The Truth About PRESIDENTIAL POWERS / EXECUTIVE ORDERS‏

Show this message...


From the Cole Report, scroll down for a well-intended and written article of which I WOULD LIKE to agree with, BUT YET pursunat Chief Justice Salmon P. Chase I must disagree with the Cole Report
 
Today,  Presidential Executive power under the War and Emergency Powers Act of 1933, amendatory to the Trading With the Enemy Act of 1917 pursuant to CJ Chase’s Supreme Ct. opinion in Tex. v. White is Res judicata/i.e. settled, unreviewable and the supreme law of the land and will remain so until either revolution, peaceful secession or changes to the constitution.  Trust me on this, executive authority will never be checked by the so-called judiciary in time of “war”.  We are and have been at “war” since at least 1861.  The now indefinite, unlimited “war or terror” is the perfect war.... unlimited and forever into eternity.  Patriot Acts I & II, National Defense Authorization Act and all these other acts of CON-gress are nothing less than a continuation of Emergency Powers under the previous acts, pursuant to the constitution as interpreted and ruled on by the court in Tex. v. White.  Toast.  Pure and simple.  We live under the illusion of being “free”.  A fkn. joke.
 
Executive Orders by any president, said orders having the force of law, are constitutional or at least must be presumed to be so.  In the case of Texas v. White 74 U.S. 700 argued in 1869, the U.S. Supreme Court settled this and many other perceived unconstitutional acts of both the Congress of the United States and the office of president.  Today we are and have been deceived into thinking that the constitution limits the presidential as well as congressional powers.  That is not what the Supreme court settled in 1869 and these and many other “frivolous” arguments are what is called in law as Res judicata.  That simply means settled.  Being that the highest court in the land settled these and many other arguments such should and will never be argued again in any court in the land.  The court ruled that the “exigencies of war”, whether said war is in suppressing rebellion or insurrection (i.e. The “Civil” War) or in a congressionally-declared war abroad or elsewhere, those exigencies are justification for suspension of the constitution, individual rights and liberty in general.  That may explain why the U.S. is constantly at war and has been since 1861 and all these so-called “unconstitutional” acts of several presidents and congresses go UNCHECKED by the judiciary.  The court also correctly ruled that Congress and Congress alone has the constitutional authority to determine what a State is and what is and is not a “republican form of government”.  I would really love to be wrong here.  Perhaps someone with a law degree can steer me in the right direction.  You can read the opinion of the court given by then Chief Justice Salmon P. Chase here: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/74/700#writing-USSC_CR_0074_0700_ZO
Short of another revolution, peaceful secession or constitutional amendments too numerous to present here, ........... we’re TOAST.  Right now the only viable option.......
 
 
 


The truth about
 
EXECUTIVE AUTHORITY / EXECUTIVE ORDERS
 
"So-called Executive Orders are null and void and of no force in law, being proclamations, which are forbidden by the Constitution. Only the monarchs of England can issue proclamations. An Executive Order, no matter how it is drawn up or who signs it, is a proclamation, and is therefore of no effect, and the citizens of the several States are not duty-bound to obey one jot of such an order. President Lincoln was the first to violate the Constitution in this manner. [...] Before his death, Lincoln admitted that his power grab was unconstitutional."
Dr. John Coleman; What You Should Know About the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights

 

 "With increasing use being made of unconstitutional "executive orders", we now have the unconstitutional situation where the President makes laws, and the Congress rubber-stamps them."
Dr. John Coleman; The Committee of 300
 
"We can safely discount so-called "Executive Orders" as these are proclamations forbidden by the Constitution. Only kings of England have the power to issue proclamations; the President of the United States, not being a king has no such power."
Dr. John Coleman; What You Should Know About the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights
 
"If the American people are satisfied with a king in the White House, let them send the Senators and Representatives home and save the people vast amounts of money by not having to pay their salaries."
Dr. John Coleman; What You Should Know About the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights

'When Lincoln issued his Executive Order # 1 declaring Martial law, he committed treason under the 1861 Treason Act."
Dr. John Coleman; What You Should Know About the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights
 
"Another myth widely circulated is that the person elected to be the president automatically assumes the position and power as Commander In Chief. Only a very few members of the House and Senate have an understanding of what the war powers of the president are. They have no clear idea what the words "when actually called into service by the Congress" mean: The president
does not assume the title of commander in chief of the armed forces simply by being elected to the office. If this were so, then the president would have the power of a king, but the words of condition in Article 11, Section 2, Part 1 of  the U.S. Constitution "when actually called into service" are there to restrain him from acting like a king.
 
