The government has your baby's DNA



(CNN) -- When Annie Brown's daughter, Isabel, was a month
old, her pediatrician asked Brown and her husband to sit down because
he had some bad news to tell them: Isabel carried a gene that put her
at risk for cystic fibrosis.


While grateful to have the information -- Isabel received further testing and she doesn't have the disease -- the Mankato, Minnesota, couple wondered how the doctor knew
about Isabel's genes in the first place. After all, they'd never
consented to genetic testing.


It's simple, the pediatrician answered: Newborn babies in the United States are routinely screened for a panel of genetic diseases. Since the testing is mandated by the
government, it's often done without the parents' consent, according to
Brad Therrell, director of the National Newborn Screening & Genetics Resource Center.


In many states, such as Florida, where Isabel was born, babies' DNA is stored indefinitely, according to the resource center.

Many parents don't realize their baby's DNA is being stored in a government lab, but sometimes when they find out, as the Browns did, they take
action. Parents in Texas, and Minnesota have filed lawsuits, and these
parents' concerns are sparking a new debate about whether it's
appropriate for a baby's genetic blueprint to be in the government's
possession.


"We were appalled when we found out," says Brown, who's a registered nurse. "Why do they need to store my baby's DNA indefinitely? Something on there could affect her ability to get a job
later on, or get health insurance."


According to the state of Minnesota's Web site, samples are kept so that tests can be repeated, if necessary, and in case the DNA is ever need to help parents identify
a missing or deceased child. The samples are also used for medical
research.


Art Caplan, a bioethicist at the University of Pennsylvania, says he understands why states don't first ask permission to screen babies for genetic diseases. "It's paternalistic, but the
state has an overriding interest in protecting these babies," he says.


However, he added that storage of DNA for long periods of time is a different matter.


"I don't see any reason to do that kind of storage," Caplan says. "If it's anonymous, then I don't care. I don't have an issue with that. But if
you keep names attached to those samples, that makes me nervous."


DNA given to outside researchers

Genetic testing for newborns started in the 1960s with testing for diseases and conditions that, if undetected, could kill a child or cause severe
problems, such as mental retardation. Since then, the screening has
helped save countless newborns.


Over the years, many other tests were added to the list. Now, states mandate that newborns be tested for anywhere between 28 and 54 different conditions, and the DNA samples
are stored in state labs for anywhere from three months to
indefinitely, depending on the state. (To find out how long your baby's
DNA is stored, see this state-by-state list.)

Brad Therrell, who runs the federally funded genetic resource consortium, says parents don't need to worry about the privacy of their babies' DNA.

"The states have in place very rigid controls on those specimens," Therrell says. "If my children's DNA were in one of these state labs, I wouldn't
be worried a bit."


The specimens don't always stay in the state labs. They're often given to outside researchers -- sometimes with the baby's name attached.

According to a study done by the state of Minnesota, more than 20 scientific papers have been published in the United States since 2000 using newborn blood samples.


The researchers do not have to have parental consent to obtain samples as long as the baby's name is not attached, according to Amy Gaviglio, one
of the authors of the Minnesota report. However, she says it's her
understanding that if a researcher wants a sample with a baby's name
attached, consent first must be obtained from the parents.


More Empowered Patient news and advice

Scientists have heralded this enormous collection of DNA samples as a "gold mine" for doing research, according to Gaviglio.


"This sample population would be virtually impossible to get otherwise," says Gaviglio, a genetic counselor for the Minnesota Department of Health.
"Researchers go through a very stringent process to obtain the samples.
States certainly don't provide samples to just anyone."

Brown says that even with these assurances, she still worries whether someone could gain access to her baby's DNA sample with Isabel's name attached.


"I know the government says my baby's data will be kept private, but I'm not so sure. I feel like my trust has been taken," she says.


Parents don't give consent to screening

Brown says she first lost trust when she learned that Isabel had received genetic testing in the first place without consent from her or her
husband.

"I don't have a problem with the testing, but I wish they'd asked us first," she says.


Since health insurance paid for Isabel's genetic screening, her positive test for a cystic fibrosis gene is now on the record with her insurance
company, and the Browns are concerned this could hurt her in the future.

"It's really a black mark against her, and there's nothing we can do to get it off there," Brown says. "And let's say in the future they can test
for a gene for schizophrenia or manic-depression and your baby tests
positive -- that would be on there, too."


Brown says if the hospital had first asked her permission to test Isabel, now 10 months old, she might have chosen to pay for it out of pocket so the results
wouldn't be known to the insurance company.

Caplan says taking DNA samples without asking permission and then storing them "veers from the norm."


"In the military, for instance, they take and store DNA samples, but they tell you they're doing it, and you can choose not to join if you don't
like it," he says.


What can parents do

In some states, including Minnesota and Texas, the states are required to destroy a baby's DNA sample if a parent requests it. Parents who want
their baby's DNA destroyed are asked to fill out this form in Minnesota and this form in Texas.


Parents in other states have less recourse, says Therrell, who runs the genetic testing group. "You'd probably have to write a letter to the state
saying, 'Please destroy my sample,'" he says.


He adds, however, that it's not clear whether a state would necessarily obey your wishes. "I suspect it would be very difficult to get those
states to destroy your baby's sample," he says.


Views: 96

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

Comment by Jecht Kerniga on February 5, 2010 at 12:39pm
Sharing information is one thing, but acting requires something more. You cn tell all the people in the world about the countless things the government does to violate your liberty and rape the country, but each one is seemingly meaningless and insignificant. The people of this country no longer hear words. If you want to make a difference you're gonna have break their routine. AFFECT their lives and make them listen.
Comment by fantomette on February 5, 2010 at 12:14pm
Thank You James for this Important Information! I will spread it like a Virus!
Comment by Randall on February 5, 2010 at 6:58am
Brave new world, isn't it?
Comment by Marley Jones on February 5, 2010 at 2:37am
I'd bet my first born - sorry Einstein - that whatever THEY R doing with the DNA is illegal, immoral, i.e., cloning? Who could say what's in the minds and hearts of the PTB. As soon as you 'register' (from the Latin - regis - King/Queen) a baby, the State/Fed Corp Gov. becomes the 'parent' an interested third-party via the birth certificate, the parents have "use" of the child, but make no mistake not ownership i.e., control which is why they can vaccinate them, 'kidnap' them, and as Henry K says "use them for cannon fodder'. The birth (berth) cert starts the commercial process rolling. CA is making home schooling illegal, so it's off to the 'public fool system', where children are taught not to think, not to create - or it's Ritilin! - to eat cheap disgusting foodstuffs, breaking potential, regimented, stiffled, learning crapola - if they learn to read at all - Vive la Revolution!!!
I like the way the fed agent says not to worry, see how they soothe.......
Comment by Tara on February 5, 2010 at 12:54am
I just can't help but think about the book "Brave New World" when I finished reading this post. The State once again wanting to be the mommy and daddies of the world! It's all just sickening!
Comment by youhavetoforgiveme on February 5, 2010 at 12:13am
The year is 2023....

"We're sorry Mr. and Mrs. Jones, your baby has a slight birth defect....blue eyes. You, your son, and all your upward relatives have been targeted for termination. For whatever it's worth, we'll get to them soon enough. I'm sorry."

BLAM! BLAM! BLAM!

"Now get these three terrorists outta here!"
Comment by truth on February 4, 2010 at 10:16pm
PH as you are probably aware , a lot of states have been moving to make home births illegal or hardly possible with restrictions and licenses. We are under attack at every level.
Comment by Ya'aKov on February 4, 2010 at 9:31pm
Really within a few lines of reading, I was like; NO f.....................[Being nice] Way!!!!!!!

What was that in the 1920s about selective sterilization?Looks like they are ready anytime...

Man O' man, what have we become.

"Destroying the New World Order"

TOP CONTENT THIS WEEK

THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!

mobile page

12160.info/m

12160 Administrators

 

Latest Activity

cheeki kea posted a video

Neil Oliver STUNNED as Dutch Official Reveals Covid-19 Was 'MILITARY Operation' in SHOCK Admission

Neil Oliver reacts after a top Dutch government official has admitted 'Covid' was a military operation.#gbnews #uknews #covid #coronavirus #covid19 Keep up t...
7 hours ago
tjdavis posted blog posts
yesterday
tjdavis commented on tjdavis's video
yesterday
tjdavis posted videos
yesterday
tjdavis posted photos
yesterday
Doc Vega posted blog posts
yesterday
Doc Vega commented on Doc Vega's blog post What Will happen When Robot Brides Replace Human Marriage?
"Less Prone thanks for your support Buddy! "
Friday
Less Prone favorited tjdavis's video
Thursday
Less Prone posted a photo

Social Engineering 101

That's how it goes.
Thursday
Doc Vega posted a blog post

A Prelude to WW III ? It Seems There We Are Trailblazing Idiocy into More Blood and Destruction!

They're rolling out the 25th Amendment trying to stop Joe Biden from insanely thrusting the US in a…See More
Thursday
Less Prone posted a video

Chris Langan - The Interview THEY Didn't Want You To See - CTMU [Full Version; Timestamps]

DW Description: Chris Langan is known to have the highest IQ in the world, somewhere between 195 and 210. To give you an idea of what this means, the average...
Wednesday
Doc Vega posted a blog post

RFK Jr. Appoinment Rocks the World of the Federal Health Agncies and The Big Pharma Profits!

The Appointment by Trump as Secretary of HHS has sent shockwaves through the federal government…See More
Tuesday
tjdavis posted a video

Somewhere in California.

Tom Waites and Iggy Pop meet in a midnight diner in Jim Jarmusch's 2003 film Coffee and Cigarettes.
Tuesday
cheeki kea commented on cheeki kea's photo
Thumbnail

1 possible 1

"It's possible, but less likely. said the cat."
Nov 18
cheeki kea posted a photo
Nov 18
tjdavis posted a blog post
Nov 18
Tori Kovach commented on cheeki kea's photo
Thumbnail

You are wrong, all of you.

"BECAUSE TARIFFS WILL PUT MONEY IN YOUR POCKETS!"
Nov 17
Tori Kovach posted photos
Nov 17
Doc Vega posted a blog post

Whatever Happened?

Whatever Happened?  The unsung heroes will go about their dayRegardless of the welcome they've…See More
Nov 17
Doc Vega commented on Doc Vega's blog post A Requiem for the Mass Corruption of the Federal Government
"cheeki kea Nice work! Thank you! "
Nov 17

© 2024   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2019 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted