MUST READ: Today’s FBI Announcement on Russia Hacking Proves the FBI Is Trying to Influence the 2020 Election — The Charges Follow Long History of FBI Deceit

MUST READ: Today’s FBI Announcement on Russia Hacking Proves the FB...

‘The Russians did it’ is still alive and well at the FBI and DOJ. 

The timing of the announcement earlier today on the indictment of several Russian operatives is to influence the national election because what they are saying is basically impossible to prove.

We reported earlier today that the DOJ announced charges against 6 Russian GRU hackers who will never see the inside of an American courtroom.

The GRU hackers were charged with conspiracy to conduct computer fraud and abuse, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, wire fraud, damaging protected computers, and aggravated identity theft in an indictment returned by a federal grand jury in Pittsburgh.

One of the Russians charged on Monday, Anatoliy Sergeyevich Kovalev, was also previously indicted by former special counsel Robert Mueller.

For one thing, the level of detail included in the indictment suggests that American authorities are so confident about their insight into the workings of Russia’s cyber-operations that the U.S. intelligence community didn’t mind revealing how much it knows.

On March 8, 2020 and before on June 16, 2019, we presented arguments against the Mueller gang’s assertion that the DNC was hacked by Russians.

Cyber expert Yaacov Apelbaum posted an incredible report with information basically proving that the DNC was not hacked by the Russians.

Apelbaum’s first argument was this –

According to the WaPo (using CrowdStrike, DOJ, and their other usual hush-hush government sources in the know), the attack was perpetrated by a Russian unit lead by Lieutenant Captain Nikolay Kozachek who allegedly crafted a malware called X-Agent and used it to get into the network and install keystroke loggers on several PCs. This allowed them to see what the employees were typing and take screenshots of the employees’ computer.

This is pretty detailed information, but if this was the case, then how did the DOJ learn all of these ‘details’ and use them in the indictments without the FBI ever forensically evaluating the DNC/HRC computers? And since when does the DOJ, an organization that only speaks the language of indictments use hearsay and 3rd parties like the British national Matt Tait (a former GCHQ collector and a connoisseur of all things related to Russian collusion), CrowdStrike, or any other evidence lacking chain of custody certification as a primary source for prosecution?

A second point by Apelbaum was –

… that three of the Russian GRU officers on the DOJ wanted list were allegedly working concurrently on multiple non-related projects like interfering with the 2016 United States elections (both HRC and DNC) while at the same time they were also allegedly hacking anti-doping agencies (Images 2-3).

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/gru-dnc-doping-hack-lineup_thumb.jpg 678w" sizes="(max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px" />

Above are pictures of the individuals the FBI says were working on both the DNC/HRC email hacking and the Olympic doping projects.

The same guys were working on both projects which is all but impossible. (Do we really know if they’re even Russians?)

Apelbaum argues 

The fact that the three had multiple concurrent high impact and high visibility project assignments is odd because this is not how typical offensive cyber intelligence teams operate. These units tend to be compartmentalized, they are assigned to a specific mission, and the taskforce stays together for the entire duration of the project.

Next Apelbaum questioned the Mueller gang’s assertion that the ‘hacker’ named Guccifer 2.0 was a Russian –

Any evidence that Guccifer 2.0 is Russian should be evaluated while keeping these points in mind:

  1. He used a Russian VPN service to cloak his IP address, but did not use TOR. Using a proxy to conduct cyber operations is a SOP [Standard Operating Procedure] in all intelligence and LEA [Law Enforcement Agency] agencies. [i.e. Russia would have masked their VPN service]

  2. He used the AOL email service that captured and forwarded his IP address and the same AOL email to contact various media outlets on the same day of the attack. This is so overt and amateurish that its unlikely to be a mistake and seems like a deliberate attempt to leave traceable breadcrumbs.

  3. He named his Office User account Феликс Эдмундович (Felix Dzerzhinsky), after the founder of the Soviet Secret Police. Devices and accounts used in offensive cyberspace operations use random names to prevent tractability and identification. Why would anyone in the GRU use this pseudonym (beside the obvious reason) is beyond comprehension.

  4. He copied the original Trump opposition research document and pasted it into a new .dotm template (with an editing time of about 2 minutes). This resulted in a change of the “Last Modified by” field from “Warren Flood” to “Феликс Эдмундович” and the creation of additional Russian metadata in the document. Why waste the time and effort doing this?

  5. About 4 hours after creating the ‘Russian’ version of the document, he exported it to a PDF using LibreOffice 4.2 (in the process he lost/removed about 20 of the original pages). This was most likely done to show additional ‘Russian fingerprints’ in the form of broken hyperlink error messages in Russian (Images 4 and 5). Why bother with re-formatting and converting the source documents? Why not just get the raw data out in the original format ASAP?


Apelbaum next discussed Guccifer 2.0 –

Views: 6

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

"Destroying the New World Order"

THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!

mobile page

12160.info/m

12160 Administrators

 

TOP CONTENT THIS WEEK

Latest Activity

Central Scrutinizer posted photos
1 hour ago
Central Scrutinizer commented on Less Prone's photo
Thumbnail

Banana Joe

"a proud member of Traitor Joe's© Inc and it's affiliates "
1 hour ago
Less Prone commented on Less Prone's photo
2 hours ago
Twilight Zone posted photos
2 hours ago
Less Prone commented on Less Prone's photo
Thumbnail

Banana Joe

"The film"
2 hours ago
Less Prone commented on Less Prone's photo
Thumbnail

Banana Joe

"LOL I go bananas"
2 hours ago
Old Denmark commented on Less Prone's photo
2 hours ago
Old Denmark favorited Less Prone's photo
2 hours ago
Guardian of Scotland replied to MAC's discussion Military Control, 11.3 Verifies As 1st Marker, The End Won’t Be For Everyone
"Why should we trust anything that these men have to say?"
2 hours ago
Less Prone commented on Central Scrutinizer's group Agnostic & Atheist Patriots
"On top of that nine classic stories. Seems like it's his whole production. Have to admit that…"
3 hours ago
Less Prone commented on Central Scrutinizer's group Agnostic & Atheist Patriots
"CS it is. Yes, it has them all, this is from amazon.com It's cheap at $72, I paid 117 euros…"
3 hours ago
Twilight Zone posted a video
3 hours ago
rlionhearted_3 posted photos
4 hours ago
Twilight Zone posted discussions
6 hours ago
Twilight Zone commented on Twilight Zone's photo
6 hours ago
Twilight Zone commented on Twilight Zone's photo
6 hours ago
Central Scrutinizer posted a status
"GAB's useless once again....man are they hammerin' that site or are they still "Optimizing"??? lol"
7 hours ago
Central Scrutinizer commented on Central Scrutinizer's group Agnostic & Atheist Patriots
"who's CC? Anyway's I'm diggin it over here....   fookin sweet.... Is that…"
7 hours ago
Less Prone posted photos
8 hours ago
Less Prone commented on Central Scrutinizer's group Agnostic & Atheist Patriots
"@CC. Just got my complete collection of Kurt Vonnegut works.. over three thousand pages."
9 hours ago

© 2021   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2019 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted