Governance.
Good read: The Response To Coronavirus Is The New World Order / Agenda 2030
Nobody Wants These Organizations
Not a single human on the earth has voted for these organizations to even exist, let alone take full control of our lives, families, communities, jobs, health, industries, etc. Yet they present themselves as our ‘world leaders’ who are planning our entire future.
The World Health Organization presents itself as the global boss over our health, without anyone of us having chosen for them.
They apply a tyranny in mainstream media and social media, where no expression of medical or scientific expertise is allowed, unless it is in line with the guidelines of this ‘World’ organization.
Tens of thousands of medical doctors and scientists have been censored all over the world, by Facebook, Youtube and Twitter. Why? Because these social media giants state that ONLY what the World health Organization says, is true.
All of humanity must submit to these people who have positioned themselves over all of us, without ever asking our opinion or even consulting with other medical experts.
In fact, every single medical expert speaking out against their decisions is censored.
This means complete loss of medical freedom, loss of freedom of speech, loss of true science, loss of true journalism and an imposing of dictatorships by organizations that nobody voted for, lead by people nobody wanted and yet they simply seize ownership of our world.
They are the big fat mean bully on the playground, that plays boss over everyone.
World Health Organization Is Run By A Terrorist
The head of the Word Health Organization, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, is a member of a violent revolutionary communist party in Ethiopia, Tigray People’s Liberation Front. (19)
The Department of Homeland Security clearly states:
“The TPLF qualifies as a Tier III terrorist organization… on the basis of its violent activities…”
Let this get through to you: the man directing the World Health Organization is literally a communist terrorist, who has been involved in murdering thousands of innocent people, trying to impose communism on Ethiopia.
And this man is bullying the entire world, telling all of us what we can and cannot do, censoring every medical professional who has a different opinion, demanding blind obedience from all of humanity, while imposing mandates to be vaccinated by their number one financial sponsor: Bill Gates.
Is this the world you want to live in, from now on?
More And More Pandemics, Untill Mankind Submits
These globalists even threaten humanity with more suffering, if we don’t submit to their total control. Prince Charles recently joined DAVOS and publicly stated:
“There will be more and more pandemics, if we don’t do ‘the great reset’ now.” (18)
Bill Gates already calls this ‘pandemic one’ and is talking about ‘pandemic two and three’.
The investigator who back in 2013 predicted a coronavirus pandemic to occur in 2020, followed by riots, said the plan is to create series of pandemics during 2020-2030.
This decade is the selected timeframe to turn the world into one big banana republic, run by mad powerhungry men, who depopulate the earth, and enslave the rest of humanity.
They are planning to cause as many pandemics as needed, in order to break the back of humanity, until everybody submits to their global control.
Are you beginning to understand why more than 500 medical doctors from Germany, 600 doctors from Spain, thousands of medical experts from the USA and many more all over the world are calling this pandemic a ‘global’ crime’?
Leaders Of Catholic Church Warn Humanity
An archbishop and several cardinals of the Roman Catholic Church wrote a letter to humanity, to warn us for gloval tyranny under the guise of Covid-19.
This is an excert of this historic message, that has been translated in many languages and was sent to leaders all over the world. (20)
“We have reason to believe, on the basis of official data on the incidence of the epidemic as related to the number of deaths, that there are powers interested in creating panic among the world’s population with the sole aim of permanently imposing unacceptable forms of restriction on freedoms, of controlling people and of tracking their movements. The imposition of these illiberal measures is a disturbing prelude to the realization of a world government beyond all control.”
Is There Hope? What Can We Do?
Is there any hope for our future, or are we surrendered to the merciless hands of these wicked mega-billionaires who want to depopulate the earth and seize total control over humanity?
Yes, there is hope. The future is brighter than we can even imagine!
This is not a doom and gloom scenario, but a wake up call for humanity to stop blindly believing the mafia-media and perverse politicians, and rise up as one for a future of freedom.
I invite you to join a unique and historic movement of Global Freedom Fighters, who will lead humanity into a new era of hope, restoration and more freedom than we have ever known.
Source: StopWorldControl.com / References:
1: German group of Doctors For Information
2: Spanish group of Doctors For Truth
2B: Richard Rothshild patented a testing method for COVID-19 in 2015
2C: World Bank shows planned end date of project COVID-19
3: Fauci guarantees an outbreak with the next two years.
4: Bill Gates announced a global pandemic
5: Melinda Gates says humanities greatest threat is an engineered virus
6: Lyrics of 2013 song that predicted coronavirus pandemic in 2020
7: Harry Vox predicted the global pandemic
8: Robin de Ruiter predicted lockdowns
9: Scenario for the future described global pandemic
10: Andrew Cuomo talks with Bill Clinton about authoritarian control
11: Bill Gates talks about a digital ID to control people
12: Linking vaccines to a digital ID
13: Gates has pattent on technology to trace a body anywhere
14: Gates wants a global monitoring system
15: Download the book of CIA officer Coleman
16: Gates talks about reducing world population using vaccines
17: Tens of millions of Covid-19 test kist were exported by the EU, USA, China etc in 2017 and 2018
18: DAVOS and the gathering of the globalists
19: The head of the World Health Organization is member of violent terorrist group
20: Letter from archbishop and cardinals to humanity
Source: https://humansarefree.com
Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website and Orphanage
Disclaimer: We at Prepare for Change (PFC) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news, and therefore may seem controversial. The opinions, views, statements, and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, espoused, or agreed to by Prepare for Change, its leadership Council, members, those who work with PFC, or those who read its content. However, they are hopefully provocative. Please use discernment! Use logical thinking, your own intuition and your own connection with Source, Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not. By sharing information and seeding dialogue, it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix in this material realm.
Post navigation
Based on latest CDC data, the Wuhan coronavirus poses virtually no death risk whatsoever for people under the age of 50
Dr. Carrie Madej with Richie From Boston
https://prepareforchange.net/2020/09/29/ultimate-proof-covid-19-was-planned-to-usher-in-the-new-world-order/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=ultimate-proof-covid-19-was-planned-to-usher-in-the-new-world-order…
In December 1983, David Bowie's massive 'Serious Moonlight ' tour arrived in Asia for three shows in Hong Kong, Bangkok and Singapore, virtually uncharted te...