Pilot Gives Sworn Testimony That No Planes Hit The Twin Towers

Ex-CIA Pilot Gives Sworn Testimony That No Planes Hit The Twin Towers

US Will Have To Rebut Or Accept Statement As Truth

By: Ron Baitley-Simens
 on 5th March 2014 @ 7.15pm

feature image number one


A former CIA and civilian pilot has sworn an affidavit, stating that no planes flew into the Twin Towers as it would have been physically impossible.


John Lear, the son of Learjet inventor, Bill Lear, has given his expert evidence that it would have been physically impossible for Boeing 767s, like Flights AA11 and UA175 to have hit the Twin Towers on 9/11, particularly when flown by inexperienced pilots:


‘No Boeing 767 airliners hit the Twin Towers as fraudulently alleged by the government, media, NIST and its contractors’, he stated in the affidavit.


‘Such crashes did not occur because they are physically impossible as depicted, for the following reasons: in the case of UAL 175 going into the south tower, a real Boeing 767 would have begun 'telescoping' when the nose hit the 14 inch steel columns which are 39 inches on center.


‘The vertical and horizontal tail would have instantaneously separated from the aircraft, hit the steel box columns and fallen to the ground.


‘The engines when impacting the steel columns would havemaintained their general shape and either fallen to the ground or been recovered in the debris of the collapsed building.


‘No Boeing 767 could attain a speed of 540 mph at 1000 feet above sea level ‘parasite drag doubles with velocity’ and ‘parasite power’ cubes with velocity.


  • The fan portion of the engine is not designed to accept the volume of dense air at that altitude and speed.
  • The piece of alleged external fuselage containing 3 or 4 window cutouts is inconsistent with an airplane that hit 14 inch steel box columns, placed at over 500 mph.  It would have crumpled.
  • No significant part of the Boeing 767 or engine could have penetrated the 14 inch steel columns and 37 feet beyond the massive core of the tower without part of it falling to the ground.


‘The debris of the collapse should have contained massive sections of the Boeing 767, including 3 engine cores weighing approximately 9000 pounds apiece which could not have been hidden. Yet there is no evidence of any of these massive structural components from either 767 at the WTC. Such complete disappearance of 767s is impossible.


The affidavit, dated 28th January 2014 is part of a law suit being pursued by Morgan Reynolds in the United States District Court, Southern District, New York.


In March 2007, Reynolds, a former chief economist under the George W Bush administration filed a Request For Correction with the US National Institute of Science and Technology citing his belief that real commercial jets (Boeings) did not hit the WTC towers.


Although the 9/11 Truth movement initially rejected the ‘no-planes’ theory as too outlandish, after scientific and rational analysis, it has become a widely accepted explanation of the evidence collected.


feature image number two


Unlike any other form of statement, an affidavit becomes truth in law, if it is not rebutted.  It will now be up to critics of the theory to present their evidence and analysis to rebut the statement point by point.  If they do not – or cannot – then the US government will be obliged to admit that the account given by the 9/11 Commission is wrong.


The 65 year old retired airline captain and former CIA pilot – who has over 19,000 hours of flight time -- also drew attention to the inexperience of the pilots who allegedly flew the planes:


‘The alleged 'controlled' descent into New York on a relatively straight course by a novice pilot in unlikely in the extreme because of the difficulty of controlling heading, descent rate and descent speed within the parameters of 'controlled' flight.


‘It takes a highly skilled pilot to interpret the "EFIS" (Electronic Flight Instrument Display) display, with which none of the hijacker pilots would have been familiar or received training on, and use his controls, including the ailerons, rudder, elevators, spoilers and throttles to effect, control and maintain a descent.


Views: 1958

Comment by Not mainstreamer on March 6, 2014 at 4:45pm

Fox News creating scripted "street interview"? With that kind of "witnesses" they may be hiding something... In the normal case it should not be a problem to aks ordinary pedestrians


Comment by Spydaman13 on March 7, 2014 at 12:02am

no plane in penn...

Comment by Spydaman13 on March 7, 2014 at 12:03am

or DC...

Comment by Spydaman13 on March 7, 2014 at 12:09am

what we saw was just some shitty, scanty, computer animated image inserted into the live feed, albeit carelessly...

Comment by Spydaman13 on March 7, 2014 at 10:37pm

06/22/2010 - (PilotsFor911Truth.org) Recently Pilots For 9/11 Truth have analyzed the speeds reported for the aircraft utilized on 9/11. Numerous aviation experts have voiced their concerns regarding the extremely excessive speeds reported above Maximum Operating for the 757 and 767, particularly, United and American Airlines 757/767 Captains who have actual flight time in all 4 aircraft reportedly used on 9/11. These experts state the speeds are impossible to achieve near sea level in thick air if the aircraft were a standard 757/767 as reported. Combined with the fact the airplane which was reported to strike the south tower of the World Trade Center was also producing high G Loading while turning and pulling out from a dive, the whole issue becomes incomprehensible to fathom a standard 767 can perform such maneuvers at such intense speeds exceeding Maximum Operating limits of the aircraft. Especially for those who research the topic thoroughly and have expertise in aviation.

Comment by Spydaman13 on March 7, 2014 at 10:52pm

Comment by Spydaman13 on March 7, 2014 at 11:02pm

Comment by ĦƟǁÿWʘʘt! on March 7, 2014 at 11:09pm

some how my post got deleted...they're on to me....lmao, trying again

I think there were planes in NY, but not THE planes, I believe they were militarized & bullet proof and made just for this job. There was some sort of a plane in PA, but shot down because of an 8 mile debris field. The only NO plane was @ the PentaCon where a global hawk was utilized along w/ pre planned explosives inside, this is my theory only, not fact.

Comment by Not mainstreamer on March 8, 2014 at 6:14pm

Interesting answer by John Lear


"My other questions have to be... about Buzz Aldrin and his claim of a base on the moon, and other Astronauts stories about UFOs. I've always found their stories either incredibly believable (these are intelligent, disciplined people), or to be disinformation using their status as being believable. My first question is: Which is it, and what's the solid truth about the bases on the moon?

Second, have you heard of the "Apollo 20 Mona Lisa" woman/alien, and what are your views on her and the alien spacecraft?"

John Lear

"I have heard the Apollo 20 stories. They were leaked by NASA to try an add credibility to the original Apollo missions. No Apollo mission ever went to, or orbited or landed on the moon. Anybody who believes they did does not know the facts or is a disinformation person. Jay Utah, Phil Plait along with Jim Oberg are out and out disinformation artists. They all have a line of bs 6 miles long.

Their final argument is hilarious: Well how do explain the footprints? There is no possibility that any Apollo mission ever went near the moon. Get over it. Other programs may have. But not Apollo."

Comment by Not mainstreamer on March 8, 2014 at 7:17pm


John Lear

"All of that underground stuff is for the planned reduction in population that Hoagland talks about. It cannot happen and it will not happen. The makers (or whatever you want to call them) who invented humanity spent an enormous amount of time and energy to make us what we are and they will not permit anyone to mess with their product."

Our current PTB may think they can, but they can't. It's like the Nazi master race. There is no master race and no master race can be genetically fabricated simply because man does not have the slightest control over the soul. The soul belongs to our makers but it is ours to live. All the best."

Thank you


You need to be a member of 12160 to add comments!

Join 12160


  • Add Photos
  • View All

Please remember this website is supported by your donations...

© 2017   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2015 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted