Pilot Gives Sworn Testimony That No Planes Hit The Twin Towers

Ex-CIA Pilot Gives Sworn Testimony That No Planes Hit The Twin Towers

US Will Have To Rebut Or Accept Statement As Truth

By: Ron Baitley-Simens
 on 5th March 2014 @ 7.15pm

feature image number one

 

A former CIA and civilian pilot has sworn an affidavit, stating that no planes flew into the Twin Towers as it would have been physically impossible.

 

John Lear, the son of Learjet inventor, Bill Lear, has given his expert evidence that it would have been physically impossible for Boeing 767s, like Flights AA11 and UA175 to have hit the Twin Towers on 9/11, particularly when flown by inexperienced pilots:

 

‘No Boeing 767 airliners hit the Twin Towers as fraudulently alleged by the government, media, NIST and its contractors’, he stated in the affidavit.

 

‘Such crashes did not occur because they are physically impossible as depicted, for the following reasons: in the case of UAL 175 going into the south tower, a real Boeing 767 would have begun 'telescoping' when the nose hit the 14 inch steel columns which are 39 inches on center.

 

‘The vertical and horizontal tail would have instantaneously separated from the aircraft, hit the steel box columns and fallen to the ground.

 

‘The engines when impacting the steel columns would havemaintained their general shape and either fallen to the ground or been recovered in the debris of the collapsed building.

 

‘No Boeing 767 could attain a speed of 540 mph at 1000 feet above sea level ‘parasite drag doubles with velocity’ and ‘parasite power’ cubes with velocity.

 

  • The fan portion of the engine is not designed to accept the volume of dense air at that altitude and speed.
  • The piece of alleged external fuselage containing 3 or 4 window cutouts is inconsistent with an airplane that hit 14 inch steel box columns, placed at over 500 mph.  It would have crumpled.
  • No significant part of the Boeing 767 or engine could have penetrated the 14 inch steel columns and 37 feet beyond the massive core of the tower without part of it falling to the ground.

 

‘The debris of the collapse should have contained massive sections of the Boeing 767, including 3 engine cores weighing approximately 9000 pounds apiece which could not have been hidden. Yet there is no evidence of any of these massive structural components from either 767 at the WTC. Such complete disappearance of 767s is impossible.

 

The affidavit, dated 28th January 2014 is part of a law suit being pursued by Morgan Reynolds in the United States District Court, Southern District, New York.

 

In March 2007, Reynolds, a former chief economist under the George W Bush administration filed a Request For Correction with the US National Institute of Science and Technology citing his belief that real commercial jets (Boeings) did not hit the WTC towers.

 

Although the 9/11 Truth movement initially rejected the ‘no-planes’ theory as too outlandish, after scientific and rational analysis, it has become a widely accepted explanation of the evidence collected.

 

feature image number two

 

Unlike any other form of statement, an affidavit becomes truth in law, if it is not rebutted.  It will now be up to critics of the theory to present their evidence and analysis to rebut the statement point by point.  If they do not – or cannot – then the US government will be obliged to admit that the account given by the 9/11 Commission is wrong.

 

The 65 year old retired airline captain and former CIA pilot – who has over 19,000 hours of flight time -- also drew attention to the inexperience of the pilots who allegedly flew the planes:

 

‘The alleged 'controlled' descent into New York on a relatively straight course by a novice pilot in unlikely in the extreme because of the difficulty of controlling heading, descent rate and descent speed within the parameters of 'controlled' flight.

 

‘It takes a highly skilled pilot to interpret the "EFIS" (Electronic Flight Instrument Display) display, with which none of the hijacker pilots would have been familiar or received training on, and use his controls, including the ailerons, rudder, elevators, spoilers and throttles to effect, control and maintain a descent.

 http://neonnettle.com/news/211-ex-cia-pilot-gives-sworn-testimony-t...

Views: 1975

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

Comment by JUST DEFIANCE on March 15, 2014 at 11:23pm

How many America's are there, then?

The numbers of people needed to orchestrate and propagate such an event has to be huge!

And to keep something that big secreted within the 'players', would demand an army of colluders, and whatever, bribes, threats 'disappearances' to get it to the point of being played out.

THEN..., keeping it under the covers even to now, means a massive number of people, worldwide, must be carrying knowledge even of the innumerable separate tasks - let alone people - that were involved and figured out to bring it to it's conclusion.

So, America, just America, must be a deeply divided nation. And from the most 'left-wing', to the most 'right wing'.

 That means that the whole structure, from 'government' through all capitalist corps and markets, AND it's and all 'western alliance' military forces, is so divided as to be in a constant state of war.

It may also mean that a significant percentage of Americans are violently in support of the perpetrators of 9/11?

What a fuck-up!

Comment by Benito Turturici on March 15, 2014 at 6:44pm

Obviously.a.CONTROLLED.DEMOLITION..!!!!!!!

Comment by Garry Best on March 15, 2014 at 6:20pm

Here's a page snip from Dimitri's book.

Just a During and After comparison.

Comment by Not mainstreamer on March 15, 2014 at 2:35am

We can conclude IZCS. Everyone above were involved (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jay_Carney = one of them - our enemy)

Comment by Garry Best on March 15, 2014 at 2:26am

My guess CIA

Comment by Not mainstreamer on March 15, 2014 at 2:23am

US government | Israel | Saud House | Al Qaeda - In war they are allied. They don't fight each other.

"Al Qaeda" (or what name to use) = if Al Qaeda was responsible that will be who?

Comment by Garry Best on March 15, 2014 at 2:11am

We would be diverting this post to go into depth on Al Qaeda. It is a completely different subject and an organisation which was manifested?manufactured by the CIA. Basically just support for CIA jackels. who are very active in Ukraine at this present moment. MHO

Comment by Not mainstreamer on March 15, 2014 at 2:05am

From The Guardian link:

Although the study is largely theoretical, a number of other more empirically-focused studies - by KPMG and the UK Government Office of Science for instance - have warned that the convergence of food, water and energy crises could create a 'perfect storm' within about fifteen years. But these 'business as usual' forecasts could be very conservative.

Amareurish

Al Qaeda had absolutely nothing to do with 911

Let us not assume what "Al Qaeda" is before we know anything about that. "CIA" (let us not assume too much about what that is) created Al Qaeda. Brzezinski was instrumental (let us not assume too much about what he is).

Comment by Garry Best on March 15, 2014 at 2:03am

Go back and read the early posts.

Who??? The Gov of USA, 5 dancing Israelis (who just happened to be in New York) to record what was happening. How the fuck did they know it was going to happen???

And all the other Zionist pricks that run the country (unbeknown to to average USA citizen) people like the mayor of New York (spel) Guilliano, Silverstein, and anybody who could make money from the trumped up war against WMD. And that's the short version. Just keep readin, watching all and everything on 911 and don't have a closed mind.

You have a lovely day, where ever you are.

Comment by JUST DEFIANCE on March 15, 2014 at 1:47am

For being a fanatic, re my last comment, I accept the 'crazy' tag, and I'm sorry for the emphasis in it.

But the last 10+ pages here, rearrange my and others' thoughts on 9/11, no doubt.

Establishing the things you have here, convinces me at least, of the possibility of 'no planes'.

If there weren't planes, then humanity has to take a deep breath, to come up to speed about how devious the attackers and the complicit MSM etc., have been.

All these pages still don't get to the answer Deep Space asked - "Who dunnit?"

Obviously, I didn't 'dunnit', as I ended with before.  I was angry and did go off, but only for being under the 'hexes of anti-establishment militia, here and in the US.  I was spun out for months after.

At this point, what with what this 12160-9/11 Truthers' investigation shows, as of 'no planes' etc., perhaps 'who dunnit' doesn't matter much at all now?

Not trying to be in front [ho-fucking-ho - light years behind!] the USA might still have as a priority to ask "why?"

Facing whichever confirmable answers come, asks the US to face it, the mainstream, have lost it, and do need massive changes.

To whit, I refer you:

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/earth-insight/2014/mar/14/na...

and one of my own, from 2012

http://maxearth.blogspot.com.au/2012/12/amoeba-to-empire-to-self-ex...

"Who?" should be outed, if they are regarded enough to have acted against the Common Best interests of humanity.

But as my rant went to, "why?' is at least as pertinent, in this discussion also.

If "Why?" is proven to be all for the better, do we then regard the 'culprits' as 'heroes'?

Shit, that's a hard one?

If, modern hi-tech society exists in say 100 years, and beyond, people then, if history can find the 9/11 truth, as opposed to the MSM versions, might well look back at whomever as Warriors for the Future [Generations], not for the egomania of the Wall Street stock marketeers, etc?

Plus, to ease the pain, if possible, for the relatives of the 9/11 fallen, we also must, I say MUST, re-adjust our perceptions of this day and age, and come to grips with the raw fact, that this is a period of very vicious, WAR.

So, the victims of 9/11, all of them, are better remembered, as Casualties of War, and most, died in the service of humanity. Especially the Fireys, Et Al.

Besides, any Firey who knows this type of scenario is something they may have to confront anytime, knows also that they are very much warlike, extreme warlike, situations.

For what it's worth.....

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

Please remember this website is supported by your donations...

© 2017   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2015 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted