Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by snoop 4 truth on June 1, 2019 at 7:04pm

I just uncovered two more Deborah Tavares hoaxes not included in the list here.

The first hoax is "The Rothschilds Are Restructuring North America Hoax" . https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OaDYMzQ2eFQ (at 4:50-5:00, 54:00-54:20); https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kf_H...zdCHzo4O4ufsaZ (at 7:30-14:30).

The second hoax is "The Rothschilds Own All Of The Utility Companies Hoax" . https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JeJkYovY0AM (at 8:55-13:26).

In "The Rothschilds Are Restructuring North America Hoax", Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims that an October, 30th 2017 press release said that the Rothschilds were "restructuring north America" itself (as in "taking it over"). But, the subject press release DOES NOT say this. Instead, it merely says that a Rothschild company was restructuring "IN" (as in "inside") north America. A full reading of the article indicates that the term, "restructuring'' as used in the article, refers to Rothschild RESTRUCTURING DEBT (effectively "re-financing"), NOT RESTRUCTURING ALL OF NORTH AMERICA ITSELF! See proof here. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-rele...300545454.html

In "The Rothschilds Own All Of The Utility Companies Hoax", Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims that she obtained a transcript of the sworn testimony of a member of the Rothschild family wherein he stated that "he OWNED dozens and dozens of utility companies". But, the subject transcript DOES NOT say this. Instead, it merely says that a "James A. Rothschild" is a financial consultant AND AN EXPERT WITNESS who has testified in dozens and dozens of court cases involving utility companies. Nothing more. See pages 3-5 and pages 36-46 here. http://www.ripuc.org/eventsactions/d...hild(3.04).pdf

So, "James A. Rothschild" has no direct involvement with any of the utility companies named in the court cases listed in the subject transcript. Otherwise, he would not have been allowed to testify as an expert witness in any of those cases.

Illustration Of James A. Rothschild's Role In All Of These Court Cases
A city gives an electrical utility company a monopoly on providing city residents with electrical power. In exchange, the utility company agrees that the city will determine the rates its residents will pay for electricity. The city promises the utility that it will set rates so as to allow the utility to pay is expenses and earn a small profit, but that it will not set rates so high as to be a burden on city residents.

Years later, the city population has tripled and the utility company needs to build a larger electrical plant to meet increased demand. But, the new plant will cost millions. So, the utility company sues the city and seeks a rate increase of 50% to offset its alleged added costs of building the new plant.

In response, the city hires James A. Rothschild as an expert witness to testify that a 50% rate increase is excessive, because the costs of the new plant can be amortized over a twenty year period which can be absorbed by a mere 5% rate increase.

By hiring James A. Rothschild to testify as an expert witness in the case, the city saved each city resident a small fortune. Note that in the case above (reflected in the link above containing the subject transcript), JAMES A. ROTHSCHILD WAS HIRED BY THE CITY TO TESTIFY AGAINST THE RATE INCREASE SOUGHT BY THE FERRY COMPANY. So, it is NOT the case that James A. Rothschild is only hired by utility companies to testify against the public and in favor of rate increases sought by utility companies.

SIDE NOTE: In support of this same hoax, Deborah Tavares also claims that she recently attended a PG&E stock holder's meeting wherein the PG&E Board Of Directors were seated in the front row and individually introduced to the stockholders. She fraudulently claims that a person named "Rothschild" was introduced to the stockholders as a PG&E Board member. But, this claim is not so. NO PG&E BOARD MEMBER HAS SUCH A NAME. See proof here. http://www.pgecorp.com/corp/about-us...directors.page

There is simply no end to the intentional fraud of Deborah Tavares. She is disgusting.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page