Judiciary Committee has approved Sonia Sotomayor's nomination

Reuters

The Senate Judiciary Committee has approved Sonia Sotomayor's nomination to the Supreme Court and has sent the measure on to the full Senate. Here, the committee debates Sotomayor's nomination on Capitol Hill in Washington on Tuesday.

By Joan Biskupic, USA TODAY

WASHINGTON — The Senate Judiciary Committee approved Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor by a 13-6 vote Tuesday, along almost perfect partisan lines and after two hours of debate.

All Democrats voted for Sotomayor, President Obama's first nominee to the high court. All Republicans except Lindsey Graham, of South Carolina, opposed. The nomination of Sotomayor, a 17-year veteran of the federal bench, now goes to the full Senate for a vote. That is likely to be held the week of Aug. 3, just before the Senate leaves for its summer recess.

Graham said he was backing Sotomayor partly because he believed President Obama, having won last November's election, deserved wide latitude to make appointments within the judicial mainstream. Graham deemed Sotomayor "well qualified," of "good character" and within "the mainstream."

Sotomayor would be the first Latina justice in U.S. history. "Now that's a big deal," Graham said.

And to his fellow conservative Republicans, Graham added, "She can be no worse than Souter, from our point of view." Newly retired Justice David Souter, whom Sotomayor would succeed, was named by the first President Bush in 1990 yet became a reliable vote for the liberal wing.

Democrats currently control 60 of the 100 votes in the Senate, and an easy majority vote for Sotomayor is not in doubt. Sotomayor, who would become the 111th justice in history, would be the third woman ever appointed and the second current female justice. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is presently the only female on the nine-member high court.

The tenor of the Senate Judiciary Committee debate Tuesday had been foreshadowed by senators' comments since Sotomayor's four days of hearings concluded on July 16. Yet, while there was little suspense about the outcome in the cavernous hearing room of the Hart Building, every seat was filled and TV cameras ringed the room.

"Judge Sotomayor is well qualified," Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., said Tuesday. "One need look no further than her experience, ability, temperament and judgment."

The chairman stressed that Sotomayor had more bench experience than any nominee in 100 years. He quoted Sotomayor's telling the committee, "throughout my 17 years on the bench, I have witnessed the human consequences of my decisions. Those decisions have not been made to serve the interests of any one litigant, but always to serve the larger interests of impartial justice."

Leahy noted that during the hearings, almost 2,000 people had been able to get seats to watch the proceedings and millions more witnessed it, heard it, or read about it.

"I see her as a most impressive person on a number of different levels," Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., said, stressing Sotomayor's personal story that began in a Bronx, N.Y., housing project and her extensive legal record, which included service as a local prosecutor in Manhattan and work as a corporate litigator. "I think this woman has done a splendid job. She has shown a dedication to the law."

Leading committee Republican Jeff Sessions, of Alabama, said he was opposing Sotomayor because he believed her "personal biases" would taint her rulings. Her judicial philosophy conflicts with "blind justice," Sessions said, as he focused on statements Sotomayor had made off the bench.

He and other Republican opponents referred Sotomayor's statement, made in speeches, that she "would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion that a white male who hasn't lived that life." Sessions said such sentiment would slant her rulings.

Sotomayor, 55 and of Puerto Rican heritage, had told the committee that the statement was meant to inspire her audiences to strive to careers in the law and was not meant to reflect her approach to judging.

Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, said he had come to the confirmation process wanting to vote for the nominee but said that in the end "her speeches and articles described a troubling approach to judging that her hearing testimony did not resolve. In some of her most important cases, she gave short shrift to fundamental constitutional rights."

Joining Leahy, Feinstein and Graham in backing Sotomayor were Democrats Herb Kohl, of Wisconsin; Russ Feingold, Wisconsin; Charles Schumer, New York, Dick Durbin, Illinois; Benjamin Cardin, Maryland; Sheldon Whitehouse, Rhode Island; Amy Klobuchar, Minnesota; Ted Kaufman, Delaware; Arlen Specter, Pennsylvania; and Al Franken, Minnesota.

Joining Sessions and Hatch against Sotomayor were Republicans Chuck Grassley, of Iowa; John Kyl, Arizona; John Cornyn, Texas; and Tom Coburn, Oklahoma.

Beyond the committee, only a few Republicans, including Mel Martinez of Florida and Susan Collins of Maine, have so far announced they would vote for Sotomayor. In terms of bipartisanship, her final Senate vote might fall somewhere between the tallies of two recent appointees of President George W. Bush.

John Roberts was approved for chief justice in September 2005 by a vote of 78 to 22. All opponents were Democratic (another 22 Democrats supported Roberts). Samuel Alito was approved for an associate justice seat by a vote of 58 to 42 in January 2006. All but two of those "nay" votes came from Democrats.

Sotomayor, a graduate of Princeton University and Yale law school, was appointed a trial judge in 1992 by the first President Bush. President Clinton elevated her to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit in 1998.

Once on the Supreme Court, Sotomayor's first order of business will include preparing for a major test of federal campaign finance law on Sept. 9. The case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission tests the constitutionality of federal regulation of corporate contributions to election campaigns. The regular 2009-2010 term officially begins on October 5, the first Monday in October.

Views: 44

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

"Destroying the New World Order"

TOP CONTENT THIS WEEK

THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!

mobile page

12160.info/m

12160 Administrators

 

Latest Activity

tjdavis posted a video

Charlie Kirk: Grief And Outrage From Turning Point USA in Phoenix

We went to Charlie Kirk's Turning Point USA headquarters in Phoenix to talk with people who were there to pay their respects.►Join my community to get exclus...
12 hours ago
Doc Vega posted blog posts
12 hours ago
Burbia commented on Doc Vega's blog post This Memorable Anthem Given by Nick Freitas Hit the Nail on the Head Please Listen!
18 hours ago
Doc Vega posted blog posts
yesterday
Doc Vega commented on Doc Vega's blog post A Few More Rats in Your Skull Concerning Charlie and the Rampaging Left
"cheeki kea, Yes that was released on to book sites 19 hours before the tragic event and also there…"
yesterday
Burbia commented on Sandy's video
yesterday
Sandy posted a video

Charlie Kirk Was Terrified Of Israel

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.
Friday
Sandy posted a photo
Friday
cheeki kea commented on Doc Vega's blog post A Few More Rats in Your Skull Concerning Charlie and the Rampaging Left
"The internet is fractioned that's for sure but it never sleeps and the big question of the day…"
Friday
Burbia commented on Doc Vega's blog post A Few More Rats in Your Skull Concerning Charlie and the Rampaging Left
"It seems America has many meanings to many people. The internet has fractioned everybody. I had…"
Thursday
Doc Vega commented on Doc Vega's blog post Plausible Explanation Behind Recent Cryptid Sightings in the Wild!
"Cheeki kea I'm glad that the giant Moa downsized to this turkey looking land walker.!"
Thursday
Burbia commented on Burbia's blog post Charlie Kirk Assaination
"I don't know what difference if any that he was also a member of Council for National Policy.…"
Thursday
Doc Vega commented on Burbia's blog post Charlie Kirk Assaination
"I remember when they found out that the united Council of Churches worldwide had been funding…"
Thursday
Doc Vega posted a blog post

A Few More Rats in Your Skull Concerning Charlie and the Rampaging Left

 Political violence and death has been perpetrated for a long time now in America. The Democrats…See More
Thursday
Burbia posted a blog post

Charlie Kirk Assaination

September 10th 2025 in Utah Turning Point USA CEO has been assassinated. Coincidentally,  answering…See More
Thursday
Doc Vega posted a blog post

Bow to Your New Masters

 Dr. Jerome Corsi reports that the discovery of a new wireless system that can corrupt any…See More
Tuesday
cheeki kea commented on Doc Vega's blog post Plausible Explanation Behind Recent Cryptid Sightings in the Wild!
"Wow I never knew penguins got down sized also over time. I knew of the Moa which is really now a…"
Tuesday
Sandy posted a video

Civalyze meme

meme ad for a fake drug that would do away with black fatiguecivilyze you're not racist your just exhausted
Sep 8
Burbia posted a blog post

Is the Timing of Alex Jones and Charlie Sheen Connected?

Alex Jones is sperging out.Charlie Sheen is coming out of the closet.Is this why Alex Jones is…See More
Sep 6
Doc Vega posted a blog post

Buying the Last haunted House on the Left (A partial autobiography)

Note to the reader, there are events here that are true and some that are fictional.Chapter IIt was…See More
Sep 5

© 2025   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2019 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted