Putin, the Ukraine and Bigfoot

What? Is there some sort of shelf life on imaginary monsters the US media release to maintain mind control on Americans? What happen to Kim Jong-un? One minute he's on the verge of launching nuclear warheads at us (Oh, the horror!) and the next minute his name drops from the English language as well as reality. Now, we are served a buffet of illogical, bull$hit about Russia's Vladimir Putin and his vague as hell "violation of the territorial integrity" in the lifeless, uninhabited Ukraine!

Obama and Putin put on a rather poor pissing contest for no apparent reason other than terrorize sleeping Americans with fears of Russia taking us off the map due to Obama's blood-lust and $hit talkin. What a joke. These ass clowns cant even pull a decent story out of their arses at this point.

Yo MSM, let your holy and chosen masters know that:

A) Their story might be more believable if the Ukraine (former Soviet Union) was actually inhabited. Like with people. Live ones.

Did these sick animals forget they unleashed their prized invention, the atomic bomb at Chernobyl, where the most deadly nuclear attack in history buried the acts of savagery and hellish atrocities against millions of gentiles? Graphite fire burned for 10 full days and those who weren't killed on target died within weeks while suffering hell on earth. Vast areas of the former Soviet union are to date void of anything but the echoed cries of slaughtered victims from the grave and radioactive materials, and radionuclides that kill even today. Think cancer.

B) Putin might scare us with his big scary threats IF he hadn't already proved he lacks any form of testicular fortitude by bowing down and licking the hands that have circumcised him.

Favorite

2 members favorited this

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Nobody Will Observe on March 6, 2014 at 11:02pm

Short attention spans. Must keep a revolving door of 2 sec boogie man spots repeating at all times.

Turn off your TV and you wont get your leather so hot and bothered over it.

Love the title! Good Chit!

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Not mainstreamer on March 7, 2014 at 1:23am

clown, arses, gentiles, animals, master, cancer, circumcised

Not in our vocabulary in politics

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Leigh James on March 7, 2014 at 4:49am

Deciphering incomplete sentences. What a drag.. but let me try my hand at it ;)

"clown, arses, gentiles, animals, master, cancer, circumcised

Not in our vocabulary in politics"

This is current events, is it not?

It appears you are implying that you are a part of some group that shares a single vocabulary or an approved word for each topic? Strikes me odd and bizarre as hell but hey, to each his own I always say. I personally choose to cultivate my very own style of self expression.

The word politics is derived from the Greek politika: "affairs of the city" or "dissertation" (literary work that argues in defense of a particular thesis) So I find the claim that ANY word might be unacceptable to express ones views on such matters wrong. And in formulating an argument or case of defense, a forced adherence to an approved word list is frankly.. Orwellian.

As for the lack of these words in your groups vocab, let us clarify, shall we?

assclowns- comic expression used to convey lack of respect for mass murderers.

arse- an alternative to the word ass.

gentiles- a word used in Judaism to describe the lesser race, not holy and chosen such as the jew..

animals- beings demonstrating behavior such as eating flesh and blood during disturbing religious rituals, or others seen sucking blood and flesh from an infants genitalia using their own mouth. I could go on?

master- one who has used hidden witchcraft and evil secret protocols to enslave and exterminate.

circumcised- A bloody Judaic ritual, where a man with no medical license whatsoever uses a scalpel to cut flesh off an infants genitalia. Proceeding this mutilation commanded by the Jewish god to prove allegiance, the man (Neither Rabbi nor medical doctor) then sucks the bloody remains off the screaming baby using their mouths.

cancer- a word that many so called doctors use to describe both nonexistent health issues they peddle to make cash off, and at other times true atrocities within bodies of victims of radiation.See the atomic bomb used like on Chernobyl:

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Nobody Will Observe on March 8, 2014 at 2:11am

:)!

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Not mainstreamer on March 7, 2014 at 6:26am

These [no respect for mass murderer] cant even pull a decent story out of their arses at this point

... the atomic bomb at Chernobyl, where the most deadly nuclear attack in history buried the acts of savagery and hellish atrocities against millions of [inferior race]?

Did these sick [bloodsucking animals] forget they unleashed their prized invention,

Ok, satire

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Leigh James on March 7, 2014 at 10:36pm

Well, perhaps not so much "satire" per se, although I'm all about enjoying or causing a laugh to keep us all sane. I'd label it if I must, as a kind of dialect, an idiosyncrasy, if you will. Certain groups will comprehend it immediately and identity me personally by it, others may comprehend it having never met me. There are additional causes as well, such as the aforementioned [bloodsucking animals] phrase.

These creatures are not men. Neither are they of the fictitious * "tribe" of Judah יְהוּדָה, or so called and equally fictitious "Jews". To refer to them as spiritual leaders or any other theological title invokes nausea.. Frankly, in that particular occasion, that phrase is best fitting, and also describes the very act they were performing- sucking blood from an infant.

*Note This group's (Jews) claims of being direct and sole descendants of a particular tribe that is reported to have reigned 1500 BC is ludicrous and both logically and mathematically impossible. There exists no fashion in which such genealogical records, let alone proof, could have been logged, stored nor preserved for such great periods of time when technology was practically nonexistant.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Not mainstreamer on March 8, 2014 at 12:06am

*Note This group's (Jews) claims of being direct and sole descendants of a particular tribe that is reported to have reigned

I think it is right to say most of the Elite don't pretend to be "Jewish", example:

http://12160.info/forum/topics/connecting-the-dots-a-closer-view-of...

(Those - 25-30%? of the Ruling people - who call themselves Ashkenazi Jews are Khazarian for sure. The most stupid thing we can do is to believe non-Judaic Caucasians are not Khazarian - because all Khazarians "must" be Judaic. Most are not, and even the Judaic Khazarians have a more Pagan interpretation of Judaism)

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Leigh James on March 8, 2014 at 2:05am

The "ruling people" of this world are merely the people (children more accurately) of the "Ruler of the World" (John14) who is also named as the "Prince of the World" two chapters later. The Son of Man, who many call Jesus, stated that Satan reigns in this world and this kingdom is his and under his control. Awareness of the true identity of the Ruler of these "elites", "Jews" or whichever name they hide under sheds light on their supernatural ability to maintain and accomplish a singular goal that has taken thousands of years. And their motivation to work tirelessly towards a goal they know full well they will not live to enjoy. His army or "people" do in fact live and die but each new generation are simply passed the torch.

As far as your 25-30% figure, the exact percentage of the public figures who work with the Ruler who are actually what is referred to as "Jews" is 6% of any populous, at any given time and they have no correlation with nations or countries. They are and always have been 'born" all over the world and the ever-changing lie of the location from where they hail isn't worth investigating. Men, Kings and Generals all over the globe have tried to discover their true origins and race for centuries all to no avail. The Son of Man confronted them (named as Jews then as well) many times:

"Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not." John 8

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Nobody Will Observe on March 8, 2014 at 2:14am

Waiting for cut and paste reply,... with baited breath ;)

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Nobody Will Observe on March 8, 2014 at 2:16am

Truly that which we see and think is real, could very well be an illusion.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Leigh James on March 8, 2014 at 2:29am

No illusion, I assure you. True enough, much activity of this nature occurs in a spiritual realm most of us can not see. Some see dimly and not as we see our hand or the sky, but make no mistake, we all will see fully what we now only see as through a great fog. "Those of you who have eyes to see" takes on meaning.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Not mainstreamer on March 8, 2014 at 2:42am

Waiting for cut and paste reply,... with baited breath ;)

Are you referring to Netiquette?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Top-posting

If you are sending a reply to a message or a posting be sure you summarize the original at the top of the message, or include just enough text of the original to give a context.

and another guideline