Since logic is no longer taught as a required subject in schools, the door is open to all sorts of bizarre reactions to the presence of information.

Here are three favorites:

One: grab the headline or the title of an article, make up your mind about how you "feel," and ignore everything else.

Two: Actually read the article until you find a piece of information that appeals to you for any reason; latch on to it, and run with it in any direction.  In all cases, the direction will have nothing to do with the intent of the article.  

Three: From the moment you begin to read the headline of the article, be in a state of "free association."  Take any word or sentence and connect it to an arbitrary thought or feeling, associate that thought with yet another arbitrary thought...and keep going until you become tired or bored.

You might be surprised at how many people use these three "methods of analysis."

The very idea that the author of the article is making a central point doesn't really register.  And certainly, the notion that the author is providing evidence for the central point and reasoning his way from A to B to C is alien.  

A college liberal education?  These days it could be imparted in a matter of weeks, simply by hammering a small set of values into students' skulls---along with requisite guilt and fear at the prospect of wandering off the reservation.

Logic as a subject is viewed with grave suspicion, as if it might involuntarily take a person down the wrong track and dump him in a politically incorrect ditch---a fate to be avoided at all costs.  

Therefore, the practice of rational debate is on the way out.  Too risky.  Besides, the preferred method of dealing with opponents is screaming at them, shoving them off stage, and whining about "being triggered."

If you think obtaining what's called a liberal college education is vastly overrated (and absurdly expensive), you're right.  Learning logic, instead, would be a good start down a different road.

And an analysis of the principle of "greatest good for the greatest number" would be very, very useful---since it underpins so much of values-centered education these days.

What does greatest good mean, specifically?  How would it be achieved?  Who would implement it?  How would the implementation affect individual freedom?  

Wrestling with these questions would open up whole new territories of insight.

As I've mentioned in past articles, when I taught a few basics of logic to middle-school students, the clutter in their minds receded.  They found the ability to follow a line of thought---for the first time, they recognized there was such a thing as a connected flow of reasoning from A to B to C to D.  The lights went on.

The world may be sinking into deeper levels of know-nothing non-rationality, but that's not a good excuse for trailing along down into the swamp.  It should be a wake-up call to go the other way.

No matter what anyone says, it's not a crime to be smarter than other people.
Use this link to order Jon's Matrix Collections.
Jon Rappoport

Views: 83

Comment

You need to be a member of 12160 Social Network to add comments!

Join 12160 Social Network

Comment by cheeki kea on December 15, 2019 at 7:47am

True and knowing all this on the bright side can be an advantage, particularly upon mild debate in Formal situations. Even acknowledging tiny inconsistency of their "facts" or how they ~"feel"~about it, can cause them to become unhinged and erupt into emotional outburst. ( always to their determent, and in front of others ) That's when a debate is won or meeting closed with successful conclusion.  

Comment by Parrhesia on December 14, 2019 at 11:24am

People don't seem to care about truth anymore, that's why they are able to "identify" as whatever they want and it's okay because "feelings".  

"Destroying the New World Order"

TOP CONTENT THIS WEEK

THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE!

mobile page

12160.info/m

12160 Administrators

 

Latest Activity

Doc Vega commented on Doc Vega's blog post “Night of Horror” Finland WWII 1939 and a Russian Massacre
"Just another bizarre chapter in WWII that seems more suspect as paranormal."
6 hours ago
Doc Vega's 7 blog posts were featured
7 hours ago
Burbia's blog post was featured

Former President Trump?

When was this article written? It is attributed to Victor Davis Hanson. He is a Fellow at Hoover…See More
7 hours ago
Less Prone commented on Burbia's blog post Former President Trump?
"It must be an unintended mistake "former". But that Trump demanded to keep Khan away is a…"
7 hours ago
Less Prone favorited Doc Vega's blog post The Mistake We Made in America
7 hours ago
Less Prone favorited Doc Vega's blog post “Night of Horror” Finland WWII 1939 and a Russian Massacre
7 hours ago
Less Prone commented on Doc Vega's blog post “Night of Horror” Finland WWII 1939 and a Russian Massacre
"Quite an uplifting story of the winter war. Finland was overpowered by ten to one and could still…"
7 hours ago
Doc Vega posted a blog post

Elon Weighs in on Charlie Kirk's Assassination and How it is an Instrument of Social Control

For a very long time now there has been in place mass population behavioral control operations that…See More
yesterday
Doc Vega commented on Doc Vega's blog post The Forest Devil
"Less Prone Thanks Buddy I worked on it for 3 days! "
Friday
Less Prone favorited Doc Vega's blog post The Forest Devil
Friday
Less Prone commented on Doc Vega's blog post The Forest Devil
"You have spun a great story, congratulations!"
Friday
cheeki kea commented on Bob of the Family Renner's photo
Friday
Doc Vega posted a blog post
Thursday
tjdavis posted blog posts
Thursday
Doc Vega posted photos
Wednesday
tjdavis posted a blog post
Wednesday
Doc Vega commented on Doc Vega's blog post Is this proof that the story about Charlie Kirk's assassination is false?
"Les prone, Thanks Buddy! "
Tuesday
Doc Vega posted a blog post
Tuesday
tjdavis posted a photo
Tuesday
Doc Vega commented on Doc Vega's blog post Is this proof that the story about Charlie Kirk's assassination is false?
"Less Prone as usual the official version of the truth does not match the evidence and is labeled…"
Oct 4

© 2025   Created by truth.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

content and site copyright 12160.info 2007-2019 - all rights reserved. unless otherwise noted