Fake Starliner Spacecraft Landing Back to "Earth" - more like dropped from very high altitude!

NASA released photos of the #Starliner Command Module on the ground, and seem to admit that "everything appears to be nominal" - yet how the hell can this be possible as there are no burn-scorch marks visible?

At the very, very least the Starliner capsule should look more like this, which is a screenshot from the video below - and not like looking like something fresh out of a spacecraft-showroom.

The pristine condition of the Starliner capsule, totally contradicts NASA own film footage of an animation (seen above - below) showing us the expected reentry into earths atmosphere and that has to go through a sequence of events following the "burn" of the space capsule, that by all expected rights the outside of it should be blackened, and not shiny white like seen in the photograph above.

Spacecraft showroom condition - as not even the NASA sign has been damaged.

Is that one of the reasons they soon covered it up, (see below) and so despite blasting off and then reentering into earths atmosphere, so therefore been through the toughened regions of space and the burn-up when reentering, - are they now worried about a little wind in New Mexico.

Source - NASA

It's just crazy, the whole space programs of the 21st century, seem to be following in the same footsteps of the fake Apollo Moon Landings. It's like they're preparing the younger generations for their next biggest scam, which will apparently be "us"landing on the Mars, and perhaps popping back to the Moon for a quick cup of tea!

Trapped in a Masonic World

Favorite

3 members favorited this

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

Comment by Exposure on December 26, 2019 at 8:49am: Your right with your observations James; the phone calls home and "live" broadcasts made, if they really were talking to the presidents and sending their images back to Earth, the delays would have been much longer.

Comment by James Roberts on December 22, 2019 at 4:38pm: With Apollo, I always thought it as interesting that, in the late 60s, the whole shebang had 4 kilowatts of power available, for life support, ignition, lights, the computer and everything, but they managed an uninterrupted and decent quality television broadcast from 238,000 miles away. Through the Van Allen radiation belts, no less. While here on Earth, analog VHF TV stations with four times that power, or more, were lucky if they broadcast 50 miles in any direction.

The earlier Musk landings, the rockets coming down vertically, that's just cartoonish. With thrust from the bottom, they would have just flipped over and crashed spectacularly. What did they do, fill the bottom with lead to keep it upright? Must be why he said we know it's real because it looks so fake, lol.