Comment

Comment by Rick on September 1, 2012 at 3:47pm

I fuckin love it !!!!! And show no mercy to the enemy and take no prisoners!!!!

Comment by Marvin on July 27, 2012 at 9:46pm

We won't have to worry about running out of 5.56 nato ammo, there will be plenty laying around those blue helmets, just sayin'.

Comment by TheLasersShadow on July 27, 2012 at 9:29pm

Waste of a good steel pot helmet but I guess it was worth the picture!

Comment by apeman2502 on July 26, 2012 at 9:28pm

  all these U.N. troops will be sent to the U.S. for Americans to institute 'population reduction'. After which we bomb the UN and take ALL their stuff.

Comment by Maria De Wind on July 26, 2012 at 10:16am

Who is in the UN Army?

The U.S. Headed For Civil War, U.N. Troops Being Trained on U.S. Soil

Comment by DTOM on July 26, 2012 at 6:23am

The picture sends a message, nothing more nothing less.

I for one hope we can overcome the NWO threat peaceably, but the UN does pose a great threat to ALL people on this planet, as its power increases daily.

Please read the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights - the promises of freedoms, rights and universal suffrage for all, upon this little planet

Sounds great, doesn't it?

Especially for those in nations where the people have few freedoms, if at all.

Then you get to Article 29

 

Paragraph 1

(1) Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.

Duties? (see more commentary on this further down)

Paragraph 2

(2) In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society.

So effectively, if the UN declare that your individual beliefs, opinions, actions etc are void if they are deemed 'offensive' in any way to them, or if they should break any law that the UN should happen to pass in the future.

Who defines what is moral? Does the state have the right to interfere in what consenting adults get up to in the privacy of their own homes - evidently a large some members of the UN membership would say 'yes'.

The 'general welfare' - ah yes, the interests of 'the collective' outweigh those of the individual in the brave new world order

 

Paragraph 3

(3) These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Effectively this small section puts forward a caveate that invalidates ALL previous 'promised' freedoms and rights (evidently the UN does NOT recognise the unalienable rights afforded to ALL freethinking individuals on this planet) listed in the previous 28 articles of the UN UDHR.

To put it bluntly, the UN can relinquish any of its alleged promises or privileges at ANY time, and as far as they are concerned NO-ONE has the right to question or oppose this.

I suppose it's just co-incidence that these provisos bear a striking resemblence to those in the Soviet Constitutions?

i.e- ARTICLE 130. It is the duty of every citizen of the U.S.S.R. to abide by the Constitution of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, to observe the laws, to maintain labor discipline, honestly to perform public duties, and to respect the rules of socialist intercourse. - http://www.departments.bucknell.edu/russian/const/36cons04.html#chap10

The Soviet Constitutions openly placed the 'duties' of Soviet citizens above any of their alleged 'promised' rights.

Will this also be the case if Article 29 Paragraph 1of the UN UDHR was implimented over the constitutions of the US and other nations.

Ask yourself this, if all nations disarm their populations following the wishes of the United Nations, and ONLY the global paramilitary forces of the UN are to be allowed to bear arms, exactly who are these UN 'security / peacekeeping forces' going to be brought to bear their arms against, when individuals object to any future UN policies or actions?

Comment by Eric Price on July 26, 2012 at 4:32am

Billy- Do you even have a clue as to the genocide that has been perpetuated world wide by the dog assed UN scum? Read about how the UN allowed the genocide in Ruanda to occurr, doing nothing to stop it when they could have. You need to grasp that the UN is satanic. You need to grasp that inside UN HQ they have an alter to satan that they call the UN Meditation room. It was built by the Lucifer trust, which changed its name to the "Lucis" trust in an effort to cover up their true nature. You need to grasp that the UN has a population control agenda called UN Agenda 21 and that the UN intends to cull our numbers quite dramatically. You need to grasp that the UN are not anyone's friend. Every UN soldier on US soil deserves to be turned into swiss cheese. We will send these bastards home in body bags and they will richly deserve death. If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen. We are all about to be plunged into a very Darwinian survival of the fittest situation. Develop a spine and stop being such a limp wristed UN lovin' wimp. The UN is the enemy.

Comment by Billy Stewart on July 24, 2012 at 1:44pm

I can't LOVE this picture.  I do not wish that there had been a human head inside it.  I am wondering if posts like this one are contributing to the fear and hate that the NWO has been accused of promulgating.  I am not trying to be 'holier than thou' but I am trying to awaken [at least in myself] the awareness of what I am contributing to this world.

Taking sides is one thing.  Turning this into another 'Sporting Event' is another.  How is a post like this one in any way solving a problem?

Help me understand this.

Comment by Rick on July 24, 2012 at 12:35am

I love it!

Comment by suzie on July 5, 2012 at 5:56pm

lol    

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page