I must repeat: Until the Congress confers the title of commander in chief upon him, the President is not the commander in chief. Conferring the title implies a future action, not a past action, which it would be if he, the President, automatically became the commander in chief upon being elected. Only Congress can confer the title, "commander in chief" upon the president and this can only be conferred after a constitutional declaration of war has been made by Congress.
 
Show me one place in the delegated powers of the executive where it says that the President has war powers. There is nothing in the delegated powers of  Congress (Art 1, Section 8, Clauses1-18 that allows for such a false and fraudulent position to be taken by the President. Article 11, Section 2, part 1 of the U.S. Constitution states that the only duties the President has are military duties, when called into actual service; he has no role in planning or choosing reasons for taking America to war.
 
Only the House and Senate can plan a war or order military action in support of it, to be taken. If and when this is done by the House and Senate, then the House and Senate tell the President what he can and cannot do with our military forces; where they can be sent and for what purposes. Before that action by the joint session of Congress, he, the President, has zero power to take action on sending troops anywhere."
Dr. John Coleman; What You Should Know About the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights
 
"America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
~ Abraham Lincoln
 
 
Educate yourself! The media is complicit to your ignorance as well as their own.
 


 
The Truth About
TAXATION!
 
Do you think our Founding Father’s wanted to penalize achievement in America? NO! America was the land of the free, the brave, and it was the land of opportunity. America was a land to build, not tax. So how did America get on this slippery slope of taxation and a nation of laws?  Law's for every aspect of living. Law’s controlling what we eat, hear, speak and listen to. Laws for what is ours, what we can keep, and laws for what we must give up.
Plainly  America has become a communist socialist nation adopting every aspect of a socialist nation with a continual steady growth of taxation which is the 2nd Plank of the Communist Manifesto?  This has been accomplished primarily by entitlements, income taxes, school taxes, and a host of other taxes as well as property taxes and sales taxes, having the form and name of law which is in reality no law.
If I may, I would like to explain and prove that the appraisal method of taxation on all direct taxes, regardless of which state you live in, is illegal and unconstitutional.
Direct taxation on property, income, and school tax should be accomplished in the proper manner in accordance with the mandates set forth in the Constitution of the United States of America and not as it has been done in the past, that is, by erroneously appraised value. You cannot have local and state law going in opposite direction of the US Constitution. Our Founding Fathers were experts on fair taxation. Therefore the Constitution of the United States of America is quite clear as to how we are to be subjected to a direct tax, and it is important that you know the difference between direct tax and indirect tax.
The framers of the Constitution included not one but two (2) limitations for direct taxation to be applied. The limitations forbidding direct taxation of individuals are found first in Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3, which states:
“Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers…”
Again, in the Constitution of the United States of America, Article 1, Section 9, Clause 4 states:
“No Capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid unless in Proportion to the Census or Enumeration here in before directed to be taken.”
These basic sections of the Constitution have never been amended. The Constitution only allows for direct taxation of individuals and property by CENSUS or ENUMERATION.
Income Tax, Property Tax, and School Taxes are applied as DIRECT TAXES!
Deceiving citizens into voluntarily subjecting themselves to a tax based on the value of their property or income is FRAUD. When individuals voluntarily subject themselves to such fraud, it is a blatant violation of the Constitution. The action is pure theft under color of law. Let me repeat that. THIS ACTION IS PURE THEFT UNDER COLOR OF LAW.
You know and I know today’s method and enforcement for the collection of property taxes, school taxes, and income tax is by fear and intimidation. It is as UN-American as the origin of the method itself. To constantly raise property value by inflationary measures is as UN-unconstitutional as the appraisal method itself, including cash-cow tactics of a home’s square footage, age of house, and structure type whether it be brick, wood, mud, bamboo or whatever. It is UN-American to penalize or punish a person for their achievements through UN-Constitutional taxation.
The Constitution is the supreme law of the land in the U.S. It was written to create a government of limited powers for the primary purpose of securing citizens’ rights to life, liberty and property. Again, you cannot have local and state law going in one direction and the Constitution going in another, they have to be in unison.
The Declaration of Independence states that it is the duty of citizens to oppose and resist abuses of their rights. These Constitutional violations and violations of citizens’ rights can be stopped if enough people become informed of these facts.
Every American has the RIGHT to own property. Nor can a RIGHT be taxed. That RIGHT is protected in our nation's fundamental law in the "Life, Liberty, and Pursuit to Declaration of Independence".
The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that no tax may be levied upon a Constitutionally protected RIGHT unless that tax is levied upon Citizens equally - that, of course, is a “properly apportioned” tax. In other words, if you owe $25 property tax, so does each person of your family living with you owe $25: the guy who owns the biggest house owes $25, and so does each member of his family owe $25 each. Every man, woman and child each owes the exact same amount.
CENSUS or ENUMERATION means head-count, not value or the amount of a persons income. Our Founding Fathers were masters at fair taxation.
Just because some lawmakers think they are acting correctly when they write an abusive, unfair and despotic tax law does not make it a proper law. There is one greater measure to which all laws must be held – the Constitution of the United States of America, ….
Article 6, Clause 2, states: “This Constitution and the Laws of the United States which shall be made pursuant thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, anything in The Constitution or Laws of any state to the Contrary notwithstanding.”
This premise is further bolstered by those more learned and scholarly than I in various Supreme Court rulings:
“The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U. S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail.”
“The General rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it.
“An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.
“Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it…
“A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby.
“No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.”
Sixteenth American Jurisprudence, Second Edition, Section 256
Folks, it’s really pretty simple: if one citizen owes one dollar in property tax, income tax, or school tax, his neighbor owes exactly the same as well as each occupant owes the same, every man, woman and child. That’s the way our founding fathers wanted it. There was no soaking the rich or penalizing achievement in America. America was the land of the free and the brave, and it was the land of opportunity.
The old cliche “but it is the law,” or “the local law lays the requirement for the taxation of property by its mandated (Appraised) value and not the number of people living therein/thereon according to a census,” is UN-constitutional. The Constitution is still the supreme law of the land. Isn’t it about time that we stop abusing the people and stop abusing the Constitution of the United States and demand the abolition of the unfair and unconstitutional taxation by the appraisal method?
Property tax, income tax, and school taxes, assessed on the APPRAISED VALUE is totally unconstitutional. I don’t care what State or County you live in, the appraised method of taxation is UN-Constitutional.
Educate Yo’Self.
 
"Life's tough, it's even tougher if you're stupid!"
- John Wayne
 
The Truth About The Internal Revenue [ IRS ]

Former IRS Special Agent says
 
NO law to File!
http://freedomabovefortune.com/
Former IRS Special Agent says NO law to File, " Joe Banister was a Special Agent for the IRS criminal investigation division since 1993.
Before that he was a tax professional and Certified Public Accountant for 9 years.He holds a bachelor degree of science, business degree, business administration. In 1993 he became an IRS criminal investigator appointed to a position of GS-1811. His duties included investigating violations of US Code Title 26 (IR Code). He was authorized to serve search warrants and arrest warrants. He later became the asset for feiture coordinator for central California.
 
"The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land,  and any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail." - 16th American Jurisprudence, 2nd Ed, Section 256  
 
 
 
Tommy Cryer ~ Attorney at Law
Someone is lying to us!!  Would our Federal Government lie to us about something as important as taxes?  YES! Do you want to know the truth and how to verify it? How can government pay its bills without the income tax? Just like it always has!!! Because not one penny of the money taken from you in illegally applied income taxes is used to pay for government services or programs- NOT ONE!!
 
The Grace Commission Report reveals that every penny taken from you is handed over to the Federal Reserve Bank, a PRIVATELY OWNED bank, OWNED AND CONTROLLED by big money banking concerns, many of which are FOREIGN!!!
So how would life be without an illegally applied income tax? Better for us, our States and even the Federal Government!!! Personal earnings flowing into every working household in America would improve our standard of living and cause local, state, and national economies to BOOM overnight, causing an immediate recovery from the current stagflation/recession;  The weekly and monthly raking off and taking of 20-25% of every State's economy would cease, allowing those resources to continue to circulate and fuel state and local economies - the economies AMERICANS live and work in - the ones that matter; More able to buy things and better able to pay their house notes, foreclosures would be greatly reduced and, since someone has to make the products and provide the services which Americans could now afford, full employment would be achieved in weeks or months, not years or decades; Increases in local and state revenues resulting from the economic boom would make States independent of federal grants and hand-outs, freeing them from federal domination and control;  Increase prosperity at home would boost local sales tax revenues and allow local and state governments to provide better highways, better schools, better libraries and public services, improving the American quality of life, even with tax reductions; With the national economy booming as well, the federal government would recover most if not all of the "lost revenues" from dramatic increases in revenues from its 80-plus other taxes as well as from the elimination of the need for grants to state and local governments; The elimination of the federal government's 40% "penalty" on hiring Americans would not only stop the flow of manufacturing jobs out of the country, but the superior productivity of the American worker would also likely induce manufacturers to bring many of those jobs back here where they belong anyway; Since it has been proven that crime, divorce, child abuse, drug abuse and even teen pregnancy are directly related to the income tax burden, all of those social ills would be reduced, providing a safer and happier society for Americans. (see http://www.incometaxcausescrime.com/ for proof) LIES - LIES - LIES!! The IRS tells us that the tax laws say everyone is liable for the Income Tax.THAT IS A LIE! There is NO LAW that makes the typical working American liable for the Income Tax. THAT IS THE TRUTH! The IRS tells us that what we receive for our labor is 100% profit- received for nothing!! THAT IS A LIE! Our personal earnings are not free, received for nothing- and there is NO LAW that supports the IRS's "zero basis" rule saying our labor and time are of zero value. THAT IS THE TRUTH! The IRS tells us that exercising our fundamental, Constitutionally protected right to earn a living is a taxable activity. THAT IS A LIE! According to the Supreme Court our rights are exempt from taxation because if the government can tax our rights it can destroy our rights -
 
"the power to tax is the power to destroy" Chief Justice John Marshall, 1819.
 
THAT IS THE TRUTH!! Get The Facts...
Constitutionalists attorney Tommy Cryer, A unanimous jury of 12, ruled that Tommy Cryer, who had not filed 1040 Income Tax Returns for many years, was not guilty of any crime. Hear about his David v. Goliath victory over the IRS.
SHOW US THE INHERENT LAW: Attorney Tom Cryer Wins Against the IRS
questforfairtrialinconcordnh.blogspot.com/2007/07/attorney-tom... Jul 30, 2007 · Editor's Note: This was uploaded to Youtube.com on July 23rd and represents more "New Media" coverage of Tommy Cryer's victory against the IRS, …
 
ALSO SEE http://www.thelawthatneverwas.com/new/home.asp
 
"Only the rare taxpayer would be likely to know that he could refuse to produce his records to IRS agents...Who would believe the ironic truth that the cooperative taxpayer fares much worse that the individual who relies upon his constitutional rights."
- Judge Cummings, U.S. Federal Judge, in US. v. Dickerson (7th Circuit 1969)
 
"Our tax system is based on individual self-assessment and
voluntary compliance."

Mortimer Caplin, Internal Revenue Audit Manual (1975)
 
"The United States has a system of taxation by confession."
Hugo Black, Supreme Court Justice, in U.S.A. Kahriger
 
"I don't like the income tax. Every time we talk about these taxes we get around to the idea of 'from each according to his capacity and to each according to his needs'.That's socialism. It's written into the Communist Manifesto. Maybe we ought to see that every person who gets a tax return receives a copy of the Communist Manifesto with it so he can see what's happening to him."
-T. Coleman Andrews, Commissioner of Internal Revenue,
May 25, 1956 in US. News & World Report
 
"If we stuck to the Constitution as written, we would have
no income tax"

- Congressman Ron Paul (1998)
 
"There is no law which requires you to file a return. The federal income tax is voluntary. The 16th amendment was not ratified. Federal income taxes are not used to operate the federal government."
- Joseph Banister, Former IRS Special Agent from the
Criminal Investigation Division
 
"The General rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it"
- 16th Jurisprudence, Second Edition, Section 256
 
"No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law
and no courts are bound to enforce it."

- Sixteenth American Jurisprudence, Second Edition, Section 256
 
 
"The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists."
~ J. Edgar Hoover, former head of the FBI

Views: 68

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

"Destroying the New World Order"

THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!

mobile page

12160.info/m

12160 Administrators

 

TOP CONTENT THIS WEEK

Latest Activity

Chris of the family Masters favorited stormtruther's blog post With 5G technology expanding across the country, Australians are more connected than ever before. So do you fall in a 5G zone?
8 minutes ago
Chris of the family Masters favorited James Roberts's blog post 'Today Marks a Countdown to Nuclear Chaos': Trump Urged to Extend Key Treaty With Russia
12 minutes ago
Phyllis Maka posted blog posts
17 minutes ago
James Roberts posted blog posts
5 hours ago
stormtruther posted blog posts
6 hours ago
stormtruther posted photos
7 hours ago
stormtruther favorited Phyllis Maka's blog post Jim Stone - The World Health organization just met with Google, faceplant and Twitter
7 hours ago
Chris of the family Masters favorited Phyllis Maka's blog post Red-Blooded Humans vs. Blue-Blooded Snakes The Reptilian Side of the Human Industry
10 hours ago
Burbia commented on Doc Vega's blog post An Incredible insight by a German Actor About Jews, their Relationship with Gentiles in Germany and How Hitler rose to power!
"This is where it led me. "
13 hours ago
Chris of the family Masters commented on Chris of the family Masters's blog post Coronavirus: run, here come the experimental drugs
"One of my friends who is Functional Medicine practitioner has a good saying : I'll take statin…"
14 hours ago
Doc Vega posted a blog post
14 hours ago
Burbia commented on Burbia's video
Thumbnail

Student Reacts to DISTURBING LGBT education - TRY NOT TO CRINGE: Gay Agenda in schools!

"Holy moly. Been waiting to see if any influence Soph/Lt. Corbis had made to the younger generation.…"
14 hours ago
Doc Vega commented on Doc Vega's blog post Robot Companion Coming To Your Town Soon
"James, thanks man! But, I was only doing what every parent should do."
14 hours ago
Doc Vega commented on Doc Vega's blog post Robot Companion Coming To Your Town Soon
"cheeki, Thnak you Honey. I always tried to let my kids have a normal childhood where as I heard so…"
14 hours ago
Burbia posted a video

Student Reacts to DISTURBING LGBT education - TRY NOT TO CRINGE: Gay Agenda in schools!

PLEASE "LIKE" THIS VIDEO, it really helps me get my message along. I wrote this hoping to help people see that some stuff is getting very extreme in schools....
14 hours ago
James Roberts favorited cheeki kea's video
16 hours ago
James Roberts commented on James Roberts's video
Thumbnail

The TRUTH About Pete Buttigieg, Leaked Bloomberg Audio, Julian Assange Out Of Solitary

"I swear, if you want to find the most incisive and hilarious criticism of the Democrats, look to…"
17 hours ago
James Roberts commented on Chris of the family Masters's blog post Trump Drops Requirement for Employers to Validate Citizenship of Employees
"But of course. Meanwhile, sports stadiums full of fools will cheer their fool heads off."
17 hours ago
James Roberts favorited Chris of the family Masters's blog post Trump Drops Requirement for Employers to Validate Citizenship of Employees
17 hours ago
James Roberts commented on Chris of the family Masters's blog post Coronavirus: run, here come the experimental drugs
"Do you know how drugs are "discovered"? They always start by finding / making a novel…"
17 hours ago

© 2020   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2019 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted