Hospital workers call police to seize newborn baby, throw momma out of the building, assault child with dangerous vaccines

hospital

by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger

Editor of NaturalNews.com (See all articles...)

(NaturalNews) Another shocking case of tyrannical, overzealous social workers and hospital staff has unfolded in Pennsylvania, where a mom who just gave birth in an ambulance to a healthy baby girl was threatened by a government social worker and accused of not allowing her child to receive "medical treatment." (A claim which is factually false.) In reality, the new mom, exhausting from giving birth in an ambulance, was merely asking questions and trying to determine how her newborn daughter was being treated by hospital staff.

A social worker named Angelica Lopez-Heagy continued to threaten the mom, who persisted in asking polite questions to try to determine what she was being accused of. In response, the social worker demanded, "Since you're not going to cooperate, I'll just go and call the police and we can take custody of the baby."

The social worker then demanded that the mom and dad sign a "safety plan" that would contractually bind them to whatever medical procedures the hospital tries to push on all newborns, including multiple vaccines. The term "safety plan" is really just a linguistic mind trick for the agenda of damaging newborns with vaccines so that they become repeat customers of the medical industry. Vaccines, as NaturalNews readers well know, routinely cause kidney damage, neurological damage and gastrointestinal damage, all of which produce huge long-term profits for hospitals, doctors and drug companies.

When the mom said she wanted her attorney to look over the document before she signed it, the nanny state social worker invoked her previous threat and called the police. The police then took custody (kidnapped) the daughter while hospital workers claimed the newborn was suffering from "illness or injury." (Completely fabricated to justify their kidnapping.) Then they forcibly vaccinated the baby without her mother's consent! This was all "approved" by the social worker, Lopez-Heagy.

Note that even though the hospital stole her baby away, if the baby ends up being vaccine damaged, the entire burden of long-term health care costs for that damage will fall squarely on the mother! In fact, the mom might even be accused of "child abuse" if the vaccine damage side effects in any way resemble physical abuse (which often happens, as vaccines can cause bruising, swelling and brain damage).

Hospital workers then proceeded to kidnap her daughter and kick the mom out of the hospital, taking "possession" of the newborn child and forcing the mom and husband to sleep in the Wal-Mart parking lot, only allowing her to re-enter the hospital every three hours to breastfeed (and I'm shocked they even allow breastfeeding. Isn't that illegal RAW milk?).

This is how parents are treated in America today: Like criminal dogs whose only function is to give birth to a new "litter" of victims for the state.

Read the full account of all the details of this incident at:
http://hslda.org/hs/state/pa/201203270.asp

http://www.naturalnews.com/035398_hospital_social_workers_medical_f...

Favorite

6 members favorited this

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

Comment by helela on April 8, 2012 at 1:49am: This is outrageous. I use to clean a house for a foster child care provider. She liked to take in new born children. There was a baby that she had. She had had the baby for a couple of months. She had the baby because the parents had taken the baby only a couple of weeks old to the hospital because the baby kept crying. Well while there, they took the baby from the parents, said that the baby had a couple of broken ribs and a broken arm. The parents of the child said that cps kept asking if he had dropped the baby and continually questioned him until he was under so much deress that he said, I don't know maybe I don't know. Well it was the day for the father and mother to go to court. The foster mother took out a picture of the new born baby that was taken in the hospital when the baby was first born. You could see that the baby had bruising, bad bruising on his ribs and his arm where the iv was put it had a terrible bruise, as big as the top of the baby's arm at top. This picture was a polaroid and she said that this was the only picture. I said "are you going to take the picture to court so they can see this? " She told me no. I lost all of my respect I ever had if I ever had any for this woman I never went back to her house and I never want to see her again.

Comment by Sweettina2 on April 2, 2012 at 9:11pm: I have always found Mike Adams to be a credible source, this is straight from his site. I agree Suz, I cant wait till the head of this damn snake is cut and Babylon burns.

Comment by Exposure on April 2, 2012 at 9:46am

Well done Daniel, as it does indeed pay to question everything we come across on the internet and elsewhere of course. The problem is and I often say this, - which is many report or "re-write" an article or blog, as I often do, - though they don't supply enough sources, and this is vital that we all do. So with that in mind I have investigated a little deeper and here's the facts of the case;

The Facts - "Hospital workers call police to seize newborn baby" - Angelica Lopez-Heagy -

The validity of this story has been called into question, mainly due to the original article on this subject, not supplying enough details and links, - though perhaps when the news broke, Mike Adams and David Icke didn't have the network of info at their fingertips, like I do? I have found the original source and the name of the parents Scott and Jodi Ferris, and in addition more info on Angelica Lopez-Heagy.

As we can see this story broke on;

Thursday, March 29, 2012 - http://www.naturalnews.com/035398_hospital_social_workers_medical_f...
by Mike Adams, [left] the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews

Then David Icke covered it the next day; and it's gone everywhere: http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/63918-hospital-workers-call-poli...

However, the original story broke on the 27th March 2012; here it is;

Newborn Seized in Hospital by Police, Social Worker

Michael P. Farris, Esq.
HSLDA Chairman

Michael P. Farris is founder and chairman of HSLDA. He and his wife homeschool their 10 children. Read more >>

I am not content to sit on the sidelines while the government gradually usurps the very essence of parental rights. I hope you share my determination. We need to stand with people like Scott and Jodi Ferris (obviously no relation to someone named Farris). Here’s their story:

Jodi went into labor a bit earlier than she had expected—and the baby was coming rapidly. Given their location and other factors, the midwife they had hoped would deliver the baby at their home encouraged them to get in an ambulance and head to the hospital.

Their baby, whom I will call “Annie,” was born in the ambulance in the parking lot of the Hershey Medical Center—a state-affiliated hospital in Pennsylvania. Hospital personnel arrived very quickly and took charge of both baby and mom.

As any mother would do, Jodi immediately began to ask the nurses and attendants how her baby was doing. The hospital staff was utterly unresponsive. When they started to give Jodi an injection, she asked what it was and what it was for. They gave her vague answers like, “It’s just to help.” Only after giving her the injection of oxytocin did they tell her what it was and then asked, “You aren’t allergic to that are you?”

Jodi persisted in asking about Annie. No one would tell her anything other than “she’s in good hands and you’ll be able to see her soon.”

Eventually a doctor told her that Annie scored a 9 on a physical exam applied to newborns known as the APGAR test. A score of 8 or higher is considered healthy. (It is unclear when the score was given since she was in the ambulance at birth.) But shortly after this a different doctor told Jodi that Annie was “very sick” and would need to stay in the hospital. This doctor’s comments were accompanied by an explanation of his disdain for midwives saying, “Too many people think they know what they’re doing.”

About an hour later, another hospital staffer finally brought Annie to Jodi and said, “The baby is doing good. She will be able to go home in no time.”

Legal Requirements?

However, several hours later yet another staffer told Scott and Jodi that Annie would have to stay in the hospital for 48 to 72 hours for observation. Even though they persisted in asking why Annie would need to stay, his only answer was that “the law requires us to keep the baby for 48 hours.” When they asked for a reference to this supposed law, he answered, “you’ll have to get that from risk management.” (By the way, there is no such law in Pennsylvania.)

The risk management staffer eventually told them that even though they saw nothing wrong with the baby, they just like “to keep babies like this” for 48–72 hours. The Ferrises were told that Annie would not be released for this period since it was “unsafe for her to leave the hospital.”

Eventually, a risk management staffer admitted that the risk that was being managed was not the health of Annie but the risk that the hospital might get sued if something went wrong after she was discharged.

Ultimately, risk management said that they would be satisfied with a 24-hour stay and that Jodi and Scott could remain with the baby overnight.

You have been Accused

Late in the afternoon, a government social worker named Angelica Lopez-Heagy came into Jodi’s room announcing that she was there to conduct an investigation. Jodi asked to know the allegations. The social worker claimed that it would be against the law for her to show Jodi the allegations.

Jodi replied that she would not be comfortable answering the questions if she couldn’t know the allegations. Immediately the social worker proclaimed, “Since you’re not going to cooperate, I’ll just go and call the police and we can take custody of the baby.”

Fearing that the social worker would carry out her threat, Jodi replied that she was willing to cooperate.

The social worker soon intimated that the issue was Jodi’s refusal to consent to medical treatment for the baby. Jodi replied that she had no idea why anyone would say that. The social worker claimed that she had refused to allow a Vitamin K shot for Annie. Jodi replied that no one had asked her about such a shot. Moreover, she had overheard hospital staffers saying that they had already given Annie such a shot.

Neither the social worker nor any hospital staffer ever gave Jodi or Scott any example of any medically necessary treatment that they had refused for Annie.

At this point, Scott left the hospital to tend to their older children who were staying with friends.

Ordering Tests

Shortly after this, the hospital asked to check Annie’s white blood cell count and to perform a strep test. Jodi agreed to the testing.

Then the hospital demanded that they give Annie shot for Hepatitis B. Jodi said that she would agree only if they tested her or Annie to see if either of them were positive. If so, then she was quite willing to have the shot for Annie. The hospital claimed that they had forgotten about this earlier when it was still possible to test that day, and that they needed to give the shot anyway without any testing.

When the social worker pressed her to make an immediate decision about this shot, Jodi asked her if they could simply wait until Scott got back before they decided.

Put yourself in Jodi’s shoes at this moment. You gave birth that morning in an ambulance. The hospital has made wild and conflicting claims about your baby’s health all day long. You are exhausted. You are in pain. Your husband has gone to check on your children. And a social worker who has threatened to take your baby into police custody is standing in your hospital room demanding that you make an immediate decision.

Jodi simply said, “Please can’t this wait until my husband gets back.”

The social worker renewed her threat. If Jodi would not answer her question right then, she would call the police. And then the social worker started adding conditions. She and Scott would have to agree to sign a safety plan before she could conclude her investigation.

Jodi said that she wanted her husband and an attorney to look at the plan. She felt she was in no position to read such a document and really understand what she was being pressured to sign.

Thrown Out

And then the story turns ugly.

The social worker left the room and called the police. Without a court order they took custody of Annie, immediately claiming that she was suffering from illness or injury—a patently false claim.

The social worker consented to the administration of the Hepatitis B shot even though no blood test had been done.

The police made Jodi Ferris get up out of her hospital bed and escorted her to the entrance—they were expelling her from the hospital because she had not signed the “safety plan.”

Scott met her at the entrance to the hospital. The police escorted them both off of the grounds of the hospital.

Jodi was told that she would be allowed to return every three hours to nurse the baby through the night.

Jodi and Scott were forced to spend the night that she had given birth in their car in a nearby parking lot. You read that right. They kicked this mother out of the hospital, and in order to be close enough to feed her child, she had to sleep in the car.

To add insult to injury, Jodi was given access to Annie only sporadically and not every three hours.

Baby Returned

The next morning a judicial officer held a shelter care hearing. After hearing the evidence, the officer immediately returned custody of Annie to her parents.

No parents should be put through this kind of ordeal. It is not a crime to ask questions about the well-being of your child. It is not a crime to ask for testing to ensure that a procedure is needed before it is done. It is not a crime to be a protective mom.

It is a moral offense of the highest order to kick a mother out of a hospital and to seize her child on the day of her birth simply because a mom wanted to have her husband read a legal document before she signed.

Both the medical personnel and the social worker engaged in outrageous behavior toward this family.

And we believe that they violated their rights under the Constitution of the United States. And we are going to court to prove it.

Why is HSLDA fighting for parental rights in this context? It is not a homeschooling case.

Parental Rights at Risk

We are taking this case because we are tired of seeing the erosion of parental rights in virtually every area of life. Parental rights in medical cases have an impact on broader parental rights, including educational decisions.

And the plain fact is this: If we don’t fight for parental rights, it is probable that our rights will be eroded bit by bit until there is nothing that remains.

We cannot afford to fund cases like this out of HSLDA’s membership dues. We are taking this case because we believe that our members and friends will stand with Jodi and Scott Ferris. We believe that parents should not be punished by “over-the-top” social workers and doctors.

The social worker’s priority was not the welfare of Annie, but her own convenience and her own perception of her power. She was aiming to teach this homeschooling mother a lesson.

And the hospital was clearly not concerned that Annie had a medical issue—they were just trying to avoid being sued for medical malpractice.

When government workers run over parents in cases like this, the lesson that needs to be taught is to the government.

This case will cost tens of thousands of dollars. Your tax-deductible gifts to the Homeschool Freedom Fund of the Home School Foundation will make it possible for us to take this case to court and to try to establish a precedent that will help protect us all.

All of our families are at risk when the government is allowed to run over one of us. When we stand together, we can fight back for freedom and for truth.

Source: http://www.hslda.org/hs/state/pa/201203270.asp

I also belong to the same website as Angelica Lopez-Heagy called; linkedin.com - here's what I have found on her;

Born: 1981
Age: 31yo
Address: 2141 Oregon Pike
Lancaster, PA, 17601
Phone: 717 560 7917
Fax: 717 560 6452
Title: Social Worker
Healthcare Provider Number: 1041C0700X
Relations: Christopher Wayne Heagy - 29 years old, lives in Middletown
Alonso Lopez - 27 years old, lives in Grantville, PA.
Francisco Riveralopez - 49 years old, lives in Aguadilla, PR.
Marcie Wilson - 29 years old, lives in Denver, CO.
Phyllis Heagy - 56 years old, lives in Middletown,
Dawn Heagy - 37 years old, lives in Middletown, PA.
Occupation: ex- Counselor at Lebanon Valley College in Harrisburg
Now fucks with parents lives
Linked in: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/angelica-lopez-heagy/35/7a2/a4b
I've reblogged this and with more details; http://12160.info/profiles/blogs/the-facts-hospital-workers-call-po...

Comment by Ragnarok on April 2, 2012 at 5:35am: I still dont believe in it. Cant find any documents worth believing. Theres no ducumentation in any way no hospital records, no local media reportings no nothing. Then digging into this person Angelica it gets really strange. Heres my screenshots so you can see for yourself.

This only of the only places you can find her.! But it seems like the profile has been made up in a hurry.

Theres also this link but its almost identical. http://www.alltherapist.com/angelica-lopez-heagy-contact-informatio...

Now Here is where its kinda prooves itself its a hoax.!!!!!!!!!

As you can see on your left shes not even located at the address as stated on the few sites you can find her name.

I've also tried to locate here via the yellow pages and according to them no such person exists.!

I dont know if i suck at locating persons, but my guess this story is made up by 'internet money mongers' who disguise themselves as conspiracy theorists cuz the net is crawling with those. Posting a lot of deceit and lies........... Unfortunately.

Comment by nicholas geoghan on April 2, 2012 at 12:36am: we have not done a blog since we may not be able to keep internet we are both on disabilaty how ever fell free to check out our web page. On behalf of nick and lynne We Truly could use your support to Keep our internet,livestream and blogtalkradio shows running Please check out our new web page be for we no longer have internet or able to do our shows. We do have a pay pal donate button on the web page if you would like to see us continue. Thank you for your support Nick and Lynne www.occupyfreedom2012.comn behalf of nick and lynne We Truly could use your support to Keep our internet,livestream and blogtalkradio shows running Please check out our new web page be for we no longer have internet or able to do our shows. We do have a pay pal donate button on the web page if you would like to see us con

On behalf of nick and lynne We Truly could use your support to Keep our internet,livestream and blogtalkradio shows running Please check out our new web page be for we no longer have internet or able to do our shows. We do have a pay pal donate button on the web page if you would like to see us continue. Thank you for your support Nick and Lynne www.occupyfreedom2012.comn behalf of nick and lynne We Truly could use your support to Keep our internet,livestream and blogtalkradio shows running Please check out our new web page be for we no longer have internet or able to do our shows. We do have a pay pal donate button on the web page if you would like to see us continue. Thank you for your support Nick and Lynne www.occupyfreedom2012.com

tinue. Thank you for your support Nick and Lynne www.occupyfreedom2012.com

Comment by suzie on April 1, 2012 at 11:53pm: Angelica Lopez-Heagy should be fired and the hospital should be sued but i imagine these parents want to forget this whole thing .. this is an outrage! why aren't the news people talking about this kinda thing .. i bet judge Napalitano would have featured it but they got rid of him now didn't they .. The system can't crash and burn fast enough for me..

Comment by Exposure on April 1, 2012 at 5:08pm: These little day to day occurances work on a drip, drip affect, so mainly go undetected or even recorded, and indeed it's just all about manipulation, indoctrination, control and the kerching, kerching...and the price tag...

Comment by apeman2502 on April 1, 2012 at 4:34pm: I have insufficient data to comment. Cities are DIRTY places with many diseases which can kill an infant.