Police Have No Duty to Protect You, Federal Court Affirms Yet Again

12/20/2018Ryan McMaken

Following last February's shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, some students claimed local government officials were at fault for failing to provide protection to students. The students filed suit, naming six defendants, including the Broward school district and the Broward Sheriff’s Office , as well as school deputy Scot Peterson and campus monitor Andrew Medina.

On Monday, though, a federal judge ruled that the government agencies " had no constitutional duty to protect students who were not in custody."

This latest decision adds to a growing body of case law establishing that government agencies — including police agencies — have no duty to provide protection to citizens in general:

“Neither the Constitution, nor state law, impose a general duty upon police officers or other governmental officials to protect individual persons from harm — even when they know the harm will occur,” said Darren L. Hutchinson, a professor and associate dean at the University of Florida School of Law. “Police can watch someone attack you, refuse to intervene and not violate the Constitution.”

The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that the government has only a duty to protect persons who are “in custody,” he pointed out.

Moreover, even though the state of Florida has compulsory schooling laws, the students themselves are not "in custody":

“Courts have rejected the argument that students are in custody of school officials while they are on campus,” Mr. Hutchinson said. “Custody is narrowly confined to situations where a person loses his or her freedom to move freely and seek assistance on their own — such as prisons, jails, or mental institutions.”

Hutchinson is right.

The US Supreme Court has made it clear that law enforcement agencies are not required to provide protection to the citizens who are forced to pay the police for their "services."

In the cases DeShaney vs. Winnebago and Town of Castle Rock vs. Gonzales, the supreme court has ruled that police agencies are not obligated to provide protection of citizens. In other words, police are well within their rights to pick and choose when to intervene to protect the lives and property of others — even when a threat is apparent.

In both of these court cases, clear and repeated threats were made against the safety of children — but government agencies chose to take no action.

A consideration of these facts does not necessarily lead us to the conclusion that law enforcement agencies are somehow on the hook for every violent act committed by private citizens.

This reality does belie the often-made claim, however, that police agencies deserve the tax money and obedience of local citizens because the agencies "keep us safe."

Nevertheless, we are told there is an agreement here — a "social contract" — between government agencies and the taxpayers and citizens.

And, by the very nature of being a contract, we are meant to believe this is a two-way street. The taxpayers are required to submit to a government monopoly on force, and to pay these agencies taxes.

In return, these government agents will provide services. In the case of police agencies, these services are summed up by the phrase "to protect and serve" — a motto that has in recent decades been adopted by numerous police agencies.

But what happens when those police agencies don't protect and serve? That is, what happens when one party in this alleged social contract doesn't keep up its end of the bargain.

The answer is: very little.

The taxpayers will still have to pay their taxes and submit to police agencies as lawful authority. If the agencies or individual agents are forced to pay as a result of lawsuits, it's the taxpayers who will pay for that too.

Oh sure, the senior leadership positions may change, but the enormous agency budgets will remain, the government agents themselves will continue to collect generous salaries and pensions, and no government will surrender its monopoly on the use of force.

Views: 159

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

Comment by Marklar's Ghost on December 24, 2018 at 3:53pm

Funny how this is the case law yet I get solicitation calls asking me for money to defend the police in the war against them. Sorry pigs, no protection from you to me means no protection from me to you.

Comment by Less Prone on December 24, 2018 at 7:29am

Their job is to enforce laws created by the corrupt politicians.

Comment by cheeki kea on December 23, 2018 at 4:25am

Thanks for the reminder, I really must head off to the gun shop soon. 

"Destroying the New World Order"

TOP CONTENT THIS WEEK

THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!

mobile page

12160.info/m

12160 Administrators

Doc Vega, Chris of the family Masters, cheeki kea and 3 more were featured

 

Latest Activity

Parrhesia commented on tjdavis's blog post How The Pentagon Dictates Hollywood Storylines
"No wonder people in the Mideast would have a bad attitude about the US. Since 1980 U.S. forces have…"
55 minutes ago
Parrhesia posted photos
2 hours ago
Doc Vega posted blog posts
2 hours ago
Parrhesia commented on tjdavis's blog post Every Single Time
"So now its antisemitism to oppose Soros' corrupt DAs who won't prosecute criminals, thus…"
2 hours ago
Parrhesia favorited tjdavis's blog post Every Single Time
2 hours ago
Parrhesia commented on Parrhesia's photo
Thumbnail

True Banana Republic

"Steve - That is exactly what someone should do if the ATF shows up asking to see your weapons…"
4 hours ago
Doc Vega commented on tjdavis's blog post How The Pentagon Dictates Hollywood Storylines
"Who does this guy write for Al Jazeera? Almost every article is a criticism of the western culture.…"
4 hours ago
Parrhesia commented on cheeki kea's blog post Ute Kruger: COVID vaccination and turbo cancer: pathological evidence with English subtitles
"Still amazing to me that people didn't think injecting an experimental gene therapy drug could…"
4 hours ago
Parrhesia favorited cheeki kea's blog post Ute Kruger: COVID vaccination and turbo cancer: pathological evidence with English subtitles
4 hours ago
cheeki kea replied to Parrhesia's discussion Ukraine halts Russian oil supply to EU
" I guess Hungary, Slovakia, and Czech Republic must have upset his feelings in some way. I…"
4 hours ago
cheeki kea favorited Doc Vega's blog post On the Isle of Doom
4 hours ago
cheeki kea commented on cheeki kea's photo
5 hours ago
Parrhesia posted discussions
5 hours ago
cheeki kea posted photos
5 hours ago
Doc Vega commented on tjdavis's blog post Best Campaign Add Of The Century
"Wow that was awesome!!!"
5 hours ago
Doc Vega favorited tjdavis's blog post Best Campaign Add Of The Century
5 hours ago
cheeki kea posted a blog post
6 hours ago
cheeki kea commented on tjdavis's photo
7 hours ago
tjdavis posted photos
9 hours ago
tjdavis posted videos
15 hours ago

© 2022   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2019 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted