US Census Report Shows Entrenched Poverty and Declining Living Standards
By Thomas Gaist
Global Research
September 18, 2013
A US Census Bureau report released Tuesday, entitled “Income, Poverty and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2012,” makes a mockery of President Barack Obama’s claims to be restoring “security and opportunity for the middle class” in the wake of the 2008 financial breakdown.
The report provides a snapshot of a society in immense crisis. Poverty is at a near-generation high of 15 percent, close to the high point since the 1965 War on Poverty, the 15.2 percent rate reached in 1983. According to Tuesday’s report, 46.5 million Americans, including 9.5 million families, live in poverty.
Some 20.4 million people live on an income less than 50 percent of the official poverty line, 7.1 million of these being children under 18. More than 48 million remain without health insurance.
More than 31 percent of the population experienced some period of impoverishment during the years 2009-2011. Median household income, at $51,017, was slightly lower than in 2011, and down by 8.3 percent from 2007. The number of people 65 and older living in poverty increased from 3.6 million to 3.9 million between 2011 and 2012.
Despite more than four years of so-called “recovery,” American society remains plagued by mass deprivation and entrenched poverty. The “recovery” under Obama is limited to the wealthy and the super-rich, who have recovered all of the losses they suffered in the immediate aftermath of the Wall Street crash of September 2008 and grown richer than they were before the financial crisis. Social inequality has deepened as a result of policies designed to further redistribute wealth from the bottom of society to the top.
On Tuesday, one day before the release of the Census Bureau report, Forbes magazine published its annual list of the 400 richest Americans. The combined wealth of these 400 individuals rose substantially from the previous year—from $1.7 trillion to $2.2 trillion. This staggering figure is equal to 12 percent of the total annual gross domestic product (GDP) of the United States and two-thirds of the tax revenues collected in the US in 2013.
The personal holdings of this modern-day aristocracy are sufficient to cover the total deficits of the federal, state and local governments of the US, with many billions to spare. Their $2.2 trillion is greater than the wealth of the bottom 50 percent of Americans—150 million people. It is larger than the GDP of such countries as Italy, Canada and Mexico.
Prominent billionaires on the Forbes list include Bill Gates ($72 billion), Warren Buffett ($58.5 billion), Michael Bloomberg ($31 billion) and Mark Zuckerberg ($19 billion).
A study updated last week by economist Emmanuel Saez documented the enormous growth of social inequality that has taken place since 2009, the official start of the Obama “recovery.” According to the Saez report, the top 1 percent has received 95 percent of all income gains since 2009, while the vast majority of Americans have seen their incomes fall. For the first time in nearly 100 years, the percentage of income taken by the top 10 percent of Americans has topped 50 percent.
Comment by Christopher on September 20, 2013 at 10:55am
If a man has an apartment, stacked to the ceiling with newspapers, we call him crazy.
If a woman has a trailer house full of cats, we call her nuts.
But when people pathologically hoard so much cash, that they impoverish the entire nation, we put them on the cover of Fortune magazine, and pretend that they are role models - B. Lester.
Comment by noblsht on September 19, 2013 at 10:37pm
This is pretty staggering, why is this being ignored these people were completely reimbursed for the 2008 crash and subsequent issues that followed, they are the ones responsible!!
Comment by Mark Sanders on September 19, 2013 at 4:23pm
Government statistics are obviously highly suspect. The BLS, for example, tallies inflation, GDP, and employment, and is notoriously inaccurate. My personal favorite is how their inflation rate does not count food or energy, because they are considered "too volatile". In other words, their price goes up too much. Coupled with the nonsensical way they count (or don't count) discouraged job seekers, the under-employed, and part-timers, there's really no point in relying on any data coming out of Washington. Like they say, "Recession is when your neighbor loses his job, depression is when you lose yours, and recovery is when politicians lose theirs."
You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!
Join 12160 Social Network