|
By Washington's Blog
March 08, 2010 "Washington'sBlog" -- Most Americans don't know what kind of people 9/11 truthers really are. So they can't figure out whether or not they are dangerous.
Below is a list of people who question what our Government has said about 9/11.The list proves - once and for all - that people who question 9/11 are dangerous.Email this list to everyone you know, to
prove to them that 9/11 truthers are all dangerous nut cases.
Senior
intelligence officers:
- Former military analyst and famed whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg said that the case
of a certain 9/11 whistleblower is "far more explosive than the Pentagon
Papers". He also said that the government is ordering the media to
cover up her allegations about 9/11. And he said
that some of the claims concerning government involvement in 9/11 are
credible, that "very serious questions have been raised about what they
[U.S. government officials] knew beforehand and how much involvement
there might have been", that engineering 9/11 would not be humanly or
psychologically beyond the scope of the current administration, and that
there's enough evidence to justify a new, "hard-hitting" investigation
into 9/11 with subpoenas and testimony taken under oath.
- A 27-year CIA veteran, who chaired National Intelligence Estimates and personally
delivered intelligence briefings to Presidents Ronald Reagan and George
H.W. Bush, their Vice Presidents, Secretaries of State, the Joint Chiefs
of Staff, and many other senior government officials (Raymond McGovern)
said “I
think at simplest terms, there’s a cover-up. The 9/11 Report is a ...,
and is open to the possibility that 9/11 was an inside job.
- A number of intelligence officials, including a CIA Operations Officer who
co-chaired a CIA multi-agency task force coordinating intelligence
efforts among many intelligence and law enforcement agencies (Lynne
Larkin) sent a joint letter to Congress expressing their concerns about http://www.pogo.org/m/hsp/hsp-911commission-040913.pdf">“serious
shortcomings,” “omissions,” and “major flaws” in the 9/11 Commission
Report and offering their services for a new investigation (they were
ignored)
- 20-year Marine Corps infantry and intelligence officer, the second-ranking civilian in
U.S. Marine Corps Intelligence, and former CIA clandestine services case
officer (David Steele) stated that "9/11 was at a
minimum allowed to happen as a pretext for war", and it was probably
an inside job (scroll down to Customer Review dated October 7, 2006).
- A decorated 20-year CIA veteran, who Pulitzer-Prize winning investigative reporter
Seymour Hersh called "perhaps the best on-the-ground field officer in
the Middle East”, and whose astounding career formed the script for the
Academy Award winning motion picture Syriana (Robert Baer) said that "the evidence points
at" 9/11 having had aspects of being an inside job
- Professor of History and International Relations, University of Maryland. Former
Executive Assistant to the Director of the National Security Agency,
former military attaché in China, with a 21-year career in U.S. Army
Intelligence (Major John M. Newman, PhD, U.S. Army) questions
the government's version of the events of 9/11.
Congressmen:
- Former U.S. Republican Congressman and senior member of the House Armed Services
Committee, and who served six years as the Chairman of the Military
Research and Development Subcommittee Curt Weldon has shown that the U.S.
tracked hijackers before 9/11, is open to hearing information about
explosives in the Twin Towers, and is open to the possibility that 9/11 was
an inside job
9/11 Commissioners:
- 9/11 Commission co-chair Lee Hamilton says http://www.cbc.ca/sunday/911hamilton.html">"I
don't believe for a minute we got everything right", that the
Commission was set up to fail, that people should keep asking questions
about 9/11, and that the 9/11 debate should continue
- And the Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (John Farmer) - who led the 9/11 staff's
inquiry - recently said
"At some level of the government, at
some point in time...there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened". He
also said
"I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was
described .... The tapes told a radically different story from what had
been told to us and the public for two years.... This is not spin. This
is not true."
Other government
officials:
- Former Deputy Secretary for Intelligence and Warning under Nixon, Ford, and Carter
(Morton Goulder), former Deputy Director to the White House Task Force
on Terrorism (Edward L. Peck), and former US Department of State Foreign
Service Officer (J. Michael Springmann), as well as a who's who of
liberals and independents) jointly call
for a new investigation into 9/11
- Former Federal Prosecutor, Office of Special Investigations, U.S. Department of Justice
under Presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan; former U.S. Army
Intelligence officer, and currently a widely-sought media commentator on
terrorism and intelligence services (John Loftus) says
"The information provided by European intelligence services prior to
9/11 was so extensive that it is no longer possible for either the CIA
or FBI to assert a defense of incompetence."
- President of the U.S. Air Force Accident Investigation Board, who also served as
Pentagon Weapons Requirement Officer and as a member of the Pentagon's
Quadrennial Defense Review, and who was awarded Distinguished Flying
Crosses for Heroism, four Air Medals, four Meritorious Service Medals,
and nine Aerial Achievement Medals (Lt. Col. Jeff Latas) is a member of a
group which doubts the
government's version of 9/11
- Director of the U.S. "Star Wars" space defense program in both Republican and
Democratic administrations, who was a senior air force colonel who flew
101 combat missions (Col. Robert Bowman) stated:
"If our government had merely [done] nothing, and I say that as an old
interceptor pilot—I know the drill, I know what it takes, I know how
long it takes, I know what the procedures are, I know what they were,
and I know what they’ve changed them to—if our government had merely
done nothing, and allowed normal procedures to happen on that morning of
9/11, the Twin Towers would still be standing and thousands of dead
Americans would still be alive. [T]hat is treason!"
Numerous other politicians,
judges, legal scholars, and attorneys
also question at least some aspects of the government's version of
9/11. |
You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!
Join 12160 Social Network