Europe Bans X-Ray Body Scanners Used at U.S. Airports
Europe Bans X-Ray Body Scanners Used at U.S. Airports
Photo by Michael Nagle/Getty Images file photo
by Michael Grabell
ProPublica, Nov. 15, 2011, 3:45 p.m
The European Union on Monday prohibited the use of X-ray body scanners in European airports, parting ways with the U.S. Transportation Security Administration, which has deployed hundreds of the scanners as a way to screen millions of airline passengers for explosives hidden under clothing.
The European Commission, which enforces common policies of the EU's 27 member countries, adopted the rule “in order not to risk jeopardizing citizens’ health and safety.”
The European Commission, which enforces common policies of the EU's 27 member countries, adopted the rule “in order not to risk jeopardizing citizens’ health and safety.”
As a ProPublica/PBS NewsHour investigation detailed earlier this month, X-ray body scanners use ionizing radiation, a form of energy that has been shown to damage DNA and cause cancer. Although the amount of radiation is extremely low, equivalent to the radiation a person would receive in a few minutes of flying, several research studies have concluded that a small number of cancer cases would result from scanning hundreds of millions of passengers a year.
European countries will be allowed to use an alternative body scanner, on that relies on radio frequency waves, which have not been linked to cancer. The TSA has also deployed hundreds of those machines – known as millimeter-wave scanners – in U.S. airports. But unlike Europe, it has decided to deploy both types of scanners.
The TSA would not comment specifically on the EU’s decision. But in a statement, TSA spokesman Mike McCarthy said, “As one of our many layers of security, TSA deploys the most advanced technology available to provide the best opportunity to detect dangerous items, such as explosives.
http://www.propublica.org/article/europe-bans-x-ray-body-scanners-u...
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Ella on
-
It seems to be reasonable, but when you realize that the planes that hit the WTC, crashed in Shanskville, PA, and hit the Pentagon were NOT REAL PLANES, but holograms, then you have to wonder why they are using body scanners at all. There are no terrorists.
-
Permalink Reply by Maria De Wind on
-
-
I don't get this reply. Are you implying that I'm being paid to say that?
-
-
Nope, I'm implying that whoever it is who buys and deploys all those body scanners might be, wasn't THAT your question?
-
-
Yes, I get your question now! Thanks! I'm so used to being called a shill because of my Youtube channel, I think I must bet getting paranoid.
-
Permalink Reply by Austin J. Schell on
-
“in order not to risk jeopardizing citizens’ health and safety.”
That just about says it all...
-
Permalink Reply by LYNN SHEDLER on
-
Also the lives of unborn babies. Any Doctor will tell you that!!! Also, sterility in males and females.
-
Permalink Reply by Anonymiss Express on
-
Thanks for the heads up on that. Time to investigate "alternative body scanner, one that relies on radio frequency waves, which have not been linked to cancer" YET.
I know how science works. You can never prove something, but you can prove something NOT, which is often ommitted when there's messages like "does not have an effect on ...".
It means "We have not found an effect on ... ", and then it often does not even get investigated properly, eager for the sell and the profit.
-
-
Absolutely. See my second schoolyard warfare scenario: We get hit by both Israel and Russia: http://anonymissexpress.tumblr.com/post/12754369884/some-schoolyard...
We're DOOMED!
-
-
I am trying to see how I could take offense from your reply, so that I couldn't. I tried really hard, but I don't see it?
Anyway, I don't have microwave ovens, and no handheld devices, for reasons of them not making me feel okay and disturbing my sleep. I live without a lot of "luxuries", and I prefer not to travel by air either. And I kid around a lot.
Yes, damage by waves has been researched a lot. Seriously. And there seem to be health risks involved with the use of EMF RFT ... effects on sperm and brain cells.
Anyway, just wanted to point out (jokingly) that the European rules aren't "better". Offense not intended. Pun intended. :D
-
-
I didn't know it was a "known bug", even tho my cousin has it too. I thought it was just us. I don't deny my experiences when something is not known. It is what it is. Doh! Great to know that it is being investigated. TYVM!
-
-
Not a Dude.
"Destroying the New World Order"
THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!
Latest Activity
- Top News
- Everything
A few reasons I don’t like jews. It’s not complicated.
These are the reasons I became antisemitic. It’s not complicated. Sure, I could go on for days, weeks, months outlining everything, but I don’t need to. This...
"Less Prone, Thanks Buddy! I'd like to volunteer as a historical reconstructionist! "
"Welcome to a revolutionary concept in public communication, the truth."
"Some incredible pieces of history!"
"cheeki kea Ha! Good one!"
This is Paris Now… You Won’t See This in the Tourist Brochures
In this video, I take you through Marché Barbès and its surrounding neighbourhoods — an area that reflects the modern, complex face of Paris most tourists ne...
Trump's Big Beautiful Bill Passes Amidst Democrat Lies About a Tax cut for the Rich Being Averted
AP Photo/Rod Lamkey, Jr.It’s over, folks. President Trump and congressional Republicans aimed to…See More
"I wonder what wearables must have been like before the last reset. "
"EVERYONE'S BEEN SHOT UP HERE": Arsonists Set Wildfire In Idaho, Open Fire On Firefighters, Police
"AAAAAAND…….HE’S ANOTHER TRANS…"
"Another scare tactic to push people into anew regime of vaccinations! Either that, or this is a…"
Dr. Mike Yeadon Speaks Out Against Digital ID, CBDCs, and Agenda 2030
Dr. Mike Yeadon, ex-Pfizer VP, urges public rejection of digital ID, CBDCs, and Agenda 2030, warning of future restrictions on freedom and privacy.
© 2025 Created by truth.
Powered by
