She Won't Quit! - Feinstein's lust for confiscation of 'assault weapons' unmitigated by time

Feinstein's lust for confiscation of 'assault weapons' unmitigated by time

http://www.examiner.com/article/feinstein-s-lust-for-confiscation-o...

Anyone following gun rights/"gun control" issues for any length of time will remember United States Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) lamenting the fact that her 1994 ban of so-called "assault weapons" included, by political necessity, a "grandfather clause," exempting any banned guns and "high capacity" magazines if they were already on the domestic market before the ban's effective date in 1994. As she explained on CBS's 60 Minutes in February 1995 (see accompanying video):

Give them a few projectiles, and if they still want more, loan them a few inches of bayonet
Photo © Oleg Volk. All rights reserved. Used with permission.

If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them, Mr. and Mrs. America, turn 'em all in, I would have done it. I could not do that. The votes weren't here.

It's now 20 years since the ban was implemented, and 10 since its demise, and even the invariably pro-"gun control" New York Times has found itself admitting that the ban did littleor nothing to reduce "gun violence." Feinstein told us in April 2009 (again on 60 Minutes) that she had no intention of giving up on going after semi-automatic, detachable magazine-fed rifles, but that she would wait until the political winds started blowing in an advantageous direction:

I wouldn’t bring it up now…I’ll pick the time and the place [to push for a new ban], no question about that.

The perfect time came, of course, in December 2012, with the massacre of 20 young children and six school staff members, in the Sandy Hook Elementary atrocity, carried out (to "gun control" advocates' delight) with an AR-15 type rifle. True to her word, Feinstein wasted little time pushing for a new "improved" ban--far broader than the old one, without a built-in "sunset provision" (expiration date)--and with, at first, a provision that would essentially have made it aconfiscatory ban for tens of thousands (hundreds of thousands? millions?), because she would put all the "assault weapons" already privately owned under the auspices of the National Firearms Act of 1934, to be treated like machine guns:

The guns would be registered (presumably, like machine guns, subject to periodic inspections by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives); owners would be subject to invasive background checks, presumably fingerprinting, etc. She did not mention the $200 tax stamp for every transfer (and would that also apply to magazines--eachmagazine?), but if they are to be regulated "like machine guns," that would be part of it. And ownership of the gun would apparently be contingent on a local judge or chief law enforcement officer approving that ownership--with the official in question not required to provide that approval, or even a reason for disapproval.

Failure to meet any of these requirements would be grounds for confiscation.

By the time the bill was written, she had apparently established at least some contact with reality, and dropped the idea of an NFA registry requirement for all the millions of such guns owned by the public, because even then, with public support for such a ban higher than in many years, that wasn't going to happen. As it turns out, even her "softened" AWB mustered only 40 votes--meaning that the number of senators, in a Democrat-controlled Senate, at the zenith of anti-"assault weapon" sentimentwho did not vote for the ban would have been enough to form the three fifths supermajority required to pass a Senate bill, had a bill torepeal such a ban been necessary.

But, as she revealed in a statement to ProPublica this month, she still wants a ban, still wants it to be permanent (no "sunset provision") and still wants it to be confiscatory:

The study suggested the law would have been even more effective [as the ProPublica article points out, that's "even more effective" than utterlyineffective] if it had banned weapons already in circulation and if it had continued past its 10-year duration. Unfortunately those limits were part of the compromise that had to be struck to pass the ban into law.

And don't think for a minute she would be content to stop at "assault weapons," if she ever manages to confiscate those.

----------

If you're a regular St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner reader and believe it provides news and perspectives you won't find in the mainstream press, please subscribe to this column and help spread the word by sharing links, promoting it on social media like Facebook (Kurt Hofmann) and Twitter (@45superman), and telling your like-minded friends about it. Also watch for Kurt's articles for Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership.

SUGGESTED LINKS

Views: 410

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

Comment by Sweettina2 on October 1, 2014 at 4:15pm

Thanks,  sharing.

Comment by Sweettina2 on October 1, 2014 at 4:14pm

Someone should fulfill her lust and give her one.

Comment by Central Scrutinizer on September 30, 2014 at 10:12am

Comment by DTOM on September 28, 2014 at 6:25am

Indeed, not to mention her shenanigans with husband Richard C. Blum - http://www.dailypaul.com/272132/insider-trader-war-profiteer-chines...

Comment by Less Prone on September 28, 2014 at 6:08am

Senator Dianne Feinstein obviously carries her Freedom Index Quisling status with pride as would any faithful servant to the international criminal cabal running the world by usury bankers, drug dealers and pirates. Having her Cumulative Freedom Index Score at 12%, she must have the cabal patting on her back all the time. 'Good' girl, indeed :(.

Her voting history consistently supports the big government, totalitarianism, destruction of civil rights and constitution. Who are voting these people in?

Freedom Index Ranking by State

Comment by DTOM on September 28, 2014 at 5:54am

Just as a reminder, she's not content with destroying Amendment 2...

For those of you who have not seen this, this creature espouses the opionion that Amendment 1 of the BILL OF RIGHTS is a privilege only granted to paid employees of the mainstream controlled press.

"Destroying the New World Order"

TOP CONTENT THIS WEEK

THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!

mobile page

12160.info/m

12160 Administrators

 

Latest Activity

Doc Vega posted blog posts
55 minutes ago
Burbia favorited tjdavis's photo
11 hours ago
FREEDOMROX's blog post was featured
13 hours ago
cheeki kea commented on cheeki kea's blog post WHY YOU MUST UNDERSTAND AMYLOIDOSIS AND AMYLOID PLAQUES June 13, 2022
17 hours ago
FREEDOMROX posted a blog post
20 hours ago
Doc Vega commented on Doc Vega's blog post The Many Keys to Deadly Secrecy in our Government
"cheeki kea, thanks so much for your support."
yesterday
FREEDOMROX posted a blog post
Thursday
cheeki kea favorited Doc Vega's blog post The Many Keys to Deadly Secrecy in our Government
Thursday
cheeki kea commented on cheeki kea's photo
Thursday
cheeki kea posted a photo
Wednesday
cheeki kea replied to cheeki kea's discussion Tartaria
"Greetings to you John, You're right and it didn't take long for those manuals to totally…"
Wednesday
Doc Vega posted a blog post

The Many Keys to Deadly Secrecy in our Government

We now know thanks to the legislation of FOIA access to federal documents and evidence and the…See More
Wednesday
Less Prone favorited tjdavis's photo
Wednesday
Less Prone favorited rlionhearted_3's photo
Wednesday
John Miller commented on rlionhearted_3's photo
Thumbnail

Another incredibly Stupid!! What, no mirrors?

"Brutal post... not sure it’s helping anyone though."
Tuesday
John Miller replied to cheeki kea's discussion Tartaria
"Tartaria: the empire that built half the world's cathedrals, then vanished because someone…"
Tuesday
Burbia commented on rlionhearted_3's photo
Thumbnail

Another incredibly Stupid!! What, no mirrors?

"This movie portrayed plastic surgery as absurd. I guess the numbers in the real world are growing."
Tuesday
Burbia commented on tjdavis's photo
Thumbnail

Redux

"Ah yes, General Jussitri Smolletkov. Good tongzhi. Good tongzhi."
Tuesday
Doc Vega posted a blog post

Unusual Discoveries and Headlines

Archaeologists have discovered an ancient tool dated to be 6,000 years old, but even more…See More
Monday
tjdavis posted a video

Inside Texas HOMELESS HELL – Even Cops Don't Dare Step In! - Documentary

In this powerful documentary, we explore the escalating Texas homeless crisis 2025, where cities and rural areas alike are witnessing a disturbing rise in th...
Monday

© 2025   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2019 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted