USA TODAY REFUSED TO PUBLISH HUNTER BIDEN SCANDAL OP-ED, SO HERE IT IS

SOURCE: PJMEDIA.COM

SO USA TODAY DIDN’T WANT TO RUN MY HUNTER BIDEN COLUMN THIS WEEK. My regular editor is on vacation, and I guess everyone else was afraid to touch it. So I’m sending them another column next week, and just publishing this one here. Enjoy! This is as filed, with no editing from USAT.

* * *

In my 2019 book, The Social Media Upheaval, I warned that the Big Tech companies — especially social media giants like Facebook and Twitter — had grown into powerful monopolists, who were using their power over the national conversation to not only sell ads, but also to promote a political agenda.

That was pretty obvious last year, but it was even more obvious last week, when Facebook and Twitter tried to black out the New York Post’s blockbuster report about emails found on a laptop abandoned by Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden’s son Hunter.

The emails, some of which have been confirmed as genuine with their recipients, show substantial evidence that Hunter Biden used his position as Vice President Joe Biden’s son to extract substantial payments from “clients” in other countries. There are also photos of Hunter with a crack pipe, and engaging in various other unsavory activities. And they demolished the elder Biden’s claim that he never discussed business with his son.

That’s a big election-year news story. Some people doubted its genuineness, and of course it’s always fair to question a big election-year news story, especially one that comes out shortly before the election. (Remember CBS newsman Dan Rather’s promotion of what turned out to be forged memos about George W. Bush’s Air National Guard service?)

But the way you debate whether a story is accurate or not is by debating. (In the case of the Rather memos, it turned out the font was from Microsoft Word, which of course didn’t exist back during the Vietnam War era.) Big Tech could have tried an approach that fostered such a debate. But instead of debate, they went for a blackout: Both services actually blocked links to the New York Post story. That’s right: They blocked readers from discussing a major news story by a major paper, one so old that it was founded by none other than Alexander Hamilton.

I wasn’t advising them — they tend not to ask me for my opinion — but I would have advised against such a blackout. There’s a longstanding Internet term called “the Streisand effect,” going back to when Barbara Streisand demanded that people stop sharing pictures of her beach house. Unsurprisingly, the result was a massive increase in the number of people posting pictures of her beach house. The Big Tech Blackout produced the same result: Now even people who didn’t care so much about Hunter Biden’s racket nonetheless became angry, and started talking about the story.

As lefty journalist Glenn Greenwald wrote in The Intercept, Twitter and Facebook crossed a line far more dangerous than what they censored. Greenwald writes:

“Just two hours after the story was online, Facebook intervened. The company dispatched a life-long Democratic Party operative who now works for Facebook — Andy Stone, previously a communications operative for Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, among other D.C. Democratic jobs — to announce that Facebook was ‘reducing [the article’s] distribution on our platform’: in other words, tinkering with its own algorithms to suppress the ability of users to discuss or share the news article. The long-time Democratic Party official did not try to hide his contempt for the article, beginning his censorship announcement by snidely noting: ‘I will intentionally not link to the New York Post.’”

Twitter’s suppression efforts went far beyond Facebook’s. They banned entirely all users’ ability to share the Post article — not just on their public timeline but even using the platform’s private Direct Messaging feature.”

“Early in the day, users who attempted to link to the New York Post story either publicly or privately received a cryptic message rejecting the attempt as an ‘error.’ Later in the afternoon, Twitter changed the message, advising users that they could not post that link because the company judged its contents to be ‘potentially harmful.’ Even more astonishing still, Twitter locked the account of the New York Post, banning the paper from posting any content all day and, evidently, into Thursday morning.”

This went badly. The heads Facebook and of Twitter, Mark Zuckerberg and Jack Dorsey, are now facing Senate subpoenas, the RNC has filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission, arguing that Twitter’s action in blacking out a damaging story constituted an illegal in-kind donation to the Biden Campaign, and most significantly, everyone is talking about the story now, with many understandably assuming that if the story were false, it would have been debunked rather than blacked out.

CNN’s Jake Tapper tweeted: ”Congrats to Twitter on its Streisand Effect award!!!” Big Tech shot itself in the foot, and it didn’t stop the signal.

Regardless of who wins in November, it’s likely that there will be substantial efforts to rein in Big Tech. As Greenwald writes, “State censorship is not the only kind of censorship. Private-sector repression of speech and thought, particularly in the internet era, can be as dangerous and consequential. Imagine, for instance, if these two Silicon Valley giants united with Google to declare: henceforth we will ban all content that is critical of President Trump and/or the Republican Party, but will actively promote criticisms of Joe Biden and the Democrats.

“Would anyone encounter difficulty understanding why such a decree would constitute dangerous corporate censorship? Would Democrats respond to such a policy by simply shrugging it off on the radical libertarian ground that private corporations have the right to do whatever they want? To ask that question is to answer it.”

“To begin with, Twitter and particularly Facebook are no ordinary companies. Facebook, as the owner not just of its massive social media platform but also other key communication services it has gobbled up such as Instagram and WhatsApp, is one of the most powerful companies ever to exist, if not the most powerful.”

He’s right. And while this heavyhanded censorship effort failed, there’s no reason to assume that other such efforts won’t work in the future. Not many stories are as hard to squash as a major newspaper’s front page expose during an presidential election.

As I wrote in The Social Media Upheaval, the best solution is probably to apply antitrust law to break up these monopolies: Competing companies would police each other, and if they colluded could be prosecuted under antitrust law. There are also moves to strip them of their immunity under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which protects them from being sued for things posted or linked on their sites on the theory that they are platforms, not publishers who make publication decisions. And Justice Clarence Thomas has recently called for the Supreme Court to revisit the lower courts’ interpretation of Section 230, which he argues has been overbroad. A decade ago there would have been much more resistance to such proposals, but Big Tech has tarnished its own image since then.

Had Facebook and Twitter approached this story neutrally, as they would have a decade ago, it would probably already be old news to a degree — as Greenwald notes, Hunter’s pay-for-play efforts were already well known, if not in such detail — but instead the story is still hot.

More importantly, their heavy handed action has brought home just how much power they wield, and how crudely they’re willing to wield it. They shouldn’t be surprised at the consequences.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE...

Views: 36

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

Comment by Doc Vega on October 22, 2020 at 5:34pm

The Nazi book burners couldn't have done it better! America and its freedoms are under siege!

Comment by Mr. Sizzle on October 22, 2020 at 4:05pm

Once you come to the realization that NO political figure has your best interests in mind it’s a quietly disturbing moment..

https://counter-currents.com/2020/10/my-case-for-trump/

"Destroying the New World Order"

THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!

mobile page

12160.info/m

12160 Administrators

 

TOP CONTENT THIS WEEK

Latest Activity

Phyllis Maka posted blog posts
3 hours ago
Old Denmark posted videos
6 hours ago
Don Mashak posted discussions
6 hours ago
Aaron posted blog posts
9 hours ago
Daily Con posted a status
10 hours ago
Daily Con posted discussions
10 hours ago
steve posted a discussion

ALEXA names the j-w who knew a machine would tell the truth(read be anti j-wmetic)

This machine needs sent to reeeeeeee edumacation camp.Steve…See More
10 hours ago
Aaron posted videos
11 hours ago
steve commented on Old Denmark's video
Thumbnail

London Police arrest Santa

"Hey Chris , I have always told people that SANTA was an anagram for satan  and in person sure…"
14 hours ago
Chris of the family Masters commented on Old Denmark's video
Thumbnail

London Police arrest Santa

"To avoid arrest dress up as a devil...."
14 hours ago
Bob Renner posted photos
15 hours ago
Old Denmark posted a status
"LIVE | STOP THE STEAL & PROTESTS ACROSS THE NATION http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2fv1VjuHg4g"
15 hours ago
Old Denmark posted a status
"LIVE: 'Stop the Steal' rallies in Atlanta, Georgia and Harrisburg, Pennsylvania (Nov. 28) | NTD http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RDBivSzjPTY"
15 hours ago
Chris of the family Masters commented on Aaron's photo
Thumbnail

pennsylvania (1)

"Claim disputed by who, exactly?"
15 hours ago
Daily Con replied to Aaron's discussion Trump Will Win in the Supreme Court
"Trump’s win should be without question however what he does in his second term in terms…"
15 hours ago
Daily Con favorited Aaron's discussion Trump Will Win in the Supreme Court
15 hours ago
Daily Con commented on Daily Con's photo
Thumbnail

"All You Have To Do…"

"“Fight and you may die. Run, and you’ll live… at least a while. And dying in…"
15 hours ago
Daily Con posted a photo
15 hours ago
Daily Con commented on Bob Renner's photo
Thumbnail

Hitler Was Right,It's Always Those Evil Talmudic Communist Jews

"Yep too bad he was surrounded by advisors sympathetic to the Zionist cause."
15 hours ago
Aaron posted photos
15 hours ago

© 2020   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2019 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted