Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Nancy Oakley on January 21, 2013 at 7:48pm

OATH KEEPERS MOLON LABE PLEDGE

We will never disarm.   We will never surrender our military pattern, semi-automatic rifles and the full capacity magazines, parts, and ammunition that go with them.  The fundamental purpose of the Second Amendment is to preserve the military power of We the People so we will have effective means to resist tyranny. Regardless of what unholy, unconstitutional filth issues from the mouths of oath breakers in “Mordor on the Potomac” our answer is MOLON LABE.

“Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force: Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined.”- Patrick Henry

We will not allow our children to be disarmed.  We will pass on those military pattern rifles, magazines, and ammunition to our children and our children’s children.

"Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birth-right of an American… [T]he unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people." – Tench Coxe, 1788

We will die in battle before we give up our arms and leave our children in slavery.

We will not register ourselves or our arms.   Registration is the prerequisite to confiscation, which is the prerequisite to dictatorship and extermination.  We will NOT be photographed, finger-printed, tracked, and subjected to psych-evaluations like convicted sex-offenders just for owning semi-automatic rifles.  Doing so is itself an act of surrender and submission, taking the mark of the slave (it is akin to taking the mark of the Beast).

We will NOT obey any order to disarm the American people or compel registration

The attempt to disarm the people on April 19, 1775 was the spark of open conflict in the American Revolution.  It was an act of war, and our forefathers fought back in justified, righteous self-defense of their natural rights.  Any such order today would also be an act of war against the American people, and thus an act of treason.  Those of us who are still current serving will not enforce any attempt to register either gun owners or guns, or to ban the sale, possession, or transfer of any semi-automatic rifles, handguns, or full capacity ammunition magazines, which are precisely the kinds of weapons the American people need to defend their lives and liberty.

We will interpose ourselves between the people and the oath breakers and traitors who try to disarm them.

We will step in between the people in our communities and any oath breaker who attempts to carry out such orders, regardless of their title, their office, their uniform, or who sent them.  When they step outside the law – outside the Constitution – they are no better than violent street criminals and we will protect the people from them.

We will keep the oaths we swore to almighty God to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. 

That oath does not expire until we do. 

American patriots, Oath Keepers, what say you?  

Will you pledge the same?

 

http://oathkeepers.org/oath/pledge/?p=1

www.oathkeepers.org

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by kRzeIt on January 22, 2013 at 12:50pm

Outstanding!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mike Petkus on January 23, 2013 at 9:16am

The system is truly panicking. You can see it in their desperate use of media, hollywood (read CIA) actors, and govt brainwashed officials speech and actions as they attempt to brainwash us, OR actually think we are already zombies like a portion of America, which by the way is quickly waking up to the whole scheme. TRUTH is winning, and the lies are falling. Their desperation shows us they are just about to fall off the cliff, but now is NOT the time to start celebrating, for when they are cornered or falling through their own cracks, they are most dangerous! Keep your poise above all else! BUT this is starting to turn on them! YES!!!!!!!!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by kRzeIt on January 23, 2013 at 10:01am

My friend thinks, and I agree, that the NWO people in Washington DC are going to implode on themselves.  Too much evil, too many lies in one place.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Nancy Oakley on January 23, 2013 at 3:08pm

Preaching to the choir, I know, but this would be good to send to people still on the fence.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Alan Wakefield on January 24, 2013 at 2:15pm

 

Dear Mr. X,

On your program today you spoke about guns being confiscated. You referenced an executive order giving the president power to simply confiscate all the food from all the homes in the country. As a matter of law and of fact, executive orders have no validity outside the executive branch of government. There are, by the way, executive orders giving the president power to confiscate all the fuel in the country, again un-Constitutional because executive orders have no validity beyond the walls of the executive branch. For executive orders to be applied any other way would be to grant and allow the president the powers of a king, simply making law according to his whim. “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge.”

Here is some information regarding Rights you and your listeners really need to know. If I have made claims or drawn conclusions contrary to the Law of God, I would be grateful to receive your correction.

Following is my explanation regarding:

THE INALIENABLE RIGHT OF SELF-DEFENSE 

          There is NO QUESTION  self defense is an INALIENABLE RIGHT. The Right to own the means (guns and other weapons) of self-defense is an intrinsic part of the Right of Self-defense.

Is the Right to Bear Arms a universal human Right?

 

          Inalienable Rights come from God and ONLY from God.

 

"INALIENABLE" is defined in the legal dictionaries as "That which CANNOT be given away or taken away." SPEND SOME TIME DIGESTING THAT PRECEPT before continuing.

 

Consistent with that definition, it is a violation of God's Law to give away your Inalienable Rights. YOUR RIGHT TO CONTRACT, YOUR RIGHT TO WORK, YOUR RIGHT OF SELF DEFENSE AND YOUR POWER OF ATTORNEY ARE EXAMPLES OF YOUR INALIENABLE RIGHTS. Your POWER OF ATTORNEY, as a matter of fact, is the ONLY difference between you and a slave.

"Inalienable"  means exactly that, YOU CANNOT ALIENATE YOURSELF FROM YOUR INALIENABLE RIGHTS! Here is the legal definition of 'Inalienable" from Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1856 Edition:

 

            “INALIENABLE. This word is applied to those things, the property of which cannot be lawfully transferred from one person to another. Public highways and rivers are of this kind; there are also many rights which are inalienable, as the rights of liberty, or of speech.”

 

Where has the church been on these FUNDAMENTAL precepts regarding INALIENABLE RIGHTS? Why have the courts not PROHIBITED such egregious violations, pretending we can surrender INALIENABLE Rights? Consider this information very carefully. Ask yourself, are these difficult precepts? Are they difficult to comprehend? Are they difficult to teach others?

 

When the International Banksters/Federal Reserve/IRS converted your RIGHT TO WORK/RIGHT TO CONTRACT into privilege AND ROBBED YOU OF YOUR POWER OF ATTORNEY by forcing you to sign a W2 (4?) Form (giving up your Power of Attorney over your wages) they converted your God given Inalienable Right to Work and Right to Contract into a government issued privilege and then made you pay for that privilege! This is a crime against against God Who granted you INALIENABLE RIGHTS. The government took away that which MAY NOT BE TAKEN AWAY and forced us to give away that WHICH MAY NOT BE GIVEN AWAY!

 

Does God grant Rights to those who refuse to recognize Him as The Source of Rights? THE ANSWER IS "NO!"

 

Has there been a "sovereign" in the history of the world that granted privileges to someone who refused to recognize his "sovereignty"?  AGAIN, THE ANSWER IS "NO!"

 

Is God a fool? Would He be foolish enough to grant the Right to keep and bear arms to anyone that did not recognize His Authority and refused to hold himself Accountable to Him for the way in which they exercised that Right? AGAIN, THE ANSWER IS "NO!" 

 

The Bible, in Revelation 13:4 and 8 tells us anyone who does not worship God is a satan worshiper: “And they worshiped the dragon (devil)...And ALL (not born again) that dwell upon the earth shall worship him (the devil), whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.” This Scripture makes irrefutably clear there has never been a third choice, ALL who have ever lived on planet Earth worship either Christ or satan.

  Do you think or believe God would grant Rights, any Rights, to a satan worshiper? THE ANSWER IS "NO, HE WOULD NOT!"  I further suspect, since satan has a legal claim on his own worshipers, God cannot grant rights to satan worshipers. Does that make sense? All God's children are Accountable to God for the way in which we use the gifts (talents) God has given us. Does that sound reasonable and Scriptural? Would God be fool enough to grant the Right to Bear Arms to a satan worshiper, who is NOT Accountable to God? Really?

 

A Christian's Right to self-defense and Right to Bear Arms COMES DIRECTLY FROM GOD. It muddies up the issue to pretend that the Right of self-defense is a human Right; it is NOT! Satan worshipers are, after all, human, and yet they possess no Lawful claim to Rights. Perhaps the origin of the term "outlaw" will clarify this precept:

Historically, a king, sovereign, czar, emperor or ruler was the source of law. His word was law. Anyone not recognizing, honoring and obeying his law, AND HIS AUTHORITY, was considered "outlaw," meaning out from under the protection of his law. How much much more does that precept apply to those who refuse to recognize, honor and obey God? Talk about OUTLAW, such are truly OUTLAW, truly out from under the protection of God's Law. Outlaws have no "privileges," (and certainly rights, per se, did not exist. The only one that had Rights was the king.). It was literally "open season" on those deemed “outlaw.” There was NO LEGAL PROTECTION for outlaws.  Everything was at the whim and pleasure of the king. God's Law was still the Law in that Rights are Inalienable and the even a king could not grant Rights; the king HAD NO POWER TO ALIENATE HIMSELF FROM HIS RIGHTS AND GRANT THEM TO ANOTHER. He could only convey revocable "privilege" or "charter."  Charters were pure privilege, not Rights, for the reason that the Power and Authority  to Grant Rights, is, NOW AND FOREVER, GOD'S PREROGATIVE!

Since Rights are from God, and ONLY from God, and since GOD CANNOT/WOULD NOT GRANT RIGHTS TO satan worshipers, it is irrefutably obvious the Right to Bear Arms is a Christian Right, not a human right. As strange as that may sound, you must always remember RIGHTS COME FROM GOD AND ONLY FROM GOD. Our misunderstanding and misapplication of this precept, RIGHTS ARE FROM GOD, has led to the present confusion over the Second Amendment. Had we understood and applied this precept properly the senseless slaughter and gun violence by non-believers using firearms, to which they possess NO LAWFUL RIGHT, would for the most part have been prevented. NON-CHRISTIANS HAVE NO LEGITIMATE CLAIM TO RIGHTS. AND CERTAINLY THEY HAVE NO RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS.

Applying this reasoning, it is self-evident there is NO RIGHT to publish pornography claiming the Right of Free Speech; there is NO RIGHT to Practice abortion under a perverted and corrupt doctrine named “freedom/right of choice;” there is NO RIGHT to practice homosexuality or “gay legal unions” under that other perverse and demonic concept identified as “separation of church and state.” THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE! God's Word in Revelation 13:4 & 8 is irrefutable:

“And they worshiped the dragon (devil)...And ALL (not born again) that dwell upon the earth shall worship him (the devil), whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.” This Scripture makes irrefutably clear there has never been a third choice, ALL who have ever lived on planet Earth worship either Christ or satan.

THERE IS CHRIST WORSHIP AND THERE IS SATAN WORSHIP; NOTHING ELSE. HOW IS IT POSSIBLE FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE TO EXIST UNDER THAT CIRCUMSTANCE? IT CANNOT AND DOES NOT EXIST. HOW HAS THE CHURCH FAILED TO RECOGNIZE THAT????

All non-Christians are safe from Christians who own firearms since Christians are Accountable to God for how we not only use our firearms but for all of our dealings with everyone, Christians and satan worshipers alike. Christians, as a matter of fact, have a moral obligation to protect those who cannot protect themselves should such occasion arise, whether Christian or not. It is our Christian heritage that motivated

the United States to send so much military and financial whenever and wherever there was a need.

 

Misunderstanding this FUNDAMENTAL PRECEPT by Christians, by the legislatures, by the Executive branch and by the courts has led to this present lunacy over gun control and the possibility of Obama violating our God given INALIENABLE Constitutional Rights AND VIOLATING his Oath of Office by mis-using and abusing executive orders. When Obama gave his Oath of Office he raised his hand to call God to Witness his Oath in which Obama promised to Protect and defend our Inalienable Rights; including our Inalienable Right of self-defense and the Corollary Inalienable Right to Own firearms as expressed in the 2^nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and many state Constitutions. EXECUTIVE ORDERS APPLY ONLY TO THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH—NOWHERE ELSE! To conclude otherwise is to eliminate our representative government.

 

The Pennsylvania Constitution,and many others, declare the Right to keep and bear arms "SHALL NOT BE QUESTIONED!" The ONLY question that MUST be asked vis-a-vis gun ownership is this question: ARE YOU BORN AGAIN?" There is no such thing as a Christian who is not born again. The phrase "born again Christian" is a redundancy since Jesus Declared, "Ye must be born again" to be one of His and to assure your name is written into "the Lamb's Book of Life." A Christian, by definition, is born again. You CANNOT define yourself born again unless you are Christian.

 

None of these are difficult precepts, None of these FUNDAMENTAL PRECEPTS conflict with the Word of God. If you think they do, please point out that conflict.

 

At the time the Constitution was written, it was presumed everyone was Christian. How can I make such an outrageous statement? In 1831, Alexis DeToqueville reported in his sociological book,Democracy in America, a law case that took place in Chester County, New York: 

 

“While I was in America, a witness, who happened to be called at the assizes(Court of common pleas) of the County of Chester (state of New York), declared that he did not believe in the existence of God or in the immortality of the soul. The judge refused to admit his evidence, on the ground that the witness had destroyed beforehand all confidence of the court in what he was about to say... .The New York Spectator of August 23d, 1831, relates the fact in the following terms:

‘The court of common pleas of Chester County, a few days since (ago) rejected a witness who declared his disbelief in the existence of God. The presiding judge remarked, that he had not before been aware that there was a man living who did not believe in the existence of God; that this belief constituted the sanction of all testimony in a court of justice: And that he knew of no case in a Christian country where a witness had been permitted to testify without such belief.’” America’s God and Country Encyclopedia of Quotations.Ibid.

 

Here we have a judge of the Court of Common Pleas, some 44 years after the Constitution was ratified, who was under the impression the entire nation was Christian. So what need was there, in 1787, the year of the Constitutional Convention, to even mention that Rights apply ONLY to Christians, since at the time of the adoption of the Constitution the overwhelming majority of the

nation was Christian? Those not Christian, prohibited from giving the Oath of Office, were effectively precluded from holding public office and thus the Freedoms and Liberties of the nation were thought secure. The prince of darkness is nothing if not persistent.

 

Further, John Adams, first vice-president and second President of the United states, wrote:

“We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” America’s God & Country Encyclopedia of Quotations, ibid.

 

The "morality" to which Adams refers is obedience to the Law of God, the ONLY foundation for a republic and certainly the ONLY foundation for our republic. We often hear the term "Rule of Law" used to explain that our republic functions under the Rule of Law. But how many ask the follow-up questions, Whose Law,? What Law? Both are properly answered with a single Word: "God's"

William Blackstone, mentor extraordinaire to the Founding Fathers, wrote in his Commentaries on the Laws of England, “Any human law that contradicts the Law of God is not valid law.” Blackstone is not the only legal authority teaching that precept.

Who would argue with what I wrote above? There is ONLY ONE ANSWER to that question: satan worshipers. God has commanded us to “Love your enemies, pray for them, bless them, do good to them...” What greater Love than Truth? What greater blessing than Truth? What greater good than Truth? What greater prayer than that they find Truth? Jesus declared, “I Am...The Truth!” New Testament, Gospel of John, 14:16. (KJV).

 

In His Name,

Alan Wakefield 

McKeesport, PA  

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Alan Wakefield on January 25, 2013 at 12:50am

The United States Constitution declares: "The Right of the people to bear arms shall not be infringed."  Article 1, Section 21 of our Pennsylvania Constitution states the same thing in these words: "The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State shall not be questioned."

The Right to Bear Arms here enumerated makes it un-constitutional for any public official to even question a Christian's Right to own or carry a firearm. For a Christian to apply for a concealed carry permit is blasphemy because the God ordained Inalienable Right to self defense includes the Right to own and carry weapons. It is blasphemy for any public official, sheriff, police officer or judge to question a Christian's Right of self defense, including the Right to carry firearms. Blasphemy is and always will be a crime at the Common Law. Blasphemy a priori makes the public official, sheriff, police officer or judge who questions a Christian about his Right to bear arms a criminal. A criminal has no lawful claim to public office.

Article IV, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution contains the Full Faith and Credit Clause meaning every other state is Constitutionally constrained to recognize the Rights protected by the Pennsylvania Constitution as well as the Rights protected by every other state's Constitution: “Full faith and credit shall be given in each state to the  public acts (the Constitution of the state is among the first public acts of the state), records (state Constitution), and judicial proceedings of every other state.” Article IV, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution. See my REPLY immediately above, The Inalienable Right of Self defense in which I explain in detail why only Christians have Rights. I suggest you read my explanation BEFORE you attack me for telling you the Truth

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Alan Wakefield on January 27, 2013 at 12:13am

Thank you, Capt. Dave. Here is another exchange you may enjoy. First the ANTI-CONSTITUTIONAL, ANTI-BIBLICAL COMMENT, followed by my response.

spinoza1111 says:

January 26, 2013 at 4:48 am

Police fire on American citizens (especially African American citizens) all the time in self-defense and to defend others. A federal government may indeed fire upon citizens who are engaged in the high crime of treason.

I realize that many right-wingers have evolved the strange opinion that the United States is unique in the world, and even amongst federations, in having no such thing as “treason” (at least until they seize power, anyway).

But this view has no Constitutional support whatsoever. Treason is recognized as a crime against the Federal government by virtue of its being mentioned in I/6 (treason of legislators), II/4 (treason of President or VP), and III/3 (where treason is restricted to making war on the United States, something you people seem to support). Just as a police officer can use deadly force to prevent the commission of a serious crime, a military officer can and should do the same;treason, making war on the United States, is no joke.

Reply

•  Alan Wakefield says:

  Your comment is awaiting moderation.
  

  January 27, 2013 at 4:54 am

  
  

  Are you born again, Mr. Spinoza1111? Born again in the Biblical sense recognizing Jesus Christ as Creator, Lord of all and Savior? If not, that would make you and your friends satan worshipers according to God’s Word in the New Testament Book of Revelation, chapter 13, verses 4 and 8: “And they worshiped the dragon (satan)…and all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him (satan) whose names are not written in the Book of Life of the Lamb…” There is ONLY ONE WAY to assure your name is in that book, “Ye must be born again.” New Testament, Gospel of John, chapter 3, verse 7. You speak like a satan worshiper, Spinoza1111, supporting obama and his friends desire to remove American’s God ordained Right of Self defense. The evidence against you is pretty conclusive, Mr. Spinoza1111, and right from your own wordprocessor. The Right to Keep and Bear Arms is an Inalienable Right. Inalienable is defined in the law dictionaries as that which CANNOT be given away of taken away. And yet here you are promoting and supporting the criminal blasphemy of forcing the people to give up their God-given Right of self defense. I ask you mr. Spinoza1111, does that sound like something a Christ worshiper would do, or does it sound like something a satan worshiper would do? As I wrote above, the evidence certainly sounds conclusive. Obviously, the obama crowd would not be included with the Christ worshipers; but that conclusion was abundantly evident long before mr. sotoro/obama/whatever was chosen as president by the satan worshipers that chose him. Your characterization of Citizens protecting God given Rights as Treason is a most unique definition of Treason. What else would one expect of a satan worshiper, worshiping in the church of the chief counterfeiter of the universe. Have I misjudged you, . Spinoza1111.
  “Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?
  Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.
  A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.
  Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.
  Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.” Gospel of Matthew, chapter 7, verses 16-20.
  Do you think I hate you, Spinoza1111? You are quite wrong. God has Ordered His followers to Love their enemies, pray for them and do good to them. What greater love, prayer and good than Truth? I have just done you more good that you can ever comprehend by doing as my God, Jesus Christ, has Commanded. Why don’t you share this Truth with your friends?

 

• ▶ Reply