According to the United States Supreme Court, Obama is ineligible to be the President. That’s right, you read that correctly. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that Obama is ineligible to serve as President.

It’s not that you haven’t been paying attention lately and yes, you can be excused for missing the ruling as it came down, not in the last few days but back in 1875.

This is the argument currently being made by the Liberty Legal Foundation.

The Liberty Legal Foundation has filed not 1 but 2 lawsuits, one in Arizona and the other in Tennessee neither of which have one single thing to do with Obama’s birth certificate OR challenging whether or not Obama was born in the United States.

There is no need for either in regard to these lawsuits.

At the core of this action is a simple request that Federal courts uphold the Supreme Court ruling. Both lawsuits, and the Liberty Legal Foundation promises there will be more, would render it impossible for the Democratic National Committee to place Obama’s name on the 2012 ballot

Here’s the crux of it.

Back in 1875, the United States Supreme Court, in Minor v, Happersett, ruled that:

“Natural Born Citizen” was defined as children born of two U.S. citizens – regardless of the location of the birth. It found: “The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also.”

MORE MORE MORE: http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/2011/11/13/u-s-supreme-court-has-...

Views: 305

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

7 months on and Barry is still here...

He's like Dog Shit DTOM, hard to get rid of, ya just gotta get down there and scrape him off your boots ;)

Either way, it's two sides of the same coin. We either get Republican tyranny or Democratic. They're just party masks really.

The unfortunate part is that the USSC will never hear any law suits on the subject of BHO eligibility. The case sited here was pre-progressive movement.  Today's USSC, with the exception of a few are Activist and have over extented their Constutional boundries by making law and not ruling on laws and there is a big big difference. Roe Vs Wade, as an example, is not law, yet it is precieved and enforced as law. In reality it is the States right to determine and make laws along the lines of birth. Roe vs Wade was and is a fabrication inspired by two law students out of Texas, Roe nor Wade are reals names and never exsisted.....Again, the USSC does not make law, they render opinions of Constitutionality of law...opinions only. As a foot note those opinions can and have been ignored. Lincoln ingnored Dred Scot (1859) decision and enacted the Emancipation Proclamation in complete opposition to the Supreme Courts opinion of slave ownership. My personal opinion is that the USSC has done more to undermine the Consitution then any other branch...... Semper Fi

well said Paladin..

were both his parents united states citizens?  i forget  i know his mom was born here but people are even questioning if that guy he says was his dad was even his dad.. all i know is he is hiding something BIG

this means he was also ineligible for the term served which means any law signed any directive issued is garbage

  Frank Marshall Davis was a U.S. military veteran and a natural born citizen. He helped raise president Obummer and seems to have been his estranged father. The Kenyan married a pregnant woman. Big deal. There are important reasons to close down The Chucky and Talking Tina show.

RSS

"Destroying the New World Order"

TOP CONTENT THIS WEEK

THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!

mobile page

12160.info/m

12160 Administrators

 

Latest Activity

Doc Vega posted blog posts
19 hours ago
rlionhearted_3 posted photos
23 hours ago
Burbia posted a photo
yesterday
tjdavis posted a video

propaganda: DIVIDE & CONQUER (1942) - Warner Bros. vs Hitler

Not to be confused with the much drier Frank Capra film from 1943.A "Broadway Brevity", released August 1, 1942. Vitaphone #1022-1023A.Transferred from 16mm.
Sunday
Doc Vega posted blog posts
Friday
cheeki kea commented on cheeki kea's photo
Thumbnail

Thumbs down - ship gone.

" So this sort of stupidity has occurred before. Norway or NZ - Who did it better? Cast your…"
Friday
cheeki kea favorited Doc Vega's blog post The Last Meal
Friday
tjdavis favorited Sandy's photo
Dec 17
tjdavis favorited cheeki kea's photo
Dec 17
tjdavis favorited tjdavis's video
Dec 17
tjdavis posted photos
Dec 17
tjdavis posted blog posts
Dec 17
cheeki kea favorited tjdavis's video
Dec 17
cheeki kea commented on cheeki kea's photo
Thumbnail

Prime clown idiot of the year.

" Stay tuned this prime clown might just resign from his own circus as his Finance Minister…"
Dec 17
cheeki kea commented on cheeki kea's photo
Dec 17
tjdavis posted a video

The Orb & David Gilmour - Metallic Spheres In Colour: Movement 1 - Excerpt (4K Official Music Video)

The 2010 album Metallic Spheres by The Orb and David Gilmour has been reimagined and remixed as Metallic Spheres In Colour. Out now: https://theorbdg.lnk.to/...
Dec 16
Doc Vega posted a blog post

The Real Explanation of the Mystery Drones over New Jersey

 Keep in mind all of the possible implications around the drones reportedly as big as cars being…See More
Dec 16
Sandy posted photos
Dec 16
tjdavis posted a video

Capitol Punishment - The Movie (Updated Trailer)

Order on DVD or Stream it Now: https://givemelibertynow.org/product/capitol-punishment/Told through the eyes of the people who were there on the ground, Capi...
Dec 15
cheeki kea commented on cheeki kea's photo
Dec 15

© 2024   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2019 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted