DC Chief to Adam Kokesh : “If you're coming here to break the law, we'll take action.”

Protest group plans July 4 march on Washington with loaded rifles

An Internet talk show host is trying to gather protesters to march into the District on July 4 carrying loaded rifles, prompting a warning from D.C. Police Chief Cathy L. Lanier that her own armed force will meet them at the border.

“If you’re coming here to protest government policy, great,” the chief said Tuesday on her monthly appearance on NewsChannel 8, reacting to the group’s plan to cross the Potomac from Arlington National Cemetery. “If you’re coming here to break the law, we’ll take action.”

Lanier added, “There’s a pretty good chance we’ll meet them on the D.C. side of the bridge.”

So will the U.S. Park Police, Sgt. Paul Brooks said. If the protesters go through with the march, Park Police will be waiting for them at the District line, which happens to be on U.S. Park Service property, near the Virginia side of Memorial Bridge.

News of the march comes amid a national debate over gun regulations that emerged following the Newtown, Conn., massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School. And it is scheduled to take place in one of the most strictly regulated cities when it comes to firearms laws. Washington allows residents to possess registered firearms on their own property, but the city forbids carrying those weapons in public. Source: Washington Post. Read full article. (link)

Check out the member blogs, videos, and discussions @ http://12160.info

Source: Washington Post. Read full article. (link)

Comment by Deep Space on May 7, 2013 at 8:12pm

There is no good point to flaunt arms in the name Liberty sans the intent to use them.

I say don't cheapen the name of Liberty.

Let's have a nation-wide demo wherever open-carry is acknowledged.

Comment by Deep Space on May 7, 2013 at 8:25pm

I'm all for arresting ALL Oath-Breaking PIGS & marching right into white house to arrest Obama & all Oath-Breaking members of congress.

BUT without overwhelming numbers, don't bother...

Comment by Paul Cary on May 7, 2013 at 8:45pm

Nah the police only show up for false flag events , their about getting  real on what really really matters . The Catholic Mafia control  the Police and  Hell's Angels making all drugs and weapons smuggling [ besides young children for the elite ] possible. 

Comment by KingofthePaupers on May 7, 2013 at 9:19pm

I think this can be peacful as long as everyone
Jct: Sadly, it only takes one hothead or agent provocateur to pull a trigger to start a massacre.

Comment by MAC on May 7, 2013 at 9:34pm

This says it all, Free people are not welcome in DC, there unconstitutional laws & law enforcement say so

Comment by Paul Cary on May 7, 2013 at 9:58pm

I like that statement ; is this it . It makes me think of Michael Jackson and Illuminati slave who spoke out warning us of this Illuminati world of control , slavery and tyranny . He said it well in his captured performance of ' This is it ' film   /watch?v=IpFtAGBjhr4  If you do not know what I'm talking about there is a scene there in the film that begins at the 17 min mark - 19:41 minutes . Michael is making a statement about the Police State that is Illuminati Catholic Mafia created .

Comment by wesley thompson on May 8, 2013 at 1:31am

Statements need to be made- I hope a few thousand show up together in strength with their guns and dam the cops- If they start shit, then give shit for shit- Let it rock- It's coming and going to happen sooner or later- The cops always have to be the ones outnumbering and out gunning everyone else- What can they do with a few thousand armed Americans that's tired of their bully fag boy shit- They think that they are the baddest and bullet proof and they spoil for a blood bath- They will never stop until they get it, so give-em what they spoil for- They should be protecting the Citizens from the 'traitors in Military Uniforms, especially all the Thousands of Foreign Military already in America- Since the Oaths and Pledges are being tossed by the Uniforms, they are the enemy to all real Americans and will kill you either way so die resisting- Anyone who gives up their weapons will hate their selves later when the stand defenseless and watch some big brutes from Somalia or Russia rape their daughters and sons and slaying all their animals- These things take place in every Country, a midst every war- America will be no different, just more of it- They are trained assassins and beasts you cannot talk, vote, beg or buy them away- They came for you and all that you possess-

Comment by Deep Space on May 8, 2013 at 1:34am

Unconstitutional Official Acts

16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256:

    The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be In agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows:

    The General rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of it's enactment and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.

    Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it.....

    A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the lend, it is superseded thereby.

    No one Is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.

Jon Roland:

Strictly speaking, an unconstitutional statute is not a "law", and should not be called a "law", even if it is sustained by a court, for a finding that a statute or other official act is constitutional does not make it so, or confer any authority to anyone to enforce it.

All citizens and legal residents of the United States, by their presence on the territory of the United States, are subject to the militia duty, the duty of the social compact that creates the society, which requires that each, alone and in concert with others, not only obey the Constitution and constitutional official acts, but help enforce them, if necessary, at the risk of one's life.

Any unconstitutional act of an official will at least be a violation of the oath of that official to execute the duties of his office, and therefore grounds for his removal from office. No official immunity or privileges of rank or position survive the commission of unlawful acts. If it violates the rights of individuals, it is also likely to be a crime, and the militia duty obligates anyone aware of such a violation to investigate it, gather evidence for a prosecution, make an arrest, and if necessary, seek an indictment from a grand jury, and if one is obtained, prosecute the offender in a court of law.


Comment by Paul Cary on May 8, 2013 at 2:20am

Yeah all well and good if the lawbreakers were not in office we would be running on constitutionality but we are operating on Admiralty Law the Law of the Jungle George Bush Senior said we would not operate in , they are LIARS these folks in power . They want to enslave you and they have to break the law to do it .

Comment by T Stirhen on May 8, 2013 at 2:24am

The problem is not Constitutional law. Washington DC is under the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States Congress and is therefore not a part of any U.S. state. Constitutional law does not apply to it or any federally owned lands (bases, embassies, etc). It would be an invasion on Kokesh part and any who go with him. Never think that Washington DC is part of the USA in that manner - it is not.

Just like when the feds go into states and try to carry out unconstitutional actions that is not directly assigned to them, nor is "in pursuance thereof" the US Constitution. Then the reverse is true - the feds are invading.

Comment by Deep Space on May 8, 2013 at 2:26am

Fine. BUT many states have unconstitutional gun laws / gun bans that SHOULD all be challenged on a Constitutional basis.

Frankly I am shocked they have not as of yet.

(NY, CT, MA CO for example)

Comment by T Stirhen on May 8, 2013 at 2:28am

Kokesh is wrong. What he is trying to do is unlawful and would not make the point he is trying to get across. He should pick a part of the USA that is NOT a federally owned and operated land as designated. Remember it was supposed to be a nuetral land when given to the feds so that no one state could have more influence on them then another. That is why Washington DC was created and the lands given to them to belong to NO state.

Comment by T Stirhen on May 8, 2013 at 2:29am

Deep space, you are correct about the US Constitution - but it does NOT apply to Washington DC as it is under the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States Congress and is therefore not a part of any U.S. state.

Comment by Deep Space on May 8, 2013 at 2:31am

I agree. I think a nation-wide demo wherever open-carry is rightfully acknowledged is the way to go. That'd get the point across sans most of the risk of confrontation.

Comment by T Stirhen on May 8, 2013 at 3:01am

The states my not go against the US Constititon. It and any law, bill, treaty, etc that is in Pursuance thereof the US Constitution is the supreme law of this land, not the federal government. The limitations put on the federal gov and the states (by the supremacy law) does not allow them to *modify or destroy any of our natural rights, including those not listed in the Bill of Rights (Amendment 9).

18 USC § 241 – Conspiracy against rights: If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or

If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured <-- any weapon that has been confiscated.

They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death. <-- remember the no warrant invasions by police of people in their homes? No warrant searches, etc? The people murdered by those doing those unlawful deeds? They fall under this law, and many others.

TSA falls under this. All weapon bans falls under this. They also fall under the US Constittution as the Supreme Law of this land along with the feds ONLY WHEN they are doing their Constitutionally assigned duties, and all laws,bills etc that are in PURSUANCE THEREOF the US Constitution. When they stopped peaceful protests they fall under this.

*The Bill of Rights are - as William Blackstone (in his “Commentaries on the Laws of England”) defined unalienable rights - "Those rights, then, which God and nature have established, and therefore called natural rights, such as life and liberty, need not the aid of human laws to be more effectually invested in every man than they are; neither do they receive any additional strength when declared by the municipal laws to be inviolable. On the contrary, no human legislature has power to abridge or destroy them, unless the owner shall himself commit some act that amounts to a forfeiture."

Inalienable rights: "a right according to natural law, a right that cannot be taken away, denied, or transferred"

Comment by T Stirhen on May 8, 2013 at 3:07am

@ Deep Space

I agree. Go state to state, those dropping off that can go no further while new ones take their place. But not on any federal lands. That would make a great statement.

A better one would be to start removing those who did not keep the lawfully required Oath and then no longer meets the lawful requirements of the position they are occupying within the states and fed gov. Arrests and prosecution would also be good.

There is much talk of impeachment of Obama. Impeachment is NOT enough. He, and his adminstration (Plus Panetta & Dempsey) have committed TREASON, murder, indicted for war crimes (Plus Both Bush's, Clinton, and others - and still need prosecution), and other criminal and civil offenses. Diane Feinstein has committed treason, as have other state representatives sent to represent the state to the feds.

Comment by Paul M. Clements on May 8, 2013 at 5:34am

"If you’re coming here to break the law, we’ll take action.” chief said, "  That's odd, coming from a police department that suffers several hundred murders per year. They don't seem very active in preventing them.

Apparently, the chief thinks she can read minds.  But only conservative minds.

Comment by Joe on May 8, 2013 at 7:11am

Paul Cary is engaging in classic misdirection. It is Catholics that have taken over the U.S. government. You can see their affiliation in their last names, all Catholic, no judaics. According to Paul Cary no fault divorce was pushed by those opposed to it, the Catholics not judaics that are moral less by religious demand. It is Catholics that lied us into WW1, WW2 as it was  Catholics not judaics that told Churchill t.h.e.y. will bring the U.S. into WW2 in exchange for Palestine. It is Catholics that sold our nuclear triggers to our opponents as Asher Karni is not a judaic. The Rosenbergs were Catholic too. So is Pollard. The aipac is filled with Catholics. It is Catholics that claim a Sampson option. It was Catholics that attacked the Liberty. I can go on and on but Paul you have the burden of proof as you made the affirmative statement that Catholics are leading our demise. Show us some proof you shill!

Comment by Paul Cary on May 8, 2013 at 9:05am

right I agree it is the Catholics who created this mess even the Jesuit Priests. 

Comment by Paul Cary on May 8, 2013 at 9:21am

Own this chart in minutes!

Beliefs & Doctrine
ultimate reality
one God, Jehovah, the God of Abraham
one God, Jehovah, the God of Abraham
nature of God
Trinity - one substance, three persons
unity - one substance, one person         It is clear that our Father God is Spirit and Jesus is both man and God and then you have the Holy Ghost those are three distinct personalities . Jesus was not a ventriloquist when the shepherds heard our Father say ; This is my son in whom I am welled pleased. Jesus never spoke about Himself in the Third person either . Jesus said Before Abraham I am  . Jesus was the I Am of the Bible who spoke to Abraham and Moses . Jesus is God over His people who call out to Him and it is by invitation only that we come to Him . God does not force anyone to come to Him like these radical Islamic groups do who are  a Catholic creation.


You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network


  • Add Photos
  • View All

Please remember this website is supported by your donations...

© 2017   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2015 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted